|
Post by spsmiler on Jul 28, 2017 19:58:01 GMT
This is fantastic news. Hopefully there will be a crowdfunding event too. I'll be more than happy to chip in with a few notes. I thought there had already been one, but could be wrong. It would be great if during the Steam On The Met event in September 2017 some Q stock cars were on display somewhere to help raise awareness of / attract extra funding for their refurbishment. This was done for the Met's bogie stock in 2000, so there is a precedent for this type of demonstration. Perhaps though rather than Rickmansworth (where I suspect that the bay platform would not be long enough and also no longer has any track) the bay at Chalfont & Latimer could be used (if that still exists). Simon
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Jul 29, 2017 8:24:39 GMT
R stock had motor alternators, COP had motor generators. The Q stock didn't have either, everything worked off line voltage.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 29, 2017 9:49:42 GMT
COP had motor generators. I remember that you'd hardly notice the MGs were running normally under load, unless the Guard switched off the car-lighting, then the MG would run up and increase in volume.
|
|
|
Post by christopher125 on Oct 7, 2017 0:31:04 GMT
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 7, 2017 8:50:55 GMT
Thanks for sharing this. Very interesting and hopefully I'll be travelling on them in a few years!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Oct 7, 2017 17:09:20 GMT
Very exciting!
I made a post on that page adding a few historical details which I would very much like to see included in the project. These are a Metropolitan Line route map and that the trailer donated by the LURS was originally a 1st / 3rd composite and it would be wonderful if they included signage in this car which shows this.
I think that no-one bar the most die-hard purists will be upset because the lighting (and some other) circuits which were originally set at line voltage will now be energised at 50v.
Simon
|
|
|
Post by patrickb on Jul 17, 2018 16:57:01 GMT
It's become apparent from both within and outside the forum that the redundant A60 Stock Rail Adhesion Car 6110 will be given a new lease of life running as a generator car for the Q Stock. There hasn't been a progress report from the LTM Friends page for a while but hopefully we'll get some more information soon as I'd like to know how they plan to incorporate 6110 with the existing arrangement without making it stand out too much. The exterior profile will be noticeably different against the Q38s but should blend in better with the Q35 and Q23's wider box profiles. EDIT: A60 Trailer for Q Stock project is 6110, not 6036. All that's left to ask is, will 6110 be re-classed as a Q60 Trailer?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 17, 2018 17:03:17 GMT
It's become apparent from both within and outside the forum that the redundant A60 Stock Rail Adhesion Car 6036 will be given a new lease of life running as a generator car for the Q Stock I’m afraid you’re mistaken, 6036 has already departed for scrap. 6110 is the LTM intended car for the Q Stock project.
|
|
|
Post by patrickb on Jul 17, 2018 17:19:47 GMT
It's become apparent from both within and outside the forum that the redundant A60 Stock Rail Adhesion Car 6036 will be given a new lease of life running as a generator car for the Q Stock I’m afraid you’re mistaken, 6036 has already departed for scrap. 6110 is the LTM intended car for the Q Stock project. Oh my. Looks like I got myself mixed up. When was 6036 taken away then? Until now, I thought 6110 went away with rest of 5110 + 5111.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 17, 2018 17:50:52 GMT
When was 6036 taken away then? 18 April 2018 link
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2018 16:00:47 GMT
Its still a 'might' not will. Its down to cost whether they will end up going ahead with the conversion or not. Hospital type generators are not cheap.
|
|
|
Post by patrickb on Jul 18, 2018 19:10:12 GMT
Thanks. My understanding is that the original plan involved salvaging electrical equipment from the A Stock to help power the Q38 cars and have the two plus Q35 car run unaided. I take it this is no longer practical?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 18, 2018 21:04:19 GMT
Thanks. My understanding is that the original plan involved salvaging electrical equipment from the A Stock to help power the Q38 cars and have the two plus Q35 car run unaided. I take it this is no longer practical? That is still the intention. Posted earlier by luacton is the idea to use the converted A Stock with generator for non-LU track running, thereby providing the traction voltage to power the motors.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:28:46 GMT
Thanks. My understanding is that the original plan involved salvaging electrical equipment from the A Stock to help power the Q38 cars and have the two plus Q35 car run unaided. I take it this is no longer practical? That is still the intention. Posted earlier by luacton is the idea to use the converted A Stock with generator for non-LU track running, thereby providing the traction voltage to power the motors. spot on.
