|
Post by alex92ts on Jan 4, 2012 16:42:34 GMT
Managed to have a ride on an A-stock this morning at around 11.30. Caught 5038 from Kings Cross to Baker Street on an Amersham all stops service. It was filthy inside and out, with severe graffiti, and the carriage I was on had a strong smell of urine. At Great Portland Street, the driver attempted to leave the station but it kept making a sort of popping or banging sound stopping it from leaving. Eventually we managed to leave after about a minute or so, but it was limping along to Baker Street and the engine sounded like it was on its last legs. At Baker Street, the same thing happend, but this time it was stuck there for at least 5 minutes or so. At each attempt to leave it just made the banging sound causing the carriages to jolt severely.
This was probably my last ride on an A stock, and its a bit unfortunate that that will be my last memory of them!
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Jan 4, 2012 17:01:13 GMT
Don't you mean "on it's last wheels"??
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2012 17:28:40 GMT
My not be on its last legs. It could be a loss of pilot light, something that happens if people lean on the doors as happened on New Years Eve!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 18:32:06 GMT
Managed to have a ride on an A-stock this morning at around 11.30. Caught 5038 from Kings Cross to Baker Street on an Amersham all stops service. It was filthy inside and out, with severe graffiti, and the carriage I was on had a strong smell of urine. At Great Portland Street, the driver attempted to leave the station but it kept making a sort of popping or banging sound stopping it from leaving. Eventually we managed to leave after about a minute or so, but it was limping along to Baker Street and the engine sounded like it was on its last legs. At Baker Street, the same thing happend, but this time it was stuck there for at least 5 minutes or so. At each attempt to leave it just made the banging sound causing the carriages to jolt severely. This was probably my last ride on an A stock, and its a bit unfortunate that that will be my last memory of them! 5038 with 5198 was changed over at 1330 today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 20:32:34 GMT
I was on an A Stock the other week and the stench inside was absolutely awful!!
Are the trains cleaned every night? And does anybody know when we say "cleaned" what that actually involves? Is it quite literally a bucket of bleach and a sweeping brush along the floor?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 20:53:43 GMT
Sadly, this seems to be the case for both A stock and C69/77 stock more so. I’ve seen some pretty horrendous examples of exterior paintwork damage on both and manky interiors, its almost like the SSR stock (bar the D's) are returning to early 1990's condition. It makes the Underground look a shambles, shame on LUL for letting them get that way really, the Olympics are taking place in a matter of months and a lot of these trains will still be here in a very bad state indeed.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 4, 2012 21:15:55 GMT
Sadly, this seems to be the case for both A stock and C69/77 stock more so. I’ve seen some pretty horrendous examples of exterior paintwork damage on both and manky interiors, its almost like the SSR stock (bar the D's) are returning to early 1990's condition. It makes the Underground look a shambles, shame on LUL for letting them get that way really, the Olympics are taking place in a matter of months and a lot of these trains will still be here in a very bad state indeed. Yes, although the A's will no doubt be gone, the C's will be around. I agree though, there has been a big deteroration in these trains over the last year or so.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2012 21:50:14 GMT
I'm sure a few A stock will be about for the Olympics. I agree that they are a state. Would never have happened in the old days.....
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 4, 2012 22:01:57 GMT
I'm sure a few A stock will be about for the Olympics. I agree that they are a state. Would never have happened in the old days..... I bet you they won't be around for the Olympics, TFL won't let clapped out 50 year old trains serve the football at Wembley! The S stock delivery will be seriusly ramped up soon, and the A's wll start to disappear pretty quickly.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2012 22:51:55 GMT
There will be a few left for the 150th thankfully.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 4, 2012 22:53:03 GMT
There will be a few left for the 150th thankfully. Yes I'd agree there! Would be a sin if LT's longest serving stock isn't around for that.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2012 22:55:02 GMT
I think there is (hopefully) a decent set of plans for the event. I don't know how many units will be left but hopefully the event ensures a few more will be around than there would usually be.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Jan 5, 2012 5:42:28 GMT
Managed to have a ride on an A-stock this morning at around 11.30. Caught 5038 from Kings Cross to Baker Street on an Amersham all stops service. It was filthy inside and out, with severe graffiti, and the carriage I was on had a strong smell of urine. At Great Portland Street, the driver attempted to leave the station but it kept making a sort of popping or banging sound stopping it from leaving. Eventually we managed to leave after about a minute or so, but it was limping along to Baker Street and the engine sounded like it was on its last legs. At Baker Street, the same thing happend, but this time it was stuck there for at least 5 minutes or so. At each attempt to leave it just made the banging sound causing the carriages to jolt severely. This was probably my last ride on an A stock, and its a bit unfortunate that that will be my last memory of them! the neglect factor has no doubt crept in and there's nothing to say whats being introduced wont be as bad in fifteen years time,and from whats been said if it lasts that long. a long journey require toilet facilities,with these additional stops it equates to the aylesbury service in timescale,and toilets are needed. i wouldn't take a bad impression away its not the train's fault its Tfl.those that remember back over the decades' will recall the A stock has many ups and downs in appearance but the train has always come back and made its mark and held its own,not least recently when reintroduced on the chesham shuttle during a points problem so remember the positives'.
