metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 2, 2008 19:37:31 GMT
It wouldn't have been the F stock I suppose, that was in 4+4 by then. I'm going to guess it was H stock, maybe with the CT we were pondering the other day?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 1:08:18 GMT
*hangs head in shame* Doh! I should have seen this! Don't you *naughty word* dare! I must admit that I did begin to wonder after reading the fifth Met. TT in a row what on earth you were suggesting, however it passed a couple of interesting hours looking at the outer reaches of the collection that have been rather neglected of late. ;D Now, the questions for mrfs42 are: Was there any uncoupling anywhere on the District in the 1946 WTT? *edit* I think there was. I think the District was the only line to maintain uncoupling throughout WWII. <wanders off into library> Fetches District and Piccadilly WTTs 47 (6/5/46) and 18 (1/5/39) - 18 there as a comparison. I'll quote the SE stuff from the '46 WTT, SO will muddy the waters and SuO was a separate TT (but as any fule kno had no uncoupling): During the day: Upminster: ‡ 2 cars of H and 2 lots of 2 car Q †3 x 2 car Q East Ham (Little Ilford): No ‡ or † SE, but 2 x 4 Q † SO (so uncoupling did take place at Little Ilford, but only on a Saturday!) Plaistow (Bay Road), Whitechapel, Cromwell Depot & Triangle Sidings, High Street Kensington (Bay Road): No ‡ or † SE (or SO, for that matter). Parsons Green: One each of 4 car M ( M meaning Metropolitan Line stock in this circumstance) H stock ‡ evening; different set † morning - (ditto SE, though 4H M‡ am, not pm.) Ealing Broadway: 2 x Q † am and pm twice, 2 x Q ‡ pm twice. What stock were the 3-car and 5-car sets on the DR you mentioned? I don't know - I'm going to borrow the 1952 District and Picc weekday WTT and have a look at the pattern, the comment about the 3 and 5 cars was from a Met. WTT, so the stock (naturally) wasn't declared. Hope this helps - to anyone else that reads this and is puzzled: † is the galley symbol for 'uncouple', ‡ is the galley symbol for 'couple'. ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 7:09:39 GMT
I'll quote the SE stuff from the '46 WTT, SO will muddy the waters and SuO was a separate TT (but as any fule kno had no uncoupling): East Ham (Little Ilford): No ‡ or † SE, but 2 x 4 Q † SO (so uncoupling did take place at Little Ilford, but only on a Saturday!) Ah. These are trains Q18 and Q12. But they both appear to go into the depot as 8-car and leave some time later as 6-car. Their arrival is shown as "uncoupling" but no symbol for coupling. I don't follow the reasoning for this. Train refomations in depots are usually not recorded in this way. Parsons Green: One each of 4 car M ( M meaning Metropolitan Line stock in this circumstance) H stock ‡ evening; different set † morning - (ditto SE, though 4H M‡ am, not pm.) This is very interesting. This would be Metadyne P Stock, which did work on the District from time to time during the late 1940s, even though no official allocation was recorded. I wonder how they managed stock training. If they uncoupled 4-cars, they must have run as 4+4 car sets. This means they would have been all motor car trains. They must have gone like a rocket! Enormously. Hugely interesting. It's becoming quite a story in it's own right.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 7:31:57 GMT
District Metadyne Stock as D is shewn as allocated/(un)coupling at Cromwell & Triangle, Parsons Green in the 1939 WTT.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 9:21:54 GMT
District Metadyne Stock as D is shewn as allocated/(un)coupling at Cromwell & Triangle, Parsons Green in the 1939 WTT. This would have been because several units of O Stock were first allocated to the District when delivered. They were run as 2-car units to begin with. Four of them (AFAIK) were converted to 3-cars by the addition of a trailer in late '38/early '39.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 12:41:54 GMT
Reading the 1939 WTT over lunch, the 2 + 3, that become 2 (5) are classed as 'S' - 'Old Standard Stock', I think I'll fire up the scanner when I get home.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 13:58:11 GMT
