Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2010 21:22:59 GMT
I'm only guessing at this but at Willesden TMD today were 378228 & 378229. Perhaps these 2 will be the first 378(2)'s going on the DC ? Hope the DOO cameras on those units are up to scratch. Units 225 and 226 have been the most problematic ones over on the ELL. Every day for the past week, the unit has been taken out of service due to a camera failing!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2010 21:36:43 GMT
I'm only guessing at this but at Willesden TMD today were 378228 & 378229. Perhaps these 2 will be the first 378(2)'s going on the DC ? Hope the DOO cameras on those units are up to scratch. Units 225 and 226 have been the most problematic ones over on the ELL. Every day for the past week, the unit has been taken out of service due to a camera failing! Hmmmm, now if a Guard was avaliable................. Makes you wonder.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jun 27, 2010 23:20:19 GMT
Two diagrams start from Saturday 26th June with 1st trains 0527 ex Euston and 0541 ex Watford Did this happen?
|
|
|
Post by dazz285 on Jun 28, 2010 13:01:45 GMT
Well they never went out first thing this morning that's for sure.. 378228 went out for route training at about 10.20 instead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2010 14:32:55 GMT
Two diagrams start from Saturday 26th June with 1st trains 0527 ex Euston and 0541 ex Watford Did this happen? Apparently not but then we could always live with 313's!
|
|
|
Post by dazz285 on Jun 28, 2010 16:08:26 GMT
The drivers can't.. Cab temp getting into the high 90's at the mo.. not nice.. Thank heavens for the air con on the 378's..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2010 20:18:26 GMT
The drivers can't.. Cab temp getting into the high 90's at the mo.. not nice.. Thank heavens for the air con on the 378's.. Provided the cab door windows are kept shut! The amount of times I've relived a driver who has left the window open making the cab air con blow hot air instead! And there's never a fitter around to reset the system!!
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Jun 29, 2010 19:56:12 GMT
I'm only guessing at this but at Willesden TMD today were 378228 & 378229. Perhaps these 2 will be the first 378(2)'s going on the DC ? I noticed that 378 227 has made an appearance at Willesden today. Looking forward to finally seeing them in service on the DC lines in this hot weather.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Jun 30, 2010 17:25:11 GMT
378 230 and 378 231 had arrived at WN today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2010 22:54:10 GMT
I understand that 2 x diagrams (WN54 & WN56) were meant to be 378 operated as of today (Wednesday) I am also led to believe that 378229 (WN56) worked 2D82 (1117 EUS-WFJ), with the other diagram being 378228. Also 378228 was at Watford Junction last night though was not there this morning (which would make working WN54 very plausible). 378227, 378230, 378231 (plus 2 x 172s) all at Willesden TMD today. It is also reported/rumoured that 313 operation should end on 11th July. ;D Martin
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jul 1, 2010 6:47:33 GMT
I saw a four car 378 at Watford too last night. Will there be a farewell tour I wonder for the 313s?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2010 10:23:53 GMT
I can confirm that 378228 worked 2C11 0820 WFJ-EUS this morning and 378229 worked 2D90 0837 EUS-WFJ. They should stay on diagrams WN56 and WN54 respectively for the rest of the day (barring failures of course)
Martin
|
|
|
Post by dazz285 on Jul 1, 2010 16:07:14 GMT
Guess what !!! Yep you guessed it one of them failled this afternoon at 1430ish going in to Euston blocking 2 roads... My god the cost is going to be huge as this was affecting the main line as well... I think that Bombardier need to pull their socks up as it seems there isn't that a day goes by without a failure...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2010 21:56:41 GMT
Luckily for LOROL (and I guess Bombardier) is the costs for disruption might not be as bad as they could be, as the service on the WCML was already up-the-wall due to reports of a trespassers on the track a short time earlier, as I saw various Virgin & London Midland Trains blocking back from Wembley Central as I travelled down the DC on 378229 this afternoon.
