|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 28, 2008 12:06:03 GMT
I wonder if anyone (perhaps mrfs42?) has a District WTT for June 1950. I am interested in how they coupled and uncoupled in this period because there are two photos in Brian Hardy's Underground Train File book which show 6-car trains made up with the 2-car unit at the west end instead of the usual east end. I wonder if any trains were required to be coupled in this way.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 28, 2008 13:57:15 GMT
TP which rolling stock was this? Not R stock in presume? I would guess H stock?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 28, 2008 16:02:21 GMT
I wonder if anyone (perhaps mrfs42?) has a District WTT for June 1950. Yes; I think I have. I'll have a rummage when I get home.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 28, 2008 21:33:28 GMT
TP which rolling stock was this? Not R stock in presume? I would guess H stock? One photo is of H Stock and the other Q Stock.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 28, 2008 21:32:49 GMT
I wonder if anyone (perhaps mrfs42?) has a District WTT for June 1950. Yes; I think I have. I'll have a rummage when I get home. Much obliged sir.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 28, 2008 21:55:41 GMT
Interesting! I presume the the H stock was very much reaching the end of its days and was formed into block 6 car units(like some of the Q stock was). There were some control trailers which I don't really understand! (Could someone explain why 6/8 CT were converted from H stock cars?) I can't think why Q stock would be formed like this however!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 28, 2008 22:38:37 GMT
I can find (all District and Piccadilly, of course): District 47 - weekdays - last District with old non-stop codes - 6/5/46 District 53 - weekdays - 6/11/46 District 60 - Snudays - 29/5/49 District 68 - Snudays - 25/5/52 - this is the Sunday version of the reintroduction of uncoupling on the Picc, and the TC inside covering this matter. I know the full weekday WTT is over the way with Roger (there's several on here that know Uncle R......). ;D District 73 - Snudays - 26/9/54 District 76 - all week - 1/4/57 - ex-Gunnersbury Jcn Signalbox So, I can (unfortunately) only find you WTTs of the period, but not the one you're looking for - which I guess is District and Piccadilly 63. Going to the Dissie and Pick Timetable notice pile: I've only got the sorting-out notice relating to Down St. reversers (in District and Picc WTT 126 - second WTT after extension to Enfield West and Oracle-land [WTT 125, which I do have]) Post 1933: I can find the first 16 pages of Christmas 1952, '53 Coronation, all of Christmas '53. I'll have a detailed trawl through on my next day off and look for 2-car west end uncouplings/timetabled 2-cars; I think they did happen occasionally. Can you see the train number - as I don't have a copy of these books (note to metman, after the conversation at Morden platform 1 - talking 'stuff' to calm my nerves before Camden Town , they *are* on the acquisition list)? Whilst I'm doing this, I'll get the ladder out and look at the 'T stock' question on the other board.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 29, 2008 7:09:23 GMT
Ha ha, cheers!
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 29, 2008 7:36:12 GMT
I'll have a detailed trawl through on my next day off and look for 2-car west end uncouplings/timetabled 2-cars; I think they did happen occasionally. Can you see the train number - as I don't have a copy of these books (note to metman, after the conversation at Morden platform 1 - talking 'stuff' to calm my nerves before Camden Town , they *are* on the acquisition list)? The date of the two photos is 29 June 1950. This was a Thursday, so it was a weekday timetable. The position of the sun suggests it was was in the evening about 7pm or later at East Ham. One train is WB No 36 or 38 to Wimbledon. The other is 40 something (maybe 43 or 48) to Richmond. I reckon any WTT of the period would suggest if they still did uncoupling at the west end. I only knew uncoupling at the east end. .
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 29, 2008 7:44:51 GMT
Hmm. Moves into Little Ilford..... *thinks*
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 29, 2008 7:46:26 GMT
Interesting! I presume the the H stock was very much reaching the end of its days and was formed into block 6 car units(like some of the Q stock was). There were some control trailers which I don't really understand! (Could someone explain why 6/8 CT were converted from H stock cars?) I can't think why Q stock would be formed like this however! Most of the conversions took place in 1938. I think it was to do with the plan to operate the Ladbroke Grove to Addison Road shuttle with District stock. I wonder if it did happen before the branch was bombed?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2008 12:01:02 GMT
Hi If you are able to get to the National Archives at Kew then they hold copies of a very large number of WTT both pre nationalisation and for LT. Taking a quick look at the online catalogue reveals the following for the District Line for 1950:
RAIL 984/85- WTT No ? Jan 1950 RAIL 984/86- WTT No 63 (W) June 1950 RAIL 984/87- WTT No 64 (S) June 1950
I can whole heartedly recommend a visit to Kew to look at these documents if able. Obviously I have only given details of the WTT they show for 1950 but there is a good variety both before (into MDR days too) and after this date if interested. All Underground/LT files for timetables (both public and service/working) at TNA can be found in:
RAIL 927 -East London Railway 1894-1910 RAIL 959 -Metropolitan Railway 1871-1933 RAIL 960 -Metropolitan District Railway 1876-1907 RAIL 983 -Underground Electric Group 1926-32 (contains Traffic Notices and Service Timetables) RAIL 984 -LT timetables (mainly WTT) from 1933-63.
