Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Jan 15, 2015 22:15:28 GMT
I'm also asking about other times of day! Well despite the fact that working timetables clearly have "Private - for staff use only" printed on the front covers and therefore fall foul our our own forum rule regarding publishing information marked in such a way, they are available to download HERE. **Forum staff look away now!!**I'll start you off.........those below are Monday to Friday from Monday 19th January; you can work out the rest as the information is within the last page and this post..... Train 63 - arr 07.49, dep 08.02 Train 123 - arr 08.30, dep 08.43 Train 63 - arr 19.35, dep 19.47
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jan 15, 2015 23:17:34 GMT
I'm also asking about other times of day! Well despite the fact that working timetables clearly have "Private - for staff use only" printed on the front covers and therefore fall foul our our own forum rule regarding publishing information marked in such a way, they are available to download HERE. **Forum staff look away now!!**Ahhhhh, for staff use but public viewing **puts fingers in ears**
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2015 23:43:24 GMT
177 didn't run today (as in Thursday, or today's traffic day!)there would have been no clearance for operation in service to have done so. It is planned to operate tomorrow Friday (tomorrows traffic day)as per the earlier posting by tridentalx! (***planned*** being the operative word) It is believed everything is in place, but there are some potential "fly's in the ointment" as Colin alludes to. However if all is good for 177 at 0807 and it runs , then 753 will also run tomorrow in service from Upminster at around 1130. 754 is about tomorrow but is not expected to take up its paths to Upminster.(there is a back up plan for 177 if the fly's do prove to be in the ointment though that would cause it to run a little later than planned!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2015 23:49:38 GMT
There's also another error which I wonder if the manager who created the list is aware of......trains 10 and 11 both start from 20/3/15......one comes out of Ealing Common and the other out of Upminster at the start of the day but both end up at Upminster in the evening. Errmm......stock imbalance!!! The error is actually in the detail of what the trains do, just like you Colin that immediately jumped out at me as a flaw, but when I checked the workings, one of the trains stated as stabling at Upminster actually stables at Ealing Common, so it does, in fact, balance!
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Jan 16, 2015 7:45:29 GMT
Train 123 is heading to Upminster as the destination indicator alleged.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2015 8:20:21 GMT
8.07 was correct! Unfortunately my picture on my phone is a bit blurry
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2015 13:20:57 GMT
8.07 was correct! Unfortunately my picture on my phone is a bit blurry 21419/21420 operated the first train ex Upminster as 177. As mentioned above T123 was also formed of S stock so became the first in service from Barking / Upney to Upminster - I don't have the unit numbers for this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2015 16:51:47 GMT
I'm also asking about other times of day! Well despite the fact that working timetables clearly have "Private - for staff use only" printed on the front covers and therefore fall foul our our own forum rule regarding publishing information marked in such a way, they are available to download HERE. **Forum staff look away now!!**I'll start you off.........those below are Monday to Friday from Monday 19th January; you can work out the rest as the information is within the last page and this post..... Train 63 - arr 07.49, dep 08.02 Train 123 - arr 08.30, dep 08.43 Train 63 - arr 19.35, dep 19.47 Cool but it doesn't appear to be running often at all during the day. I know this will change over the year.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Jan 17, 2015 1:14:39 GMT
Train 123 is a midday stabler at Ealing Common depot and train 63 mainly goes only as far east as Barking Bay road.
As you say, S stocks will start to appear more often at Upminster as time marches on.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jan 18, 2015 17:41:03 GMT
Blimey, whilst I only did 11 years on the combine I started out on CO/CP, R stock and C69/77, then along came the future with the new D Stock, now C stocks gone D's have been through a refurbishment and are now on the way out I'm really feeling old, the S stock is the price of progress but I still cant take to them yet and I do miss transverse seating still enjoy looking out of the windows in open sections at least the S8's still retain some. Think there should be transverse seats for the District main allocation.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 18, 2015 19:30:37 GMT
Blimey, whilst I only did 11 years on the combine I started out on CO/CP, R stock and C69/77, then along came the future with the new D Stock, now C stocks gone D's have been through a refurbishment and are now on the way out I'm really feeling old, the S stock is the price of progress but I still cant take to them yet and I do miss transverse seating still enjoy looking out of the windows in open sections at least the S8's still retain some. Think there should be transverse seats for the District main allocation. But the District S7's will be part of an integrated fleet along with the Hammersmith & City and Circle trains. Only the S8's will be line specific.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jan 18, 2015 20:02:05 GMT
Strange how the transverse seats go first on the D78s.
S7 layout was chosen without public consultation.