Reading the 1939 WTT over lunch, the 2 + 3, that become 2 (5) are classed as 'S' - 'Old Standard Stock', I think I'll fire up the scanner when I get home. This fits with B Stock, which was referred to as "Standard Wooden Stock" in the 1920s before the rebuilding programme. About 30 cars survived until 1945-6.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 3, 2008 15:53:37 GMT
The B stock would have been on the Putney Line by the war I guess, because they used to be on the Uxbridge/Sth Harrow shuttles until the Picc took over! So it was the B stock we think? Makes sense!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 16:17:29 GMT
*firing up A3 scanner - watch for updates as I add images* Non - WTT interested people look away! I'm going to do some pages of interest from District and Picc WTT 18 (1/5/39); and the District rolling stock working pages from both WTT 18 and WTT 47 (6/5/46). unless anyone's interested in the workings of the Experimental Tube stock on the Picc in 1939 , but that is better in another thread
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 18:02:03 GMT
Right then - some bits of interest - the comments aren't particuarly aimed at you TP, but as I was looking through these WTTs at lunchtime I thought some others might find them entertaining. Apologies if they're really dull. ;D WTT 18 1939 page 59Bakerloo stock to Acton, ex Stonebridge Park, reversing in Earls Court; LMS goods train ex Brent; train 8 uncoupling at Upminster; note the two halves of Met. train M64 a/b following each other to Whitechapel. WTT 18 1939 page 61Bakerloo stock ex-Willesden to Acton, stores train ex-Uxbridge; LMS passenger train to Earls Court ex-Willesden. Note also how far apart in time M67 a/b have become, and M65 b/a have got transposed - they would originally have been Met. trains M65/M67 respectively. WTT 18 1939 page 79First of all look at all the non-stop codes, lower case are for the Picc. Single upper case are for the District west of Aldgate East, double for east of Aldgate East[1]; Train 75 shews that if a non-stopped station appears on the galley the hour figure is supplanted by the appropriate non-stop code: X 45 for Earls Court, EE 15 for Bow Road. Note too the 8 car 8N (1920 stock/tanks/'F' stock) coming off Acton Town as Train 58 at 5.29. This page is also unusual as it is one of three or four in the many thousands of Dizzie&Pick WTT pages that I have shewing a Met train to New Cross and New Cross Gate on the same page. WTT 18 1939 page 81Nothing exceptional on this page, apart from a timetabled move off the Met to Surrey Docks, most odd. This merits further research. Anyway, enough pro. tem. I'll get on with the stock working pages and put them up in a bit. Enjoy! [1] whenever I see the phrase 'East of Aldgate East' I'm always reminded for whatever reason of the fillum 'Krakatoa, East of Java'
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 18:04:55 GMT
*firing up A3 scanner - watch for updates as I add images* I will Anyone interested in rolling stock history must be interested in WTTs as they can tell you so much about how the trains were used. That's brilliant. Thank you. It may help me understand some of the more odd operations carried out on the District over the years. This will all go into my new DR Rolling Stock history articles. Yes. But another thread when there's time. I'm too old for multi-tasking.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 18:25:47 GMT
Just got the scans. Wonderful. They are very interesting and I need time to digest them. I am intrigued by the odd DR 3-car set running around. I think I know the answer but I need time to think about it.
I'll be back! *off to have supper and digest scans - No I'm not eating them!*
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 19:40:24 GMT
WTT 18 1939 page 63One I forgot! Note that there are 2 DR 3 cars sculling about: trains 23, 54; plus a 2 car 48. Of particular interest is Train 105. Returning Bakerloo stock from Acton, running in service Turnham Green - Earls Court, see the ¶ footnote.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 20:17:33 GMT
WTT 18 scan p59:
Train 7 (5N) - What does the N mean? It could be New stock (O Stock) which was on the District in 1939.
Train 8 (6) - I thought they put the number of cars the train lost in brackets when uncoupling so it would have 6 (2) in the no of cars column. Did I misunderstand?
