|
Post by underground16 on Feb 3, 2011 20:19:43 GMT
I see that the met line is now part suspended between Wembley Park to Aldgate.. My mate says it is an S Stock that has caused the problems as the doors would not open.. how could this happen the train is new they dont seam to be doing very well If i am wrong could someone let me know what the problem was with the line tonight.. Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 22:05:35 GMT
I saw the defective S Stock at Finchley Road tonight as I got off the Jub, preparing to change: I took one look at it, listened to the announcement that passengers should go onto Wembley Park on the Jub, and back on I went! By the time I got to Wembley Park (I had to change at Willesden Green), the train had apparentely just left Finchley Road empty, and an Uxbridge train was at least 10 mins away. I took my chances with a bus at Queensway back to Ruislip! I have to say that HOTH didn't look that busy when we passed over the bridge, and the Met still doesn't look that clever on the TFL site, 4 hours later. It doesn't usually take this long to recover, does it?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Feb 3, 2011 22:10:37 GMT
Its not too bad off peak as the timetable is quite straightforward but in the rush hours trains are everywhere and there are probably quite a few stuck in the City. This will take a great deal longer to sort than normal. Many trains will be sent to Neasden to get care of trouble. The advantage the Met has is it can retreat to the safety of Neasden and run Wembley-Northbound and use the Jub to connect!
|
|
|
Post by knap on Feb 3, 2011 22:31:18 GMT
Took me 90 minutes to get from West Hamspstead to Amersham via Finchley Road.
When I got to Finchley Road the S stock was on platform 1, don't know how long it had been there, this was about 6:15. I have no idea of the defect, but one set of doors was partly open, all the others seemed either open or closed. Passengers were eventually de trained. The Jubilee was thus packed and I had to let several go through. An Uxbridge train pulled in shortly after the S stock left and then set off with passengers. the next train was an Uxbridge, but this had passengers taken off as the driver said "being taken out of service as the new train has broken down again and needed to go into the depot, so they needed a clear line". Sadly, the new trains may be getting a reputation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 22:42:22 GMT
There was also another problem with one at Preston Road LL N/B earlier on, my Uxbridge train was stuck for 5mins behind it just north of Wembley Park
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 4, 2011 0:36:42 GMT
Took me 90 minutes to get from West Hamspstead to Amersham via Finchley Road. When I got to Finchley Road the S stock was on platform 1, don't know how long it had been there, this was about 6:15. I have no idea of the defect, but one set of doors was partly open, all the others seemed either open or closed. Passengers were eventually de trained. The Jubilee was thus packed and I had to let several go through. An Uxbridge train pulled in shortly after the S stock left and then set off with passengers. the next train was an Uxbridge, but this had passengers taken off as the driver said "being taken out of service as the new train has broken down again and needed to go into the depot, so they needed a clear line". Sadly, the new trains may be getting a reputation. Considering there's only a couple of S stock trains running, it's amazing how much damage they've managed to inflict on the service already. Maybe it's time for the trains to be withdrawn from service until their reliability is assured.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 1:45:43 GMT
Well, I'm absolutely seething - what the he'll has been going on tonight? Got to Baker st at 7, finally reached Chesham (via taxi from Chalfont) at 10.15. Tried Marylebone but couldn't get on a train they were so full, back to BS to get the Jubilee, plan was going ok until the Jubilee also fell apart - supposedly due to met trains trying to get into Neasden. It seemed there were blocked back empty mets all the way from Finchley rd to Neasden, the offending S stock by now was parked in the platform at Neasden surrounded by orange jackets doing f all. This must have been getting on for 8.30.
Two points: 1. If they're not reliable enough send them back to Old Dalby until they are.
2. Why on earth was it not pushed into the depot by the following A stock pronto?
Maybe there needs to be a call to Booths in the morning and get the removed units back if they're stillnin one piece. The average punters were well aware of what caused the problem tonight.
I'll be putting in another refund claim first thing.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Feb 4, 2011 9:29:03 GMT
I cannot answer your questions as I was not on duty during the disruption. I will add one thing though. After discussion with a senior colleague it appears the A-stock were not without their problems when they were introduced. Doors were one issue.
