|
Post by ruislip on Dec 22, 2011 20:15:38 GMT
Has any consideration ever been given to show a direct link between Earls Court and HSK as some D stocks travel over there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2011 16:07:35 GMT
This seems to imply that there is a regular Earls Court - High Street Kensington shuttle service (with D stock) when the Olympia service isn't running.
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Dec 23, 2011 16:38:14 GMT
I thought that, too. Surely the HSK branch (and why not all the way to Edgware Road) should be properly joined up to Earl's Court. This seems to imply that there is a regular Earls Court - High Street Kensington shuttle service (with D stock) when the Olympia service isn't running.
|
|
gantshill
I had to change my profile pic!
Posts: 1,372
|
Post by gantshill on Dec 23, 2011 17:31:03 GMT
Looking at the new District D stock map, I wonder why the whole of the Edgware Road branch is not shown. I know that D stock is not allowed beyond High Street Kensington, but what we have now is not easy to understand when compared with a tube map in a passenger's hand. When the 1960 and 1967 stock was used solely between Hainault and Woodford, the line diagrams were the general Central line ones, not ones just showing the shuttle to which the ATO stock was restricted.
|
|
|
Post by rdm on Dec 23, 2011 17:59:24 GMT
Since there is (or rather, maybe, was) a regular direct service between Ealing Broadway and HSK I have always wondered about the fact that this has not been shewn on the D Stock car maps for some time now.
As I often hop across the platform at Acton Town between Picc and District EB, for points East of Gloucester Road, the HSK service has sometime caught me out, so I now go through to Hammersmith and check the destination shewing on any DR that I overtake en route.
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 23, 2011 18:08:06 GMT
little offtopic, but anyhow; Edgware Road bays need to be lengthened to fit the S7. The S7 is much longer than the D78. Will Edgware Road be able, at some point, to fit the D78, or is it already able to?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Dec 23, 2011 22:21:00 GMT
little offtopic, but anyhow; Edgware Road bays need to be lengthened to fit the S7. The S7 is much longer than the D78. Will Edgware Road be able, at some point, to fit the D78, or is it already able to? Yes, i guess they could berth at Edgware Road (again!*) Although they wouldn't be able to stop at any of the platforms beyond High Street, as D Stock do not have selective door opening. (*= having taken one there in 1990s)
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Dec 23, 2011 23:51:46 GMT
Looking at the new District D stock map, I wonder why the whole of the Edgware Road branch is not shown. I know that D stock is not allowed beyond High Street Kensington, but what we have now is not easy to understand when compared with a tube map in a passenger's hand. When the 1960 and 1967 stock was used solely between Hainault and Woodford, the line diagrams were the general Central line ones, not ones just showing the shuttle to which the ATO stock was restricted. Since the purpose of the car diagrams is to help passangers follow the progress of the train they are on, there is little point in showing Edgware Road on a train that can't go there. In the same way I don't think A stock diagrams ever showed the Hammersmith line. The 1960/67 stock was probably too small a fleet to justify a separate set of car maps.
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Dec 24, 2011 10:14:55 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2011 16:10:57 GMT
The standard UndergrounD map for some years also looped the District Line about Earls Court so as to show no possibility of a through service from West Kensington to High Street Kensington. During the staff consultation/ feedback about the map that omitted the Thames, I wrote to suggest the lines should be reworked to show the West Ken - High Street possibility as enough trains did that, both scheduled and during disruption, to justify it. Much to my surprise, I received an e-mail saying they agreed and it would be incorporated in the next revision, which indeed it was, that became the same layout as today's map. I'm just a touch surprised the in car line diagram was never changed in the same way (perhaps it had been forgotten by the time it was next up for a reprint, or perhaps different people do the line diagrams).
