|
Post by countryman on Sept 5, 2020 12:17:56 GMT
Again, couls someone help me please? What is a Carrington Event?
|
|
|
Post by johnlinford on Sept 5, 2020 12:26:29 GMT
An extreme solar storm. The last one occurred in the 19th century and affected telegram systems - causing them to not need power or starting fires. It's predicted that one now would knock out satellites and potentially destroy many power grids especially transformers leading to lack of communication and power for weeks or worse. Sky made a drama called COBRA based on this at the start of the year.
Suffice to say one would definitely lead to further delays on Crossrail opening (in a vague attempt to stay on topic)...
|
|
|
Post by billbedford on Sept 5, 2020 13:02:19 GMT
An extreme solar storm. The last one occurred in the 19th century and affected telegram systems - causing them to not need power or starting fires. It's predicted that one now would knock out satellites and potentially destroy many power grids especially transformers leading to lack of communication and power for weeks or worse. Sky made a drama called COBRA based on this at the start of the year. Just read something that suggests they may not be a rare as one a century
|
|
|
Post by alpinejohn on Sept 17, 2020 17:23:28 GMT
I am getting truly depressed by the endless excuses about a railway which were regularly told would be open for December 2018.
I note the "planned summer possession" was officially due to end today - when the core was off limits to trains and handed over to building teams so that all residual building stuff was meant to have been completed - so that active line testing could then resume. Any bets on that deadline being achieved?
I wonder how long it will be before Mark Wild comes along with another of his cheery videos telling us how everyone has been working their little socks off over the summer and that it will only be a few more years and need just a few more £Billion before the CrossRail core will be ready for passengers. Given the snails pace progress, doubtless CrossRail should rank as the safest and most efficient work-site on the planet just like a Yes-Minister Hospital which was wonderfully efficient without any patients.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Sept 17, 2020 19:16:25 GMT
To be candid, if this had been in a developing nation / because work had been temporarily stalled for financial reasons / strike / because of a war / tunnel wall collapse causing an inundation of mud, water, etc., - then I would have understood the delays. But this happening here in London, despite previous experience of building tube lines (etc) is leaving me astonished at the scope and timescale of the ongoing delays. Yes its a big project - but there have been multiple work sites with many, many staff (not just the proverbial "one man and his dog"). I want to see a school headmaster who has a loud voice (like a military parade ground Sargent Major) giving decision makers and others involved in this project a verbal ear-bashing telling them to pull their socks up, get a grip, and get this done. I accept that it might not be very helpful but right now it feels like the thing will never actually be completed . Every six or so months there is an announcement of further delays.... plus request for yet more funds
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Sept 17, 2020 19:39:48 GMT
No railway has been been built in this country on the scale of the Crossrail project. Then add in lifts, escalators, air conditioning and giant ventilation fans. All this has to be incorporated into the existing control systems in the old parts of the station.
A lot of the materials specified have been superseded by improved or safer items. There has been some replacement of things like cables.
Liverpool Street is so deep that there are pairs of staircases at each end with 20 flights on each. One then has 5 more storeys above it. Can you imagine how difficult it is to replace a cable that runs from platform level to street level amongst a mass of other cables?
The change from Bombardier supplying the trains and signalling to Siemans doing the signalling could not have been foreseen.
When you get to use the Central London section you will only see parts of the project.
I promise you there are a lot of project directors with very loud voices trying to get everything working together.
|
|
|
Post by johnlinford on Sept 18, 2020 7:53:50 GMT
I have to say one of the things that surprised me is the, for example, "Ah, the specified fire proofing is no longer up to code, so we need to replace whats already been done" - is it normal in railway projects to re-write the specification requirements before something goes in to service and do the job twice? Seems to set yourself up for a never-ending build project if so...
|
|
|
Post by silenthunter on Sept 18, 2020 8:13:07 GMT
Did the fireproofing code change?
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,746
|
Post by class411 on Sept 18, 2020 8:39:02 GMT
Liverpool Street is so deep that there are pairs of staircases at each end with 20 flights on each. One then has 5 more storeys above it. Good heavens! Assuming two flights per story, that must be the height of a fifteen story building.