I think for any reasonable and mature discussion to continue, and for those who know what's going on to be able to feel they can explain everything without being shot down, some of the immense negativity needs to be left at the logging-in screen or taken to the rant area or somewhere.
It is a new train. It has had teething problems - show me one new product that doesn't. There is no question of the fleet being abandoned. Unfortunately, however much the initial running of the train affects the service, the faults cannot always be detected within a depot, and full-on front-line service is sometimes what it takes to find the problems. Once found, they are not ignored.
It will all come good in the end, just as the A-stock did. But then that was so many years ago very few people are still around to remember it.
|
|
|
Post by knap on Feb 4, 2011 10:02:06 GMT
My point was that the S stock may be gaining a reputation of being unreliable. I was annoyed at being delayed, but I have also been annoyed at being delayed over my 25 years commuting life by signal failures, A stock failures and Chiltern failures and more.
I posted about a LU driver saying "the new train has broken down again" this will not be lost on normal passengers and passengers around me were making negative comments about the train.
I appreciate the LU staff did not want this failure (or any failure) and (I believe) work very hard to sort things out (even if at times us passengers don't see this as much, I assume a lot is done in the back ground).
Perhaps some publicity apologising for delays would help the situation.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Feb 4, 2011 10:22:03 GMT
The two I saw in Ruislip depot (west end) this afternoon were not 20189+20227. According to www.wnxx.com/ the four 20's were being used to drag a Class 73 to the west country on Saturday but the pic on the News page only shows two of them. As we seem to be not due another delivery for a while, perhaps GBRF has got some other work for them This has been mentioned on another forum. DBS (EWS) have recently lost a shunting contract in south Wales and the class 73 was urgently required to take over the duties.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Feb 4, 2011 11:31:34 GMT
A Stock can't push out S Stock. Not powerful enough! The S Stock apparently had an ACM* failure. They had to get another S Stock to rescue it. There weren't any OK to go in the depot so they had to get the other one that was in service. There was also a cock-up on the Jub as well, so getting into Neasden was difficult. Never rains but it pours eh?
*Auxiliary Converter Module: Function = Motor Alternator++ and it supplies the compressors too so, no ACM, no air either. Who ever thought that one up? Must have been a science fiction writer! To be fair, the two ACMs on a train are supposed to be able to work alone if one fails but obviously they both packed up.
As an aside, it is interesting that there are two VOBCs[1] on a 96TS train and either one is supposed to be able to work alone but there have been a number of dual failures with them too. Maybe we should be learning something from this.
[1. I wrote VCC when I meant VOBC. VCC is the line control for the area.]
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Feb 4, 2011 14:53:50 GMT
As far as I have been made aware, the only problem on the Jubilee was the fact that their post-peak service had problems accessing the depot, due to the large number of Met trains using the depot reception roads. This is unfortunately a common occurance when shutdowns happen at that time of evening.
The fault has been narrowed down to a wiring problem which was compounded by the on-board computer trying to do what it was designed to do - which without the initial problem it would have rescued the train.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Feb 4, 2011 15:00:24 GMT
My point was that the S stock may be gaining a reputation of being unreliable. I was annoyed at being delayed, but I have also been annoyed at being delayed over my 25 years commuting life by signal failures, A stock failures and Chiltern failures and more. 6 trains in, with a few teething problems. Granted it doesn't bode well at this point if you adopt the "glass is half-empty" philosophy. But when there are more trains, all examined to check they won't suffer the same problems, then I am sure the reliability percentages will rise significantly. For your 25 years of commuting, can you really honestly say that more than half of that time has suffered delays? Bad days / bad weeks will always stick in people's minds.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 15:12:28 GMT
My second message and guess the subject?
Quick overview of events for those that are interested:
Last night I left to go home from Finchley Road at 6ish and jumped onto a S stock at the platform. I immediately noticed that only half of the lights were on. Doors then closed and rather than setting off all the lights went out. After a few minutes they half came back on and the driver advised us to take the Jubilee however the doors were still closed. Eventually the doors were opened after watching 3 Jubilees go past and now the platform was packed.
