Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2011 15:31:03 GMT
Not sure where to write this as i'm scared any new thread with someone who's had their first ride on an S stock train will get locked!
So my first ride today and obviously comparisons are obvious with the class 378s. Unlike the 378s there is no way to open the windows if the air conditioning fails and of course there is no emergency egress handle. But other than that the units are nice and modern.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2011 20:49:00 GMT
My 1st post please no flaming !
Last week was not the best on the S stock however it seems to be teething problems.
Monday – On at Northwood Hills at North Harrow front carriage doors did not open – ended up waiving at the punters on the platform telling them to go down to the next carriage. When we got to Harrow the train got taken out of service, however again the front carriage doors did not open and had to call out to the other passengers to tell them to turn round and exit so we could get out.
Tuesday - got on a Finchley road however looks like the train stopped slightly north of the point and so the front doors would not open. Had to fight my way though from the 2nd carriage back to the 1st most travellers have not worked out that you can move between carriages and are still bunching up at the door they get in. Unfortunately the front doors would not open again all the way to Harrow and a few passengers were stuck not able to get off at their stop as they did not release you have to move down however compounded by the fact other passengers do not realise they have to move out of the way. Once we got to North Harrow the doors were back in operation.
Wednesday – yes you guessed it I was on the one that detrained at Neasden.
The “big” reported problems to me are life when you have new stock, I am sure they will sort out the gapping and get the voltage right once all is over. The door thing is starting to frustrate. I guess (I can only guess as I don’t ride in the pointy bit) that if you don’t stop on a pin the front doors are locked as this has happened on trains that I have been on at least 8 times. I am sure me and the other punters will get used to it however it may need a few more prompts to tell people to move down or make way for others when it happens. I am sure even this will go away once drivers have got used to the stock under all conditions, although will the Met go all ATO ?
So as an average punter am I happy with the S stock, I would say yes. Will I miss the A’s to a degree however like everything it is progress that needed to happen.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Jan 24, 2011 22:16:43 GMT
Monday – On at Northwood Hills at North Harrow front carriage doors did not open – ended up waiving at the punters on the platform telling them to go down to the next carriage. When we got to Harrow the train got taken out of service, however again the front carriage doors did not open and had to call out to the other passengers to tell them to turn round and exit so we could get out. What a great first post mate! Informative and factual too. We are having some problems with accurate stopping but this isn't down to the train. It is a combination of new Train Operators getting used to the new system, and the new system itself requiring some 'fine tuning'. Tuesday - got on a Finchley road however looks like the train stopped slightly north of the point and so the front doors would not open. Had to fight my way though from the 2nd carriage back to the 1st most travellers have not worked out that you can move between carriages and are still bunching up at the door they get in. Unfortunately the front doors would not open again all the way to Harrow and a few passengers were stuck not able to get off at their stop as they did not release you have to move down however compounded by the fact other passengers do not realise they have to move out of the way. Once we got to North Harrow the doors were back in operation. Same deal I'm afraid. We are fine tuning the system and have some really rather clever engineers working quite hard to get this done as quickly as possible. It is fair to say that this system has been the most difficult to get right in respect of both the 'fine tuning' and also in terms of operational usage. This system was introduced quite late in the day in order to plug the gap that not having a signalling system left and as such we have had to do a certain amount of last minute testing and reworking as problems have arisen. Wednesday – yes you guessed it I was on the one that detrained at Neasden. Then I can only apologise to you for this. We fully understand the problems this train was experiencing and are working towards a solution. This problem was previously known to us and we were already working to eradicate it, however the cold weather on Wednesday morning seemed to exacerbate the situation on your train. The “big” reported problems to me are life when you have new stock, I am sure they will sort out the gapping and get the voltage right once all is over. The door thing is starting to frustrate. I guess (I can only guess as I don’t ride in the pointy bit) that if you don’t stop on a pin the front doors are locked as this has happened on trains that I have been on at least 8 times. I am sure me and the other punters will get used to it however it may need a few more prompts to tell people to move down or make way for others when it happens. I am sure even this will go away once drivers have got used to the stock under all conditions, although will the Met go all ATO ? I appreciate your frustration with the door system and can only assure you that we are working to fix the problem as quickly as we can. I must reiterate though that it isn't all down to our drivers in this respect. We are coming at this from two angles, with engineers working on the system while Instructors (with many years experience) work with the crews in order to assist them too. ATO is most definitely coming incidentally. So as an average punter am I happy with the S stock, I would say yes. Will I miss the A’s to a degree however like everything it is progress that needed to happen. Thanks for your comments. It is always good to get feedback and you may be interested to know that the project team regularly read these posts. The engineer responsible for the door system pops in as a guest regularly and quite often references members posts. Welcome to the forum btw!