|
|
pitdiver
No longer gainfully employed
Posts: 439
|
Post by pitdiver on Jan 5, 2012 8:04:21 GMT
As the A stock is such an important piece of Underground history lasting as long as it has. Should the LT Museum save a 4 car train, get it restored to it's original condition and run it like the 38ts. Have any members got any thoughts along these lines. (Sorry for the pun)
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Jan 5, 2012 14:12:23 GMT
I believe I have read (probably here in the dim distant past) the intention is to have some S7s running on the Circle/H&C for the Olympics, the cost of this was not completing the S8 delivery for full A-stock replacement by the summer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2012 14:27:12 GMT
Managed to have a ride on an A-stock this morning at around 11.30. Caught 5038 from Kings Cross to Baker Street on an Amersham all stops service. It was filthy inside and out, with severe graffiti, and the carriage I was on had a strong smell of urine. At Great Portland Street, the driver attempted to leave the station but it kept making a sort of popping or banging sound stopping it from leaving. Eventually we managed to leave after about a minute or so, but it was limping along to Baker Street and the engine sounded like it was on its last legs. At Baker Street, the same thing happend, but this time it was stuck there for at least 5 minutes or so. At each attempt to leave it just made the banging sound causing the carriages to jolt severely. This was probably my last ride on an A stock, and its a bit unfortunate that that will be my last memory of them! the neglect factor has no doubt crept in and there's nothing to say whats being introduced wont be as bad in fifteen years time,and from whats been said if it lasts that long. a long journey require toilet facilities,with these additional stops it equates to the aylesbury service in timescale,and toilets are needed.i wouldn't take a bad impression away its not the train's fault its Tfl.those that remember back over the decades' will recall the A stock has many ups and downs in appearance but the train has always come back and made its mark and held its own,not least recently when reintroduced on the chesham shuttle during a points problem so remember the positives'. I really dont agree with that at all. If you cannot hold your bladder for an hour on a train then there must be something wrong. Toilets are not needed on these trains at all. This is a metro system, it is not a long distance railway- (Yes I know we all have our thoughts about the new timetable making it feel like like a long distance trek! ) I'm quite sure the S Stock will serve London and the surrounding areas very well over the coming years. The reason it is having more issues is simple - more technology has been introduced. When the A Stock first came in it had no need for computers and the like, it was a simple piece of machinery which worked. Times have changed and as computers control pretty much everything now this is the result. Good, or bad - They are here to stay........without toilets im afraid ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2012 17:06:46 GMT
I guess if the Underground was flush with money the S Stock would have been built with toilets XF
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 5, 2012 17:59:49 GMT
They might look terrible at the moment, but thats so that people fall for the bait and *think* that they need replacing. Don't confuse 'newest' with 'best'! Considering that the S8s are a segregated fleet anyway, one wonders if, for a fraction of the sum of money spent, the A's could not have been re-engineered yet again. And XF; thats terrible ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Jan 5, 2012 18:14:14 GMT
Don't you just love it when someone travels on ONE set - have a bad experience - then label the entire fleet dog s**t.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2012 18:56:34 GMT
They might look terrible at the moment, but thats so that people fall for the bait and *think* that they need replacing. Don't confuse 'newest' with 'best'! Considering that the S8s are a segregated fleet anyway, one wonders if, for a fraction of the sum of money spent, the A's could not have been re-engineered yet again. And XF; thats terrible ;D ;D Ben do you not think they need replacing then mate? I'm sure it was met control or someone else who was speaking about the A-Stock nearing the end of its structural safety life or something similar a while back, if it was him hopefully he could add a little more to it. Either way, they need to go. A brilliant workhorse, a real classic BUT they are around 50 years old now and no matter how many refurbs you give them, in the end the cracks will start to show.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2012 19:19:29 GMT
They might look terrible at the moment, but thats so that people fall for the bait and *think* that they need replacing. Don't confuse 'newest' with 'best'! Considering that the S8s are a segregated fleet anyway, one wonders if, for a fraction of the sum of money spent, the A's could not have been re-engineered yet again. And XF; thats terrible ;D ;D Ben do you not think they need replacing then mate? I'm sure it was met control or someone else who was speaking about the A-Stock nearing the end of its structural safety life or something similar a while back, if it was him hopefully he could add a little more to it. Either way, they need to go. A brilliant workhorse, a real classic BUT they are around 50 years old now and no matter how many refurbs you give them, in the end the cracks will start to show. This is absolutely right. Don't forget that a reburbish replaces wear items like motors, bearings, fabric etc and then adds new paint. But the time comes when the fundamental structure, like the chassis, will start to crack after many years of constant stress and vibration and then entire structure is likely to fall apart. At that point its time to say goodbye.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 5, 2012 19:38:26 GMT
It would be interesting to get a survey on a few of them from someone like the vintage carriage trust! The bogies have never been any good but the bodies appear quite good, better than the 1967 and C stock.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Jan 5, 2012 20:01:23 GMT
Apparently the S stock deliverys have been stopped at the minute and production will start on the Circle line!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 5, 2012 20:11:19 GMT
Where did you hear this? This was talked about some time ago so there would be some S7s for the Hammersmith and City Line during the Olympics. I heard the idea had been dismissed.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 5, 2012 20:25:00 GMT
Apparently the S stock deliverys have been stopped at the minute and production will start on the Circle line! MetControl mentioned that S stock deliveries are about to resume very shortly, so I can't see any truth in your post. Not saying that you didn't hear it, only that your source is wrong. And in response to an earlier post about the A stock being run down to make them look like they need replacing, the fact is they DO need replacing and fast. The effort that is now going into them to get them to run each day is a large one. It's like some people are still in denial about the A stock going. They'll be gone by the summer - fact. They've given sterling service over the years - fact. I'll miss them as they are the last trains of a great era of LT - fact. They are on their last legs - fact - and for a 50 year old train, that's no disgrace.
