Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 14:11:50 GMT
With almost all of the S8 Stock Trains here, how long until we can expect the last A Stock Train to leave Neasden? Well! it's anyone's guess really, but the idea is as far as I understand that there'll only be 4 trains of A Stock kept back for emergency use during the Olympics and then they will be disposed of in September apart from one A60 double ended unit, which is going to be preserved at Ruislip depot. With all this in mind, the end of A Stock operation in regular daily service can only be a few weeks away, although as far as I know, there's no precise cut off date for this. The last T717 scrap run prior to the Olympics is booked for Monday 25. July. Hope this has at least gone some way to answering your question. Best Wishes Green Lion.
|
|
|
Post by malcolmffc on May 23, 2012 14:46:03 GMT
I wonder what the "S stock withdrawals" thread in 30 years' time will look like.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 15:03:22 GMT
Maybe it will shock everyone and might be in 50 years time? Doubt it though ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 15:30:07 GMT
With almost all of the S8 Stock Trains here, how long until we can expect the last A Stock Train to leave Neasden? Well! it's anyone's guess really, but the idea is as far as I understand that there'll only be 6 trains of A Stock kept back for emergency use during the Olympics and then they will be disposed of in September apart from 5116-5117 which is apparently going to be preserved at Ruislip depot. With all this in mind, the end of A Stock operation in regular daily service can only be a few weeks away, although as far as I know, there's no precise cut off date for this. Hope this has at least gone some way to answering your question. Best Wishes Green Lion. The last A stock should be gone by 25th July, as that is the last date T717 is booked to run.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 15:57:56 GMT
..... but a new Timetable Notice may be issued for anything that is left - after the Olympics
|
|
|
Post by adehare2012 on May 23, 2012 16:08:54 GMT
I've been catching up with this thread and I have to say, and I know there are some that will not like me saying it, but the quicker the A Stock go the better. I know they've done 50 years service. I know they were built like tanks (they definitely sound like one), but thankfully the S Stock are here, and are here to stay. At least with S Stocks, passengers get information about where they are going, rather than being left to work it out for themselves when the train doesn't go where you think it is at Harrow on the Hill, and you end up in North Harrow instead of on the way to Uxbridge. Give these trains a good send off, they probably do deserve it after all this time, but they are yesterday's engineering, yesterdays technology and definitely a bygone era. Bye bye A Stocks, BIG HELLO S Stocks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 16:41:16 GMT
I've been catching up with this thread and I have to say, and I know there are some that will not like me saying it, but the quicker the A Stock go the better. I know they've done 50 years service. I know they were built like tanks (they definitely sound like one), but thankfully the S Stock are here, and are here to stay. At least with S Stocks, passengers get information about where they are going, rather than being left to work it out for themselves when the train doesn't go where you think it is at Harrow on the Hill, and you end up in North Harrow instead of on the way to Uxbridge. Hi There! You are of course entitled to your opinion and whilst I am a die-hard A Stock fan, I do also like the S Stock a great deal. As a totally blind person though, I must admit that I've never got lost on A Stock after over 20 years of independent travel on them. In recent years, since the introduction of audio announcements on LU rolling stock, many Met drivers (but certainly not all) have been far more vocal on the PA giving out passenger information about the train destination etc. to compensate for the lack of audible announcements. Admittedly due to the state of repair of some of the PA systems, these driver announcements varied from very clear and coherent information, to the same thing but broadcast at deafening high volume, through to crackling and broken up audio, but nevertheless the effort was being made!. With regards to your problem about knowing where your train is going northbound when you reach HOTH, please use the following rule of thumb which has stood me in good stead for many years. If the doors open on the left hand side of the train (in direction of travel) then you're on platform 4 bound for West Harrow, Rayners Lane and Uxbridge. If the doors open on the right then you're either on platform 1 or more likely platform 3 these days bound for North Harrow, Moor Park, Amersham/Chesham/Watford. Of course there are always exceptions to this rule in times of service disruption etc. and if you're not facing the direction of travel, then you need to reverse this rule. Finally might I say that the audible announcements on modern LU rolling stock are not entirely fail safe. I still get on trains where the announcements are either barely audible, are not working at all or are giving out incorrect information, so you still need to have some idea where you are and where you're going. Well! enough said for now me thinks, but happy and safe travelling to all!. Best Wishes Green Lion.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 23, 2012 17:53:44 GMT