Although some dates and lines/railways are better covered than others it is a very useful archive. If I am correct I don't believe that the LT Museum Library/Archive has a significant collection of WTT- they certainly denied it when I enquired last year. Back to TNA, you are able to take photocopies (although limited in pages and not cheap) and best of all can take photos if you have a digital camera.
I often go on a Thursday as it is late night viewing (need to maximise time as travelling from the Midlands) and am quite happy to meet up and 'show you the ropes' so to speak or if you are about the GCR at some point give you some further assistance on how to use TNA (I am assuming here you have never been so apologies if I am patronising you here- not my intention). Depending on how quickly you want the info I am also quite happy to photograph the WTT for you and give you copies of the files but I am not likely to get there in October because of work commitments unless I go on a Saturday (which is a distinct possibility as I seem to have every October weekend off work and reduced GCR signalling turns too.)
Let me know if I can be of any assistance.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 29, 2008 12:28:40 GMT
Whee! I guessed the WTT number correctly. *Goes back to reading August 1934 Metropolitan Working Notice, divided working on a Bank Holiday!*
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 29, 2008 17:31:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Sept 29, 2008 18:03:29 GMT
Did they uncouple after the evening peak? I ask this question based on what TP stated about the sun's position earlier in this thread.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 29, 2008 18:06:23 GMT
Yes; click on the link in my last post in this thread. If you can't read the text, click the 'full size' button at the top left of the image. ;D
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 29, 2008 20:32:08 GMT
It does. Thank you. It provides two very interesting facts. First, all the off-peak trains listed for coupling were 4-car sets and were made up to 6-car or 8-car sets for the peak. Now I wonder when 4-car operation stopped on the District. I don't remember it at all but then I wasn't paying attention. Logic suggests it would have stopped with the introduction of the R Stock. Second, all the coupling/uncoupling involved adding or subtracting the east end portion. I think the trains in the photos must have been 6-car block trains which ran all day or in the peak only. Perhaps, if they were short a 2-car east end unit, they had to split a 4-car into two 2-car sets to release a 2-car east end for coupling according to the WTT requirements and then made up a block 6-car by adding the other 2-car to the west end of a 4-car. That's what I would have done if I was the depot foreman and short of east end units. As an aside, it is interesting to see that they ran 3-car O/P Stock Metropolitan units with one compressor and one Metadyne on the unit.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 29, 2008 20:36:08 GMT
.......[snip] Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Thanks for all this Natterlee. I don't have much time to get to Kew. I didn't even know they had an online catalogue. Now I know, I might make the time to see what's there and see if it's worth my going down for a few days.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 29, 2008 21:06:46 GMT
It does. Thank you. It provides two very interesting facts. First, all the off-peak trains listed for coupling were 4-car sets and were made up to 6-car or 8-car sets for the peak. Now I wonder when 4-car operation stopped on the District. I don't remember it at all but then I wasn't paying attention. Logic suggests it would have stopped with the introduction of the R Stock. Second, all the coupling/uncoupling involved adding or subtracting the east end portion. I think the trains in the photos must have been 6-car block trains which ran all day or in the peak only. Perhaps, if they were short a 2-car east end unit, they had to split a 4-car into two 2-car sets to release a 2-car east end for coupling according to the WTT requirements and then made up a block 6-car by adding the other 2-car to the west end of a 4-car. That's what I would have done if I was the depot foreman and short of east end units. As an aside, it is interesting to see that they ran 3-car O/P Stock Metropolitan units with one compressor and one Metadyne on the unit. The H stock mostly ran on the Putney service I think, and I guess they would have mosty likely run as 4 cars in the slack hours the latest. Strange that O/P stock ran as 3 cars! I thought all trains were 6 or 8 cars on the met, 5 on the Circle and 6 cars of O stock on the Hammersmith & City!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 29, 2008 22:47:32 GMT
The H stock mostly ran on the Putney service I think, and I guess they would have mosty likely run as 4 cars in the slack hours the latest. Strange that O/P stock ran as 3 cars! I thought all trains were 6 or 8 cars on the met, 5 on the Circle and 6 cars of O stock on the Hammersmith & City! mm/TP: I'll have a good look on my next day off - I managed to upload a scan inbetween other stuff. If I can with my meagre collection, I'll attempt some answers.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Sept 30, 2008 7:43:41 GMT
So there is a precident then for the 3 car COCP unit at Quainton once fully restored to run by itself? Presumably the air usage was less with a metadyne unit then with a PCM though?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 30, 2008 16:59:28 GMT
In theory, an extra compressor would need to be fitted. I thought when test runs were done, 3 car trains carried a portable compressor in the saloon, much like the 1983 stock did (and it needed to!).