Last research I was involved with confirmed that passengers prefer a mix of seating as on the S8s.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 18, 2015 22:18:27 GMT
I prefer transverse seats too, but the philosophy these days is to create as much room as possible!
|
|
|
Post by malcolmffc on Jan 19, 2015 7:30:30 GMT
The transverse seats are awful - they take up so much space to seat hardly any people and make it very uncomfortable for anyone having to stand in that area.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,746
|
Post by class411 on Jan 19, 2015 8:56:59 GMT
Transverse seats are a pain.
I'm forever seeing people standing because there are two large people with luggage occupying the outer two seats of a transverse set and it's such a hassle getting 'in' and out, if you're only going a couple of stops.
Makes a lot more sense of longer routes.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 19, 2015 9:59:27 GMT
There is a reason why, since time immemorial, passenger seats in all modes of transport, from stagecoaches to aircraft, have faced forwards or backwards. Longitudinal seats are less comfortable - any acceleration or deceleration pushes you against your neighbours, instead of applying force through the seat back.
I am sure I am not the only one to suffer motion sickness in longitudinal seats.
I don't think transverse seats do take up more space - a seated passenger takes up the same area either way round. The reason there is more standing space in a 378 than in, say, a 377 is because there are so few seats. And in face-to face seating he legroom is effectively shared. Longitudinal seats generally make the gangways wider, that's all.
If someone is using a second seat as a luggage rack to the exclusion of a standing passenger, it makes no difference whether it's transverse or longitudinal: just ask them to move it. (Usually a hard stare is enough!)
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,746
|
Post by class411 on Jan 19, 2015 10:25:15 GMT
If someone is using a second seat as a luggage rack to the exclusion of a standing passenger, it makes no difference whether it's transverse or longitudinal: just ask them to move it. (Usually a hard stare is enough!) I wasn't talking about people using the seats for luggage. Just two people each having it in front of them will effectively block the entrance to the two inner seats. As I said, it's not much of a problem if you are going several stations on, but it's not worth the hassle of getting in and out of the space (particularly if you have luggage yourself), if you are getting off in a couple of stops. I'm pretty sure this is why they now seem to be adopting all lateral seating on stock where most of the passenger journeys are short (even if the line itself is long). I agree that one of the disadvantages of lateral is the force exerted on acceleration/deceleration but that can be ameliorated by sitting back firmly in your seat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2015 15:06:57 GMT
If someone is using a second seat as a luggage rack to the exclusion of a standing passenger, it makes no difference whether it's transverse or longitudinal: just ask them to move it. (Usually a hard stare is enough!) I wasn't talking about people using the seats for luggage. Just two people each having it in front of them will effectively block the entrance to the two inner seats. As I said, it's not much of a problem if you are going several stations on, but it's not worth the hassle of getting in and out of the space (particularly if you have luggage yourself), if you are getting off in a couple of stops. I'm pretty sure this is why they now seem to be adopting all lateral seating on stock where most of the passenger journeys are short (even if the line itself is long). I agree that one of the disadvantages of lateral is the force exerted on acceleration/deceleration but that can be ameliorated by sitting back firmly in your seat. Well the reason generally given is that you can fit more people on a train which only has longitudinal seats as there's more standing room. However, you can fit more transverse seats in a carriage than you can fit longitudinal seats. You can seat more passengers with transverse seats, but - ultimately - your carriage will be able to take fewer people overall. As such, transverse seating is popular on routes where people regularly make long trips, because they need a lot of seats, because people don't want to have to stand for an hour. Longitudinal seating is popular on routes where people make short trips, because you can fit more people and they will usually be happy enough standing for twenty minutes or so. Also norbitonflyer is absolutely right, transverse seats are more comfortable and apparently - given a free choice between a transverse seat and a longitudinal seat - more people choose the transverse seat. So they're more popular in that way as well. They also offer nicer views out of the window, generally speaking. Moreover, as I think has been mentioned, among passengers a mix of seats is generally considered the best environment to travel in. Among train operating companies, longitudinal seats allow you to carry more people. This does mean more money, but it also can mean more comfort - in the sense it might help with crowding. For what its worth, I find transverse seating quite cluttered, I always felt the old A stock had a very cramped and cluttered feel and I got a little claustrophobic. It's also very awkward when you have to slide past someone to take the end seat by the window - with your bottom in their face - especially if you do have a bag or something and then you have to do it all again to get off. I also (and I'm short) tend to find my knees are a little too close to the knees of the person in front. However, I do - despite this - almost always take a transverse seat on an S8 (given a choice) because the views are better and it is a nicer ride.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Jan 19, 2015 16:36:20 GMT
Dear all I've just been moving posts regarding D stock withdrawals in this S Stock Intro thread to another place under the District Line (possibly a better place). It was a thread created by FISH7373 a few days ago and then I pointed him down here. Upon relection a seperate thread might be better so I've unlocked it and have transferred the relevant posts Please feel free to PM me if anyone has any questions The D Stock Withrawal thread can be found HERERegards ChrisW
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jan 20, 2015 2:46:06 GMT
Regarding luggage and transverse seats. Many years ago when travelling on the National Rail network a Guard asked me to move a plant that I had placed on the (transverse) seats opposite me or pay for a ticket for said plant, I replied that as there was only three other passengers in the carriage I thought they were being a little "over officious". They persisted, the plant was moved and a three page letter of complaint was written to the TOC involved. I finished the letter by enquiring what far would be charged, as the plant was less than five years old and under-fives travel free. They replied, with appropriate apologies for their staff and clarified that: "Under-fives are expected to travel on their parent's lap, thus not occupying a seat". The author also saw the funny side as they finished their letter with the closing statement that "I hope your plant will feel able to travel with us again." As for transverse seats offering a better view, I am reminded of this:
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jan 20, 2015 4:57:59 GMT
I hate the transverse seats on the S8s. Most because if i'm sitting in them I have the awkward situation where someone is directly staring at the side of my face. If the roles were swapped i'd feel uncomfortable staring directly at someone's face.
