|
Post by stapler on Feb 1, 2016 22:33:15 GMT
Rather thin PR IMO. Not much detail on individual components of the work. Lowering a couple of platforms by a foot doesn't seem the biggest project in the world! Or indeed raising the A1 bridge....
|
|
|
Post by dazz285 on Feb 1, 2016 22:53:23 GMT
Cheers snoggle for the info.. Amazing that I work for Lorol & have to get my info from here rather from my own company..
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Feb 2, 2016 0:20:32 GMT
Rather thin PR IMO. Not much detail on individual components of the work. Lowering a couple of platforms by a foot doesn't seem the biggest project in the world! Or indeed raising the A1 bridge.... Shall I drop Network Rail a line and ask them to take all the information down then?
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 2, 2016 8:34:57 GMT
No, let it remain there, FWIW!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Feb 2, 2016 22:49:43 GMT
PR video music is nauseating, isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 3, 2016 17:21:51 GMT
Track access charges though should I think be cheaper for EMUs than DMUs, but by how much I have no clue. Not necessarily - although it may depend on axle loading it may also depend on the number of those axles! Network Rail also charges for electric trains also take into account the electricity they use - and diesel fuel is cheap at the moment.
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Feb 3, 2016 19:08:02 GMT
Answering a couple of points made earlier, any change of rolling stock is dependant on what is available from the easing companies and the requirements of the TOCs. Also, staff traction knowledge, so any stock change will involve training a large number of drivers for stock that may only be on a line for a few months. By the time everyone is gained, it's gone somewhere else! There's a similar debate going on in other fora about future use of the 442 Bournemouth units.
All I know about the upgrade is that I earn a bit out of it by driving buses for Dean Sullivan at weekends replacing the trains on this line, and that the traffic in the whole area is horrendous. One day last November 1 hr 5 minutes to get from the bus stand in Barking, to Barking station, to the roundabout by the North Circular, less than 2 miles. 1 round trip and ran out of drive time!
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Feb 3, 2016 19:33:39 GMT
All I know about the upgrade is that I earn a bit out of it by driving buses for Dean Sullivan at weekends replacing the trains on this line, and that the traffic in the whole area is horrendous. One day last November 1 hr 5 minutes to get from the bus stand in Barking, to Barking station, to the roundabout by the North Circular, less than 2 miles. 1 round trip and ran out of drive time! Welcome to East London at the weekends!
|
|
|
Post by phil on Feb 3, 2016 19:53:38 GMT
Take your point wkiller,but I think the doctrine that those in authority (engineers, bankers, politicians....)know best can be a dangerous one.... Engineers are good at Engineering which is exactly what you want to happen and it is not unnatural for them to be not so good at other things. bankers (should in theory) be good at finances and ensuring the engineers don't get carried away. However they make lousy engineers so should curb any tendency to get involved in any engineering themselves. Politicans are usually rubbish at absolutely everything except politics - mainly because they have relatively little experience in the areas they are expected to oversee. This is particularly evident with those aiming for high office, who spend a long time studying politics and social sciences at University, followed by a brief period working in a media organisation before ingratiating themselves into the party machine. Germanys top politician had a long career as chemical research scientist before turning to Politics - we haven't got anyone in the UK that comes close to it. Instead our political scene is dominated by Lawers, accountants and career Politicans - none of whom seem to have any genuine understanding of good solid practical stuff - be it science, engineering, healthcare, social care, etc.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 3, 2016 20:35:18 GMT
Germanys top politician had a long career as chemical research scientist before turning to Politics. I seem to recall that there was a British Prime Minister who had been a research chemist before she entered politics. As for leaving engineering to the engineers and PR to the publicists - quite so, but the press office should check with the enginers that what they've said is factually accurate. (I work at the interface between engineering and the law - I wouldn't go to court without a both a technical expert and a barrister, - and I have to act as interpreter between them!)
|
|
Dom K
Global Moderator
The future is bright
Posts: 1,831
|
Post by Dom K on Feb 3, 2016 20:42:46 GMT
Although fascinating, we are heading off topic. Can we get back to GOBLIN electrification. We can discuss the off topic in another thread, provided the politics doesn't become opinionated, which would result in a thread lock!
I personally am looking forward to the electrifying of this line as its been a long time coming! Of course the extra capacity will be eaten up pretty quickly!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 3, 2016 21:05:07 GMT
The 172s were the first real improvement it had had for decades, .... Hard to believe, I know, but when they arrived in 2000, the 150s were a step-change improvement over the clapped-out first generation units. And, further back in time, the diversion to Gospel Oak in 1981 coincided with a doubling of frequency to a heady 2tph! What next - a return to St Pancras, as a branch of Thameslink?
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Feb 3, 2016 23:44:30 GMT
St Pancras would need more platforms! In theory Thameslink would be a good idea, but the risk of importing delays from the Thameslink route could lead to tears.
