|
Post by John Tuthill on Apr 23, 2019 18:31:13 GMT
Perhaps no surprise comes news today (twitter) that recycled D Stock (class D230s) have now entered into passenger service with LNWR. Meantime fancy brand new 710s whizz past platforms on GOBLIN without a single fare paying passenger aboard. Perhaps it is fair to say well done to LNWR and VivaRail, as for the 710s I hope it will not be too many more weeks before they too enter passenger service. D stock on the GOBLIN. There’s a thought! Many a true word spoken in jest(Who knows?)
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Apr 23, 2019 22:25:12 GMT
Perhaps no surprise comes news today (twitter) that recycled D Stock (class D230s) have now entered into passenger service with LNWR. Meantime fancy brand new 710s whizz past platforms on GOBLIN without a single fare paying passenger aboard. Perhaps it is fair to say well done to LNWR and VivaRail, as for the 710s I hope it will not be too many more weeks before they too enter passenger service. To be fair it's not really a proper comparison. Yes Vivarail have eventually got their D stock conversion to work but it has taken a lot longer than expected and has had its share of problems along the way. However it is still an old train with a bit of modern tech stuck inside it that really should not have taken as long as it did. I do wonder just how much money has been poured into that venture and whether they will ever see a solid financial return on the investment. I'm not aware that a pantograph equipped version has even been trialled so I can't see them turning up on the GOBLIN. A return to diesel passenger trains would not exactly fit with Mayoral commitments on air quality. The 710s are a vastly more complex train and represent a generational step in design. Yes we're all completely fed up with the delays and it should never have taken Bombardier this long to get to just a tentative possibility of passenger service use. It is worth noting that no 710s have whizzed past a GOBLIN platform today - all the training runs have been cancelled. I wonder if ARL have now "folded their arms" and said "no more" until you fix all the things we (and ASLEF) want fixing plus cleared the conditional issues set out by ORR. Will be interesting to see if they have done that or whether it's just a one day glitch that I've noticed.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Apr 24, 2019 6:23:05 GMT
Yes Vivarail have eventually got their D stock conversion to work but it has taken a lot longer than expected and has had its share of problems along the way. I'm not aware that a pantograph equipped version has even been trialled so I can't see them turning up on the GOBLIN. A return to diesel passenger trains would not exactly fit with Mayoral commitments on air quality. I doubt a pantograph could be fitted without a major rebuild of the body, and in particular the roof, which would rather miss the point of re-using them. However, a battery version of the 230 is in development. And yes, they are late - the prototype was originally supposed to be used in passenger service on the Nuneaton-Coventry route in early 2017, more than two years ago. Compare that with the (so-far) 11-month delay on the 710s.
|
|
|
Post by nopixar on Apr 24, 2019 9:40:42 GMT
Perhaps no surprise comes news today (twitter) that recycled D Stock (class D230s) have now entered into passenger service with LNWR. Meantime fancy brand new 710s whizz past platforms on GOBLIN without a single fare paying passenger aboard. Perhaps it is fair to say well done to LNWR and VivaRail, as for the 710s I hope it will not be too many more weeks before they too enter passenger service. To be fair it's not really a proper comparison. Yes Vivarail have eventually got their D stock conversion to work but it has taken a lot longer than expected and has had its share of problems along the way. However it is still an old train with a bit of modern tech stuck inside it that really should not have taken as long as it did. I do wonder just how much money has been poured into that venture and whether they will ever see a solid financial return on the investment. I'm not aware that a pantograph equipped version has even been trialled so I can't see them turning up on the GOBLIN. A return to diesel passenger trains would not exactly fit with Mayoral commitments on air quality. The 710s are a vastly more complex train and represent a generational step in design. Yes we're all completely fed up with the delays and it should never have taken Bombardier this long to get to just a tentative possibility of passenger service use. It is worth noting that no 710s have whizzed past a GOBLIN platform today - all the training runs have been cancelled. I wonder if ARL have now "folded their arms" and said "no more" until you fix all the things we (and ASLEF) want fixing plus cleared the conditional issues set out by ORR. Will be interesting to see if they have done that or whether it's just a one day glitch that I've noticed. Back out today so if they had folded arms they unfolded them rather quickly
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Apr 24, 2019 12:46:05 GMT
I doubt a pantograph could be fitted without a major rebuild of the body, and in particular the roof, which would rather miss the point of re-using them. However, a battery version of the 230 is in development. An LT Museum Friends visit to VivaRail in February 2018 revealed that they were looking at precisely this concept and drawings were shown of how the pantograph well would look.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Apr 24, 2019 22:24:52 GMT
There is a possibly interesting development with the GOBLIN service this coming Sunday. Someone has pointed me at realtimetrains.com which shows some supplementary journeys from Upper Holloway to Barking late morning and then the advertised passenger service is a x15 min headway for the remainder of the day. As there are only 3 class 378s this must mean there *may* be an attempt to run 3 Class 710s on Sunday in passenger service. That's the only practical way a x15 min service could be operated.