Whilst I follow Edgware Road not being on the D stock Diagram, I have seen enough people looking for it and Paddington and such like on there, thoroughly confused, sure it's on the District Line but unable to work out where or what to do. I don't think there is another line diagram that doesn't show the whole line! In fact i think showing the Circle and H&C on there would also be a bonus given their close connection. The CO and CP stock (and possibly R stock) diagrams whilst showing the District and Circle also showed the Metropolitan (H&C) just between Liverpool Street and Aldgate East, just to make clear that useful link existed.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Dec 24, 2011 16:55:06 GMT
A stock did travel on the ELL but never to Hammersmith or Barking.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Dec 24, 2011 17:44:37 GMT
As mentioned before, A Stock ran to Barking Sidings in connection with training on the ELL, but obviously not in service to the station as has just been said.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Dec 24, 2011 19:10:06 GMT
Whilst I follow Edgware Road not being on the D stock Diagram, I have seen enough people looking for it and Paddington and such like on there, thoroughly confused, sure it's on the District Line but unable to work out where or what to do. At both Earls Court and HSK the line diagram shows interchange for the Edgware Road branch.[/quote] I don't think there is another line diagram that doesn't show the whole line!. C stock diagrams also show a change for the rest of the District at EC. And as has alraedy been said, when the H&C was part of the Met, neither A stock nor C stock showed those parts of the network that they did not serve. The CO and CP stock (and possibly R stock) diagrams whilst showing the District and Circle also showed the Metropolitan (H&C) just between Liverpool Street and Aldgate East, just to make clear that useful link existed. As seen here Surely they showed it for the same reason that C stock diagrams used to show the Tower Hill-Aldgate East link - because some trains work that section in service - mainly to turn trains end for end to even out the wear on the wheels.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Dec 25, 2011 5:37:16 GMT
The CO and CP stock (and possibly R stock) diagrams whilst showing the District and Circle also showed the Metropolitan (H&C) just between Liverpool Street and Aldgate East, just to make clear that useful link existed. Pre-D stocks, did any District trains have car maps with just their line?
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Dec 28, 2011 18:58:33 GMT
Don't understand the alteration made to D stock maps for the EC-OLY section. Why is that shown as a limited service, and suggests a regular service is in operation between EC-HSK?
Would it not make more sense to have OLY-EC-HSK depicted as a restricted/limited service?
I guess that only EC-OLY is shown as limited is because you can travel from WIM/RMD/ELY-UPM and change at EC for a Wimbleware service to Edgware Road.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Dec 28, 2011 19:42:35 GMT
Its tricky on the D stock diagrams because, as implied, there is a regular frequent service under District line branding between HSK and EC, but the D stock doesn't provide it.
I wonder if, instead of the HSK-EC-Oly shuttle being shown as a seperate interchanging route on the D stock line maps it could just be connected at EC with the rest of the line (ie, just moved down a bit). At least that way Oly's dashed line wouldn't look like an odd appendage to an implied regular D stock shuttle between EC and HSK?
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Dec 28, 2011 21:17:04 GMT
Would it not make more sense to have OLY-EC-HSK depicted as a restricted/limited service? I agree that if for some reason they don't want to include the Edgware Road service on D stock maps, they should show all of it as a limited service. Edgware Road - Wimbledon is shown as if it's a separate line, so it would still clearly show a way of getting to HSK. However, it is not clear where the Edgware Road trains start from, as that map suggests they reverse at ECT. The problem is that if you show the services accurately the map becomes messy and can look too complicated for people to quickly understand (especially as the map of the whole system would have to have this and the Picc): But as passengers should get on the first train and change at Earls Court there shouldn't be a problem with not attempting to show separate services at all, just having ECT - OLY as a limited service. That would also mean that if service patterns could be changed after the S7s have replaced all the D stock, (for example Richmond - Edgware Road) then new maps wouldn't be needed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2012 22:30:11 GMT
At both Earls Court and HSK the line diagram shows interchange for the Edgware Road branch. Indeed it does, which isn't much help to the people looking at a map of the District Line expecting to find a District Line station that isn't on there! It would take minimal effort to add the Edgware Road branch after all the map infers it's a map of the District line not a map of where that particular train might go! Surely they showed it for the same reason that C stock diagrams used to show the Tower Hill-Aldgate East link - because some trains work that section in service - mainly to turn trains end for end to even out the wear on the wheels. Well they still do and it's not on there now!!