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jan 25, 2011 8:57:23 GMT
I'm sure the S Stock will make it. After the agonies that the 73TS went through for years, it became one of the most reliable stocks on the system. Mind you, a lot of money was spent getting it right.
As for the S Stock door opening trouble, I found getting it to stop in the right place was difficult, and I was on the simulator! I thought it was just the simulator. If it's not and the real thing is also difficult to stop in the right place, the simulator was very good!
My impression was that the sighting is difficult but this will improve with practice. The other point is that, if the CSDE system is designed for future ATO, it will be set up for +/- 250mm. This will cause trains to lose time while drivers position the cab in the right place, like the Jubilee PED situation. Perhaps the range needs widening.
Oh yes, did anyone do gapping tests before letting the trains go into service?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 25, 2011 23:13:15 GMT
My driver this morning was less than positive about the S stock trains on a PA ;D
No names, times, stations, set numbers or trains to protect identity!!
|
|
|
Post by dangeruxb on Jan 27, 2011 11:12:03 GMT
21009/10 has been on Train 451 for the last 3 days (including today) although it was showing All Stations to Baker St when heading north from Harrow this morning! I also noticed that the driving car side display does show the train number intermittantly but none of the other cars do.
Train 441 was an UID S Stock yesterday to, seen going back to Neasden from Uxbridge on the way home last night
|
|
|
Post by dangeruxb on Jan 27, 2011 11:15:50 GMT
Also, noted (from another discussion) that we had a delivery last night but no sign at Neasden of it or the 20's and Barriers by 09:25 this morning. Are there some new tighter timings these days?
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Jan 27, 2011 12:35:02 GMT
I saw 451 at Baker Street yesterday, and certainly the side displays in the middle of the train were saying '451 Metropolitan Line / Semi-Fast / Watford'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2011 13:18:49 GMT
I caught a Watford Semi-Fast S Stock yesterday at about 1745, and the scroller kept saying that Wembley Park was closed, when it clearly wasn't! I presumed it was some sort of software issue.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2011 16:16:02 GMT
Also, noted (from another discussion) that we had a delivery last night but no sign at Neasden of it or the 20's and Barriers by 09:25 this morning. Are there some new tighter timings these days? the 20's and the barriers do not leave ruislip depot until tommorow night (friday) they used to transfer toinght (neasden-ruislip) but have often gone during the day
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Jan 27, 2011 19:09:57 GMT
I caught a Watford Semi-Fast S Stock yesterday at about 1745, and the scroller kept saying that Wembley Park was closed, when it clearly wasn't! I presumed it was some sort of software issue. Possibly, but all the fast and semi-fast journeys have stopping and non-stopping Wembley Park options when the T/Op sets the destination. Maybe the wrong one was selected and the T/Op then used the skip station feature.
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Jan 27, 2011 19:20:14 GMT
I caught a Watford Semi-Fast S Stock yesterday at about 1745, and the scroller kept saying that Wembley Park was closed, when it clearly wasn't! I presumed it was some sort of software issue. Possibly, but all the fast and semi-fast journeys have stopping and non-stopping Wembley Park options when the T/Op sets the destination. Maybe the wrong one was selected and the T/Op then used the skip station feature. However I doubt that the non-stopping at Wembley Park selection would cause the scroller to say Wembley Park is closed. ribbit - Just to double check, this was being said on the internal DMI's right?