After detraining the train was taken out of action and I took the proceeding Uxbridge. Sensibly the UXB train did not leave until the S Stock had got a fair distance down the road. Unfortunately the S died again at Neasden platform so we were de-trained at Willesden Green it took 10 mins to cross over to the platform is was so busy, and I made my way to Wembley on the Jubilee. After 20 mins there was an all stations to Watford and back to Northwood hills about an hour late.
Comments / Observations
For those calling for the removal of S stock, how do you think these type of problems will be fixed ? As long as it is not the same problem repeating over and over you will always get teething problems with a new product. Remember you don’t get 20 people posting every morning to say that their journey was fine only the problems are reported.
At Finchley Road it appears the driver did the equivalent of an alt-ctrl-del however with the doors closed us punters could not take the option of getting out which may have reduced the numbers stuck.
De-training at Willesden was not helped by the fact they did not turn on the platform lights. All that money spent on nice shiney lights a few years back and not used when needed.
Going past Neasden and seeing the stalled train it looks like it was stopped at the point that crew changes are carried out or was held waiting for signals to take the crossing but stalled again. Could it not have been pathed to run straight into the depot non-stop and the secondary delay would have been avoided ?
As someone else said why was it not pushed by the following empty A stock. There were comments on another thread that S carried a coupler ? That said it was right next to the depot was there nothing that could drag it home ?
It took an age to get anything out of the depot to run north. With the introduction of the S and the end of the A on ELL I would have thought there is enough spare A at the depot and this is also where crew changes happen ?
I wonder how many of the problems are down to the fact that the S Stock need higher voltage and other things that cannot be implemented until all the A’s are put to bed. I know in my own work a compromise always means the worse of both.
I know I am just a punter so my observations are just that with no direct knowledge.
I am sure the S Stock will get there and in a few years time be as reliable or better than what they are replacing.
Leo
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Feb 4, 2011 15:27:02 GMT
Going past Neasden and seeing the stalled train it looks like it was stopped at the point that crew changes are carried out or was held waiting for signals to take the crossing but stalled again. Could it not have been pathed to run straight into the depot non-stop and the secondary delay would have been avoided ? Unfortunately there is no direct route from the northbound Metropolitan Line to Neasden Depot at Neasden. All trains must go to Wembley Park and this is the first place that a defective train may be got out of the way of following trains. Crew changes do not take place in the depot and when the incident first happened there would not have been any drivers within the depot to bring out any spare trains that might have been in there. Thus any northbound services starting from depot during the course of the incident would have been those trains which had been terminated at Wembley Park on the southbound and sent to depot. There is always a delay before the first of these re-emerges from the depot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 16:17:24 GMT
Unfortunately there is no direct route from the northbound Metropolitan Line to Neasden Depot at Neasden. All trains must go to Wembley Park and this is the first place that a defective train may be got out of the way of following trains. I actually tried to look this morning as I wondered about this. Which makes me again question why it stopped at Neasden. As said it looks like it was right next to the crew tunnel slope as if someone tried to get on / off. Crew changes do not take place in the depot and when the incident first happened there would not have been any drivers within the depot to bring out any spare trains that might have been in there. Thus any northbound services starting from depot during the course of the incident would have been those trains which had been terminated at Wembley Park on the southbound and sent to depot. There is always a delay before the first of these re-emerges from the depot. Sorry I was not trying to be that specific I mean crew changes take place around WP / Neasden so in the local vicinity. It took so long I could have walked to Neasden and back in the time it took for a train to arrive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 18:25:21 GMT