I saw a Bombardier engineer sitting in the rear cab as I got off at Queen's Park (after it sat there for a while due to the reports, firstly of congestion, and then of trespassers, on the track ahead), so if it was this train then at least the driver wouldn't have the pressure of moving a faulty train that's blocking 2 roads in & out of Euston all on their own to deal with.
Still, I hope this incident doesn't affect things too much, or delay the withdrawal of the remaining 313s.
|
|
|
Post by 33056 on Jul 2, 2010 18:02:15 GMT
Guess what !!! Yep you guessed it one of them failled this afternoon at 1430ish going in to Euston blocking 2 roads... My god the cost is going to be huge as this was affecting the main line as well... I think that Bombardier need to pull their socks up as it seems there isn't that a day goes by without a failure... Guess who was on the next DC 20 minutes behind it (the 1401 from Watford). Sat on the junction to Primrose Hill for around 35 minutes before setting back wrong road through the tunnel, crossing over to the right road at Kilburn High Road and back towards Watford. Hate to think what the delay minutes would be; there was a lovely queue of trains on the up slow back to Kilburn and the Up Fast wasn't moving that quickly either, though I do believe the situation was exacerbated by a trespasser around the same time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2010 0:02:23 GMT
Hi,
Both 378228 and 378229 failed on Thursday while working on the DC.
378228 suffered a loss of power on 2D65 1657 EUS-WFJ at Park Street Tunnel - though this was rectified by a specially dispatched fitter before crawling back into Euston.
378228 delayed earlier and having to step up due to the BTP chasing some nutter down the tracks at around 1330 for an hour or so.
378229 suffered a loss of power at Camden Junction while working 2C27 1341 WFJ-EUS and requiring assistance by another 378 into Euston.
Only one 378 out on Friday - 378229, seen on 2C35 1621 WFJ-EUS, the other diagram being "deputised" by a 313.
Martin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2010 16:24:22 GMT
We have 378 228 / 230 / 231 in traffic to day (5th Jul)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2010 22:09:58 GMT
We have 378 228 / 230 / 231 in traffic to day (5th Jul) Were there three different diagrams on the DC today? I only saw 378228 and 378230, the rest seemed to be 313s. Martin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2010 10:19:46 GMT
Three diagrams out today - WN52 (229?), 54 (230) and 56 (231).
Martin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2010 16:58:27 GMT
3 diagrams for Wed & Thu, 4 diagrams for Fri, 5 diagrams for Sat with 1 Diagram for 313 plus 1 spare 313
The end is nigh.............so Sun should see 4 digarms and no 313's for the first time in many years
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2010 19:07:29 GMT
3 diagrams for Wed & Thu, 4 diagrams for Fri, 5 diagrams for Sat with 1 Diagram for 313 plus 1 spare 313 The end is nigh.............so Sun should see 4 digarms and no 313's for the first time in many years Great news no more 313's ! Xerces Fobe
|
|
|
Post by patstonuk on Jul 6, 2010 20:07:38 GMT
3 diagrams for Wed & Thu, 4 diagrams for Fri, 5 diagrams for Sat with 1 Diagram for 313 plus 1 spare 313 The end is nigh.............so Sun should see 4 digarms and no 313's for the first time in many years Might be a bit tight on Saturday if the service relies on the availability of 5x 378/2s then? By my reckoning only 228-231 have seen service with 202 still at Chart Leacon, 227 at WN (?) but unused in traffic, and 232-234 still at Derby.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jul 6, 2010 21:26:33 GMT
Might be a bit tight on Saturday if the service relies on the availability of 5x 378/2s then? By my reckoning only 228-231 have seen service with 202 still at Chart Leacon, 227 at WN (?) but unused in traffic, and 232-234 still at Derby. The unit at Ashford is 378201. 378202 went back to Derby. I've read that 208 and 210 should be delivered this week. Will they need to go to Ashford for testing? Also, could 225 or 226 move to Willesden or are they both needed on the ELL?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2010 23:37:42 GMT