|
|
|
Post by djlynch on Jan 15, 2012 21:40:45 GMT
At both Earls Court and HSK the line diagram shows interchange for the Edgware Road branch. Indeed it does, which isn't much help to the people looking at a map of the District Line expecting to find a District Line station that isn't on there! It would take minimal effort to add the Edgware Road branch after all the map infers it's a map of the District line not a map of where that particular train might go! It seems like LU needs to develop a way to say "It's the same line, but you (most likely) can't get there without changing trains" on a map. I had the same thought during the thread about how platform diagrams on the western branches of the District show all stations to Upminster even if very few trains from that station actually go that far east.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 16, 2012 15:13:49 GMT
Its an inherent problem with lines composed of many 'services'. The easiest way to deal with it would be a soft brand change to the service (or group of) that is most different to the others. Recolouring the Wimbleware service though seems to have little support!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2012 21:04:00 GMT
Recolouring the Wimbleware service though seems to have little support! Indeed, oft mentioned on here, but no support in LU circles. (and the "Wimbleware" name is something unique to here too.) It could generate more confusion when, like today, the Edgware Road trains were diverting to Mansion House (as they often do). Anyhow, when the SSR is fully worked by S7 stock there would no longer be any reason for the Edgware Road service to originate specifically from Wimbledon, trains could readily originate from any mix of the western branches. Time, of course, will reveal all.... !
|
|
kabsonline
Best SSL Train: S Stock Best Tube Train: 92 Stock
Posts: 686
|
Post by kabsonline on Jan 23, 2012 21:16:15 GMT
I do apologise it this has already been discussed in this thread but I did a quick search and couldn't find it. Just shout at me and direct me in the correct direction if it has already been discussed. I read on Wikipedia that Olympia still receives one District Line train a day Mondays to Fridays due to a certain railway law of having to provide a service a long that route. Is this true and if so what time does it arrive at Olympia and does it return to HSK in public service? kabsonline
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2012 21:35:48 GMT
AFAIK the District, Circle and H&C in-car maps will be identical with the advent of S7s. Three tenths of a full tube map. This will sort out everything above..............
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jan 23, 2012 21:57:30 GMT
I read on Wikipedia that Olympia still receives one District Line train a day Mondays to Fridays due to a certain railway law of having to provide a service a long that route. Is this true and if so what time does it arrive at Olympia and does it return to HSK in public service? I had already posted the times further up this thread, there are morning passenger runs from Olympia, and 2 evening trips: 6 passenger train departures each day M-F: 05.50 (C to ERd) Then the description "about every 8-9 minutes" between 6am-7am is stretching it a bit, with actual departures at: 06.06 (D to HSt) 06.15 (D to HSt) 06.24 (D to HSt) 06.32 (C to ERd), with nothing then until 19.58 (D to HSt) 20.38 (D to HSt) Just 2 passenger arrivals each day M-F: 19.48 (D ex-HSt) 20.28 (D ex-Hst) If an Event required trains to operate M-F then only an approximate 30min service would be provided (to High Street unless annotated) at: 10.28, 10.58, 11.28, 11.58, 12.28, 12.58, 13.28, 13.58, 14.28, 14.58, 15.28, 15.58, 16.33u, 16.49, 17.23e, 17.50, 18.23e, 18.55, 19.23e, 19.58, 20.18, 20.58, 21.28, 21.58, 22.28, 23.00. u= to Upminster e= to Edgware Road Some of these trips are the result of cancelling Wimbledon trains.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jan 23, 2012 22:41:51 GMT
The reference to the 'Parliamentary' requirement probably relates to the need to run at least one passenger service over a route in order to avoid costly/time-consuming closure proceedings. Thus there is the Tuesdays-only 'ghost bus' from Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth Road in place of the withdrawn Cross-Country trains that ran from the ex-GWR through Olympia, then East Croydon to Brighton. It's the connection from the ex-GWR to the West London Line and from the WLL to one of two ways to get to/from East Croydon that were used, near Clapham Junction, that lost their passenger services.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 24, 2012 12:48:59 GMT
If only one service a week is required to comply with the law, well then that is already well covered by the full weekend service which still operates.....
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 17, 2012 16:34:41 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2012 18:38:52 GMT
Is the Saturday service to Olympia worked by C or D stock?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 24, 2012 18:53:11 GMT
Normally D Stock, as was today's service.
|
|