|
|
|
Post by eurostarengineer on Jan 5, 2012 21:23:07 GMT
They might look terrible at the moment, but thats so that people fall for the bait and *think* that they need replacing. Don't confuse 'newest' with 'best'! Considering that the S8s are a segregated fleet anyway, one wonders if, for a fraction of the sum of money spent, the A's could not have been re-engineered yet again. And XF; thats terrible ;D ;D Ben do you not think they need replacing then mate? I'm sure it was met control or someone else who was speaking about the A-Stock nearing the end of its structural safety life or something similar a while back, if it was him hopefully he could add a little more to it. Either way, they need to go. A brilliant workhorse, a real classic BUT they are around 50 years old now and no matter how many refurbs you give them, in the end the cracks will start to show. Cracks already started to show last year..... In the auto couplers and bogies. Bahahaha
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2012 22:50:18 GMT
Apparently the S stock deliverys have been stopped at the minute and production will start on the Circle line! MetControl mentioned that S stock deliveries are about to resume very shortly, so I can't see any truth in your post. Not saying that you didn't hear it, only that your source is wrong. And in response to an earlier post about the A stock being run down to make them look like they need replacing, the fact is they DO need replacing and fast. The effort that is now going into them to get them to run each day is a large one.
It's like some people are still in denial about the A stock going. They'll be gone by the summer - fact. They've given sterling service over the years - fact. I'll miss them as they are the last trains of a great era of LT - fact.
They are on their last legs - fact - and for a 50 year old train, that's no disgrace. I completely agree with you mate. There is an awful lot of denial on here in that many people seem to think that the A stock if left will just continue to breeze merrily down the line without any issues - it just wont happen. Just look at the Routemasters in London! They were/are a fantastic, lovely vehicle that gave years of brilliant service to the capital BUT towards the end all you ever saw was the poor things on the back of a recovery truck. Age caught up with them in the end, just like it is with the A-Stock. I'm from Sheffield originally and I remember when we lost the mighty Dennis Dominator from the streets up there, they were a great vehicle but once again they needed to go in the end. They were replaced with bland vehicles BUT for the company they found them cheaper to run and easier (in the long run) to maintain just like LU will do with the S Stock.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 5, 2012 23:58:52 GMT
Just look at the Routemasters in London! They were/are a fantastic, lovely vehicle that gave years of brilliant service to the capital BUT towards the end all you ever saw was the poor things on the back of a recovery truck. I don't recall ever seeing an RM on tow - plenty of more modern buses though. It was elfin safety and a premature response to the DDA which saw them off. (A few of them are still working on routes 9 and 15)
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Jan 6, 2012 6:42:08 GMT
they are but its each to their own.to say changes have been radical is an understatement. the toilets are not going to happen but i did harrow-chesham after a saturday night out and chalfont&latimer was never such a welcome sight ,its hard to see all these additional stations at the time could have been coped with let alone a through train. the s stock is more suited the district line as its already a similar layout,but not the metropolitan line.when criticism arises on a scale something is wrong. the rm did have an incident with fire in 1966 seen here. www.flickr.com/photos/23875695@N06/sets/72157625122669476/detail/ they were nice buses in the 70s on the later 140 and the 52 was a nice ride to victoria,its very sad that these were scrapped in vast numbers with little interest only for scrap in the 1980s,now they are in demand.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Jan 6, 2012 7:30:03 GMT
The 1967 stock was very reliable don't you think? I find older things are better made and built to last a long time I don't know what was the origional design life for the A stocks? The A stock is starting to show its age and I don't think they are bothering maintaining them nor cleaning them properly.
|
|