Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2012 10:18:36 GMT
If A stock is not preserved now in working order it won't happen at all. Something needs to be done! People I talked to in TFL seem to rule out vehicles going to private owners. Let alone preserving one that operational. Unless someone know a way around all the rules they have in place.
|
|
neilw
now that's what I call a garden railway
Posts: 284
|
Post by neilw on Apr 11, 2012 11:36:02 GMT
It believe it was done by soda-blasting, which is what I did to my 62TS, as shown here in a sort of before and after shot..... Quite a messy process, but the initial results are good. It uses bi-carbonate of soda at about 2,000 psi. After a few years, the paint leeches back through, so I recently investigated wrapping it with vinyls of nicely oxidised aluminium. Not only was this very expensive, I haven't been able to get a good match for the colour. It is a very strange material, oxidised aluminium, and far from as suggested earlier in the thread, not at all easy to restore to"unrefurbished". I know CHT have the same dilemma with their 62TS set. Restoring the inside has been easier for me, but the "bird's eye maple melamine" at the guard's panel has proved tricky! As for the "shovel" lampshades on the emergency lights, well...........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2012 12:31:26 GMT
Neilw - Is that your very own 62ts in your back garden?
*Mods* - without wishing to go too far off topic would it be ok for some pictures of the above to be posted? We are after all talking about preserved trains and by the looks of it there is a fine example above! That is of course if you wouldnt mind Neil?
Just to add, sorry if you have posted them in the past - I will have more than likely missed it!!
|
|
neilw
now that's what I call a garden railway
Posts: 284
|
Post by neilw on Apr 11, 2012 13:02:42 GMT
Hi, yes it's my very own 62TS, car 1677. There have been pictures on here from time to time, I'll try to do a montage when I get a minute. Playing trains at 12"/ft scale is certainly challenging....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2012 15:30:08 GMT
Brilliant! Look forward to it bud!
Sticking with the preservation theme here can I ask how you came about it, how difficult it was to purchase and did u get it straight from Tfl?
|
|
neilw
now that's what I call a garden railway
Posts: 284
|
Post by neilw on Apr 11, 2012 16:00:45 GMT
It's a long..........story, I'll pm you!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2012 12:03:21 GMT
If A stock is not preserved now in working order it won't happen at all. Something needs to be done! People I talked to in TFL seem to rule out vehicles going to private owners. Let alone preserving one that operational. Unless someone know a way around all the rules they have in place. I thought I would do a quick check with Knights Rail Services at Eastleigh. They confirm they are unable to enter into any negotiations with third parties about former LUL rolling stock. So unless they have decided to store 5000 & 6000 then it’s bad luck for all of us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2012 12:09:39 GMT
For those of you au fait with Paris will know that near Versailles, Sprague stock is operated on special occasions on non-electrified track, with a generator on one of the (trailer, I think?) cars. Having been there, seen it and done it, it is fantastic - all the right sounds still from the motor cars.
So, where there's a will (and loads of money!), there's a way.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Apr 12, 2012 22:03:17 GMT
If A stock is not preserved now in working order it won't happen at all. Something needs to be done! People I talked to in TFL seem to rule out vehicles going to private owners. Let alone preserving one that operational. Unless someone know a way around all the rules they have in place. its a pretty poor excuse.how it can be seen as operational is another matter when its on the back of a transporter is another matter. other stock has been seen to be in private hands,however in some cases that's been scrapped later in some cases.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Apr 12, 2012 22:08:02 GMT
Which is why it needs to be an inside job or someone with a lotto win- I'm trying folks.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 8:55:55 GMT
Which is why it needs to be an inside job or someone with a lotto win- I'm trying folks..... It was quite easy to acquire former LUL rolling stock until quite recently and fairly cheaply. So this is clearly a new change of direction. And I certainly cannot see the reason why they have decided to take this course of action. If someone is willing to save and store an ex LUL train or part of one, then why not offer it for sale? In the 50’s Bus preservation was unheard of – this is why so few examples exist of pre 40’s buses, trolleys & trams. Yes there are other reasons I accept, but preservationists were almost completely unheard of back then. Now it’s quite normal. In fact most of the Routemasters that came off in the last decade found willing homes either in preservation or alternative uses. Very few ended up in the scrap yard. Could it not be conceivable that with the current clear interest in railway memorabilia, that someone - somewhere could find the space to preserve a few carriages? I hardly think it would spoil the contract