metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 12, 2008 19:11:20 GMT
Ha ha ha! Fair play!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 19:19:44 GMT
As you can see from the previous posts on other threads the S stock is just one big secret.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,348
|
Post by Colin on Jun 12, 2008 22:25:13 GMT
The plan now seems to be to run through services to London. The TfL page which was linked to in that blog seems to have been misread/misunderstood by the author of the said blog, which appears to have now mislead you and probably many others...... Yes there's now a proposal to have Chesham trains running through to Central London - BUT....... Only during off-peak hours! The peak time shuttle continues (as implied by the linked T fL announcement which states there are no changes to peak service patterns). I'd be interested to know why the author of the said blog thinks this is directly linked to the introduction of S stock - if you're gonna make statements like that, it would help if they knew things as fact rather than having a guess ........
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 12, 2008 22:36:08 GMT
At a guess, I would presume the issue with the bay road at Chalfont and fixed block trains prompted the debate?
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 12, 2008 22:39:21 GMT
Peak time shuttle? Aren't there two through trains per peak anyway?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 12, 2008 22:41:54 GMT
Yes, but not in either side of them!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2008 7:14:11 GMT
This is what the TfL site says on the matter:
This implies the diversion of the two Amershams throughout the day. If this is the case where is the need for the shuttle as the peak service will form part of the 2tph Chesham service. Another point being that TfL are funding extra cars for Chiltern on the provision that Chiltern enhance their peak formations to cater for any reduction in Met peak capacity especially when the S stock comes into traffic..
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,348
|
Post by Colin on Jun 13, 2008 10:40:23 GMT
If this is the case where is the need for the shuttle as the peak service will form part of the 2tph Chesham service. Have another look at the TfL page, specifically the bit which says: Now given that there are just two through trains in each peak period, and that the morning peak is generally considered to last two hours (0730-0930) & the evening peak three hours (1630-1930)........that leads me to conclude that some form of shuttle must still be required.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 13, 2008 12:09:00 GMT
Could it not be refering to the peak-time-only services though? There seems a bit of ambiguity on this!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2008 12:58:00 GMT
As the peak service is already 2tph and they appear to be offering 2tph throughout the day. Possibly the peak service is part of the proposed service after all this won't change the service for Chesham. This may also indicate that the service will be at an even 30" interval throughout the day and enable the Met to go over to a 15" repeating cycle of services. They are always talking of increasing services. Also the mention of trains through to the city is this a prelude to through Aldgate services off peak.
To clarify the last sentence, this means other than Uxbridge services.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Jun 13, 2008 13:57:22 GMT
Also the mention of trains through to the city is this a prelude to through Aldgate services off peak. There already are to/from Uxbridge. So I guess if these additional through trains to the City would be from Watford, Amersham, or Chesham?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 13, 2008 18:31:00 GMT
I was very upset when Amersham/Watford trains ceased to serve Aldgate off peak-but it does make the service more reliable! I like the current service pattern! I hope the 4tph stays with Amersham and Chesham gets an extra 2tph.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,348
|
Post by Colin on Jun 13, 2008 22:16:14 GMT
There seems a bit of ambiguity on this! Indeed - all will become clear no doubt; after all, what's the betting the proposal will happen regardless of whatever feedback T fL get? (me, cynical? Never! ;D ;D) Might have been clearer if they'd just said here's the new timetable.....what d'ya think?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 14, 2008 0:13:07 GMT
I agree, very much so Colin!
|
|
|
Post by amershamsi on Jun 14, 2008 2:13:46 GMT
The proposed changes (as far as I can see) are to make the off-peak service pattern slightly better than the peak one (1 train every 30, rather than 34 minutes). The peak for Amersham and Chesham is when the through trains run, at least in terms of service pattern - seems stupid to have 4tph/2tph shuttle in the 'shoulder peak' of outside through Chesham running when you only will have 2tph/2tph in the peak - the same as off-peak. One guesses that, as through Cheshams happen at the height of the peak (in terms of flow) that the shuttle won't run - that the peak would be made of about 2tph to each location (and 1tph on Chiltern to Amersham) and the off peak would be made up of about 2tph to each location (and 2tph on Chiltern to Amersham).
