|
Post by allan60 on Apr 9, 2012 14:58:55 GMT
Hi, As we draw closer to the end of A stock's in service, there still is a question unanswered. How many and what are the units that are saved from the scrap yard? There is also rumor that one unit will return to it's pre refurb state for a while before all the A stocks are withdrawn, so is that still the case or has things changed? I heard that 5062/63 would be the unit to be preserved but I would like to see 5096/97 being preserved. What are your thoughts in what unit/s you want saved? Thanks Allan60
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Apr 9, 2012 15:15:15 GMT
I doubt any A stock will run in service in 'silver'. It would be against LULs branding! I believe that 5110 and 5234 will be available for heritage events and perhaps one other unit I have not heard anything regarding 5062. I'm desparately playing the lottery at the moment to try and save 5056!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 15:45:40 GMT
It would not be impossible, nothing is in the railway preservation field is, however it would be a major project to put an A stock back to pre refurb condition, however there is not the time or finance for LUL to do such work. An easier choice would be for LUL to do a silver wrap over with the LONDON TRANSPORT lettering etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 15:47:02 GMT
I think the rumour you have heard about an A-Stock running in it's pre refurb state is exactly that.......a rumour.
We have to remember this is a railway, a commercial railway which is there to move people from A to B. Whilst Tfl have always been good at giving units send offs I think it would be a massive step to start returning an A-Stock to its pre-refurb looks. Aside from the fact it would take an awfully long time it would also cost an awful lot of money which tfl simply do not have.....
Either way I am also playing the lottery and if I win then we will be in A Stock heaven!
|
|
|
Post by allan60 on Apr 9, 2012 16:40:17 GMT
I did think that it would be quite costly to bring a unit back to pre refurb condition, but it would be a sight to see a pre refurb unit arriving at wembley park on a fast service to baker st, for old times sake.
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Apr 9, 2012 16:41:48 GMT
It is likely that the interior would be refreshed in the short term to remove the wear and tear, as well as the err... nasty bits.* Returning to pre-refurbishment would likely be a long term project.
*Can I say the word graffiti on District Dave?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 16:54:18 GMT
I think it would be great for a private collector to consider returning a unit to pre-refurb condition, if only I had the money and space to do something like that! The same goes for the rotting 83ts units at South Harrow - a multi million pound project there! Unfortunately when it comes to preservation trains a lot harder to do as apposed to buses etc due to the cost and space that is needed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 17:19:46 GMT
I think it would be great for a private collector to consider returning a unit to pre-refurb condition, if only I had the money and space to do something like that! The same goes for the rotting 83ts units at South Harrow - a multi million pound project there! Unfortunately when it comes to preservation trains a lot harder to do as apposed to buses etc due to the cost and space that is needed And anything electric does not get the same effort or recources which steam traction enjoys.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 17:30:08 GMT
I did think that it would be quite costly to bring a unit back to pre refurb condition, but it would be a sight to see a pre refurb unit arriving at wembley park on a fast service to baker st, for old times sake. It would be great to see an A stock back to pre refurb and with the guards gangway back in action. I expect that a lot of parts including the interior melamine interiors would have to be remade, as when they went to for refurb no parts were kept, with the view of refitting a preserved A stock in the future. In the early 1990s LUL had the bodywork of one 4 car 1962 stock unit specially cleaned, I believe by blasting with fine glass beads???, and applied with a matt lacquer, which made the unit look fresh out of the factory again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 17:39:35 GMT
Agreed, its disappointing that steam traction gets all the attention. Lovely as steam is – Electric Traction is a major part of the UKs history, and key examples should be saved. Problem is of course powering them.
Many underground trains which were saved, have been allowed to slowly rot away. Witness the recent departure of the Standard Stock stored at Acton, and perhaps the gradual deterioration of the few remaining CP/CO & R stock carriages around the place.
As much I would like to see a complete A stock train saved, we have to accept that this is going to costly in both the long and short term. Obviously anyone who saves one is going to have very deep pockets, a lot of space and the willingness to accept they will probably end up as static museum pieces.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 18:04:47 GMT
Agreed, its disappointing that steam traction gets all the attention. Lovely as steam is – Electric Traction is a major part of the UKs history, and key examples should be saved. Problem is of course powering them. Many underground trains which were saved, have been allowed to slowly rot away. Witness the recent departure of the Standard Stock stored at Acton, and perhaps the gradual deterioration of the few remaining CP/CO & R stock carriages around the place. As much I would like to see a complete A stock train saved, we have to accept that this is going to costly in both the long and short term. Obviously anyone who saves one is going to have very deep pockets, a lot of space and the willingness to accept they will probably end up as static museum pieces. There is the APT up at York which I believe is still sitting outside, when it should be under cover. It is a shame about the CO/CP stock up at Quainton Road, one of the cars up there was a wartime rebuild of 2 bomb damaged cars, cut and shut by Acton Works, made into one new car. Where did the standard stock cars end up going to? It would be great if the static R stock car at the LT museum could be fired up again with 630 volts to hear that unique sound of an R stock's high pitched motor generator whine again.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Apr 9, 2012 18:20:40 GMT
The standards went for scrap!