Obviously it's worth just saying that timetables can and do get changed on the GOBLIN at literally hours notice so it might all vanish again by Saturday! Nonetheless a potentially interesting development. The Monday service remains half hourly so no one should get *too* excited about a massive breakthrough.
Two Class 710s were out today on driver training runs but only until lunchtime. Nothing in the afternoon at all.
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Apr 25, 2019 0:11:11 GMT
Don't hold your breath. They are just the standard WTT paths that they haven't got round to cancelling yet, not any sort of additional run.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Apr 25, 2019 7:33:09 GMT
Don't hold your breath. They are just the standard WTT paths that they haven't got round to cancelling yet, not any sort of additional run. Strange given they've never been present on any other Sunday timetable in recent times. However I take the point about not holding my breath.
|
|
|
Post by jswallow on Apr 25, 2019 8:51:20 GMT
Same, for not holding my breath. But are they really the regular timetable paths, as they're loaded in as 'VAR' and as from Upper Holloway to Barking at the start of day? Neither are what the normal timetable say.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Apr 25, 2019 11:49:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jswallow on Apr 26, 2019 10:01:03 GMT
... and Realtimetrains is showing a currently-normal (30 minute) Sunday service now on Sunday afternoon.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 26, 2019 11:27:38 GMT
Just saw one heading towards Woodgrange Park going over the flyover at Barking. Driver training?
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Apr 26, 2019 12:29:16 GMT
... and Realtimetrains is showing a currently-normal (30 minute) Sunday service now on Sunday afternoon. Indeed and that's why I hedged my original post with "possibly" etc. Sorry if anyone was misled as I posted in good faith having double checked the online info. Just saw one heading towards Woodgrange Park going over the flyover at Barking. Driver training? Yep - there are 4 return workings scheduled on weekdays. That was most likely the second trip out of Barking today.
|
|
|
Post by jswallow on Apr 26, 2019 19:24:45 GMT
... and Realtimetrains is showing a currently-normal (30 minute) Sunday service now on Sunday afternoon. Indeed and that's why I hedged my original post with "possibly" etc. Sorry if anyone was misled as I posted in good faith having double checked the online info It was a sensible suggestion though based on the information loaded earlier in the week. There are so few freight trains on a Sunday there would likely have been less impact if something had failed. Fingers crossed I’ll see them passing the top of my road with passengers before Crossrail opens.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Apr 26, 2019 23:17:53 GMT
I doubt a pantograph could be fitted without a major rebuild of the body, and in particular the roof, which would rather miss the point of re-using them. However, a battery version of the 230 is in development. An LT Museum Friends visit to VivaRail in February 2018 revealed that they were looking at precisely this concept and drawings were shown of how the pantograph well would look. I wonder, is that a 25kV pantograph for use whilst the train is in motion - or is it for what is known as opportunity charging* battery top-up at stations (during station stops) so therefore it will be lowered when the train is in motion?