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Sept 18, 2020 8:45:06 GMT
I have to say one of the things that surprised me is the, for example, "Ah, the specified fire proofing is no longer up to code, so we need to replace whats already been done" - is it normal in railway projects to re-write the specification requirements before something goes in to service and do the job twice? Seems to set yourself up for a never-ending build project if so... In at least one case the long term traditional UK cable supplier went out of business. Alternatives had to be identified and tested. Fire safety has to be constantly under review but everything should be OK by now on the project. All tasks are carried out to an agreed (and signed off) standard. To give you another indication of size a pair of fire doors to a fan room at street level measure approx 10m x 4m. Certainly not off the shelf at Door'R'Us.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 18, 2020 12:24:22 GMT
I have to say one of the things that surprised me is the, for example, "Ah, the specified fire proofing is no longer up to code, so we need to replace whats already been done" - is it normal in railway projects to re-write the specification requirements before something goes in to service and do the job twice? Seems to set yourself up for a never-ending build project if so... If it's purely a contractual matter (e.g using the latest upgrade) then no. And I recall in the early days of the Crossrail project there was a definite policy of avoiding "mission creep" by not allowing any "bells and whistles" (or extra branches) to be added, to void potential delay to the project (Haha). But if a new legal requirement is introduced, that has to be installed whether you like it or not. So if there is a requirement for all new trains to have a particular feature if entering service after a given date, any non-compliant design either has to be rushed into service before that date, or retro-fitted. This happened recently with new emissions rules for diesel locomotives (and why it was worth salvaging some old engines with "grandfather rights") I recall there were some good bargains to be had on new cars without catalytic converters towards the end of 1992, as dealers tried to shift stock that would be non-compliant if registered after 1/1/93.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Sept 18, 2020 22:33:58 GMT
I have to say one of the things that surprised me is the, for example, "Ah, the specified fire proofing is no longer up to code, so we need to replace whats already been done" - is it normal in railway projects to re-write the specification requirements before something goes in to service and do the job twice? Seems to set yourself up for a never-ending build project if so... This happened with recent railway electrification works and even meant that bridges which had been rebuilt (over the years, as required, eg; because the old bridge was becoming life expired) in a way that met the electrical safety clearance standards suddenly needed rebuilding again, to meet new standards with larger clearances - adding extra cost and delays. This was despite the fact that the safety clearances suddenly deemed 'dangerous' still applied (with a track record of safety) on routes elsewhere in the UK which had been electrified ages ago.
So, yes, there is a precedent.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,197
|
Post by Tom on Sept 18, 2020 22:55:03 GMT
I have to say one of the things that surprised me is the, for example, "Ah, the specified fire proofing is no longer up to code, so we need to replace whats already been done" - is it normal in railway projects to re-write the specification requirements before something goes in to service and do the job twice? Seems to set yourself up for a never-ending build project if so... Yes, it's not unheard of. It often happens when something is specified but the product supplied is found not to meet the specification in practice. For example, London Underground specified a new type of signalling equipment room wire in the 1980s. A supplier developed it, it passed the required tests, and it was used in several resignalling projects in the late 1980s. It was then discovered that the insulation on the wires had a tendency to fail in certain circumstances. The new equipment room at Queen's Park had to be completely rewired before it was commissioned, and and at least five other rooms which were already commissioned when the problem was discovered had to be subsequently rewired.
|
|
|
Post by alpinejohn on Sept 26, 2020 10:45:12 GMT
To be candid, if this had been in a developing nation / because work had been temporarily stalled for financial reasons / strike / because of a war / tunnel wall collapse causing an inundation of mud, water, etc., - then I would have understood the delays. But this happening here in London, despite previous experience of building tube lines (etc) is leaving me astonished at the scope and timescale of the ongoing delays. Yes its a big project - but there have been multiple work sites with many, many staff (not just the proverbial "one man and his dog"). I want to see a school headmaster who has a loud voice (like a military parade ground Sargent Major) giving decision makers and others involved in this project a verbal ear-bashing telling them to pull their socks up, get a grip, and get this done. I accept that it might not be very helpful but right now it feels like the thing will never actually be completed . Every six or so months there is an announcement of further delays.... plus request for yet more funds It looks like you may be about to get the Sargent Major you want... (even if Mr Wild has somehow dodged the bullet) Construction News ArticleAs for excuses - 13 miles of Crossrail tunneling in London is not immense or undoable quickly. From Royal assent to opening the original City & South London (also 13 miles) took 6 years 3 months and 1 week - and that was using technology available in the 1880s! Meanwhile CrossRail is still years away from opening after Royal assent way back on 22 July 2008, despite all the immense improvements in super fast tunneling equipment. Something is very wrong and the project really does seem to have turned into a never ending project continually pushing back the completion date and endlessly asking for yet more money.