Simon
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Feb 4, 2016 10:53:59 GMT
Ahem, this isn't a RIPAS thread, thank you.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 4, 2016 14:29:32 GMT
<<Hard to believe, I know, but when they arrived in 2000, the 150s were a step-change improvement over the clapped-out first generation units. And, further back in time, the diversion to Gospel Oak in 1981 coincided with a doubling of frequency to a heady 2tph! >>
It used to be quite fun heading out east on a WR "heritage" unit belching out black smoke as it passed the MR box at Leytonstone. Westward Ho!! The 150s were an improvement, but the 172s were a revolution!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Feb 7, 2016 23:23:05 GMT
<<Hard to believe, I know, but when they arrived in 2000, the 150s were a step-change improvement over the clapped-out first generation units. And, further back in time, the diversion to Gospel Oak in 1981 coincided with a doubling of frequency to a heady 2tph! >> It used to be quite fun heading out east on a WR "heritage" unit belching out black smoke as it passed the MR box at Leytonstone. Westward Ho!! The 150s were an improvement, but the 172s were a revolution! If I had known then what I know now I'd have videotaped the class 117s on this route somewhere. Alas, all I have are a few still images from Barking. Simon
|
|
|
Post by patstonuk on Feb 8, 2016 16:24:14 GMT
<<Hard to believe, I know, but when they arrived in 2000, the 150s were a step-change improvement over the clapped-out first generation units. And, further back in time, the diversion to Gospel Oak in 1981 coincided with a doubling of frequency to a heady 2tph! >> It used to be quite fun heading out east on a WR "heritage" unit belching out black smoke as it passed the MR box at Leytonstone. Westward Ho!! The 150s were an improvement, but the 172s were a revolution! I'm taking a particular interest in this thread as for a while in 1959/1960 I lived in Forest Gate - in a house a mere hundred yards or so from this line between Leytonstone High Road and Wanstead Park stations and from where I could see and identify most trains passing over the arches. Imagine my surprise when reading the quoted post and noting the use of 'Westward Ho!' - the village which I visited this morning, a mere mile or so from where I now sit at home typing. Wonderful coincidence!
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 8, 2016 16:44:07 GMT
I've just been googling Leytonstone High Road for something else - if you then click on images, you will get several of cl 117s and 31s in the station/going over the bridge. There's also a nice pic of the wagon hoist.
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Feb 8, 2016 17:43:00 GMT
Will c2c services still have access for at least some parts of the 8 month closure to run to/from Liverpool Street, or will everything run to/from Fenchurch Street?
|
|
|
Post by jukes on Feb 8, 2016 17:59:59 GMT
Will c2c services still have access for at least some parts of the 8 month closure to run to/from Liverpool Street, or will everything run to/from Fenchurch Street? Yes they will. The section between Barking Tilbury Line Junction and Woodgrange Park Junc is already electrified and will not require much work.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Feb 12, 2016 9:44:57 GMT
I see the TfL track closures page now recognises the GOBLIN blockade from June onwards. However it says the entire line is closed rather than Barking to South Tottenham which is what I thought the plan was!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2016 13:07:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Feb 12, 2016 13:59:51 GMT
An interesting take, but from somebody who doesn't really know the full picture. In no particular order:
Because an overnight possession is about 5 hours long. Looking at Upper Holloway, the last passenger train is at ~0030, the first train at ~0530. 5 Hours is not long at all, when you take into account that you will need to have about an hour either side for gaining access, moving to the worksites, and doing small menial things like waiting for machinery to warm up and come into action. That gives you 3 hours of work, which isn't all that much when you are having to pile and install masts to a relatively high level of accuracy. Not only that, but the NLL isn't exactly deserted at night, there are still quite a few trains running, almost certainly too many to also fit more trains in.
They do have many innovative solutions, like overhead conductor bars, but I don't see how they would be of any benefit to GOBLIN. GOBLIN is a relatively simple electrification job, easily doable with the series 2 equipment, as fitted to the Chat Moss line.
IPEMUs are still very much a young technology at this point, they are nowhere near to being used in place of electrification. They certainly couldn't be used over the entirety of the GOBLIN
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Feb 12, 2016 14:53:02 GMT
Something else this article doesn't take account of is that some EMUs are being cascaded to c2c/Essex Thameside in an attempt to offset that operator's woeful handling of implementing a new timetable last December before it had the necessary extra trains. Any cascaded trains will need to be trains that re available for at least 3 and a half years, probably even longer.
Also, another reason why freight trains can't be diverted via the North London line is that there is no longer a way of getting from Channelsea Junction to Forest Gate Junction, as the required crossovers from down fast to down electric/up electric to up fast have either already been, or will shortly be removed. Even if there was, you would still need Woodgrange Park to Barking open in order for said freight trains to operate.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 12, 2016 19:38:07 GMT
Sawb, why do freight trains ex LT&S have to run at night anyway? There are surely not that many of them per day. And if the GEML crossovers are still there, as I think they are, why can they not be kept until 2018?
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Feb 12, 2016 21:49:52 GMT
Yawn. The last thing anyone needs now is armchair experts saying that the work should stop so their own bright ideas are used instead. Let's just get the work done and the new trains here ASAP. It's a right old pain for 8 months and then we're done with it (yes I know the new trains arrive later). And what relevance has producing software for oil rigs got to do with rebuilding a railway across London? He'll be pronouncing on brain surgery, cancer treatments and dentistry next.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 13, 2016 8:04:48 GMT
Snoggle, it all depends whether you're an engineering apparatchick or someone who uses the line. The Walthamstow blockade at 3 weeks was one thing, months on end is quite different
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Feb 13, 2016 8:09:04 GMT
Snoggle, it all depends whether you're an engineering apparatchick or someone who uses the line. The Walthamstow blockade at 3 weeks was one thing, months on end is quite different the amount of work at Walthamstow is nothing compared to what is required to electrify this line.
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Feb 13, 2016 8:41:33 GMT
Sawb, why do freight trains ex LT&S have to run at night anyway? There are surely not that many of them per day. And if the GEML crossovers are still there, as I think they are, why can they not be kept until 2018? I'm afraid I don't have the answer to either of those questions, other than to say we're talking about Network Fail here, who at times couldn't organise a brewery!
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 13, 2016 9:29:58 GMT
To which, amen!
|
|