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 30, 2008 20:08:20 GMT
In theory, an extra compressor would need to be fitted. I thought when test runs were done, 3 car trains carried a portable compressor in the saloon, much like the 1983 stock did (and it needed to!). Yup. An extra compressor would be required.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 30, 2008 20:17:19 GMT
The H stock mostly ran on the Putney service I think, and I guess they would have mosty likely run as 4 cars in the slack hours the latest. Strange that O/P stock ran as 3 cars! I thought all trains were 6 or 8 cars on the met, 5 on the Circle and 6 cars of O stock on the Hammersmith & City! Yes; I thought this too. I believe the extension line stopped uncoupling in 1940 but I didn't know the H & C still did it in 1946. OK, this leads us to some questions: 1. When did the extension stop uncoupling? 1939? 1940? Some other time? 2. Did the H & C stop uncoupling at the same time and then resume it after the war? Dates? 3. If so, when it is stop uncoupling completely?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 1, 2008 0:10:23 GMT
All I know/thought is that with the demise of the W stock trains on the Met, the T stock ran in 6 and 8 car block units-from 1943 maybe. I was lead to believe the H&C ceased uncoupling on delivery of its trailers!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 2, 2008 15:47:09 GMT
Right then, this post might end up being a little rambly and utterly dull (so I apologise in advance for the dryness of the post); I've spent some time digging around the outer reaches of both the District and Metropolitan parts of the WTT library. I fear, due to gaps in what I can peer into I might not be able to come up with anything definitive. Looking into the District WTTs, particularly the (un)coupling at East Ham - which in itself leads onto H&C working and <er...> 'things' related to the T stock, I consider this to be the case: No scheduled uncoupling at all on Sundays; the majority of services being run (unsurprisingly) by Q stock. After a telephone conversation just now with Roger: all Met. Line stock at Barking and Little Ilford were still shewn as 3 car in WTT 67 - 19/5/52 (reintroduction of uncoupling on the Picc.) By 1957 - WTT 76 1/4/57 all Met. Line stock were shewn as 6 car in the District and Piccadilly WTTs. However, the mystery deepens - currently reading through what Met. No 1 section WTTs of the era I can lay my hands on - Met. WTT 127 5/6/50 shews all H&C trains starting and finishing as 6 cars with no provision for divided working, it might well be through historical reasons (of the time) this was not recorded on the Rolling Stock working of the No 1 section, hence the need to look through the WTT in some detail. All H&C at this stage were shewn as O6 - however, there were a few 3 car District workings - D56 6.18 off South Ken to Wimbledon, D54 ety off Triangle to 6.13 to High St, D54 High St - Putney 7.58pm, in its previous working to Putney, the formation is recorded as 5 car, presumably † at Putney as the next working east to High Street is shewn as 3 car. Looking through all the Met. WTTs I can lay my hands on: the last one I've got before 1939-45 that shews divided working is WTTs 65/66 28/11/38 (which I know you've got a copy of the stock working from me TP) - but I've got a gap in the collection from WTTs 65/66 (1938) until WTTs 80/82 (1941). Returning back to divided working on the Met. - WTT 197 (No. 2 section, 18/6/62) has it - and the WTT header reads 'Four tracking Northwood Hills to Watford South Junction, Introduction of Uncoupling A60 stock.' Hope this helps, chaps.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 2, 2008 17:10:43 GMT
All Hammersmith and City train would have been O6 or 6 cars of O stock. The 3 cars at East Ham depot maybe uncoupled units?
I don't get 3 car districts! That ended in the 1930s. Afaik, the basic formation was M-T-T-M with T-M added or T-M+T-M added in the peaks.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 2, 2008 17:17:28 GMT
All Hammersmith and City train would have been O6 or 6 cars of O stock. The 3 cars at East Ham depot maybe uncoupled units? Indeed - however, in the Met. WTTs of the period there is no mention of uncoupling - so what are the Met. 3-car units? Could this be a galley error and should read '6'?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 2, 2008 17:23:20 GMT
If the H&C was still using the 1906 saloon stock then short trains may have been used. Is any of the timetable pre 1937?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 2, 2008 19:17:45 GMT
All Hammersmith and City train would have been O6 or 6 cars of O stock. The 3 cars at East Ham depot maybe uncoupled units? Indeed - however, in the Met. WTTs of the period there is no mention of uncoupling - so what are the Met. 3-car units? Could this be a galley error and should read '6'? Thank you for all your digging mrfs42. Ah..........*blinks as light comes on in brain* There was NO uncoupling at E Ham. *bangs head on desk* Look at the departure and arrival times. This is a simple yard list. The units are part of the same train for each main portion and each east end portion and they have the same set numbers and departure/arrival times. All the District trains are 6 or 8 cars (4 + 2 or 4 + 4) and all the Mets are 6 cars (3 + 3) and leaving or arriving at the same time. They didn't uncouple at E Ham. At least, they didn't put units in the depot. Hence the O6 in the timetable. We've been on a wild goose chase. *hangs head in shame* Doh! I should have seen this! Now, the questions for mrfs42 are: Was there any uncoupling anywhere on the District in the 1946 WTT? *edit* I think there was. I think the District was the only line to maintain uncoupling throughout WWII. What stock were the 3-car and 5-car sets on the DR you mentioned?
|
|