Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2011 16:14:03 GMT
Well that is a lie straight away. The first ran on the 31st July 2010. I was on it! Yup, I agree. My camera's metadata says 31/7/2010 with the S Stock pulling into Wembley Park at 10:53am. Anyone else there then? If 10:53 was the first run, I was. Don't recall seeing anyone looking like you there though!
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Jan 15, 2011 17:45:58 GMT
Yup, I agree. My camera's metadata says 31/7/2010 with the S Stock pulling into Wembley Park at 10:53am. Anyone else there then? If 10:53 was the first run, I was. Don't recall seeing anyone looking like you there though! I was definitely there I remember you being fairly new to the forum then and wondering if this fairly middle-aged person with the most enormous camera was CJ. Seems silly now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2011 23:44:40 GMT
Returning to the title of this thread, " the end is nigh " when do people really think we will witness the A stock in normal service for the last time? the met is now only getting 40 s stock, because uncle wants Some S7s out for London 2012. Some A stock will run late 2012, and quite likely a bit further. Really?!?!? also, snapped 5179 today, it was on an ex watford and it was going faster than my 'fast' Baker Street!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 16, 2011 1:55:38 GMT
The met is only getting 40 trains now??? Well if thats the case deliver them as 6 car trains to augment the H&C fleet; it seems they could always do with more trains.
Deadmans, will the allocation be restored to 58 in the fulness of time?
I cant see why something happily doing ~50mph should irrovocably be destroyed within 5 days.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 2:28:38 GMT
I think it's meant to mean after the first 40 production will switch to S7s, with S8s resuming later
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Jan 16, 2011 5:11:16 GMT
why are tfl apparently running a filthy fleet of trains?.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 16, 2011 5:18:33 GMT
Would you bother cleaning a car if youre driving it to a scrap yard?
Besides its psychological, you look at that and think, 'tatty, old, worn out'. Instead of, 'solidly built, hard wearing, handsom design that'll never again be equalled in iconicism'.
If you take the pride out of something it becomes far easier to destroy.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Jan 16, 2011 8:09:57 GMT
Would you bother cleaning a car if youre driving it to a scrap yard? Besides its psychological, you look at that and think, 'tatty, old, worn out'. Instead of, 'solidly built, hard wearing, handsom design that'll never again be equalled in iconicism'. If you take the pride out of something it becomes far easier to destroy. See also the Routemasters in their last years of "front line" operation on London 's Buses (Stagecoach excepted).
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 16, 2011 9:59:51 GMT
I also saw 5179 yesterday and a variety of other wonderful trains. Not an S stock in sight strangely!!
Is the Met really only getting 40 trains?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 16, 2011 13:05:10 GMT
Thanks, glad to hear they are running right to the end!! This is quite common - you might as well get as much use out of your "expiring assets" as possible. Look at how much work the Deltics did in their last few months: they were run right into the ground, several of them ending their last revenue-earning journeys on one engine. It is a sad reflection on the setup of the UK's railways that a train being sent from London to Rotherham is broken up and put on lorries, rather than being hauled up. Isn't A stock out-of-gauge for most NR lines? ...........which makes me wonder how they were delivered from Cravens of Sheffield in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Jan 16, 2011 13:31:57 GMT
Isn't A stock out-of-gauge for most NR lines? ...........which makes me wonder how they were delivered from Cravens of Sheffield in the first place? IIRC they were delivered via the Great Central line which had sufficient clearances. The GC was closed and largely dismantled a few years later.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 16, 2011 13:38:52 GMT
Yes, they came down the existing Chiltern Line either to Ruislip of straight to Neasden.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Jan 16, 2011 21:03:22 GMT
why are tfl apparently running a filthy fleet of trains?. Well, I can't say whether it went through the wash the night before, but it only takes a drop of rain to have vehicles looking filthy before they've completed their first run of the day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 21:29:31 GMT
The A Stock was delivered to Ruislip depot.
Commissioning runs took place between Ruislip depot and North Acton.