(*an increasing number of overseas towns and cities use battery buses and opportunity charging battery topping-up as a way to get around the inability to carry sufficient battery power for a full day's operations. It works - but can delay the service if the bus arrives late and still needs to spend time out of service charging the batteries.)
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Apr 30, 2019 12:06:09 GMT
An LT Museum Friends visit to VivaRail in February 2018 revealed that they were looking at precisely this concept and drawings were shown of how the pantograph well would look. I wonder, is that a 25kV pantograph for use whilst the train is in motion - or is it for what is known as opportunity charging* battery top-up at stations (during station stops) so therefore it will be lowered when the train is in motion?
(*an increasing number of overseas towns and cities use battery buses and opportunity charging battery topping-up as a way to get around the inability to carry sufficient battery power for a full day's operations. It works - but can delay the service if the bus arrives late and still needs to spend time out of service charging the batteries.) VivaRail will supply what the customer wants/needs. If a pantograph version was required it could be made. The opportunity charging system is based on newly installed 3rd and 4th rail lengths at terminal stations.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Apr 30, 2019 13:01:56 GMT
VivaRail will supply what the customer wants/needs. If a pantograph version was required it could be made. Like any commercial organisation, it will only do so if it the customer's wants are realistic and Vivarail can make money at it. If a customer wanted a 200mph version of the D-Train (for example) I would expect Vivarail to decline to quote, or at least suggest a more suitable vehicle to upcycle.
|
|
Dom K
Global Moderator
The future is bright
Posts: 1,831
|
Post by Dom K on Apr 30, 2019 14:07:14 GMT
Vivarail has nothing to do with 710s entry to service, indeed Vivarail has its own thread. Back on topic please
|
|
|
Post by alpinejohn on May 8, 2019 19:22:25 GMT
So this year, the May National Rail timetable change is due on 18 May.
Is it just wishful thinking that after spending about half a billion pounds on Class 710 trains, and noting they seem to have finally received some sort of ORR caveated approval to carry passengers, then perhaps it would be nice if Arriva Rail London uses the Timetable change to deliver a full service with the new trains on Goblin in ten days time?
I rather fear the Class 378 fix has removed a lot of the pressure on Bombardier to sort out their software mess let alone other understandable ORR concerns.
As a result we could possibly be waiting until the December timetable update before we actually see 710s in squadron passenger carrying service rather than a handful of 710s shuttling along Goblin. This has knock on consequences for other Overground services, which should have been reinforced by 378s being redeployed after 710s take over the Watford Junction-Euston route. I understand that ORR has explicitly not approved the use of 710s in passenger service on third rail routes - which rather scuppers that plan for now, and probably makes the December Timetable changeover the only real deadline against which TFL can now bash Bombardier to get these trains sorted out rather than clogging up sidings all over place.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on May 8, 2019 19:31:04 GMT
I would hope that the new trains enter service 'asap' rather than wait for timetable changes!
