prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Oct 7, 2010 19:11:56 GMT
The first 'A' Stock units for scrapping, to make way for 'S' Stock, will be leaving the Metropolitan line this weekend. The Units concerned are: 5173 & 5197.
Counselling is available for those who feel they may need it. ;D
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Oct 7, 2010 19:19:09 GMT
The first 'A' Stock units for scrapping, to make way for 'S' Stock, will be leaving the Metropolitan line this weekend. The Units concerned are: 5173 & 5197. Counselling is available for those who feel they may need it. ;D Are these Units leaving by road or rail ?
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Oct 7, 2010 19:29:25 GMT
Road.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2010 19:31:21 GMT
*orders a lorryload of Kleenex mansize for Metman*
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2010 19:50:35 GMT
It is quite sad actually. I used to use them all the time when I was at school making the cosy little suburban run between Pinner and Watford. Plus there was sad music on the TV as I read this so it added to the mood.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 7, 2010 20:07:51 GMT
*downs a vodka in celebration* Sorry Metman et al.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 7, 2010 22:06:52 GMT
*downs a vodka in celebration* Sorry Metman et al. Really? What have they done to you? Where is the councilling? That is actually really upsetting. Where are they going for scrap btw?
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 7, 2010 22:26:54 GMT
Really? What have they done to you? The only stock on which I have been accused of fare dodging having "touched-in" and "touched-out". Oh, and their propensity to add to the 'rear blind debate' {Link to follow}.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 8, 2010 10:44:17 GMT
The first 'A' Stock units for scrapping, to make way for 'S' Stock, will be leaving the Metropolitan line this weekend. The Units concerned are: 5173 & 5197. Counselling is available for those who feel they may need it. ;D Are these Units leaving by road or rail ? A couple of them just lately probably wouldn't have made it by rail ;D I know we've got to make room for the S-stock, but we now seem to be entering that period of time we all feared. That is, a shortage of good rolling stock, and being unable to fill that shortage with the S-stocks we have. Couple this with the ongoing industrial action, and work on the trains that need it is not getting done. The other evening we got through the peak without too many gaps, but several trains missing (8 at one point). I fear this will worsen before we can use the S-stock.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 8, 2010 18:10:13 GMT
What's wrong with the A stock? Why can they not be prepared for service?
At least their show beams aren't falling off ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 8, 2010 18:41:50 GMT
At least their show beams aren't falling off ;D True (nice dig at the opposition ;D ) The stock are, as everyone knows, quite old now, and just as an elderly relative can still get out and about, there comes a time when each morning something else has sagged or even fallen off That probably makes it sound a bit more dramatic than it actually is, but there are jobs that need regularly doing to keep them serviceable - more than the newer stocks need. With the current industrial dispute which includes an overtime ban, there simply are not as many depot staff available - which of course not only affects stock availability, but also re-inforces the case for those taking the action.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 8, 2010 18:51:28 GMT
It wasn't a dig at the opposition! ;D The D stock's time will soon come! I always thought the A stock was pretty reliable for it's age, but you are right, they will need more attention because of their age. It's a shame they don't get the care they deserve, because they are still capable of providing a good service.
It's lucky there are quite a few trains in stock or otherwise you're [Metcontrol] job would be even harder....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2010 19:16:26 GMT
Where are they going for scrap? I heard Eastleigh?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2010 19:20:13 GMT
Lets go down with the handcuffs and placards and lay infront of the roads... I see a mass-scale protest brewing...
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 8, 2010 19:31:14 GMT
Good plan! Perhaps I could get hold of a few of the racks...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2010 19:37:47 GMT
we would go to one of those souvenir shops that seem to be on any street and buy a lot of tat with 'Mind the Gap' on it
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on Oct 8, 2010 21:23:49 GMT
Don't worry prjb, I'll be there to counsel those who mourn the C-Stock....
|
|
|
Post by harlesden on Oct 8, 2010 21:45:06 GMT
we would go to one of those souvenir shops that seem to be on any street and buy a lot of tat with 'Mind the Gap' on it Linda, my lovely Brooklyn NY based fiance, loves her "Mind The Gap" t-shirt
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2010 22:30:21 GMT
How well would they run on the Downhill stretch from 'sham to Ricky with a couple of motors cut out? Obviously won't keep to current schedules but the service isn't exact Vic/Central levels out that way.
Reducing Traction Motor Mileage (even a little) will preserve them, and I daresay other related mechanical components. Then cut them back in at Ricky where the line levels out a bit.
