Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2008 16:18:21 GMT
95 stock all the way for me! btw their new range of acessories should be out soon
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 16, 2008 12:38:25 GMT
It would be all so simple were it not for the interiors and underframes:
What you say imples that a valid train (P Stock) could be made from just one single car. This could sell in two different liveries and (EFE trick) lots of different running numbers/destinations. That's almost worth a retailer taking a punt on.
BUT railway modellers tend to be totally obsessive have a keen eye for detail these days. Not only would they require different cab fronts (vent on the A end, no vent on the D end, or is it the other way round) and underframes (even though many of them have probably never seen a P stock underframe) also different interiors (vent intake in one car, not the other). The result is no model.
A shame, because something like this could be done incrementally. Get one full train up and running, sell some units to make some money, then produce the next car, sell some more units, and so on.
Just out of interest, what is the smallest number of cars needed to make up an R stock train? Could it be done with just exQ motor cars, and R trailers, or is it more complicated than that. My copy of 'Steam to Silver' is elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Sept 16, 2008 15:46:40 GMT
Not only would they require different cab fronts (vent on the A end, no vent on the D end, or is it the other way round) The O stock DMs didn't have vents, P stock DMs did. Just out of interest, what is the smallest number of cars needed to make up an R stock train? Could it be done with just exQ motor cars, and R trailers, or is it more complicated than that. My copy of 'Steam to Silver' is elsewhere. All R stock cars were motors. All DMs (apart from 6 R49s) were rebuilt from Q38 trailers. The shortest R stock train that you could run was 6 car.
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 16, 2008 16:14:17 GMT
Thanks,
I thought that the motor cars were different (A end different from D end). The driving end of the car with the Metadyne didn't have a vent, because the machine drew air from the passenger saloon. The driving end of the other car did have a vent. Anyway, vent/no vent is easy for a manufacturer to do these days.
It does seem as though it might be possible to gradually build up a wide variety of rtr possibilities incrementally. This should be compared with the Blue Pullman DMU (causes big debates amongst railway modellers) because an authentic train requires several different types of car, a lot of tooling/investment before a valid train can be created and anyone makes a purchase, and the potential of a big loss if it doesn't sell. At least with a train based on a single carbody, there is less risk to the manufacturer.
Which is probably why we have rtr New York Subway models. R17 and R21/R22 have both beed produced (very similar bodies), all prototype vehicles are double-ended DMs.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Sept 16, 2008 18:06:27 GMT
I ddn't know that there was a model of a R21/R22.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2008 18:57:09 GMT
it's a shame they didn't have the r27/r30 in the subway series
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 16, 2008 22:57:31 GMT
Technically-the shortest R stock train could be a 5 car train. From 1971 the R stock was reduced to 7 cars. 21XXX-223XX-224XX+225XX-226XX+225XX-226XX OR 21XXX-222XX-222XX-223XX224XX+225XX-226XX
Basically the position 2 car was moved from one unit into another unit so some trains had 2X no2 cars and others had none! 21 pos2 cars were surplus and scrapped too.
Therefore a train without a no2 car in could run as 5 cars and indeed did on the ELL once I believe (although not in service).
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 17, 2008 9:40:49 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2008 15:05:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Sept 17, 2008 16:43:11 GMT
nice! looks very much like an r27, that was the type of livery I want to but to make it look like true to that time they ran it needs graffiti Like this? www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?4500R27s were wider and longer than the R21/22s (and had 4 sets of doors), and ran in pairs, but otherwise they look very similar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2008 21:32:35 GMT
Digressing a tad from the original thread but it would be interesting to know if the chassis would fit a Radley models kit!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 18, 2008 7:19:54 GMT
I don't know. I'm looking into the 1960ts very seriously now. It will probably go on the old 1959ts chasis.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2008 23:07:39 GMT
Metman, you are a star... A star that is tryng to financially ruin me!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 18, 2008 23:10:20 GMT
Check out EBAY- type 'London Underground' under collectables.
There is 1931ts, F and Q38 stock!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2008 23:20:55 GMT
You see, you ARE trying to ruin me!!! I saw them a couple of days ago and subtle hints to the Wife fell on angry and deaf ears! She knows as well as I that starting to order on e-bay will be financial suicide for me. I can't resist a bargain. It's bad enough having a model shop five minutes walk from the front door.....
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Sept 23, 2008 15:29:42 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 17:13:50 GMT
In converting the Northern Line EFE unit to the overhauled version, need to get rid of the cream striping on the window pillars, as well as the London Underground graphic. Has anyone tried removing this and if so, how?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 17:46:49 GMT
Brake fluid?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2008 16:06:48 GMT
In converting the Northern Line EFE unit to the overhauled version, need to get rid of the cream striping on the window pillars, as well as the London Underground graphic. Has anyone tried removing this and if so, how? ah the lt logo? I got a trailer in a sale at metromodels of 62 stock to sit in the sidings, I found they come of quite easily just sort of scraped it off with my little craft knive mind you this was just to make it look a bit old and dirty you have to be very careful not to damage the model
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2008 17:02:51 GMT
Hi Ajax,
I'm a little nervous about scraping the paintwork on these models. It would help to know if the striping is paint or transfer. I suspect, I'll just have to respray these units with LT bus Red.
Thanks for the advice though!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 20, 2008 17:46:46 GMT
I'm told brake fluid is the best stuff, experiment first tho!
I'm about to do a repaint on a Thames Trains class 166 into a class 165 Chiltern train, I'm bricking it too!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2008 19:25:30 GMT
Thanks Metman, I was not sure if you were serious or not on an earlier post about the brake fluid. Will try this carefully. I suppose the worst that can happen is the plastic body desolves -aaaargh.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 20, 2008 21:15:53 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2008 14:45:55 GMT
Got it Thanks!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2008 14:51:57 GMT
:oEXPERIMENT FIRST!!!!!! Many years ago there was a similar article in a model magazine extoling the virtues of brake fluid to remove paint. A month later came a letter from a reader who had tried it with (from memory) a Mainline class 45 body. IT DISSOLVED INTO A FLOPPY MESS!!! For removal of logos I would imagine that the tiniest amount on a cotton bud would suffice. Scraping the bodyside transfer with the trailing edge of a craft knife will not work on EFE stuff. I've tried it! It does remove the transfers but leaves a mark. It is as if the coaches are varnished after the application of the transfers. Thankfully I only tried it on the numbers as I was renumbering it anyway (UNDM!). I will try the brake fluid method in due course (when I know the kids aren't about) and will let you know how I get on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2008 16:30:08 GMT
I plan on converting a six car unit of EFE 98T stock, so a mistake on one of the cars means I have to repaint the whole unit. Thanks Glyn!
|
|
neilw
now that's what I call a garden railway
Posts: 284
|
Post by neilw on Oct 21, 2008 17:27:31 GMT
I used methylated spirit to remove the incorrect LT transfers on the 59/62 T and NDMs , it worked fine. I rubbed them very gently with a cotton bud soaked in meths. Beware white spirit, and I suspect brake fluid, paint stripper, etc., as this can melt the plastic.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Nov 11, 2008 16:20:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 13, 2009 22:02:29 GMT
There is a review of this unit in 'Model Rail' and it says ''Three packs are promised, the LT 'heritage' red set reviewed here, 'Dinosaur' livery and Network SouthEast colours'', but EFE haven't anounced the other sets yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2009 23:13:14 GMT
Dinosaur livery! Damn! My nine-year-old will want one! It will truly hurt buying model tube trains for someone else!
|
|