metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 7, 2008 23:00:41 GMT
They shouldn't be in any cars! If you provide a space for wheelchair users thats fine but one must remember the other punters! The transverse seats should have been removed during the refurb! I like them-the only comfy seats on the train.....
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jun 8, 2008 16:01:51 GMT
They probably didn't change the seating layout in the 67s and 72s because it would cost too much, and it wasn't the best refurb either. They don't even have end windows!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2008 16:38:08 GMT
The 1967/72 body shell didn't have enough strength to have the end windows cut.
|
|
|
Post by 100andthirty on Jun 8, 2008 19:59:26 GMT
One unit had the centre section seat layouts changed. But it was a real compromise and didn't bring the benefits that were seen on the Piccadilly line. Unfortulately there was nowhere else to put the Safety Box, Auto Driver Box and batteries.
As to end windows; Victoria Line was the first refurb, and end windows weren't thought of 'till after the programme was set, and a lot of design had been done to relocate equipment to the car ends. The bodies would have been strong enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2008 20:21:23 GMT
Apologies, I must have misinterpreted something I read. The lights on the bulkhead are a nice touch though Wasn't the 67ts car with the altered seating a trial for the Piccadilly Line's refurbishment?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 8, 2008 22:45:00 GMT
Yes I believe so. I heard the end bulkheads weren't strong enough too!
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jun 9, 2008 1:02:58 GMT
They shouldn't be in any cars! If you provide a space for wheelchair users thats fine but one must remember the other punters! The transverse seats should have been removed during the refurb! I like them-the only comfy seats on the train..... They have considered other punters, hence why there are tip up seats in the wheelchair space.
|
|
|
Post by maxtube on Jun 9, 2008 13:32:48 GMT
The lights on the bulkhead are a nice touch though Agreed! They look awesome!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 9, 2008 16:58:48 GMT
They shouldn't be in any cars! If you provide a space for wheelchair users thats fine but one must remember the other punters! The transverse seats should have been removed during the refurb! I like them-the only comfy seats on the train..... They have considered other punters, hence why there are tip up seats in the wheelchair space. I don't have a problem with the seating-simply the silly partitions that stick out. The same is true of the S stock-but don't get me started on them! I too like the end lights although perhaps end windows could have looked better!
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jun 9, 2008 17:57:09 GMT
Didn't the last 67TS to be refurbished have dark ggrey on the ends of the cars (like the 73, 92, 95 and 96TS, as well as a different interior layout? The grey ends must have looked weird as 67TS doesn't have end windows. I actually think the lights in the ends were a good idea for the Victoria, because as the line's all in tunnel, what is there to see outside (no I don't think they shouldn't have any windows, like the C&SLR carraiges ), and the lights make the interior a bit brighter.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 9, 2008 21:27:21 GMT
Fair shout, the Bakerloo is mostly below ground too! There are photos of the 67ts car in the Picc trial end colours somewhere on the forum!
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Jul 3, 2008 22:59:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Jul 3, 2008 23:15:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pgb on Jul 4, 2008 6:51:12 GMT
Was this an experimental layout? I think it was. Its unit 3176(?) and may have been the first to have the digital announcements on it. If I'm right, it was an experimental design as a sort of prototype for the Piccadilly refurbishment. Of course, I could be wrong!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2008 7:11:56 GMT
This was the prototype refurb, which was carried out at Vic Berry's in Leicester in 1990.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Jul 4, 2008 10:34:02 GMT
This was the prototype refurb, which was carried out at Vic Berry's in Leicester in 1990. Thanks for the explanation. I got in the car this week, thought "this looks different" how come I don't recall this layout? Am I imagining things?". In a way they ruined the 67TS when they painted them. Before that they were still almost graffiti-free with shiny black painted roofs, all very space-age and 1960s as the Vic Line project was. Remember the trains and stations were both designed under the control of Misha Black and the LT Design Panel. Trains unpainted and 'silver' just like the Apollo rockets (or should that be Bluestreak or Skybolt missles?) and controlled by 'robots' (well, almost), escalators which could run faster once a passenger had boarded and been detected by a 'magic eye' (again, very 1960s) and new-fangled AFC barriers and yellow tickets. Even if the grey tiles didn't stay on the walls for too long, platforms clearly showed a common and integrated look with facilities placed in the head- or tailwall, discreet ATO b&w CCTV and none of the jumble of barriers and monitors installed since. Note also the internally illuminated platform roundels (some still work!) and the metal staff letter boxes and associated former fire bucket (which were a natty rectangular shape) cabinets, both designed as a matching suite. Original Victoria Line finishes are steadily disappearing, enjoy them while you can, with Pimlico (1972) probably the most complete example. The only Underground line built as a single design concept.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2008 10:53:04 GMT
I agree with you totally there. I remember seeing that prototype re-furb at Morden Depot open day in 1990 and thinking 'Yuk!'. I thought that the worst bits were the vinyl flooring and the curved partitions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2008 10:56:20 GMT
I'd disagree. I like curves of the 67TS refurbishments. The car end lights are a nice touch too.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jul 4, 2008 12:39:49 GMT
This was the prototype refurb, which was carried out at Vic Berry's in Leicester in 1990. I went to Leicester to see it with a party led by Denis Tunnicliffe (former LU MD). We did want to put in end windows and it was structurally possible but there was a lot of wiring and piping to move. It pushed the price beyond reasonableness so we dropped it and put in the end lights instead.
|
|
|
Post by maxtube on Jul 25, 2008 11:38:00 GMT
Original Victoria Line finishes are steadily disappearing, enjoy them while you can, with Pimlico (1972) probably the most complete example. The only Underground line built as a single design concept. I hope that they keep the tiling designs on the walls of the stations behind the benches, they are nice.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jul 25, 2008 15:47:26 GMT
It's sad, the 67 stock will probably end up in Vic Berrys!
|
|
|
Post by maxtube on Jul 26, 2008 20:43:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Jul 29, 2008 15:37:01 GMT
I had the misfortune (for the first time ever) to be trying to get on a Victoria line train at Victoria yesterday at about 9am - believe me, it wasn't funny - I had to let 3 trains go before I could get on one, and that was with the station CSAs closing the station for short periods to relieve congestion.
Will the 09 stock actually have a greater capacity in terms of how many people can fit on a train or in terms of line capacity with fewer gaps between trains (which already seemed only about 60 seconds) - or is it purely and simply newer and more reliable stock?
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jul 29, 2008 15:55:52 GMT
The 09TS is bigger (it can't use the connection to the Piccadilly at Finsbury Park), and has wider doors and more standing room whith tip-up seats, so I think it will have a greater capacity in terms of how many people can fit on a train. There are 43 trains of 67TS. 47 trains of 09TS have been ordered, and they plan to run up to 43 in service, so there should be fewer gaps between trains as well.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jul 29, 2008 16:21:02 GMT
The 09TS is bigger (it can't use the connection to the Piccadilly at Finsbury Park), and has wider doors and more standing room whith tip-up seats, so I think it will have a greater capacity in terms of how many people can fit on a train. There are 43 trains of 67TS. 47 trains of 09TS have been ordered, and they plan to run up to 43 in service, so there should be fewer gaps between trains as well. I'm sure that the results of last year's gauging test runs, were that they cold fit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2008 17:28:49 GMT
I'm sure that the results of last year's guaging test runs, were that they cold fit. At a significantly reduced speed or could the new Picc stock be this larger size?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2008 18:40:16 GMT
IIRC I read somewhere that the new trains were to be delivered to Ruislip and transferred by rail to Northumberland Park, which would obviously need them to use the Finsbury Park connection.
|
|