with the scrap yard as LUL could "on paper" dispose of it to the dealer who then sells it on to the new owner. This happens with main line stock. You can even buy a Diesel Locomotive or DMU with relative ease. In fact Booths offer them for sale on their website. Theres also mention of LUL carrages, but this is currently not the case. As I have said before, I have space here (at South Mimms) and elsewhere where I could store a carriage. For me it would need to have historic interest. So something like 5000 to make it worthwhile. I even went after the carriage we travelled in on the 67 stock tour! But it’s not going to happen unless LUL relax their stance. To highlight how things have changed, in the mid nineties, a 62 stock train was offered for auction by the then LUL Business Manager (and well know Transport author) Mike Horne. It was well advertised - including in the Evening Standard. The train was taken to Moorgate (Met platforms) for public viewing. Sadly on that occasion, there were no takers. However a small handful did get sold on to private preservationists. Part of one 59 stock was also purchased by the Met Police for training. So perhaps the 59/62 stocks are quite well represented outside of LUL. Including the well restored one in Nottinghamshire of course! In addition one operational unit of the 60’s Cravens Stock (inc 38 stock trailer) was also sold to private preservationists, as was a 4 car 62 (for a relatively small sum). And LUL have been extremely generous in allowing these trains to remain on LUL metals. In fact, even a number of the short lived 83 stocks were saved in various guises, one I think as a recording studio in a London hospital, and a group of carriages are in use as offices on old railway land in Shoreditch. With the exception of the 67TS DM to Walthamstow Pump House, it seems LUL have decided not to release any more to private owners. That’s a shame in my view, as I feel that, in the case of the A stock and the 67 stock these are just as worthy of preservation. Yes its going to be a struggle, and some projects will inevitably fall by the wayside. But if they survive they will offer a glimpse at time of rapid change for London Underground. And also random sales give the opportunity that at some point in the future, these carriages to be collected back into one unit and brought back into operational use, if future generations deem it worthy and possible. Lastly in the LT/LRT Act, there is a legal requirement for LBSL/LUL to save items of historical interest for future generations. Its under that remit that the London Transport Museum exists. However its obviously not possible to save every example. Sadly once cut up - there’s no going back.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 9:44:35 GMT
There is just no common sense in this 'our contract says we can't sell this to you etc...' Booths could be making more money by selling a complete carriage to a preservationist than all the scrap metal to a scrap metal dealer.
Talking of the CHT 62ts, are there any plans for that to ever make a comeback on LU metals?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 15:23:14 GMT
There is just no common sense in this 'our contract says we can't sell this to you etc...' Booths could be making more money by selling a complete carriage to a preservationist than all the scrap metal to a scrap metal dealer. Ah yes, but the price of scrap metal makes it a good business to be in these days
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 17:23:55 GMT
@ Dean, a very well worded post mate and one which I completely agree with.
It is honestly such a shame that Tfl seem to not want to allow people the chance to preserve what are absolute icons of the tube.
The 67's and the A's need to be preserved - I just think how sad it is when I see that we only have one of the Prototype HST Power cars left as the other one went to the cutters torch. As I understand it though this unit is now in the care of the "125" group who are looking at returning it to traffic which would just be fantastic!
The same goes for the APT-E - This was left to rot for many years outside the NRM until the APT-E.Org team took it on and spruced it up. It is now under cover at The Railway Age. I just hope that the remaining part of the APT-P at Crewe gets taken undercover sooner or later before it starts to rot.
If only we all had the time, money, effort and space we could be a real movement in preserving an A-Stock (Tfl allowing of course).
I would happily devote my time to something like this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2012 18:32:44 GMT
I wonder if one or more of the London Mayoral candidates might run with this - worth ago ?
XF
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 13, 2012 19:11:01 GMT
There is just no common sense in this 'our contract says we can't sell this to you etc...' Latest Asbestos Regulations may well be relevant here. Might do better with later builds, but of course they wouldn't be A stock
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on Apr 13, 2012 21:39:38 GMT
A thought...I wonder how feasible it would be to take current carriage 5034 (the former 5008), and to attach that to current carriages 6234/6235/5235 (the former 6008/09/5009), and renumber the lot to their original numbers. It'd be double-ended, and a good candidate for preserving, as it was part of the first A60 to run in service...