Just to ask - what consideration do we show these trains? Hold a funeral service as each one is scrapped? Get flowers? It's a train for heaven's sake. There are people who are starving in the world, dying of diseases, being persecuted etc. Put things into perspective! I daresay you'll be the one wearing black on the final day of the A stock in a few weeks time . . . What a mature way of responding to a post... If you'd see the point I was trying to get across you'll see I was just trying to raise the point of the significance of these trains. Did I mention for one second we should keep ever one of them and start becoming emotionally attached to them? no. My point was that these trains are a great piece of engineering and a few should be kept. For instance they could be learnt from as a way of building new stock in the future. I would really appreciate it if you actually responded to it with something with substance rather than writing a load of over the top rubbish about "having a funeral for a train" Superteacher - I really do apologise for ranting away like that but I just think some of your post was a bit uncalled for that's all. Actually it wasn't your post that I had the issue with - it was Redsetter who then quoted your post. Are you going to say the same thing about Redsetter about making constructive posts?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 18:13:04 GMT
Are you going to say the same thing about Redsetter about making constructive posts? Ah yes sorry about that, I just thought you were addressing my post because the quote was left in that’s all. The mentality Redsetter raises of rejecting the notion that units shouldn't to be scrapped, is backward. And indeed it is being done for a reason (well where else are they going to be useful at their age other than soft drinks cans) letting sentimentality get in the way of the fact these trains are mechanically had their day is certainly not very constructive, I agree. But as a compromise we've still got to keep at least a unit or two, not just for their centimental value but the fact they are very unique trains of an excellent design.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 23, 2012 18:31:04 GMT
Are you going to say the same thing about Redsetter about making constructive posts? Ah yes sorry about that, I just thought you were addressing my post because the quote was left in that’s all. The mentality Redsetter raises of rejecting the notion that units shouldn't to be scrapped, is backward. And indeed it is being done for a reason (well where else are they going to be useful at their age other than soft drinks cans) letting sentimentality get in the way of the fact these trains are mechanically had their day is certainly not very constructive, I agree. But as a compromise we've still got to keep at least a unit or two, not just for their centimental value but the fact they are very unique trains of an excellent design. No worries. :)Totally agree about preserving a few of the A's.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on May 23, 2012 18:42:19 GMT
sometimes you have to go backwards to go forward.
|
|
|
Post by adehare2012 on May 23, 2012 18:45:21 GMT
I've been catching up with this thread and I have to say, and I know there are some that will not like me saying it, but the quicker the A Stock go the better. I know they've done 50 years service. I know they were built like tanks (they definitely sound like one), but thankfully the S Stock are here, and are here to stay. At least with S Stocks, passengers get information about where they are going, rather than being left to work it out for themselves when the train doesn't go where you think it is at Harrow on the Hill, and you end up in North Harrow instead of on the way to Uxbridge. Hi There! You are of course entitled to your opinion and whilst I am a die-hard A Stock fan, I do also like the S Stock a great deal. As a totally blind person though, I must admit that I've never got lost on A Stock after over 20 years of independent travel on them. In recent years, since the introduction of audio announcements on LU rolling stock, many Met drivers (but certainly not all) have been far more vocal on the PA giving out passenger information about the train destination etc. to compensate for the lack of audible announcements. Admittedly due to the state of repair of some of the PA systems, these driver announcements varied from very clear and coherent information, to the same thing but broadcast at deafening high volume, through to crackling and broken up audio, but nevertheless the effort was being made!. With regards to your problem about knowing where your train is going northbound when you reach HOTH, please use the following rule of thumb which has stood me in good stead for many years. If the doors open on the left hand side of the train (in direction of travel) then you're on platform 4 bound for West Harrow, Rayners Lane and Uxbridge. If the doors open on the right then you're either on platform 1 or more likely platform 3 these days bound for North Harrow, Moor Park, Amersham/Chesham/Watford. Of course there are always exceptions to this rule in times of service disruption etc. and if you're not facing the direction of travel, then you need to reverse this rule. Finally might I say that the audible announcements on modern LU rolling stock are not entirely fail safe. I still get on trains where the announcements are either barely audible, are not working at all or are giving out incorrect information, so you still need to have some idea where you are and where you're going. Well! enough said for