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on May 8, 2019 22:12:20 GMT
So this year, the May National Rail timetable change is due on 18 May. Is it just wishful thinking that after spending about half a billion pounds on Class 710 trains, and noting they seem to have finally received some sort of ORR caveated approval to carry passengers, then perhaps it would be nice if Arriva Rail London uses the Timetable change to deliver a full service with the new trains on Goblin in ten days time? I rather fear the Class 378 fix has removed a lot of the pressure on Bombardier to sort out their software mess let alone other understandable ORR concerns. As a result we could possibly be waiting until the December timetable update before we actually see 710s in squadron passenger carrying service rather than a handful of 710s shuttling along Goblin. This has knock on consequences for other Overground services, which should have been reinforced by 378s being redeployed after 710s take over the Watford Junction-Euston route. I understand that ORR has explicitly not approved the use of 710s in passenger service on third rail routes - which rather scuppers that plan for now, and probably makes the December Timetable changeover the only real deadline against which TFL can now bash Bombardier to get these trains sorted out rather than clogging up sidings all over place. I don't see any sort of squadron service on the GOBLIN any time soon. I certainly don't see it in time for the timetable change. A few more weeks are needed and we might see some peak time infills. Having seen a e/b 378 approaching Blackhorse Rd (BHO) this evening at 1700 or so it was well loaded and there are always large crowds waiting at BHO. Peak time relief is needed. I don't agree the 378 "fix" has removed pressure from Bombardier. They have to make Aventra work as a product. They have hundreds of the things on order. That is a massive commercial imperative given they don't want to be forking out compensation on every contract. The point is it is a generational change in how trains are designed and made. Now OK Bombardier have undoubtedly badly misjudged how long it would take to get them in to a working state. The pressures for delivery on Crossrail can't be helping either. I don't think anyone was shocked with a conditional ORR consent to operate. Given barely any testing has been on DC tracks on NR metals there isn't the data to present to ORR to demonstrate compliance. The use of the 378s is a sticking plaster that can come "undone" at any point. In fact we've seen how fragile the service is when units fail - you very rapidly have no GOBLIN service at all. I suspect everyone wants to move away from their use as soon as possible but only when the 710s are running OK and in sufficient number. I agree there are knock on consequences but once they can start putting 710s into service on the GOBLIN I would expect to see a fairly quick move to build up testing on West Anglia metals and also on DC tracks. The aim must be to get the third rail / "working in multiple" for passenger service conditions removed as quickly as can be sensibly achieved. Given there are no service enhancements on West Anglia it will simply be a driver training task initially and doing "multiple unit" testing. The only problem for TfL / Arriva is that the interworking on West Anglia makes it difficult to put 710s into squadron service without "multiple unit" capability. I guess they could run a few single units at weekends to begin with. I don't see any deliberate delay with 710 deplyment until timetable switchovers. The aim has to be to get trains into service quickly provided reliability builds. That's the next potential "showstopper" - how often do the trains fail once passengers are let loose on them and doors etc all start getting used properly (or improperly)? I suspect timetable enhancements are out for this year. May 2020 is probably the earliest that something can be done with NLL/ELL/WLL. Sadly it looks like the Watford DC timetable moves to a ludicrous 15/15/30 headway in 10 days time.
|
|
|
Post by brooklynbound on May 10, 2019 8:10:24 GMT
From Twitter: First ever Overground train in Fenchurch Street. "Electrical Testing" according to the ROG driver.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on May 13, 2019 15:28:28 GMT
A little update of things I've noticed or been told about / read.
- from today there are a couple of extra peak time empty stock workings with class 710s. This use the normal bay platforms at Barking and Gospel Oak. Looking at the timing it is possible these are runs that could be livened up for passenger use in the near future. They're timed to cover busy times in the AM and PM peak. Fewer of the test runs are now accompanied by a "rescue" loco. Barring issues related to planned possessions there has been a reasonable volume of test runs on the GOBLIN in daylight hours plus some overnight trips on the WCML.
And now more speculative stuff.
- an informed source on another forum has said that class 710 passenger operation on the GOBLIN is imminent with the 378s likely to disappear relatively soon. - a reasonable volume of drivers have now been trained up with more to come. - trains are now on version 33 of the software.
I have yet to see anything that says the trains have been formally accepted by Arriva Rail London but I assume that has to happen before passengers can use the trains. So some positive signs or hints.