It is important to protect trains from the elements. Even covers would help in the winter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 19:17:44 GMT
Electric motive power preservation albeit Underground or Network Rail has not faired well over the years. Despite what some may think LU is a shinning light in this area as with have Sarah Siddons the 1938 stock and Acton Depot and it's treasures.
Many of us on this forum would like to see at least a 4-car A Stock unit preserved but how many on this forum would support this financially and manage the ongoing responsibilities and liabilities that preservation entails?
XF
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 19:39:21 GMT
Afaik 5110 & 5234 are the RAT/Heritage trains rolled into one. There may well be another unit kept for heritage purposes but thats just speculation. Look at the bleak future the 67ts had for future use, now look at how many have been saved! Plenty in Eastleigh works for storage not scrappage, 3007 as new Tunnel Cleaning Train, 3067 cleaner training unit and of course 3079 as part of the Asset Inspection Train!
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Apr 9, 2012 19:46:15 GMT
As Dean said above, the problem with electric traction is how to power them. They can't run on their own on preserved lines and can only move using steam/diesel locos, but this is hard with LUL (and modern mainline) stock since the couplings used are different.
If someone did have deep pockets the best way IMHO to preserve the A Stock is to obtain 5 cars, with one car becoming a battery car (like the old MLVs) and that car powers the rest of the train*. Thus, the A stock would be able to trundle along scenic preserved lines gaining a bit of revenue along the way.
*Yes I know making a MLV type car is expensive but I did say deep pockets!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 19:56:04 GMT
Afaik 5110 & 5234 are the RAT/Heritage trains rolled into one. There may well be another unit kept for heritage purposes but thats just speculation. Look at the bleak future the 67ts had for future use, now look at how many have been saved! Plenty in Eastleigh works for storage not scrappage, 3007 as new Tunnel Cleaning Train, 3067 cleaner training unit and of course 3079 as part of the Asset Inspection Train! Don't forgot to mention 3067 as a (short-term?) Pilot unit as well
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 19:59:58 GMT
In the early 1980s when the Epping to Ongar Line was looking at closure there were plans by "preservationists" to run the service with District Line R stock under their own power, which were being withdrawn at the time. However, the users of the line preferred that the service was run by the professionals and so the line remained in operation with LT a little longer.
If a set of A stock went to Ongar it could be pushed hauled by a diesel loco.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 21:24:20 GMT
In the early 1980s when the Epping to Ongar Line was looking at closure there were plans by "preservationists" to run the service with District Line R stock under their own power, which were being withdrawn at the time. However, the users of the line preferred that the service was run by the professionals and so the line remained in operation with LT a little longer. If a set of A stock went to Ongar it could be pushed hauled by a diesel loco. A laudable idea but would it fit in with the ethos of the EOR? None of the rolling stock currently on it has any remote connection to LUL. Having said that, I'd rather see a diesel hauled 62TS which at least had some history with the Epping-Ongar section than A stock which never went anywhere near the place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2012 23:15:30 GMT
Going back to the topic of returning an A stock to 'as built' condition, I'd like to bring up the sailor's pocket knife argument (3 new blades, 2 new handles, still the same knife) It would be all well and good returning an A stock to original condition, but as the majority of the parts would have to be fabricated from new, I feel it would end up losing authenticity as it'd be a new interior based on an old design. Not only that but changes in safety standards would mean some parts would have to be different from the original interiors. You've heard my two cents on this matter now, Goodnight!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2012 2:14:33 GMT
I wholeheartedly agree that at least one set should be preserved in running order for heritage days etc
There is one other factor not yet mentioned in this thread however. The above is all well and good if the unit is saved and run by LU/TfL as it will presumably be kept and maintained on the line (also obviously applies to the Heritage/RAT sets). However, IF a set (or even an individual car) were to be rescued by private individual(s), undercover storage is surely a must - not just for keeping the body and running gear in good order as previously mentioned, but also to protect it against vandals.
I am aware that several preserved buses have suffered or even been totally destroyed because they were left outside or with inadequate security, and unfortunately graffiti artists etc do not generally see preserved transport items as heritage but rather as redundant relics which offer a blank canvas for their activities. I somehow doubt that a privately owned A60/62 could be kept on TfL metals, therefore this issue would also need addressing, and of course this would come at a cost.
Another example of this concerns withdrawn Luxembourg Railways 'Wegman' coaching stock a couple of years back. Observed on a visit, and intact in a yard near the German border on the outward trip - but 'painted' head to toe (including the roofs!) when I returned a week later...