Perhaps it really is time to sack the lot - and fill it in and forget about it entirely. In the meantime I really hope the National Audit Office takes a deep look at where all the money has gone. Certainly CrossRail project Management approach does not inspire faith in CrossRail 2 ever happening.
|
|
|
Post by 35b on Sept 26, 2020 10:48:01 GMT
To be candid, if this had been in a developing nation / because work had been temporarily stalled for financial reasons / strike / because of a war / tunnel wall collapse causing an inundation of mud, water, etc., - then I would have understood the delays. But this happening here in London, despite previous experience of building tube lines (etc) is leaving me astonished at the scope and timescale of the ongoing delays. Yes its a big project - but there have been multiple work sites with many, many staff (not just the proverbial "one man and his dog"). I want to see a school headmaster who has a loud voice (like a military parade ground Sargent Major) giving decision makers and others involved in this project a verbal ear-bashing telling them to pull their socks up, get a grip, and get this done. I accept that it might not be very helpful but right now it feels like the thing will never actually be completed . Every six or so months there is an announcement of further delays.... plus request for yet more funds It looks like you may be about to get the Sargent Major you want... (even if Mr Wild has somehow dodged the bullet) Construction News ArticleAs for excuses - 13 miles of Crossrail tunneling in London is not immense or undoable quickly. From Royal assent to opening the original City & South London (also 13 miles) took 6 years 3 months and 1 week - and that was using technology available in the 1880s! Meanwhile CrossRail is still years away from opening after Royal assent way back on 22 July 2008, despite all the immense improvements in super fast tunneling equipment. Something is very wrong and the project really does seem to have turned into a never ending project continually pushing back the completion date and endlessly asking for yet more money.
Perhaps it really is time to sack the lot - and fill it in and forget about it entirely. In the meantime I really hope the National Audit Office takes a deep look at where all the money has gone. Certainly CrossRail project Management approach does not inspire faith in CrossRail 2 ever happening. Perhaps what a project to build an underground railway is has changed somewhat since the 1880s. Without defending the failures of planning in Crossrail, the comparison to the C&SLR feels facile.
|
|
|
Post by johnlinford on Sept 26, 2020 11:06:06 GMT
Well, they're not really comparable. C&SL railway build was a much smaller tunnel bore, and there were fewer other tunnels to navigate around at the time. There was far less over-land development to be concerned with, and far less H&S and other law to comply with, and far less complex construction requirements like tunnel edge doors etc. The section opened in 1890 was only from Stockwell to King William St at around 3.2 miles, with it being later extended via Bank up to Angel and Down to Clapham by 1901 (18 years after the initial act of Parliament) and to Euston by 1907 (25 years). The Morden extension didn't open until 1926.
This is before you get to the bits that are largely taking time - systems integration between trains, signalling, station systems and the very many computers involved.
While there are undoubtable flaws, one of the biggest will have been to see this as a civil engineering project, rather than a systems project. The tunnelling was completed on time and on schedule, it's the rest of it that's gone a bit pear shaped.
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 26, 2020 11:19:24 GMT
There's not been a problem with the tunnelling which was finished a long while ago. It's the fitting out where the money has gone.
|
|
vincenture
Quiz tryhard, and an advocate for simpler, less complicated rail routes
Posts: 885
|
Post by vincenture on Sept 26, 2020 11:20:38 GMT
Especially when Bond Street has been causing lots of problems combined with what was described as substandard engineering workmanship from CSJV that’s what I heard
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Sept 26, 2020 14:56:32 GMT
I am getting truly depressed by the endless excuses about a railway which were regularly told would be open for December 2018. I note the "planned summer possession" was officially due to end today - when the core was off limits to trains and handed over to building teams so that all residual building stuff was meant to have been completed - so that active line testing could then resume. Any bets on that deadline being achieved? I wonder how long it will be before Mark Wild comes along with another of his cheery videos telling us how everyone has been working their little socks off over the summer and that it will only be a few more years and need just a few more £Billion before the CrossRail core will be ready for passengers. Given the snails pace progress, doubtless CrossRail should rank as the safest and most efficient work-site on the planet just like a Yes-Minister Hospital which was wonderfully efficient without any patients. Did you say "cheery" and not "cheesy"?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,197
|
Post by Tom on Sept 27, 2020 12:56:38 GMT
While there are undoubtable flaws, one of the biggest will have been to see this as a civil engineering project, rather than a systems project. The tunnelling was completed on time and on schedule, it's the rest of it that's gone a bit pear shaped. Absolutely, and this is what people keep forgetting: Building tunnels is the easy bit. Comparisons to the CSLR are all well and good, but the signalling (including the trainborne elements) on Crossrail is more complicated than anything currently found on LU, let alone the CSLR.