|
|
|
Post by knap on Jan 20, 2015 9:35:43 GMT
With regards to staring at the side of faces when sitting on the side facing seats looking at the transverse seats, is that better than when the trains are full and people are standing as it is not pleasant having to look at the bottoms or fronts of people standing right in front of you. I know this happens on tube stock too, but the height of the seats on S stocks seem to give a different view!
Still the S Stock (S8) have to do two things, provide high capacity for central London and seats for longer distances. I still get annoyed though having to stand past Ricky in my way home!
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Jan 20, 2015 11:24:21 GMT
With regards to staring at the side of faces when sitting on the side facing seats looking at the transverse seats, is that better than when the trains are full and people are standing as it is not pleasant having to look at the bottoms or fronts of people standing right in front of you. I know this happens on tube stock too, but the height of the seats on S stocks seem to give a different view! Still the S Stock (S8) have to do two things, provide high capacity for central London and seats for longer distances. I still get annoyed though having to stand past Ricky in my way home! I'm assuming the bottoms in question are covered in clothes, thereby conforming with legal requirements. Mind you, I suspect that for a substantial number of passengers, looking at other people's bottoms on the underground, clothed or otherwise, helps diffuse the misery of their daily journey to and from work. For those who don't enjoy checking out some rear may I recommend standing up to alter your field of vision or alternatively, if this is a problem, burying your nose in a smartphone for the duration. This second solution already seems popular with 90% of the travelling public anyway although there's always the possibility that they're actually taking pictures of selected eye level bottoms to look at later in the privacy of their own darkened houses........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 22:13:47 GMT
Train 1......19/1/15......123 (am)/124 (pm) Train 2......19/1/15......63 Train 3......26/1/15......67 Train 4......2/2/15.......62 Train 5......2/2/15.......64 Train 6......9/3/15.......125 Train 7......16/3/15......66 Train 8......16/3/15......56 Train 9......23/3/15......102 Train 10.....30/3/15......60 Train 11.....30/3/15......55 Train 12.....6/4/15.......126 I saw two with Upminster as the destination this morning, didn't get to see the train numbers as I was on a train heading the other way. I'd guess one was 124 and one was 65, looking at the WTT. Is it just two trains being used in service at the moment?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 23:31:10 GMT
Train 1......19/1/15......123 (am)/124 (pm) Train 2......19/1/15......63 Train 3......26/1/15......67 Train 4......2/2/15.......62 Train 5......2/2/15.......64 Train 6......9/3/15.......125 Train 7......16/3/15......66 Train 8......16/3/15......56 Train 9......23/3/15......102 Train 10.....30/3/15......60 Train 11.....30/3/15......55 Train 12.....6/4/15.......126 I saw two with Upminster as the destination this morning, didn't get to see the train numbers as I was on a train heading the other way. I'd guess one was 124 and one was 65, looking at the WTT. Is it just two trains being used in service at the moment? The ones you saw in the morning was 123AM & 63.There are also the 2x Training Trains (753/754).
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Jan 20, 2015 23:39:26 GMT
The train I was on this morning (435 I think - whatever was on T076 on 20/1/15) was a bit odd. The doors all opened late, and at different times to each other, and there were 4 warbles instead of 3. Most odd, and more awful to listen to than usual when the doors open
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Jan 21, 2015 0:25:47 GMT
Sounds like staggered door operation which is the result of a particular defect.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2015 0:45:53 GMT
One which is apparently fairly common if my experience of commuting via the northern Circle is anything to go by.
|
|
|
Post by Hassaan on Jan 21, 2015 13:39:17 GMT
21365 is Number 63, saw it leave Upminster at 1331 on a Wimbledon service.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2015 14:05:25 GMT
Boarded 125 at Upminster at 9am (for Ealing Broadway). Saw 123 at Ealing Common depot.
|
|