|
Post by citysig on May 23, 2011 22:03:46 GMT
no more than I'm interested in golf, a popular past-time I'm led to believe. Indeed, a good walk spoilt as someone famous once said ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 22:08:55 GMT
Oh, really...? Are we allowed to know how "short" and why? Because the trains used are by no means ideal when it comes to meshing in with our current service plans (and nobody in service control was consulted before they were chosen - so somebody - me - had to formulate a plan to make sure both parties were happy.) Come July, both the Met and H&C will have "new" working timetables (even though the H&C only introduced their newest one yesterday). So all arrangements will change. For now, expect to see the S-stock in the city off-peak on trains 431 and 474. What do you mean by "meshing in" with your current service plans? Also, will it be either 431 or 474, or both 431 and 474?
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 23, 2011 22:51:47 GMT
These timings are correct but will only be valid in the short term. Oh, really...? Are we allowed to know how "short" and why? Sure! Once we are happy with the current running we will look to start peak hours operation and also look to increase the numbers of trains in service. I expect that this will not take too long to achieve, but we are being justifiably cautious in our approach as this is a very busy operational section we are moving in to. Hope this clarifies, didn't mean to be cryptic!
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 23, 2011 22:54:53 GMT
Because the trains used are by no means ideal when it comes to meshing in with our current service plans (and nobody in service control was consulted before they were chosen - so somebody - me - had to formulate a plan to make sure both parties were happy.) I didn't get involved in the train paths and don't want to ' wash our dirty linen in public' but Service Control were consulted and agreed to the planned reformations. I saw your internal e-mail though and am grateful for your intervention.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on May 24, 2011 10:29:08 GMT
What do you mean by "meshing in" with your current service plans? Also, will it be either 431 or 474, or both 431 and 474? Put simply, there are still a few tweaks to the current timetable that needed to be made. The proposed S-stock paths did not take account of this other plan. Given I'm the man behind that other plan, it should have been me they came to see, but hey ho... It will be both 431 and 474 - but not at the same time ;D The plan is that at 1056 Harrow on the northbound, the existing Train 451 will swap over with Train 431 - putting the S-stock onto an Uxbridge-Aldgate path. 431 will continue as S-stock (this train reverses at Baker Street during the evening peak) until it reaches Watford at 1928. Then it will become 474 and run on that path (Uxbridge-Aldgates - although it will first of all run Watford-Moorgate - the first time the bay roads there will have been used) for the rest of the day.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 24, 2011 11:11:14 GMT
So the first chance to capture S stock in the Moorgate bays coming up then? Has the Mets S stock physically got many places Met trains end up left to run into now, or has testing seen such places previously visited? Just out of interest, would testing take into account possible wrong sticks, such as South Harrow, or Baker Street platform 6?
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 24, 2011 14:02:00 GMT
Leaving aldgate now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2011 14:43:37 GMT
Leaving aldgate now Which train is it? [Weren't you supposed to be revising for exams? ;D]
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 24, 2011 15:11:52 GMT
431 - someone set off the pass alarm at moorgate and the driver started to phone the controller with the handset set to pa - whoops! Left it at Uxbridge now for it to go back to baker street I had an exam this morning, give me a break
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2011 16:19:49 GMT
431 - someone set off the pass alarm at moorgate and the driver started to phone the controller with the handset set to pa - whoops! Left it at Uxbridge now for it to go back to baker street I had an exam this morning, give me a break What I meant was - which units are operating 431 today? Incidentally, the same thing with the PA happened yesterday with 21003+21004. The driver used the PA by mistake to start communicating with the controller, but quickly realised after about 2 seconds...
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 24, 2011 16:33:40 GMT
Oh right 21007 on 431, 21005 on 465
|
|
|
Post by citysig on May 24, 2011 20:36:40 GMT
So the first chance to capture S stock in the Moorgate bays coming up then? Has the Mets S stock physically got many places Met trains end up left to run into now, or has testing seen such places previously visited? Just out of interest, would testing take into account possible wrong sticks, such as South Harrow, or Baker Street platform 6? The S-stock will have (in theory) had it's first public service outing to Moorgate bay roads yesterday - the alterations started from then. However, as I'm now on leave, anything could have happened. Testing has taken into account - but not visited - the locations you mention. Baker Street platform 6 should be fine, given the fact the S7s are the same gauge, just a car shorter.