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 28, 2020 11:01:19 GMT
It is a scandal. Mayors Boris Johnson and Sadiq Khan would not know one end of a screw driver and have to believe what they are told. Canary Wharf station was finished on time then are told the specification has changed.
Civil servants are useless and as trustworthy as QuickFit fitter talking about car tyres. I am only glad that food supply and distribution is in the hands of the private sector during covid. What fun the civil servants could have had.
Also why do civil servants decide 30 for a funeral, 15 for a wedding. It's mischief making.
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Sept 28, 2020 11:44:16 GMT
It is a scandal. Mayors Boris Johnson and Sadiq Khan would not know one end of a screw driver and have to believe what they are told. Canary Wharf station was finished on time then are told the specification has changed. Civil servants are useless and as trustworthy as QuickFit fitter talking about car tyres. I am only glad that food supply and distribution is in the hands of the private sector during covid. What fun the civil servants could have had. Also why do civil servants decide 30 for a funeral, 15 for a wedding. It's mischief making. The specification for Canary Wharf station did not change. The station was fitted out by Canary Wharf Management and some of the materials they used did not meet the specification.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Sept 28, 2020 21:25:54 GMT
The specification for Canary Wharf station did not change. The station was fitted out by Canary Wharf Management and some of the materials they used did not meet the specification. When were decisions made which components to use/buy I wonder... When were these components installed I wonder... How common is this across the project I wonder... How much has it cost to replace these components I wonder... Are we surprised that there is a trend of trying to pin the blame on anyone I wonder... #BuyCheapBuyTwice
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Sept 28, 2020 22:11:06 GMT
It is a scandal. Mayors Boris Johnson and Sadiq Khan would not know one end of a screw driver and have to believe what they are told. Canary Wharf station was finished on time then are told the specification has changed. Civil servants are useless and as trustworthy as QuickFit fitter talking about car tyres. I am only glad that food supply and distribution is in the hands of the private sector during covid. What fun the civil servants could have had. Also why do civil servants decide 30 for a funeral, 15 for a wedding. It's mischief making. Remind me who actually did the work on Crossrail? Was it TfL? Was it the DfT? Was it Network Rail? No, they hired private sector contractors like Mott MacDonald, Ove Arup, Atkins, Laing O'Rourke, J Murphy, Carillion (RIP), Costain, McNichols, Skanska, Balfour Beatty, McAlpine, Alstrom, Siemens, Bombardier and others to do the actual work. And it was private sector contractors who failed to get the jobs finished on time but thanks to generous clauses that have become almost obligatory in the age of outsourcing and privatisation they got away without incurring any serious financial penalties, leaving the taxpayer to pay for their incompetence. Don't blame the civil servants, they were working on instructions from above.
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 28, 2020 22:42:20 GMT
Politicians only say they want a train from A-B. The civil service procure the contractors. How many transport secretaries have there been during Crossrail construction...5 or 6.
Construction began May 2009, four prime ministers ago. It'll have to be renamed the Charles Line before it opens or worse the William Line.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Sept 28, 2020 23:08:17 GMT
Private contractors get nice little earners paid for by the taxpayers, politicians get seats on the boards after they leave politics (sometimes while they're still in politics) and civil servants get jobs with contractors (a couple of notable ex-TfL staff at Ove Arup).
Its a nice comfortable arrangement for everyone except the taxpayers who fund it
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 29, 2020 5:39:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Sept 29, 2020 8:54:45 GMT
Or to cover all eventualities: "TBA LINE"
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 29, 2020 9:02:48 GMT
How many transport secretaries have there been during Crossrail construction...5 or 6. . The parliamentary process stared in 2005, when Alastair Darling was Transport Secretary. Three more had come and gone by the time construction started in 2009, when Lord Adonis was in the hot seat. Since then we have had Philip Hammond, Justine Greening, Patrick McLoughlin, Chris Grayling and now Grant Shapps. The average tenure was about 18 months, so I wouldn't bet on Shapps still being in post when Crossrail finally opens
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Sept 29, 2020 14:41:02 GMT
l'd prefer it to be called "Crossrail"
l wonder how much money has been spent (= wasted) on re-branding? Why name it after somebody who (1) won't use it, and (2) hasn't had to help pay for it? Why name it after somebody whose son can spend £16,000 on a helicopter trip to see one golf match?
Does it help to get some sort of medal if you suggest that you want to name something after the person who gives out the medals?
|
|