Not trying to pour cold water on a good idea, just being realistic...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2012 2:30:04 GMT
As Dean said above, the problem with electric traction is how to power them. They can't run on their own on preserved lines and can only move using steam/diesel locos, but this is hard with LUL (and modern mainline) stock since the couplings used are different. If someone did have deep pockets the best way IMHO to preserve the A Stock is to obtain 5 cars, with one car becoming a battery car (like the old MLVs) and that car powers the rest of the train*. Thus, the A stock would be able to trundle along scenic preserved lines gaining a bit of revenue along the way. *Yes I know making a MLV type car is expensive but I did say deep pockets! If one had deep pockets to preserve an A stock, I expect an arrangement could be struck to run it on the Old Dalby Test Track.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Apr 10, 2012 4:43:37 GMT
its whats underneath the current paint and the condition of it.the graffiti damage in some cases was bad, and a valid point mentioned before any attempt to remove could weaken the structure.
its hard to see these ever being returned to the original finish,it would be time consuming/expensive and may well be impractical,just hope for the best and as many as possible survive.once their gone their gone and that's it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2012 6:58:50 GMT
I can't see why returning one of the Heritage/RAT trains back to unpainted would be so difficult. Surely its just a good go over with paint remover (the 'artists' seem to be able to write a badly spelt version of their name in unpainted aluminium) and a good sanding down to get rid of remaining bits of paint will do the job?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2012 16:13:24 GMT
Because bud as already said this is Tfl and whilst they are actually quite good at preserving certain items of stock it is the cost, time and effort required to do it.
As already stated this is a railway company - a company which needs to turn a profit, a company which at the minute is facing a massive cut in funding due to the economic downturn whilst still needing to provide a good service to the public - as a result of this things what we want such as a nice A Stock in unpainted livery just is not going to happen.
We need to be greatful that there will be any working units preserved at all. Look at the old Vic line stock - As far as I am aware we have one "preserved" cab end at Acton and some others which are in storage with their fate unknown. I am sure if Tfl had the money, time and space we would have seen a full train saved, preserved, full restored and sheltered from vandals to be used on an ad-hoc railtour/heritage service but as said, unfortunately, tfl have bigger things to worry about....
I'm sorry to sound so negative but we need to be realistic here..
|
|
|
Post by christopher125 on Apr 11, 2012 0:32:56 GMT
There is the APT up at York which I believe is still sitting outside, when it should be under cover. I believe the NRM's gas turbine ATP is undercover at Shildon, the other is Crewe Heritage Centre's and is kept outside. Regarding the preservation and operation of units, dont forget that the Cravens group have several trains on LU property including one undercover at Northfields, so it can be done. Indeed, next year should see quite a few privately owned preserved loco's and carriages out and about. Chris
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Apr 11, 2012 0:33:10 GMT
In defence, I feel that the A Stock deserves recognition, regardless of the car numbers eventually chosen. This time is a good opportunity to lay the foundations for the first 4-car working sub-surface heritage train at the very least.
I understand that austerity is the hot topic at present but I feel that cost saving measures and crucial upgrades should not come at a cost of transport history. It is important that future generations should be able to feel what it is like to travel like we did up until recently. For now though, the focus should be on the storage and maintenance of at least one unit of A60/62 Stock, in working condition in anticipation of eventual restoration.
I feel that TfL does have the money and courage to preserve and eventually restore a unit of A60/62 Stock.
I admit that I do sound optimistic but great achievements such as the 1938 Stock have happened before. It can happen again.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Apr 11, 2012 2:02:05 GMT
that's a little cheesy for a preserved units.if this is dispensing sand its certainly going to be filthy,look at the final chesham shuttle train and many others' in photographs at the time.
thats another point also,until the chesham shuttle is reliably run in winter and the recent points problem the A stock has other purposes.ie one at the ready.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Apr 11, 2012 6:15:40 GMT
Remember that the RAT trains are 5 cars so only the Sandite dispensing trailer will get dirty inside. I think the aim was to remove the middle car 'off season' and have two four car units available for events.
If A stock is not preserved now in working order it won't happen at all. Something needs to be done!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2012 7:25:22 GMT
that's a little cheesy for a preserved units.if this is dispensing sand its certainly going to be filthy,look at the final chesham shuttle train and many others' in photographs at the time. thats another point also,until the chesham shuttle is reliably run in winter and the recent points problem the A stock has other purposes.ie one at the ready. If operating a railtour, they will obviously be cleaned beforehand! I agree its not the best situation but it's better than nothing And like Metman said, the Sandite car will be removed also and re-inserted when Autumn calls
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2012 10:15:40 GMT
There is the APT up at York which I believe is still sitting outside, when it should be under cover. I believe the NRM's gas turbine ATP is undercover at Shildon, the other is Crewe Heritage Centre's and is kept outside. Regarding the preservation and operation of units, dont forget that the Cravens group have several trains on LU property including one undercover at Northfields, so it can be done. Indeed, next year should see quite a few privately owned preserved loco's and carriages out and about. Chris The APT vehicle (APT-P Motor Coach) that was outside at Shildon moved to the Electric Railway Museum last year. Since when work has started on restoring the Bodywork.
|
|