While most of the interpeak (when DCGS kicks out is a busy time) at Amersham can cope with 2tph on the Met (though Chiltern won't like the move, due to it putting more passengers on it's trains). The only problem is that Amersham is 5 times busier than Chesham between the peaks - so the 5x capacity of double the amount of Mets, that are twice the length (4x Chesham capacity) plus the 2 chilterns (~1x Chesham capacity) that currently exists meets the demand of the two stations proportionately.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2008 14:54:22 GMT
While most of the interpeak (when DCGS kicks out is a busy time) at Amersham can cope with 2tph on the Met ( though Chiltern won't like the move, due to it putting more passengers on it's trains). Maybe after TfL has bought the extra stock for Chiltern, to enhance their capacity over the Met, they won't mind so much. You never bite the hand that feeds you!
|
|
|
Post by cetacean on Jun 14, 2008 15:27:17 GMT
What's the source for TfL buying Chiltern stock? It's not really their job and I haven't heard it anywhere else.
As far as I can tell the only reduction in capacity is between Amersham and Chalfont & Latimer. I can't imagine the trains are full on this stretch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2008 19:03:48 GMT
What's the source for TfL buying Chiltern stock? It's not really their job and I haven't heard it anywhere else. As far as I can tell the only reduction in capacity is between Amersham and Chalfont & Latimer. I can't imagine the trains are full on this stretch. Whilst they push ahead with the provision of new Standard Stock for SSL there is a desire to placate the voracious season ticket holders of the Met & GC Joint. A fair amount of money is paid into the coffers that will buy these new trains and the season ticket holders still like a seat for their journey. As a means TfL are planning to help Chiltern with extra stock. It is likely that a high proportion will switch to Chiltern pushing the numbers up on their services. This proposal for Chesham appears to be the first stage to a general change in service provision.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 16, 2008 11:05:06 GMT
If they ever decide to revert back to a shuttle, and the Croxley Link is built, an Overground diesel unit could be substituted, perhaps?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2008 16:05:19 GMT
If they ever decide to revert back to a shuttle, and the Croxley Link is built, an Overground diesel unit could be substituted, perhaps? What about the switchable 3rd / 4th rail version of the class 378 (Ha Ha) or the clas 165 from Aylesbury or perish the thought S Staock!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 17, 2008 16:10:00 GMT
S stock couldn't use the bay platform as an 8car
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 17, 2008 16:30:21 GMT
Refurbish another class 121?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2008 17:14:22 GMT
S stock couldn't use the bay platform as an 8car The pevious link did actually refer to the Croxley link (pie in the sky maybe) but that would infer a through Watford Jcn to Chesham service.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 17, 2008 18:06:14 GMT
Ah fair enough, I only ment it as a point to allow easy transfer of a unit.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jun 17, 2008 19:50:07 GMT
Couldn't the S stock run to Rickmansworth and reverse there?
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Jun 17, 2008 23:25:47 GMT
Running through to Ricky would combine the disadvantages of the shuttle with the risk of delays from the flat junction at Chalfont and Latimer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2008 8:20:01 GMT
Or go the whole hog and have trains do this:
Baker Street - Watford - Baker Street Baker Street - Watford Watford - North Curve - Chesham Chesham - North Curve - Watford Watford - Baker Street Baker Street - Watford - Baker Street
(you get the idea)
Send a train round every half and hour, also with the Cheshams getting roped in with the Watfords you could have some sort of direct service all day, even if it is longer. Be a nice run I think though.
EDIT: Just read page five of this thread and see that a similar idea has already been mentioned!!! Never mind.............
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 18, 2008 16:14:05 GMT
When 4 rails stopped at Rickmansworth, didn't the pattern go City-Watford-Rickmansworth-City, or somthing similar?
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 24, 2008 5:29:02 GMT
One might be interested to know that I tried to order the Chesham consultation leaflet from TfL today, ABBey 1234, but they hadn'y heard of it; neither had the real time new people...Very strange.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2008 5:46:53 GMT
One might be interested to know that I tried to order the Chesham consultation leaflet from TfL today, ABBey 1234, but they hadn'y heard of it; neither had the real time new people...Very strange. Plenty in the leaflet rack at Amersham so help yourself! It gives no further info than the press release and looks like a cut & paste exercise on a PC.
|
|