The Putney-Edgware Rd shuttles are 2- or 3-car sets. They were probably B Stock. DM-DT or DM-T-DM. I suppose they could couple to 5-car trains for peak hours. Any evidence of this?
The Picc service pattern is interesting. They do Wood Green-Hammersmith, Arnos-Hounslow and Uxbridge-Cockfosters; same as we used to do in the 60s except we reversed at Barons Court instead of Hammersmith. Also, the running time is 37 minutes from Acton Town to Wood Green. Now it's 44 minutes!
The District hasn't changed much either: Ealing-Man Hse (now Tower Hill); Richmond-Upminster and Wimbledon-Barking.
The Met. trains M66a and M66b following each other was not unusual. The Central used to do it. You uncouple 6 cars in the platform at Hammersmith (or elsewhere) and send the train on as two 3-car separate trains until the evening peak when the "a" train waits for the "b" train to catch it up and couple.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 20:26:06 GMT
N is 1920 stock - 'F' stock I presume. 8 (6) - I quote: NUMBER OF CARS When the composition of a train is the same SE and SO the number of cars is only shewn against SE. When a train attaches or detaches cars at an intermediate station the number of cars before and after the alterations are shewn thus: 8 (6) Rolling stock working coming up within the hour. I'll have a look at the Putneys to-morrow.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 20:44:58 GMT
WTT 18 1939 page 63One I forgot! Note that there are 2 DR 3 cars sculling about: trains 23, 54; plus a 2 car 48. Of particular interest is Train 105. Returning Bakerloo stock from Acton, running in service Turnham Green - Earls Court, see the ¶ footnote. p 59 has Trains 56, 23, 54 as 3-car and 46 as 2-car. Looking at the running times, there were 8 trains running a 6 minute service on the "Putney Locals" as they were called. They would need 22 cars to run this. There were over 30 B Stock cars available at this time.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 20:48:42 GMT
N is 1920 stock - 'F' stock I presume. 8 (6) - I quote: NUMBER OF CARS When the composition of a train is the same SE and SO the number of cars is only shewn against SE. When a train attaches or detaches cars at an intermediate station the number of cars before and after the alterations are shewn thus: 8 (6) Ah..gotcha! Thank you My notes in the previous post give my latest thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 20:59:07 GMT
WTT 18 1939 page 63Of particular interest is Train 105. Returning Bakerloo stock from Acton, running in service Turnham Green - Earls Court, see the ¶ footnote. Not in service. The note says empty Bakerloo stock. The interesting thing is the routing through Acton siding to the EB Picc then over to the District just east of Turnham Green. The southernmost Acton siding was originally double ended.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 21:08:17 GMT
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 21:11:38 GMT
Not in service. The note says empty Bakerloo stock. The interesting thing is the routing through Acton siding to the EB Picc then over to the District just east of Turnham Green. The southernmost Acton siding was originally double ended. Ah. Of course, pays to read the small print - I was going on the column header which only has ¶ instead of Ety..
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Oct 3, 2008 21:17:07 GMT
then over to the District just east of Turnham Green. Was that the connection which I recall from say the late 1960s was an electrified 'fifth line' connecting the EB Picc to the EB District (EB Fast to Local), which I believe was used by the Midland Coal Trains via the unelectrified lines that went under the WB Local and Fast flyover?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 21:24:12 GMT
WTT 18 p 61:
I wonder if the swapping of the Mets form a/b to b/a was because units went to the ELL and back. Maybe they reversed at Aldgate at times.
What is interesting about this page is Train 10 reversing at Bow Road and a Picc reversing at S Harrow. It is difficult to see a pattern to the services.
