Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 20:01:57 GMT
Surely they're displaying the codes for thier next duty, not thier last one! Prior to 1965 CY would only be shown for trains to Croxley Shed and they would not show a B code but correctly show C with the number of the working so a C2 to Bushey & Oxhey would change to a B2 forward to Broad Street. From 1965 all ECS workings to and from Croxley Shed would show CY, the units at Willesden TMD were sent to and from Croxley after Stonebridge Park electric depot closed to electric maintainence and therefore correctly showed CY. In later years when everyone got lazy headcodes became a little haphazard. I liked the A1 headcode on the First & Final 501 tour. I also have a picture of a northbound 501 with B8 which was the Broad Street to Croxley direct service via Colne Jctn. For the models I have been thinking of a using a multi- segment LED display so that I could change the headcodes. This could not be a seven segment display because I could bot produce a realistic Y - I will have to think on this one Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2010 20:13:53 GMT
For the models I have been thinking of a using a multi- segment LED display so that I could change the headcodes. This could not be a seven segment display because I could bot produce a realistic Y - I will have to think on this one Xerces Fobe You'll be after a 16-segment (maybe it is?) display. Although I've never seen them particularly small enough.
|
|
|
Post by metroland on Dec 22, 2010 14:25:16 GMT
How are the BR brake vans coupled to the vandalised trailer car?
I may need to include some stock moves in due course for cars that Acton works can't fix!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2010 21:53:50 GMT
I pondered on how to connect the brake van to the vandalised tube car and then had a flash of inspiration. I had fitted Metromodels bogies to the vandalised tube car so I got some of the Long coupling bars from John Polley I think they maybe from his 96 stock removed the Bachmann coupling from one end of each brake van and permanently fitted the bur allowed enough float to ensure it would be level when connected to the tube car- works a treat! Xerces Fobe
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 22, 2010 23:33:21 GMT
Nice one, works well
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 22, 2010 23:35:11 GMT
Prior to 1965 CY would only be shown for trains to Croxley Shed and they would not show a B code but correctly show C with the number of the working so a C2 to Bushey & Oxhey would change to a B2 forward to Broad Street. From 1965 all ECS workings to and from Croxley Shed would show CY, the units at Willesden TMD were sent to and from Croxley after Stonebridge Park electric depot closed to electric maintainence and therefore correctly showed CY. In later years when everyone got lazy headcodes became a little haphazard. I liked the A1 headcode on the First & Final 501 tour. I also have a picture of a northbound 501 with B8 which was the Broad Street to Croxley direct service via Colne Jctn. For the models I have been thinking of a using a multi- segment LED display so that I could change the headcodes. This could not be a seven segment display because I could bot produce a realistic Y - I will have to think on this one Xerces Fobe Would a flat white screen with a bulb behind do. They you can slide black templates over the top with the cut out displaying the headcode. Fiddly, but cheap!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2010 1:11:07 GMT
That is what I actually do but use sticky labels made on a label printer however I can only really change them between running sessions. Given that I will have 6 501's and 12 ends I think I will just go with a mixture of headcodes on the different units.
Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2010 19:44:30 GMT
Croxley Wiggenhall Road Depot gains a heritage Underground Stock allocation! I will shortly be receiving the following for the layout.
Bodies and chassis for
1 off Q35 LT Centre Car 3 off Q23 LT Driving Car 1 off Q27 LT Driving Car 1 off R stock Driving Car 1 off R stock Centre Car
Is it feasible to convert the R stock to Q stock and was there ever a Q Driving car with this style of body?
So what am I going to do with this lot?
I was thinking about some “what if” District Dave Excursions! “First and Final Q stock to Croxley”
The route, Richmond – Broad Street, Broad Street -Watford Junction, Watford Junction – Croxley West, Croxley West – Willesden High Level via Colne Junction curve ( reversal required), Willesden High Level - Richmond.
Xerces Fobe
|
|
|
Post by metroland on Dec 27, 2010 20:08:29 GMT
Funnily enough I was going to ask a somewhat similar question. With the impending re-issue of CO/CP stock, is the driver essentially the same bodyshell as Q38 driver?
Ref the Q stock xercesfobe: You're on pretty safe ground having almost any combination of Q23/Q27/Q35/Q38 in a 4 car set. There was even 1 set that had 4 x Q38 cars!
(I have a part built Q23 driver I bought on ebay + 1 x unbuilt Q38 trailer so was looking for another driver myself (Q-anything!) - no idea when it'll get built hence I was searching for something to make 3-car set)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2010 20:59:48 GMT
In my 'umble opinion the underframe gear supplied with the Radley Models 38 surface stock car is more akin to Q38 stock than anything else. I have built the Radley kit as Q and R stock DMs and I have three more in the pipeline for use as a CP set. The R stock is unfinished as yet as I still have to do the underframe. I'm waiting for a conversion kit..... ;D Which kits do you have for the Q23/27/35? As for formations, run what you like. I challenge anyone to tell you that you have got it wrong! Even after the stock was formed into semi-fixed formations pretty much anything went together. It was right at the end that two four-car sets of all-Q38 stock were formed as the plan was to use solely Q38 stock on the ELL. As for your five vehicles, a set formed with two Q23 DMs rebuilt as trailers would be fine. Q stock ran in 4, 6 and 8 car formations so you would either need another vehicle or you have a 'spare'. Go for a Q38 just to mix it up! For referance on the history and formation of the above you can do no better than Brian Hardys excellent 'London Underground Train File, surface stock 1933-1958'.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 28, 2010 10:43:20 GMT
The CO/CP conversion kit is being made now - its on the website!!