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 24, 2011 22:37:29 GMT
Phew! I'm exhausted! Just got home from a manic north London rush to get home - including somehow despite how careful I was all day getting an incomplete journey! :/ In the end I caught: 431 - Finchley Rd 14:30 - Aldgate Aldgate 15:05 - Uxbridge arrived at 16:00 465 - saw it coming out the depot and caught it at 17:10 Finchley Rd - Baker Street then went round to Westfield and other places, came back to catch 474 - Baker Street at 20:30 - Moorgate 20:45 All times very approximate, as from my camera which is a little out, pictures going up on Flickr soon although they're not the best focused in some of them Note: Can I just say a big thanks to prjb and MetControl for your help in letting me find all of these trains (and more workings I saw going to/from places!) by providing those cheeky hints (which sometimes turn into absolute timings!). Although the LU employee said he could think of better things to do with an afternoon, I found it a great way to pass the time while going to places to do other things (I didn't JUST spend all afternoon on S stock, honest! )
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2011 22:55:06 GMT
474 - Baker Street at 20:30 - Moorgate 20:45 I was on this train as well There was a A-Stock which went to the Bay Platforms around 20:00 leaving Baker St
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 24, 2011 23:15:34 GMT
Indeed, I saw Moorgate on the describer whilst working out "how long will it take for the train to get from Watford to Baker Street?" and ran for it down the stairs... to find it was an A stock. Not impressed. Then had dinner consisting of the marked-down sandwiches from the shop on platform (1? from City to Finchley Rd...) and I eventually saw a train for Moorgate and thought "I'm getting that, S stock or not, I've been here too long" and it was, thankfully
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2011 14:58:48 GMT
S-*** stock rolled into Eastcote w/bound at about 15:45, driver underran so the computers locked out the first carriage and one of the 2nd carriages doors!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2011 19:29:36 GMT
I think you'll find it will disable the front and rear 4 sets of doors when CSDE override has to be used, bronzeonion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2011 20:02:47 GMT
S-*** stock rolled into Eastcote w/bound at about 15:45, driver underran so the computers locked out the first carriage and one of the 2nd carriages doors! If a driver does this with any train, would you prefer the doors open leaving passengers exposed to falling on live rails? With all new trains the possibility of mis-judging the braking distance is more probable. It's about human error, familarity and learning.
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 25, 2011 20:11:45 GMT
Indeed, as I was told last night, "It's all about the confidence; I can't stay in that cab and nurse him [the driver] forever and soon he'll be on the mark every time"
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 25, 2011 21:21:13 GMT
Testing has taken into account - but not visited - the locations you mention. Baker Street platform 6 should be fine, given the fact the S7s are the same gauge, just a car shorter. The S8 has visited both Baker Street Platform 6 and Aldgate Platform 1 actually. We haven't been to South Harrow and there are no plans to do this currently although we are considering this path in order to get S7 test trains to Acton more efficiently. Regardless of the S7 and S8 having the same gauge as an S7 hasn't been in to Baker Street we still needed to test it with an S8.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 26, 2011 2:12:37 GMT
Thanks MetControl and prjb. I suppose in the fullness of time at appropriate occassions the scope of gauging will increase to cover where ever it can be done and might be useful.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on May 26, 2011 14:08:54 GMT
Met Control the first time the bay roads there will have been used) for the rest of the day. There was a A-Stock which went to the Bay Platforms around 20:00 leaving Baker St[/quote] In my haste at typing I ommitted the words "the first time the bay roads there will have been used by an S-stock in revenue earning service. All academic now as the event has been and gone ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2011 8:47:04 GMT
In my haste at typing I ommitted the words "the first time the bay roads there will have been used by an S-stock in revenue earning service. All academic now as the event has been and gone ;D Ohhhh ok For Causton - 17/18 was on 431/474 yesterday
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 27, 2011 17:47:11 GMT
Oh! I was actually waiting for 474 as well last night, as I needed to return an item I bought on Tuesday! I saw Moorgate on the T/D at Wembley Park which I was hopeful for, then 3 mins, then 2 mins, then 1 min... then it stayed at 1 min for about 4 minutes and then I saw an A stock come round the corner and thought "Oh, that must be 474" but then I realised it was going onto the fast line platform, and I never saw the destination or number of that one. About 30 seconds later a Baker Street reverser turned up at my platform and I caught it, it was on the tail of the one on the fast platform so a slow ride. I think I saw a second Moorgate train about 10 minutes behind which I knew was probably it - but I had to sort out an Oyster issue, return the item I bought, buy something else, then get back up the Met to catch the last bus back out to Hertfordshire - which I did with 5 minutes to spare! On the way back home I was looking out for 474 but think I was at the wrong time oh well - once in a week is enough for me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2011 17:52:57 GMT
431 was an A stock today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2011 10:44:13 GMT
I read in Underground News that the PP1-S7 21001/2 is going to be moved to Hammersmith this month
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Jun 5, 2011 7:30:38 GMT
The first phase of testing of the pre-production S7 train will be undertaken in enginerring hours. It is due to work from Neasden Depot to Moorgate and then Moorgate to Edgware Road.
|
|
|
Post by causton on Jun 5, 2011 10:54:36 GMT
I presume you mean reversing at Moorgate, meaning this testing is only for 2 places it hasn't been before!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2011 11:25:20 GMT
2 places it hasn't been before, and in a formation it hasn't worked before (which can potentially cause all sorts of computery problems)
|
|
|
Post by causton on Jun 5, 2011 11:29:36 GMT
Oh yes, I didn't mean to undermine that, just a lot less significant than if it were to go from Moorgate clockwise! (Which sounds highly risky indeed)
|
|