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Apr 13, 2012 23:14:24 GMT
Yes I'd thought of that too. Also looked at taking 5116-6036-6117-5117 and renumbering it back to 5036-5037 and using the interior of 6036 as a basis.
|
|
neilw
now that's what I call a garden railway
Posts: 284
|
Post by neilw on Apr 16, 2012 10:54:15 GMT
the plan is yes, but quite a bit of work to do yet..........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2012 22:10:12 GMT
Wasn't it in pretty much as withdrawn condition?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2012 7:29:48 GMT
There is just no common sense in this 'our contract says we can't sell this to you etc...' Latest Asbestos Regulations may well be relevant here. Might do better with later builds, but of course they wouldn't be A stock There is very little left on the A stock. It WAS REMOVED in the 1990's refurb.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2012 7:32:18 GMT
Three units are being kept back, two RATs' plus one other. Im sure the other will come as a nice surprise.
They are due for one last heavy overhaul at Acton i believe. The depot has been storing parts for weeks, just for such an event.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2012 9:06:24 GMT
Three units are being kept back, two RATs' plus one other. Im sure the other will come as a nice surprise. They are due for one last heavy overhaul at Acton i believe. The depot has been storing parts for weeks, just for such an event. @undergrounddriver - That's great news - does that mean that the 3rd unit will be retained by the LTM (along the lines of the 38ts) do you think ? - Shame it couldn't have been 5000 - but nonetheless great news to hear that a running example will be retained. ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2012 9:18:39 GMT
Latest Asbestos Regulations may well be relevant here. Might do better with later builds, but of course they wouldn't be A stock There is very little left on the A stock. It WAS REMOVED in the 1990's refurb. What they deem as removed in the 90's is not longer classed as such in many cases. The set that went from neasden couple of years ago had a full check done on it and the list of items with asbestos in is long, from what I heard and the lists I seen.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Apr 17, 2012 12:54:57 GMT
Three units are being kept back, two RATs' plus one other. Im sure the other will come as a nice surprise. They are due for one last heavy overhaul at Acton i believe. The depot has been storing parts for weeks, just for such an event. @undergrounddriver - That's great news - does that mean that the 3rd unit will be retained by the LTM (along the lines of the 38ts) do you think ? - Shame it couldn't have been 5000 - but nonetheless great news to hear that a running example will be retained. ;D ;D From a realistic point of view, the trouble with keeping 5000 as a working unit is that the 'D'-end cab has been a "middle" since OPO, and therefore lacks a lot of equipment necessary to operate the unit on its own with passengers. Of course, if an 8-car train was to be retained that would be a different matter!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2012 14:45:33 GMT
I was told A stock retain it in the roof linings and shed lead connectors.
Keeping a middle end cab would be an opportunity to preserve a pretty much unrefurbished cab.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Apr 17, 2012 14:59:37 GMT
its best left (asbestos) alone in situ,when disturbed or worse cut then the fibers are released.
its a great shame about the loss of 5000,but at least there looks another unit to be saved which is on the positive side.asbestos or not i would be quite happy to continue using the A stock.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Apr 17, 2012 15:13:27 GMT
We are ASSUMING that the reason for the non sale is Asbestos. Are we certain??
IF that is the reason, it is very valid as LU wouldn't want any "comeback" for any future claim for asbestosis. I lost a friend to this awful disease recently, and he is supposed to have got it from working in an asbestos environment for just 3 weeks over 30 years ago when a building he worked in was refurbished.
But is it really the reason that LU won't sell??? If it is, why don't they say so??
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on Apr 17, 2012 17:46:13 GMT
I hope the additional one is 5056 (for Metman's sake).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2012 17:47:25 GMT
The residual asbestos is one of the reasons that I know of for vehicle sales not being allowed (I'm not close enough to the project to know if there are any other reasons).
The condition of the RAT/Heritage units will be 'as withdrawn', but in as good a condition as possible. Exactly what that means depends on what funding becomes available, but having two units primarily for RAT use means that there's a real need to keep them in mechanically good condition, and anything passenger facing that can be sneaked in will be a bonus.
|
|