|
|
|
Post by dazz285 on May 13, 2019 18:24:58 GMT
A little update of things I've noticed or been told about / read. - from today there are a couple of extra peak time empty stock workings with class 710s. This use the normal bay platforms at Barking and Gospel Oak. Looking at the timing it is possible these are runs that could be livened up for passenger use in the near future. They're timed to cover busy times in the AM and PM peak. Fewer of the test runs are now accompanied by a "rescue" loco. Barring issues related to planned possessions there has been a reasonable volume of test runs on the GOBLIN in daylight hours plus some overnight trips on the WCML. And now more speculative stuff. - an informed source on another forum has said that class 710 passenger operation on the GOBLIN is imminent with the 378s likely to disappear relatively soon. - a reasonable volume of drivers have now been trained up with more to come. - trains are now on version 33 of the software. I have yet to see anything that says the trains have been formally accepted by Arriva Rail London but I assume that has to happen before passengers can use the trains. So some positive signs or hints. Version 33 has been uploaded to 1 train for testing on Wednesday, fingers crossed it solves ALL of the ongoing software issues.. 90+ drivers have been trained & more training is ongoing. Until all the powers that be are happy with the software be it 33 or higher then NO 710 will be coming into service soon.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on May 13, 2019 20:05:55 GMT
Version 33 has been uploaded to 1 train for testing on Wednesday, fingers crossed it solves ALL of the ongoing software issues.. 90+ drivers have been trained & more training is ongoing. Until all the powers that be are happy with the software be it 33 or higher then NO 710 will be coming into service soon. Thank you for the clarification. I was clear I was speculating as I had info from one source and it was unverifiable hence my caution. Looks like I was right to be cautious.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on May 14, 2019 22:54:41 GMT
The Quarter 4 Financial Report, in next week's TfL Board Papers, contains an interesting statement re the class 710s. Seems that TfL are £26m better off because of payments received from Bombardier for the delays to the Class 710s! I assume that ignores the fact that Arriva (and thus TfL) are not incurring higher leasing charges for the new trains as none have been delivered and also skips over the savings from having lost the class 172s and also not paying for diesel fuel for those trains. Also electricity traction charges will be marginally lower than expected given the 50% cut to the GOBLIN frequency. Kerching! Elsewhere in the Commissioner's report it makes reference to 60 out of 200 drivers having been trained so far. I assume the report was drafted a wee while ago given Dazz285 recently stated a higher number. No indication of a start date (unsurprisingly) but there is the (obvious) reference to the trains now being seen on the system for training purposes.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 15, 2019 7:23:24 GMT
But does that saving take into account the lost revenue, (including the promised free travel) the cost of replacement buses, the conversion of three 378s to 4-car and the cost of running them (including the lack of maintenance cover, and the suspension of the refurbishment programme)
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on May 15, 2019 8:22:31 GMT
Well Bombardier will be paying for the free travel, but it's not been publicly stated (to my knowledge) when they'll be paying for it - it could be that the payments received already are for that, or it could be that they'll pay retrospectively.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2019 12:57:27 GMT
Is there a connection between the proposed interim timetable for the dc lines ( of 12, 18, and 30 minute intervals! ) and the need for testing 710s on the dc lines? Possibly utilising a slot during the 30 minute interval?
The interval pattern is possibly suggestive of a 12, 18, 12, 18 interval service when four tph service is introduced?
(( In the meantime I feel that introducing this somewhat ludicrous 'service' might more appropriately have been initiated on April the First. ))
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on May 15, 2019 15:34:16 GMT
Is there a connection between the proposed interim timetable for the dc lines ( of 12, 18, and 30 minute intervals! ) and the need for testing 710s on the dc lines? Possibly utilising a slot during the 30 minute interval? The interval pattern is possibly suggestive of a 12, 18, 12, 18 interval service when four tph service is introduced? (( In the meantime I feel that introducing this somewhat ludicrous 'service' might more appropriately have been initiated on April the First. )) Yes, the "missing" path will be available for training runs initially and will come into service at some point once sufficient units / drivers are available. The pattern has to be slightly erratic as you have 6tph Bakerloo to Harrow and 4tph Overground to Watford, combining for a 10tph service as far as Harrow (every 6 minutes) A typical hours northbound service from Queen's Park 00 Stonebridge Park 07 Watford Jn (cancelled) 10 Harrow & Wealdstone 18 Harrow & Wealdstone 24 Watford Jn 27 Harrow & Wealdstone 30 Stonebridge Park 37 Watford Jn 40 Harrow & Wealdstone 43 Stonebridge Park 48 Harrow & Wealdstone 54 Watford Jn 57 Harrow & Wealdstone
|
|