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Jan 27, 2011 21:51:35 GMT
Also, noted (from another discussion) that we had a delivery last night but no sign at Neasden of it or the 20's and Barriers by 09:25 this morning. Are there some new tighter timings these days? They were there at about 8.15 this morning.
|
|
|
Post by dangeruxb on Jan 28, 2011 10:47:01 GMT
That they were, so where have they been hiding since Wednesday night then? They usually leave the 20's etc where they were this morning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 17:13:53 GMT
The 4 class 20s were seen in Neasden on Thursday and two of them (assuming of the same?) were in Ruislip this afternoon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 18:54:47 GMT
The 4 class 20s were seen in Neasden on Thursday and two of them (assuming of the same?) were in Ruislip this afternoon. The ones are Ruislip are different,these are 20189+20227 the ones at Neasden are the GB ones 20/3s /////////// They were reported to be next to West Ruislip Station
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 21:38:50 GMT
The two I saw in Ruislip depot (west end) this afternoon were not 20189+20227.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Jan 29, 2011 10:46:11 GMT
As for the S Stock door opening trouble, I found getting it to stop in the right place was difficult, and I was on the simulator! I thought it was just the simulator. If it's not and the real thing is also difficult to stop in the right place, the simulator was very good! You know what it's like with a simulator, even one as good as ours just doesn't give you that 'seat of your pants' external feedback. I don't have very much 'S' Stock handle turning time under my belt but took the train out a week or so ago (under the supervision of a qualified Instructor Operator naturally) and stopped on the mark every time without any issue. I think it is more a matter of confidence than expertise, because I am very familiar with the train systems I felt able to 'give it a handful'!! The other point is that, if the CSDE system is designed for future ATO, it will be set up for +/- 250mm. This will cause trains to lose time while drivers position the cab in the right place, like the Jubilee PED situation. Perhaps the range needs widening. This is an interim system brought in to cover the gap that ATO left when we retendered. It is envisaged that the system will be replaced with fully integrated functionality when the new system is brought in. Oh yes, did anyone do gapping tests before letting the trains go into service? Yes, but the gapping study in this area is being revisited.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Jan 29, 2011 10:54:02 GMT
So my first ride today and obviously comparisons are obvious with the class 378s. Unlike the 378s there is no way to open the windows if the air conditioning fails and of course there is no emergency egress handle. But other than that the units are nice and modern. Opening windows negate the effects of air con (even our units cannot cool the entire planet if a window is left open!). Also as other adjacent cars compensate in the unlikely event of a complete failure on one car, opening windows are not necessary.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Jan 29, 2011 10:58:02 GMT
Also, noted (from another discussion) that we had a delivery last night but no sign at Neasden of it or the 20's and Barriers by 09:25 this morning. Are there some new tighter timings these days? Yes, I wanted one more down to bolster our passenger service operations. We won't have another for a little while now as we have enough in London and want to allow testing outside of London to continue unhindered.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2011 18:53:33 GMT
From another thread....