now me thinks, but happy and safe travelling to all!. Best Wishes Green Lion. Hi there. You have this A Stock business down to a much finer art than me, though I can see just about as much as you I'm afraid, so I do sympathise. I hadn't worked out that bit at Harrow, I think because I'm not up there often enough these days, but its definitely something for me to bear in mind when I do next go through on a trip to good old Ruislip. I wonder if my experience with drivers on A Stocks never saying anything at Aldgate is down to them not having time between getting in the cab and having to leave Aldgate, seeing as trains never ever seem to hang around long there. More haste less speed me thinks, What will be interesting is to see how good it is when the S Stocks take over the Circle, Hammersmith and city and District. Its easy to tell the trains apart at the moment from the motors, but once they are all the same, well, that's another thread
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2012 19:06:34 GMT
I like a good argument but let's be honest here. We live in times of austerity most of us have never experienced before. People are losing their jobs and some are losing their homes as a result. In light of this, please understand that preserving a non-operational underground train is a costly undertaking and, to the majority of non-enthusiast taxpayers, not something worth bothering with in comparison to their current financial struggles and privations. Redsetter, I admire your devotion to such a long lost cause and in an ideal world, whilst I'd not get quite so worked up over it, I'd also be calling for preservation orders on all sorts of engineering icons, but let's be honest, we don't live in an ideal world anymore do we? It's time to grasp reality. Take as a blessing the one preserved unit, whatever it maybe. The rest are glorious history, and to be remembered with affection by those who feel that way. As a confirmed atheist I'll offer no biblical quotes but instead a worthwhile remembrance in verse. Shakespeare can be corrupted thus: "What a piece of work is an A Stock, How noble in reason, How infinite in faculties, In form and moving; how express and admirable, In action; how like an angel, In memory; how like a god..........."RIP
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 23, 2012 21:40:00 GMT
Much as we'd like to see A Stock in operation for some time longer, their time has come, I'm an A Stock fan, and avoid S Stock where possible, but in times of austerity, there seems little point in maintaining trains made by a manufacturer which went out of business 46 years ago (not to mention the crippling shortage of parts that goes with it). Many of us bemoan the fact that unemployment is on the way up - but by letting the A/C/D Stock go out of service, train builders are getting jobs when otherwise the government has f****d them over. Not forgetting that the scrap metal industry also benefits from this. Our economy benfits from this.
The only way we could possibly an A Stock replicated is if the times of austerity are much worse in 35 years time, and the sheer simplicity of the A Stock design may need to be implemented. Like them or loathe them, the S Stock are here to stay and our posteriors will get used to the hard seats.
I will miss the A Stock, but I'm glad they got refurbished and got 15-20 years extra to their lives, another undertaking would have only kept them operable for another 5-10 years. They are off either going back home or further away, but we were all once glad of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2012 7:12:34 GMT
Hi there. You have this A Stock business down to a much finer art than me, though I can see just about as much as you I'm afraid, so I do sympathise. I hadn't worked out that bit at Harrow, I think because I'm not up there often enough these days, but its definitely something for me to bear in mind when I do next go through on a trip to good old Ruislip. I wonder if my experience with drivers on A Stocks never saying anything at Aldgate is down to them not having time between getting in the cab and having to leave Aldgate, seeing as trains never ever seem to hang around long there. More haste less speed me thinks, What will be interesting is to see how good it is when the S Stocks take over the Circle, Hammersmith and city and District. Hi there! Well! as I said, it's year's of practice and to an extent trial and error! but do try out that rule of thumb when you're next in Harrow, it does work!. As for drivers making announcements at Aldgate prior to departure, that really does depend on the individual. Dwell times there during the day are usually around 10 minutes, but of course at peak times they're quite a bit less than that, but they usually have a few seconds whilst preparing the train after having opened up the DBVIC etc. to make an announcement. Maybe you've just been particularly unlucky, but in my experience this has become more the rule than the exception in recent years, as have announcements at the major stations en route e.g. Kings Cross St. Pancras, Baker Street and of course HOTH. It will certainly make life "interesting" when all subsurface lines are operated by S Stock, as the clearly, audible distinctions between A, C and D stock will be gone. Let's just hope that the audible information systems are working correctly, otherwise VIPs may find themselves pitching up in all sorts of places that they hadn't intended to go!. We'll just have to wait and see I guess as to how it all pans out. Take care and happy and safe travels. Best Wishes Green Lion.