3 diagrams for Wed & Thu, 4 diagrams for Fri, 5 diagrams for Sat with 1 Diagram for 313 plus 1 spare 313 The end is nigh.............so Sun should see 4 dig arms and no 313's for the first time in many years Great news no more 313's ! Xerces Fobe Yeeess..! ;D I did manage to travel between Watford and Euston and back today 378231 on the 0820 WFJ-EUS and 378228 on the 1637 EUS-WFJ, both busy peak trains, the majority of punters rather excited about "their" new trains. Yes I got a seat, but travelling from Watford and from Euston - you invariably will. The 0820 WFJ did get busy, especially at Harrow, but loads decamped at Willesden and Queens Park (as per usual) and the train - albeit longer than a 313 - arrived at Euston full but not rammed. The 1637 EUS-WFJ nearly didn't run, as 378228 decided to shut itself down completely at 1635, and, after attention by the resident Bombadier fitter, departed 8 late. It was busy but again not overly wedged. I suppose I will be a bit sad when the 313s go, because they are, after all, a BR designed train and there's not a great deal of that sort of thing left these days....but they were rubbish! I must admit having a 21st century train rattle along on some of the country's oldest bull-head rail rather amusing - all that money spent on new trains, phase 3's, 1000s of CCTV cameras, platform extensions etc - nothing seems to be spent on the more important things like the track! Martin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2010 10:07:54 GMT
I personally love the class 313 to travel on, the ride is very smooth, the seats are comfortable (and have a better alignment) and I like the noise they make.
|
|
|
Post by harlesden on Jul 7, 2010 11:39:04 GMT
I personally love the class 313 to travel on, the ride is very smooth, the seats are comfortable (and have a better alignment) and I like the noise they make. The Watford-Euston 313's are a bit of a disappointment after regular use of the 313's on FCC's Moorgate service. High back seating and still the same number of seats as they originally had when built
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2010 18:56:59 GMT
378228 failed at Euston today in the rush-hour on its 17.57 departure, and despite various Bombardier engineers being on board. From what I heard, the train wouldn't "re-set".
Everyone got kicked off and had to wait for the next train, which, being a 3-car 313 (and departing 20 mins after the failed 378 was due to leave), ended up getting rammed full.
Why are these trains failing so often? Bombardier must be forking out shed loads in compensation to LOROL / TfL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2010 20:28:30 GMT
378228 failed at Euston today in the rush-hour on its 17.57 departure, and despite various Bombardier engineers being on board. From what I heard, the train wouldn't "re-set". Everyone got kicked off and had to wait for the next train, which, being a 3-car 313 (and departing 20 mins after the failed 378 was due to leave), ended up getting rammed full. Why are these trains failing so often? Bombardier must be forking out shed loads in compensation to LOROL / TfL. The trains dislike the way their seating has been placed and how badly uncomfortable it is, so they're failing regularly in protest.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jul 8, 2010 21:12:02 GMT
Not sure about that, but I also like the class 313s, mainly because they are old school. I like the noise of the camshaft etc.
The seats on the 378s are terrible, but the extra car is a great move!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2010 23:19:42 GMT
378228 failed at Euston today in the rush-hour on its 17.57 departure, and despite various Bombardier engineers being on board. From what I heard, the train wouldn't "re-set". Everyone got kicked off and had to wait for the next train, which, being a 3-car 313 (and departing 20 mins after the failed 378 was due to leave), ended up getting rammed full. Why are these trains failing so often? Bombardier must be forking out shed loads in compensation to LOROL / TfL. The trains dislike the way their seating has been placed and how badly uncomfortable it is, so they're failing regularly in protest. The 0837 EUS-WFJ was also in trouble this morning, requiring the now mandatory tweak by man with big hammer. Left at 0856 requiring the 0857 to leave from platform 10. I wonder how many will need attention tomorrow now that 4 diagrams are scheduled. Martin
|
|