As a more general suggestion: Slacken up the Met Timetable a bit, so the drivers don't have to cane around keeping to time - it all sounds very simple, and perhaps a bit draconian but if it preserves the As until the S8s are ready to start taking over then it's gotta help. It also might convince Mr Banker, upset on his commute from his ivory towered mansion in the chalfonts to central london that the performance gains on the S Stock are even more than they are, and he genuinely feels he's getting a faster and better service... A bit of a con perhaps? Or clever marketing?
EDIT: slight corrections to wording for understanding purposes
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Oct 8, 2010 23:47:28 GMT
How well would they run on the Downhill stretch from 'sham to Ricky with a couple of motors cut out? Obviously won't keep to current schedules but the service isn't exact Vic/Central levels out that way. Reducing Traction Motor Mileage (even a little) will preserve them, and I daresay other related mechanical components. Then cut them back in at Ricky where the line levels out a bit. Aside from the fact that we don't run 8 car trains in service with more than one motor out (one "motor" being one motor car), I can't imagine it would be worth the effort. They could probably still keep to time on that stretch, however a late departure from Ricky would result due to the driver having to walk back to cut in the 2nd motor! ;D With all motors working and an on-time departure from Amersham, you can be more or less right time at Ricky without touching parallel, coasting most of the way. As a more general suggestion: Slacken up the Met Timetable a bit, so the drivers don't have to cane around keeping to time... Current running times are generous enough that we don't need to cane around to keep time. In fact it's quite the opposite on some sections of the line.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 9, 2010 0:22:14 GMT
Slacken up the Met Timetable a bit, Why? MetControl's adrendalin levels will then become sub-optimal. A tragedy. ;D
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 9, 2010 14:25:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by deadmans on Oct 9, 2010 15:22:51 GMT
Somewhat old news now, they have been of the asset register for years. They will have their semi permanent coupler cut, and they will be lifted out crane onto low loaders. Various scrap firms, are taking two cars each.
I witnessed 5197, today, sadly its 5173 turn on Sunday. Its all happening close to the TMR, as you come in from the north.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 9, 2010 16:35:25 GMT
Slacken up the Met Timetable a bit, Why? MetControl's adrendalin levels will then become sub-optimal. A tragedy. ;D I could do with a break after the last few weeks. Since my week of nights the other week my shifts seem to have been plagued with disruption - from small annoying problems to larger failures.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 9, 2010 16:37:00 GMT
Lets go down with the handcuffs and placards and lay infront of the roads... I see a mass-scale protest brewing... As long as you keep it outside on the roads. Whilst not condoning any such action, I would rather the disruption was kept outside rather than delaying the service ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 9, 2010 16:39:03 GMT
As a more general suggestion: Slacken up the Met Timetable a bit, so the drivers don't have to cane around keeping to time - it all sounds very simple, and perhaps a bit draconian but if it preserves the As until the S8s are ready to start taking over then it's gotta help. Years ago there were some of us who warned of wearing the A-stock out before its time - round about the same time that half-empty A-stocks were kept running to the city all day, rather than just in the peaks. They were never really meant for the stop-start working that the city entails.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Oct 9, 2010 17:20:24 GMT
As a more general suggestion: Slacken up the Met Timetable a bit, so the drivers don't have to cane around keeping to time - it all sounds very simple, and perhaps a bit draconian but if it preserves the As until the S8s are ready to start taking over then it's gotta help. Years ago there were some of us who warned of wearing the A-stock out before its time - round about the same time that half-empty A-stocks were kept running to the city all day, rather than just in the peaks. They were never really meant for the stop-start working that the city entails. How different is that from the stop-start working in the suburbs? I'm thinking that the distance between KXSP and Farringdon is approximately that between Ruislip and Ickenham. The same comparison could be made for Ruislip-Ruislip Manor and KXSP-Euston Square.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 9, 2010 17:44:26 GMT
True, but I think Metcontrol is more concerned with stop starting at signals and junctions as well as stations. Would the lack of a weak field help? I know in years gone by, drivers left the flag up!!
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 9, 2010 18:37:30 GMT
True, but I think Metcontrol is more concerned with stop starting at signals and junctions as well as stations. That was what I was getting at. Add also that although some distances are comparable, there are quite a few that are not. So for a train doing Baker Street-Uxbridge all day, there will be a few spells where the train gets to stretch its legs (well wheels!). For a large proportion of those journeys the train will leave one station with a clear run to the next - one steady acceleration, a spot of coasting and one steady spell of braking. On top of that, a service running only as far as Baker Street would need less trains, allowing all important maintenance to be undertaken at a more leisurely pace, with less reliance on the fleet availability as a whole. But as most lines see, we have a tendancy to make timetables that thrash virtually the whole fleet, day in day out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2010 21:08:16 GMT
Steam trains are still running and they are over a hundred years old. What is it about 60s engineering that we're replacing all of it?
|
|