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Jul 23, 2018 8:50:46 GMT
Thanks. My understanding is that the original plan involved salvaging electrical equipment from the A Stock to help power the Q38 cars and have the two plus Q35 car run unaided. I take it this is no longer practical? That is still the intention. Posted earlier by luacton is the idea to use the converted A Stock with generator for non-LU track running, thereby providing the traction voltage to power the motors. Without wishing to flog a dead horse I thought of a while back (well, OK, I am...) Presumably there will be a lot of space in there (relatively speaking). Can they put all the gubbins in there needed for the various new signalling systems in use. Also, can it be made de-couplable from the Q-stock - then it can be used as a more widely-used thing in case there is anything else self-propelled that needs to go across the surface networks. and if you keep the traction motors in it, you could run it up the quieter ends of the met and sell tea-towels to commuters between trains
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 9:49:34 GMT
It’s a trailer car isn’t it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 15:28:02 GMT
That is still the intention. Posted earlier by luacton is the idea to use the converted A Stock with generator for non-LU track running, thereby providing the traction voltage to power the motors. Without wishing to flog a dead horse I thought of a while back (well, OK, I am...) Presumably there will be a lot of space in there (relatively speaking). Can they put all the gubbins in there needed for the various new signalling systems in use. Also, can it be made de-couplable from the Q-stock - then it can be used as a more widely-used thing in case there is anything else self-propelled that needs to go across the surface networks. and if you keep the traction motors in it, you could run it up the quieter ends of the met and sell tea-towels to commuters between trains While that sounds ideal, it would not work. Whatever train it would be working with would have to have pipework amended to allow an 'electronic' dump of air in a spad case. The cabs would need indication panels, mode selection switches, and being heritage stock (which never works so well with new signalling), test department would need easy access to isolation points to get the train moving again as quick as possible if something happened.
|
|
|
Post by fish7373 on Jul 23, 2018 17:09:46 GMT
When all the new signalling fitted on the underground there will be no heritage trains running on the underground the Q STOCK to run on non LUL lines with a generator car to say Enjoy while it lasts to say PS Luacton not to sure what you are saying and part signalling with the AIT dumped
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2018 0:05:43 GMT
The fast lines North of Harrow will have convential signalling with CBTC laid over the top, this has to happen to run the Chilterns
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Jul 24, 2018 13:33:28 GMT
The fast lines North of Harrow will have convential signalling with CBTC laid over the top, this has to happen to run the Chilterns Other way round for the Met Main (and Uxbridge branch for the Picc) - CBTC will be underlaid to provide the core train separation functionality with colour light signalling then overlaid for the Chilterns and Piccs - this is where the blue aspects will be provided and will only be for communicating trains. The CBTC overlay is for the Richmond and Wimbledon branches - here the existing NR signalling will continue to provide the core train separation, passing this information to the in cab displays but broadly still running as a fixed-block railway. At least, that's the theory...
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jul 24, 2018 17:49:52 GMT
Other way round for the Met Main (and Uxbridge branch for the Picc) - CBTC will be underlaid to provide the core train separation functionality with colour light signalling then overlaid for the Chilterns and Piccs - this is where the blue aspects will be provided and will only be for communicating trains. The CBTC overlay is for the Richmond and Wimbledon branches - here the existing NR signalling will continue to provide the core train separation, passing this information to the in cab displays but broadly still running as a fixed-block railway. At least, that's the theory... I accept that this is less sexy and not the hi-tech system that LU wants, but it will probably be cheaper and easier to just switch to manual driving. And (as I am led to believe) at the present time reducing costs is important. Also, this will help train driver's retain their driving skills and keep license up to date. Simon
|
|
|
Post by patrickb on Jul 24, 2018 18:52:06 GMT
Other way round for the Met Main (and Uxbridge branch for the Picc) - CBTC will be underlaid to provide the core train separation functionality with colour light signalling then overlaid for the Chilterns and Piccs - this is where the blue aspects will be provided and will only be for communicating trains. The CBTC overlay is for the Richmond and Wimbledon branches - here the existing NR signalling will continue to provide the core train separation, passing this information to the in cab displays but broadly still running as a fixed-block railway. At least, that's the theory... I accept that this is less sexy and not the hi-tech system that LU wants, but it will probably be cheaper and easier to just switch to manual driving. And (as I am led to believe) at the present time reducing costs is important. Also, this will help train driver's retain their driving skills and keep license up to date. Simon Which in a way is always good for retaining knowledge imho. Sadly I wish the same could be said for a majority of ATO lines (with the exception of the Victoria Line which can only work in ATO). Most Central Line drivers adhere to the practise of PM (Protected Manual) on Sundays. The same can't be said for the Jubilee and Northern Lines though. The worst offenders are Night Tube ops across the whole network. (Piccadilly Line exempt). Going back to topic though, hopefully heritage runs will remain achievable with block signalling whether it's underlain or overlaid to Seltrac on the SSL. It's unclear if the Q Stock will be compatible though, lets hope that it can still run before ATO is live on the District Line.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 24, 2018 20:22:09 GMT