WTT 18 p 63:
Train 33 couples at PG - 4(6) as you explained.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 21:25:13 GMT
*EDIT* - To Oracle:
Pass - I don't even remember much of the 1970s ;D
I suspect so - I think I've got a note somewhere, but it'll be buried within one of the 150-odd timetables within the District areas of the WTT library.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 21:35:08 GMT
WTT 18 p 61: I wonder if the swapping of the Mets form a/b to b/a was because units went to the ELL and back. Maybe they reversed at Aldgate at times. Looking at Met WTT 65 (28/11/38), that might very well be the case with a/b|b/a swapping; however, thinking about it there isn't a clear cut pattern, because in this WTT a/b trains would couple at Whitechapel ELL - and generally stay east of St. Mary's Curve. However, I've got the matching District WTT to this Met. one - would you like the rolling stock workings for WTT 17?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 21:46:04 GMT
Parsons Green: One each of 4 car M (M meaning Metropolitan Line stock in this circumstance) H stock ‡ evening; different set † morning - (ditto SE, though 4HM‡ am, not pm.) We have codes for: D = Metadyne stock S = Old standard stock N = 1920 (F) Stock M = Metropolitan? If so, which type? It's not Metadyne so what else could it be?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 21:48:23 GMT
WTT 18 p 61: I wonder if the swapping of the Mets form a/b to b/a was because units went to the ELL and back. Maybe they reversed at Aldgate at times. Looking at Met WTT 65 (28/11/38), that might very well be the case with a/b|b/a swapping; however, thinking about it there isn't a clear cut pattern, because in this WTT a/b trains would couple at Whitechapel ELL - and generally stay east of St. Mary's Curve. However, I've got the matching District WTT to this Met. one - would you like the rolling stock workings for WTT 17? Yes please. I am trying to work out certain patterns to see how they managed the service and the stock.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 21:48:57 GMT
then over to the District just east of Turnham Green. Was that the connection which I recall from say the late 1960s was an electrified 'fifth line' connecting the EB Picc to the EB District (EB Fast to Local), which I believe was used by the Midland Coal Trains via the unelectrified lines that went under the WB Local and Fast flyover? Yes.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 21:54:53 GMT
We have codes for: D = Metadyne stock S = Old standard stock N = 1920 (F) Stock M = Metropolitan? If so, which type? It's not Metadyne so what else could it be? That I don't know - as this is from a District WTT - things might become clearer when I scan WTT 17 - I'll do Met 65/66 as well (even though you've got them in paper copy). 'M' means a couple of things in the District WTTs - against train number = Metropolitan, against number of cars - composed of two main portions.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 3, 2008 21:59:08 GMT
Parsons Green: One each of 4 car M (M meaning Metropolitan Line stock in this circumstance) H stock ‡ evening; different set † morning - (ditto SE, though 4HM‡ am, not pm.) We have codes for: D = Metadyne stock S = Old standard stock N = 1920 (F) Stock M = Metropolitan? If so, which type? It's not Metadyne so what else could it be? I don't think the M code = Metropolitan. It is only used for east end portions. All other codes apply to both portions. Is there anything in the WTT notes to give us a clue as to what the M means? *yawns - off to bed now*
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 3, 2008 22:24:24 GMT
The quote about the positioning of the M was from WTT 18 preamble. My apologies, I should have made that clear - sorry. Currently exercising thoughts on the Bow Road reversers, which I'd forgotten about... More anon (as I'm a bit of a night owl, you may have something further to read in the morning). Bow Road reversers, approximately every 10 minutes from 10.31 (at BR) until 3.34. Ignoring the Circle and Edgware Road services, plus the Barking/Upminsters, after a very crude overview it is either a Bow Road or Mansion House reverser slotted in between the Upminster/Barking services [1]. Turnback time is generally 8 or 9 minutes, very occasionally less. Largely ex-Richmond services that turnback at Bow Road, rarely an Ealing or Wimbledon (they seem to be Mansion House). Perhaps a further analysis is needed - I'm not sure how I'd perform this on one of these computery things - as there are so many variables to consider: point of origin before turnback or point of destination after turnback? Hmmmm. *puts thinking cap on* [1] I'm also ignoring all Whitechapel terminators, because in the 1939 WTT these are all of Met. origin. (unless in the analysis these are akin to imaginary numbers, you put them in and then take them out again)
|
|