How good would it be if LUL could arrange a photoshoot at Upminster with all 4 surface stocks side-by-side. Maybe even wheel out a Q stock driving car for completeness. There won't be many more opportunities to have all of the surface stocks built since the formation of London Transport together.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 22:12:11 GMT
So my first ride today and obviously comparisons are obvious with the class 378s. Unlike the 378s there is no way to open the windows if the air conditioning fails and of course there is no emergency egress handle. But other than that the units are nice and modern. Opening windows negate the effects of air con (even our units cannot cool the entire planet if a window is left open!). Also as other adjacent cars compensate in the unlikely event of a complete failure on one car, opening windows are not necessary. On the class 378s the windows are provided for emergency use only - ie if the train fails and it is hot outside. This prevents people smashing windows in the event of an aircon failure. I have to admit I'm disappointed with the performance of the S Stock at the moment. My original post was edited for reasons unknown but on departure from Northwood Hills towards Northwood 35 mph took 30 seconds to achieve. A class 378 does this in 20 seconds.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 22:13:33 GMT
Possibly, but all the fast and semi-fast journeys have stopping and non-stopping Wembley Park options when the T/Op sets the destination. Maybe the wrong one was selected and the T/Op then used the skip station feature. However I doubt that the non-stopping at Wembley Park selection would cause the scroller to say Wembley Park is closed. ribbit - Just to double check, this was being said on the internal DMI's right? Yes, that's right: the scrolling message on the inside of the carriages.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 22:19:36 GMT
Opening windows negate the effects of air con (even our units cannot cool the entire planet if a window is left open!). Also as other adjacent cars compensate in the unlikely event of a complete failure on one car, opening windows are not necessary. On the class 378s the windows are provided for emergency use only - ie if the train fails and it is hot outside. This prevents people smashing windows in the event of an aircon failure. I have to admit I'm disappointed with the performance of the S Stock at the moment. My original post was edited for reasons unknown but on departure from Northwood Hills towards Northwood 35 mph took 30 seconds to achieve. A class 378 does this in 20 seconds. Obviously it's capped to match the acceleration of an A stock with weak field flag up!
|
|
|
Post by mcmaddog on Jan 30, 2011 22:28:53 GMT
On the class 378s the windows are provided for emergency use only - ie if the train fails and it is hot outside. This prevents people smashing windows in the event of an aircon failure. I have to admit I'm disappointed with the performance of the S Stock at the moment. My original post was edited for reasons unknown but on departure from Northwood Hills towards Northwood 35 mph took 30 seconds to achieve. A class 378 does this in 20 seconds. Obviously it's capped to match the acceleration of an A stock with weak field flag up! Plus there's less juice than on NR
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 23:16:57 GMT
.
That was the idea on the Thames Turbo( now FGW) Class 166 Turbos however nearly 20 years later the window latches are often broken windows remain open and the air-con is totally useless
I was on a Class 166 last Friday and I heard the air con kick in a couple of times with zilch effect. I bet it still has the original coolant in the system. Lets hope the S stock works like the Chiltern Turbos rather than the First Great Sweatstern Turbos
Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 23:20:43 GMT
Yes admittedly this 20 second figure was achieved under the wires. Timing them on the Euston to Watford section which they share with Bakerloo lines 1972 stock (and hence using the same juice) would be better. However I don't think it would be that much slower. Why does the S Stocks performance have to be capped anyway ? Is it because of current supply limitations as on the Northern line ? If so I can't see them being let off the leash any time soon as 1995 Northern line Stock is still slow. 2009 Victoria line stock afaik realise most of their performance potential even though 1967 stock still obviously operates on the line!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 23:25:06 GMT
Yes admittedly this 20 second figure was achieved under the wires. Timing them on the Euston to Watford section which they share with Bakerloo lines 1972 stock (and hence using the same juice) would be better. However I don't think it would be that much slower. Why does the S Stocks performance have to be capped anyway ? Is it because of current supply limitations as on the Northern line ? If so I can't see them being let off the leash any time soon as 1995 Northern line Stock is still slow. 2009 Victoria line stock afaik realise most of their performance potential even though 1967 stock still obviously operates on the line! The A stock pulls away like a snail- it'd be silly to have them uncapped or they'd be running on reds a little too often! Also yes, the S stock power upgrade involves going to 750v- all axles motored + air con is a big power draw! That is probably another reason. PRJB? ;D 09ts are still matched down a little, you can feel it- they should have the same acceleration as a 92ts.
|
|
|
Post by dangeruxb on Jan 31, 2011 14:14:57 GMT
Another sighting for today:-
21009 / 10 where on Train 451 this morning and the new Unit (21015 / 016?) was outside Neasden this morning
|
|
|
Post by dangeruxb on Jan 31, 2011 14:17:43 GMT
The two I saw in Ruislip depot (west end) this afternoon were not 20189+20227. According to www.wnxx.com/ the four 20's were being used to drag a Class 73 to the west country on Saturday but the pic on the News page only shows two of them. As we seem to be not due another delivery for a while, perhaps GBRF has got some other work for them
|
|