Heritage runs will still be possible under possessions, whatever the signalling. However this may not be possible in practice due to the massive disruption that would occur.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2018 20:22:11 GMT
I accept that this is less sexy and not the hi-tech system that LU wants, but it will probably be cheaper and easier to just switch to manual driving. And (as I am led to believe) at the present time reducing costs is important. Also, this will help train driver's retain their driving skills and keep license up to date. Simon Which in a way is always good for retaining knowledge imho. Sadly I wish the same could be said for a majority of ATO lines (with the exception of the Victoria Line which can only work in ATO). Most Central Line drivers adhere to the practise of PM (Protected Manual) on Sundays. The same can't be said for the Jubilee and Northern Lines though. The worst offenders are Night Tube ops across the whole network. (Piccadilly Line exempt). Going back to topic though, hopefully heritage runs will remain achievable with block signalling whether it's underlain or overlaid to Seltrac on the SSL. It's unclear if the Q Stock will be compatible though, lets hope that it can still run before ATO is live on the District Line.
The Victoria line cannot only work in ATO, manual is very much available.
On the Central they call it Coded Manual, not Protected Manual
|
|
|
Post by patrickb on Jul 24, 2018 21:15:33 GMT
What's the best way to address all modes of manual operation across all ATO lines without making a long winded response?
My understanding was that drivers were limited to Restricted Manual on the Victoria Line. Or is that no longer the case with the new signalling?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2018 21:50:11 GMT
What's the best way to address all modes of manual operation across all ATO lines without making a long winded response? My understanding was that drivers were limited to Restricted Manual on the Victoria Line. Or is that no longer the case with the new signalling?
With the old signalling, coded manual was available, but due to technical limitations, speed was restricted to 25 mph.
That restriction is gone with the new signalling. Trains can be driven at full speed in what is now called Protected Manual
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Jul 24, 2018 22:02:28 GMT
What's the best way to address all modes of manual operation across all ATO lines without making a long winded response? My understanding was that drivers were limited to Restricted Manual on the Victoria Line. Or is that no longer the case with the new signalling?
With the old signalling, coded manual was available, but due to technical limitations, speed was restricted to 25 mph.
That restriction is gone with the new signalling. Trains can be driven at full speed in what is now called Protected Manual
It rarely happens now that there's a full end-to-end service however. Unlike Seltrac there's fewer limitations to prevent trains from keeping time, but most drivers don't have the experience/confidence to drive as well as the computer. One slow train would kill 36tph instantly.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jul 25, 2018 10:52:17 GMT
What's the best way to address all modes of manual operation across all ATO lines without making a long winded response? How about Manual?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2018 16:06:03 GMT
When all the new signalling fitted on the underground there will be no heritage trains running on the underground the Q STOCK to run on non LUL lines with a generator car to say Enjoy while it lasts to say PS Luacton not to sure what you are saying and part signalling with the AIT dumped Not quite sure which part you mean, but fitting a 'box of tricks' which could easily be transferred between different heritage stocks would not be so easy. The actual equipment is fairly bulky, plus adding on all the 'permanent' additions the various pieces of heritage stock would need makes the whole idea very impractical. One of the more expensive jobs is making a train 'profile' so the signalling understands what the train is able to do and how large a braking gap you need. At present only the 38ts is planned to be fitted, but the q stock will as well if funding permits. The q stock generator wagon is still just an idea, and the budget is what will be the main factor for whether it happens or not. The q stock is being done to run on the underground, and any external running will just be a bonus.
|
|
|
Post by patrickb on Jul 25, 2018 16:28:30 GMT
What's the best way to address all modes of manual operation across all ATO lines without making a long winded response? How about Manual? That's what I though, but then I would be told that there different types of manual operation.
|
|