|
|
|
Post by twobellstogo on May 24, 2012 7:33:40 GMT
yes but line 4 is quoted as 6.6 miles and line 11 at 3.9 miles. Have you ever used the Paris Metro? The usage is just as intensive as with the London Underground, and with far more stops, the wear and tear, if anything, is higher. Line 4 is the second busiest on the network, it serves the Gare du Nord, plus a large swathe of the touristy bits of Paris... Back on topic, I presume the two RAT trains will also survive, as well as the officially preserved example, so there will be options in the future for three A60s to survive long term, and I think that's a good return. Much as I like As, it'll be when the D stock starts to go when I'll feel a bit sad But again, it's progress, and though I think the Ds have got quite a bit of life left in them, I can see the advantages of having a uniform fleet across the sub-surface lines.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2012 12:17:37 GMT
I presume the two RAT trains will also survive, as well as the officially preserved example, so there will be options in the future for three A60s to survive long term, and I think that's a good return. Much as I like As, it'll be when the D stock starts to go when I'll feel a bit sad I think the plan is to replace the A Stock RATs with D Stock ones, once D Stock withdrawal begins in earnest. This should be good news for you though, as it'll mean that some D Stock will be preserved to keep your sadness at bay. It might otherwise have all gone for scrap. There's obviously much logistical, operational and doubtless financial sense in having one standard fleet of trains for the SSLs, although it makes life for the enthusiast much more mundane. I think it's the shape of things to come and I'm pretty sure that when the Bakerloo and Piccadilly Line stocks are up for renewal at the end of the decade, they'll be replaced by a standard type of tube train, possibly known as "T Stock"?. This would mean that history repeats itself on LU metals, as there used to be a T stock on the SSLs many years ago from what I understand. Best wishes to all Green Lion.
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 24, 2012 12:51:54 GMT
Not forgetting that there are plans to replace Class 150s with D78 Stock in Yorkshire, seems slightly pie in the sky however...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2012 15:47:30 GMT
The replacement of A stock RATs with D stock RATs will mean three units will be kept permenantly on heritage use? a60, if that happens I will be very happy, 150's are total rubbish!
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 24, 2012 16:34:21 GMT
I concur, when I moved to Norfolk, I had to suffer them for the first few months... Now, I'm lumbered with nearly as bad 156s. That's why I'd even be quite smug having A Stock on the Norwich/Sheringham.
|
|
|
Post by alfie on May 24, 2012 16:50:00 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2012 17:40:34 GMT
The replacement of A stock RATs with D stock RATs will mean three units will be kept permenantly on heritage use? I think not! but I might be wrong. I suspect that the A Stock RATs will follow a similar course as the rest of the stock and just the one 4-car unit will remain for heritage use. Best Wishes Green Lion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2012 21:52:05 GMT
yes but line 4 is quoted as 6.6 miles and line 11 at 3.9 miles. Much as I like As, it'll be when the D stock starts to go when I'll feel a bit sad But again, it's progress, and though I think the Ds have got quite a bit of life left in them, I can see the advantages of having a uniform fleet across the sub-surface lines. I see the S stock replacement of the D stock being a retrograde step.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2012 22:15:10 GMT
The replacement of A stock RATs with D stock RATs will mean three units will be kept permenantly on heritage use? I think not! but I might be wrong. I suspect that the A Stock RATs will follow a similar course as the rest of the stock and just the one 4-car unit will remain for heritage use. Best Wishes Green Lion. I originally read on here that 5110 and 5234 will be RAT/Heritage train. With the sandite cars removed when needed for a railtour or other event.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2012 7:21:46 GMT
I originally read on here that 5110 and 5234 will be RAT/Heritage train. With the sandite cars removed when needed for a railtour or other event. That's great then! the more A Stock preserved the better! Best Wishes Green Lion.
|
|
|
Post by malcolmffc on May 25, 2012 13:00:10 GMT
[/quote] I see the S stock replacement of the D stock being a retrograde step.[/quote]
I suspect the thousands of people who used the District line yesterday, squeezing onto hot, sweaty trains with tiny single-leaf doors would strongly disagree with you.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on May 25, 2012 18:05:29 GMT
i can very well remember a couple of years ago there was severe delays on the jubilee line,when the train eventually arrived at kilburn everyone was eager to move. unfortunately the train did not move very far at all and came to a halt on the bridges' at kilburn.it was like a sardine can on a curve facing the july afternoon sun.
|
|
|
Post by allan60 on May 27, 2012 8:10:19 GMT
5169 will form the North End of the scrap run Tomorrow
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 27, 2012 8:34:24 GMT
with 5016 at the South?
|
|
|
Post by allan60 on May 27, 2012 11:10:35 GMT
with 5016 at the South? Looks like it Unless its been uncoupled from 5169 which is unlikely
|
|