I think you may find it stopped at Neasden because it broke down again! As my colleague MC says, there are problems with every new stock and most of the problems will only occur when the train is running in full passenger service, however, the two recent shutdowns caused by failures on the S stock have made them stand out for all the wrong reasons! You will also find that crew changes no longer take place at Wembley, as the crew depot is now at Harrow. which is not the best place in the world for a crew depot. We also had T/Ops who had been on their trains for 5-7 hours without a break (and I may add without a word of complaint!), and these trains were delayed at Harrow awaiting relief T/Ops who were still on their breaks as they had gotten off late as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 21:15:56 GMT
A Stock can't push out S Stock. Not powerful enough! The S Stock apparently had an ACM* failure. They had to get another S Stock to rescue it. There weren't any OK to go in the depot so they had to get the other one that was in service. There was also a cock-up on the Jub as well, so getting into Neasden was difficult. Never rains but it pours eh? *Auxiliary Converter Module: Function = Motor Alternator++ and it supplies the compressors too so, no ACM, no air either. Who ever thought that one up? Must have been a science fiction writer! To be fair, the two ACMs on a train are supposed to be able to work alone if one fails but obviously they both packed up. There should be a MCM (Motor Converter Module) for the motors. What can happen is if there is a LIM (Line Interference Monitor) fitted and it trips too many times it will shut that MCM and ACM on that car down. I'm not sure how many MCMs and ACMs each S Stock has but both are usually isolated if there is a problem As an aside, it is interesting that there are two VCCs on a 96TS train and either one is supposed to be able to work alone but there have been a number of dual failures with them too. Maybe we should be learning something from this. There should be a MCM (Motor Converter Module) for the motors. What can happen is if there is a LIM (Line Interference Monitor) fitted and it trips too many times it will shut that MCM and ACM on that car down. I'm not sure how many MCMs and ACMs each S Stock has but both are usually isolated if there is a problem I'm not a driver so I could be talking utter **** and something else different happened!
|
|
|
Post by oneround on Feb 4, 2011 21:25:14 GMT
A Stock can't push out S Stock. Not powerful enough! The S Stock apparently had an ACM* failure. They had to get another S Stock to rescue it. There weren't any OK to go in the depot so they had to get the other one that was in service. There was also a cock-up on the Jub as well, so getting into Neasden was difficult. Never rains but it pours eh? *Auxiliary Converter Module: Function = Motor Alternator++ and it supplies the compressors too so, no ACM, no air either. Who ever thought that one up? Must have been a science fiction writer! To be fair, the two ACMs on a train are supposed to be able to work alone if one fails but obviously they both packed up. There should be a MCM (Motor Converter Module) for the motors. What can happen is if there is a LIM (Line Interference Monitor) fitted and it trips too many times it will shut that MCM and ACM on that car down. I'm not sure how many MCMs and ACMs each S Stock has but both are usually isolated if there is a problem As an aside, it is interesting that there are two VCCs on a 96TS train and either one is supposed to be able to work alone but there have been a number of dual failures with them too. Maybe we should be learning something from this. There should be a MCM (Motor Converter Module) for the motors. What can happen is if there is a LIM (Line Interference Monitor) fitted and it trips too many times it will shut that MCM and ACM on that car down. I'm not sure how many MCMs and ACMs each S Stock has but both are usually isolated if there is a problem I'm not a driver so I could be talking utter **** and something else different happened! Not too far off the mark, one ACM shut down, then the fault shut the second one down. THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN. But it all adds to the stock knowledge of the maintenance staff.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Feb 4, 2011 21:39:31 GMT
And to add to linecontroller66 above, way, way over their driving hours allowed, so hats off to them. Driving hours still count during a breakdown or stuck in traffic etc, and the adjustments must be made on the other side of the next viable break. So to have any service at all speaks volumes.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Feb 4, 2011 22:18:06 GMT
i have question about front line service is this the manufacturer at this point?,as this suggests this is carried out elsewhere rather then at neasden which i assume is meant by depot.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Feb 5, 2011 1:46:07 GMT
From the A stock withdrawal discussion thread: the currret 5 ( one has been stopped since dec) S stock Which one? Obviously it can't be 21017, and I saw 21009 and 21013 last month, so it must be either 21003, 21005 or 21007.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2011 18:18:14 GMT