Transfer to Neasden was Ruislip depot - North Acton - Ealing Broadway (Central to District) - Acton Town - Rayners Lane - Neasden depot.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 16, 2011 21:35:24 GMT
Yes, long before the connection at Ickenham was built!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2011 21:52:19 GMT
Indeedie - or even before a twinkle in some engineer's eyes ;D ;D
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 17, 2011 12:15:33 GMT
Do we know which poor units are going on Thursday yet?
|
|
|
Post by edwardfox on Jan 17, 2011 13:05:52 GMT
I rode on a Metropolitan Line train on Thursday. The exterior and interior appearance along with the quality of ride was such that were I a foreign tourist visiting London for the first time, I would be amazed by the fact that the train I was one was one due to be scrapped and replaced. I am not a fan of any particular type of LU rolling stock, but it seems such a waste for these wonderful majestic icons of the Metropolitan Line to be withdrawn and broken up simply because shiny new trains have arrived to replace them. Aside from the walk through facility, the new Metropolitan Line trains simply look like the bigger brother of the Central Line stock.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2011 15:45:30 GMT
were I a foreign tourist visiting London for the first time, I would be amazed by the fact that the train I was one was one due to be scrapped and replaced. I think you'll find that options of rail enthusiasts differ significantly from the rest of the population - I've seen reactions of many foreigners using the Met for the first time (my parents, a couple of German colleagues, friends, boyfriend, etc) and generally they were not impressed by bumpy ride, excessive vibration, smells, and lack of voice announcements. Most preferred Jubilee line. it seems such a waste for these wonderful majestic icons of the Metropolitan Line to be withdrawn and broken up simply because shiny new trains have arrived to replace them. A stock will be replaced because it is on the verge of inevitable reliability decline (and some people would argue that it is already started).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2011 16:45:11 GMT
were I a foreign tourist visiting London for the first time, I would be amazed by the fact that the train I was one was one due to be scrapped and replaced. I think you'll find that options of rail enthusiasts differ significantly from the rest of the population - I've seen reactions of many foreigners using the Met for the first time (my parents, a couple of German colleagues, friends, boyfriend, etc) and generally they were not impressed by bumpy ride, excessive vibration, smells, and lack of voice announcements. Most preferred Jubilee line. it seems such a waste for these wonderful majestic icons of the Metropolitan Line to be withdrawn and broken up simply because shiny new trains have arrived to replace them. A stock will be replaced because it is on the verge of inevitable reliability decline (and some people would argue that it is already started). Only because the maintenance has lulled!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2011 17:04:07 GMT
Only because the maintenance has lulled! Maintenance won't be able to save it forever. What was the reason for A stock to be speed-capped? And could it be resolved by better maintenance?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2011 17:16:02 GMT
Cracking bogies, its just a sticker in the cab to keep the H&S Freaks/Idiots/Nutcases call em what ya want happy! They can still reach 70mph
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 17, 2011 18:03:20 GMT
...and do! The A stock bogies have always been cracking, even in 1961! Correct me if I'm wrong but the bogie design was old fashioned when made. They look like they were based on the District K2 bogie but with rubber suspension. The K2 bogie served the District and later the Met well but I'm not sure it was cut out for 70mph! They are on the verge or replacement but they could be maintained for another 5 years with love before it would be time to throw the towel in! As I said last week, they have served the Met for over a third of its existance and are surely the longest serving trains as a fleet on the Underground, and probably England. Hats off to Manser/Cravens
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2011 22:20:09 GMT
Clocked one at 65mph Moor Park - Harrow-on the-Hill, 5167 I think
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 17, 2011 22:24:53 GMT
Although not the best place to say this, whoever is at the controls of the unfortunate units on Thursday, would they please open her up for the last time and really bomb it to Northwood!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2011 7:33:36 GMT
5093 covered in graffiti, shameful.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2011 11:51:04 GMT
@ metman I think it will be on the slow lines unfortunately, why do I have to be at school for this? I will venture up to Northwood after school though see if its still there
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2011 17:12:52 GMT
I'm pretty sure the STN said it goes down the fast...
|
|
|
Post by zakwebb on Jan 18, 2011 17:21:02 GMT
Bengley wrote "5093 covered in graffiti, shameful"
I think I have just solved the graffiti problem. I hate graffiti in any form but it came to mind if LU built a depot for all the old stock trains and had it maintained and controlled then all these vandals could go to the depot and spray paint all the trains which would stop graffiti on the LU forever.
It would be costly but surely in the long run it would save LU millions of pounds in cleaning the trains.
Think of the cost savings. Less security in depots. No hiring of staff to clean the trains. No money spent on chemicals. No disruption to service because of these mindless criminals. More police time which could be used to control harder crimes. And lets not start on the amount of millions spent by tax payers, court costs, money spent on prisons to house and feed these individuals.
After all the trains are being scrapped.
Woo hoo ;D Has anybody allready thought of this idea?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2011 17:38:55 GMT
I think it rather defeats 'the point' though - the thrill doesn't come from the act, AFAIUI it comes from the recognition of their tag being out there for the world to see, as often as possible. The trains aren't a canvas, they're a publicity platform.
|
|