Xercesfobe, can you post some photos when you get them so we can all have a look!
I would follow Glyn's advice. Make them up as Q stock, you probably can't do much with the middle R stock car although 21 went for scrap in 1972!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2010 19:26:54 GMT
The CO/CP conversion kit is being made now - its on the website!! Xercesfobe, can you post some photos when you get them so we can all have a look! I will be collecting this stock in a fortnights time and will post some photos then Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2011 1:55:10 GMT
That is what I actually do but use sticky labels made on a label printer however I can only really change them between running sessions. Given that I will have 6 501's and 12 ends I think I will just go with a mixture of headcodes on the different units. Xerces Fobe Excellent layout with a real north London feel to it. Hope to see it live sometime soon! Just an idea for the headcodes, what about fitting a small magnet behind the white screen and then making up some magnetised templates as above - perhaps easier and less fiddly than a slide-in system? Come to think of it, didn't the SR 4SUB units employ a similar principle (without the magnets of course) in real life?
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jan 15, 2011 10:58:37 GMT
4SUBs had metal stencils,the nimbers made up of lots of square holes cut from a rectangular metal sheet.This sheet was hung over an illuminated pearlised-glass panel between the cab windows..... I should know as I own a (nearly) complete set of stencils.... (Anyone out there got a "4" and a "1"?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2011 12:18:14 GMT
Remember them well. There were also some 504s stored in open sidings near Northampton, some in lined green livery, too. Wonder if they were the same cars.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2011 21:31:33 GMT
I have a complete set of 4-SUB stencils and a mounting bracket 'acquired' by a friend when the units were being stored at Eastleigh. Bizarrely, no numbers were duplicated so '00', '11' etc were not possible unless the Driver borowed one from the set at the other end of the unit. Etched brass 4mm scale ones are available from Roxey Mouldings. I have accidently come up with a method of changing headcodes on a Hornby class 33. I used the Wills flush glazing and then made a 'blank' headcode panel out of black plasticard. This is a tight enough fit to wedge in solidly enough but also to enable removal and swapping with an identical panel with a different headcode. It does mean that the body has to be removed every time but it does allow you to ring the changes between running sessions. One end of the 33 is currently displaying 'GH;.... I can't think why? The magnetic idea certainly seems worthy of further investigation. Changeable headcodes is one of the many 'holy grails' for modellers that could be within easy reach with a spark of genius from someone. Please don't expect it from me though.... ;D
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 16, 2011 1:02:29 GMT
I have a complete set of 4-SUB stencils and a mounting bracket 'acquired' by a friend when the units were being stored at Eastleigh. Bizarrely, no numbers were duplicated so '00', '11' etc were not possible Presumably it was thought that 90 different headcodes were enough, and therefore only ten stencils, instead of twenty, would be required. When headcodes were introduced for non-electrified lines, (notably the Hastings demus) they were given headcodes which were multiples of 11, as no 4SUB would ever be need to use those codes, and demus all had roller blinds - indeed several 4SUBs also had them. Until the 1930s the Southern used single-letter headcodes - some stencils were invertable, so the maximum use could be obtained from a limited set (only twelve stencils), so headcodes V and ^ were both used, similarly P and d.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 18:10:38 GMT
Metal stencils and a magnet is a good idea however this would make the illumination of the headcode difficult.
Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 18:21:19 GMT
Metal stencils and a magnet is a good idea however this would make the illumination of the headcode difficult. Xerces Fobe Not if you use a thin sticky-back magnet and light it around the sides with some sorts of a lightpipe or side-looking LEDs! That said, that produces the cheap game effect with the lighting being brighter at the edges than the middle.. Or, you could print on paper a headcode strip, and have a magnet square on the side, to pull it up or down with.. then light from behind. Won't take a huge amount of space.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jan 16, 2011 18:45:41 GMT
I have a complete set of 4-SUB stencils and a mounting bracket 'acquired' by a friend when the units were being stored at Eastleigh. Bizarrely, no numbers were duplicated so '00', '11' etc were not possible unless the Driver borowed one from the set at the other end of the unit. As I recall,"Double" number headcodes were used on the unelectrified routes ( Eg:66 Victoria to East Grinstead) so the SUBs would only have to carry ten stencils at each end. Long,long ago,there were letters,too I've seen an advert with five trains side-by-side,spelling out HOVIS
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 16, 2011 21:37:11 GMT
Long,long ago,there were letters,too Not that long ago. I was surprised to read (in David Brown's new book on the Southern Electric) that pre-war suburban stock used letters right up until the last was withdrawn in 1962. However, numerical codes had been introduced for main line stock in 1933 (actually re-introduced, as the LBSCR's ac units had numerical headcodes), and numerical codes were also used for Bulleid-type 4SUB units. Thus, for example, a Hampton Court service could be either "H" or "30", depending on the age of the stock. The special sets used on the South London and Wandle Valley lines both used headcode "2" (possibly to signify they were two-car units, or just because "O" and "I" had already been used?) The letters used were H, I, L, J, L, N, O, P, S, T, U, V, selected to be easily distinguishable and easy to make as stencils. On the SW and SE divisions some of them had lexicograhical significance - H: Hampton Court, or Hayes, L: Leatherhead, or (Dartford) via Lewisham; N: (Dartford) via Nunhead, O: "Roundabout" (Hounslow),or Orpington P: via East Putney, or (Crystal) Palace (HL) S: Shepperton, or Sevenoaks U: SidcUp line (getting contrived here!) Some of the stencils could be inverted (P and V were both used this way) and a bar or two dots could be placed above the letter to triple the number of available codes. Roller blinds were introduced with the 4EPBs in 1951, and a few older sets were retrofitted (some SUB, COR, and BEL units). As has been said, numerical headcodes which were multiples of "11" were not used on electric units, to avoid the need for a duplicate set of stencils. However, as all SR demus and locos had roller blinds, such codes could be used on non-electrified lines like those to Hastings (22) and East Grinstead (66). Letters (in pairs) were re-introduced for use on freight duties when class 33 diesels, class 71 electrics, and class 73 and 74 electro-diesel locos started to appear, all fitted with roller blinds. Blinds were also retrofitted to the three "Booster" locos (class 70), but they only ran for four or five years in that condition.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 21:47:41 GMT
The joy of letters in SR headcodes is that, whenever I had a 33 or 73, I used to put 'GH' up. Anyone who had initials of L or above couldn't do it! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 22:55:04 GMT
Sidcup line? I'm pretty sure it's called the Dartford Loop Line (the one that goes via Lewisham, Hither Green, Lee, Mottingham, to Crayford and then to Dartford, with the opportunity to loop back up the Bexleyheath line to London again at Slade Green.
What was the headcode for Dartford via Bexleyheath?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2011 11:43:59 GMT
When we learnt the route for engineers trains to Hoo Junction (what a desolate place!) it was always refered to as the Sidcup line. That would have been during 1997ish.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 17, 2011 23:52:35 GMT
What was the headcode for Dartford via Bexleyheath? You could buy the book...........! The Bexleyheath line, (which was codes 70-79 in numerical headcode days, depending on the termini used at each end) was "S" for services from CX or Cannon Street, and "J" for those from Holborn Viaduct and Blackfriars (both via London Bridge or Nunhead). Various dots and bars above the letter distinguished individual destinations (Charing Cross/Cannon Street, Holborn Viaduct/Blackfriars, Slade Green/Dartford/Gravesend/Gillingham. So for example a bar on an up train signified a Charing Cross train, whilst in the down direction it meant the train was going beyond Dartford (which might be from either CX or CS). (S was also used for services to Sevenoaks via Swanley on the ex-LCDR route)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2011 7:27:49 GMT
Ah, thank-you very much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2011 0:00:52 GMT
Latest stock for Croxley WRD 5 Q Stock cars and and 2 C69's which were described as R Stock by the supplier who got his leg suitably pulled at the CMRA Show at St Alban's last weekend ( no it wasn't Phil!!) The C69's are both banana'd one worse than the other so not to sure what i am going to do with them yet. The Q stock will be formed into a 5 coach train and will run as a special assuming that it had got to Croxley via Richmond and Willesden. Very much a "what if "but it will add a bit more variety to the layout . A 5 coach train is too long for the depot head-shunt and therefore will not run into the depot unless split into a 2 and a 3 car unit. I guess a Croxley WRD "Open Day" would be another possibility. Xerces Fobe
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 19, 2011 7:50:39 GMT
The C stock is nicely bowed isn't it!
The Q stock didn't run in 5 cars but anythings possible. If you put the Q23 at the North End, convert on of the Q23s to a trailer and make sure the Q27 is at the South End you'll be ok. Perhaps the C69 stock can be being delivered new!
Good luck
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Jan 19, 2011 10:11:57 GMT
Is the 'C' stock resin? if so it might be possible to straighten them out by placing them in warm water. It works with smaller items but I'm not that sure about a complete body-shell.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2011 12:31:20 GMT
Sometimes the hot water method works but not on a body that has distorted sideways or upwards along its whole length. Even the inward bow on the bodyside can be beyond the water method. I had to build new sides for my Q27 car as it was w-a-y beyond salvation. It's worth a try but don't hold your breath.
|
|