A Stock can't push out S Stock. Not powerful enough! The S Stock apparently had an ACM* failure. They had to get another S Stock to rescue it. There weren't any OK to go in the depot so they had to get the other one that was in service. There was also a cock-up on the Jub as well, so getting into Neasden was difficult. Never rains but it pours eh? *Auxiliary Converter Module: Function = Motor Alternator++ and it supplies the compressors too so, no ACM, no air either. Who ever thought that one up? Must have been a science fiction writer! To be fair, the two ACMs on a train are supposed to be able to work alone if one fails but obviously they both packed up. As an aside, it is interesting that there are two VOBCs[1] on a 96TS train and either one is supposed to be able to work alone but there have been a number of dual failures with them too. Maybe we should be learning something from this. [1. I wrote VCC when I meant VOBC. VCC is the line control for the area.] Apologies for the sense of humour failure the other night - although it was pretty justified. Major disruption seems to be a fairly regular occurance for whatever reason - probably signal failures are top of the list and all are wearing the regular customers down. Re the other night, is this true that A stock can't be used to push an S? That seems like a major flaw to me, especially if there are going to be teething problems like this. Would also explain the second S I saw at Wembley Park on P1 - I assume this was going to run wrong line to Neasden to pull the disgraced S back to Wembley, the back down the Depot flyunder? This surely has to be sorted out? OK, S stock is heavier I assume but surely an A stock must be able to move it, even if it is very slowly? I can see this being a regular problem that's not going to win any friends, especially if the S delivery to the Met is going to be paused at 40 trains, this must mean there are still going to be A stocks running for maybe the next three years? As was said, as the disruption went on for hours it meant drivers hadn't had breaks and were out of hours meaning hardly any trains north (and none to Chesham!) the key to this has to be recovering quickly so there has to be a way to move a failed train out of the way that doesn't take hours.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Feb 5, 2011 18:47:20 GMT
As far as I have been made aware, the only problem on the Jubilee was the fact that their post-peak service had problems accessing the depot, due to the large number of Met trains using the depot reception roads. This is unfortunately a common occurance when shutdowns happen at that time of evening. The fault has been narrowed down to a wiring problem which was compounded by the on-board computer trying to do what it was designed to do - which without the initial problem it would have rescued the train. During this incident the Jubilee had a "person ill on train" (PIOT) at Canary Wharf E/B, whilst on the W/B platform a train was "not communicating" (or similar). So their service was already failing apart at that point.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Feb 5, 2011 18:51:41 GMT
Does the S Stock have Spring-Applied Parking Brakes on all cars? If so, then without main line air, if you're using an assisting train you're pushing not only the weight of the defective train but also against brakes hard on. These can be isolated but then this brings up issues associated with the Highgate 'runaway' a while back.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Feb 5, 2011 19:06:24 GMT
During this incident the Jubilee had a "person ill on train" (PIOT) at Canary Wharf E/B, whilst on the W/B platform a train was "not communicating" (or similar). So their service was already failing apart at that point. I see. I wasn't aware of that - which probably explains why use of the depot was almost as critical for them as it was for the Met. (Nice slip there by the way - if indeed it was a slip. Whilst most lines "fall apart" the Jubilee "fails apart" ;D ;D)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2011 20:03:24 GMT
From the A stock withdrawal discussion thread: the currret 5 ( one has been stopped since dec) S stock Which one? Obviously it can't be 21017, and I saw 21009 and 21013 last month, so it must be either 21003, 21005 or 21007. I saw 21003 yesterday and 21005* on Thursday (both on 451)
|
|
|
Post by thc on Feb 5, 2011 20:10:20 GMT
I saw 21003 yesterday and 21005* on Thursday (both on 451) That's a cracking shot of yours at Northwood featured in the new issue of Rail, Julian. Well done. ;D THC
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Feb 5, 2011 20:41:58 GMT
Surely compound incidents like this just demonstrate the usefulness of having crossovers on the four track section.
|
|
|
Post by oneround on Feb 5, 2011 22:06:41 GMT
From the A stock withdrawal discussion thread: the currret 5 ( one has been stopped since dec) S stock Which one? Obviously it can't be 21017, and I saw 21009 and 21013 last month, so it must be either 21003, 21005 or 21007. 21007 is stopped. 23007 booked for lifting. Monday.
|
|