Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2007 21:46:54 GMT
From news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6431841.stmTons of newspapers found on TubeMetro on the underground Free newspapers can be picked up at Tube stations Up to 12 tons of newspapers a day are being abandoned by commuters on London Underground stations and trains, new figures show. The statistics were revealed by Ken Livingstone following a question raised by the London Assembly Conservatives at Mayor's question time in January. They have asked Transport for London to install more newspaper recycling points on the network to tackle the problem. London Lite was launched in August last year and The London Paper a week later. They followed the Metro freesheet which was introduced a number of years ago.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2007 21:48:02 GMT
I was taking a 134 home tonight, and on the luggage area as you board the bus there was a pile of newspapers... but not used, New! They were putting them on the bus to hand out, it's outrageous
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Mar 9, 2007 21:50:01 GMT
Looks like TubeLines willhave to get some "Paper Only" dustcarts! From news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6431841.stmTons of newspapers found on TubeMetro on the underground Free newspapers can be picked up at Tube stations Up to 12 tons of newspapers a day are being abandoned by commuters on London Underground stations and trains, new figures show. The statistics were revealed by Ken Livingstone following a question raised by the London Assembly Conservatives at Mayor's question time in January. They have asked Transport for London to install more newspaper recycling points on the network to tackle the problem. London Lite was launched in August last year and The London Paper a week later. They followed the Metro freesheet which was introduced a number of years ago.
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Mar 9, 2007 22:55:00 GMT
I occasionally do leave my metro (I don't take the evening papers on principle) on a train, but only when I'm fairly sure someone will pick it up (so not if the carriage is always full of them). In fact on one occasion I tucked it by where I was sat and someone claimed it straight a way.
It's hard to get the balance between recycling (by having two people read the one paper) and littering (by the only person picking it up be a tubes line cleaner at the end of the line). That's why I most often keep hold of it and toss it in the metro racks at the end of my journey or find a bin somewhere.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2007 23:01:51 GMT
On the few occasions I have a Metro with me, I always put it back in the holder when I exit the system.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2007 10:38:07 GMT
Whenever I catch a tube after 9pm the carriages are always full of them.
I was in Barnet the other evening and caught a tube home from there. The cleaner got out with four sacks of rubbish. In the clear bags you could see it was virtually all the evening freebies. No sorting and I guess the majority will go to landfill sites.
I think that there should now be a newspaper recycling bin at every tube station, paid for by the freebie newspapers.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Mar 11, 2007 13:09:48 GMT
The publishers should pay for the clean up costs, Somerset Chris, I use the Northern every day. On night shifts, I board at Finchley Central at around 2145, no way has the train [Not the one I get anyway] been cleaned at HBT, they are always filthy, most of which is papers. The public are just animals [some anyway] Same types spit all over the station, leave their food rubbish on the train, and have their feet on seats. Zero tolerance should be called for, more Police Tony Blair!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2007 13:19:15 GMT
Indeed, the problem is that the contents of these papers is so awful, it only takes thirty seconds to read it from cover to cover. They have to be Londons biggest litter problem, and in my humble opinion the worst line for litter is the Waterloo and City. City Am, Metro, London Lite, London Paper and mainstream papers everywhere, with coffee cups and sandwich wrappers as city people have a moving lunch. What makes me laugh is on ITV London Tonight, the London Lite and London Paper are featured near the end of the programme with the Standard as 'the evening papers' - it looks like a joke!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2007 14:05:42 GMT
Tubeboy, I live in East Finchley, so I know exactly what you mean. Perhaps LUL should charge BIG money for the vending boxes for Metro and also for the people who stand there handing out the damned things.
Alex, I saw that on the evening news as well. I was surprised anyone could call it a newspaper. I used to pick one up when they first came out, now I just carry a book instead. I might get the Standard (full version) if I have to travel an hour or more, but I never bother with the freebies anymore.
By the way, I think that the freebies might be starting to lose their popularity. I can still pick up a Metro at 10.00am at East Finchley!
|
|
|
Post by gavelex on Mar 11, 2007 15:23:35 GMT
I can still pick up a Metro at 10.00am at East Finchley! OH MY GOSH!!! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2007 4:56:48 GMT
I can still pick up a Metro at 10.00am at East Finchley! OH MY GOSH!!! ;D It just shows that they are losing their popularity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2007 8:18:35 GMT
Tubeboy, I live in East Finchley, so I know exactly what you mean. Perhaps LUL should charge BIG money for the vending boxes for Metro and also for the people who stand there handing out the damned things. Trouble is TfL DO charge alot of ££££ for the rights to distribute free newspapers on the network, which at present is only the Metro. Other evening publications are handed out outside the station. 12 tons of paper produced, the question the mayor should be asked is how much of this 12 tons is being correctly recycled by the infraco's?
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Mar 12, 2007 8:51:50 GMT
Trouble is TfL DO charge alot of ££££ for the rights to distribute free newspapers on the network, which at present is only the Metro. Other evening publications are handed out outside the station. Maybe some future generation of Oyster will include a small screen. Then when it is touched in at a station it could simultaneously upload travel information and the latest edition of Metro - for which TfL would charge a distribution fee.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2007 10:13:07 GMT
Trouble is TfL DO charge alot of ££££ for the rights to distribute free newspapers on the network, which at present is only the Metro. Other evening publications are handed out outside the station. Maybe some future generation of Oyster will include a small screen. Then when it is touched in at a station it could simultaneously upload travel information and the latest edition of Metro - for which TfL would charge a distribution fee. That's not as impossible as it sounds: www.universaldisplay.com/foled.htm refers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2007 21:54:41 GMT
The vendors that hide in the subway under all the Nat rail platforms at Waterloo [the one that links to the tube platforms] have been told that they need permits, are creating a nusiance, etc, so have been told to 'go elsewhere to flog the rags' Walked along there one day, trying to find a photo op, and must have been hassled at least thirty times with offerings of the London Rag...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2007 22:36:54 GMT
Waterloo...........hassled at least thirty times with offerings of the London Rag... Tell me about it. Only there do I get so many papers waved in my face. That's why all those papers end up on the Waterloo and City Line
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2007 22:46:55 GMT
What we should do is collect them all up [the abandoned ones] and simply hand them all back to a vendor!
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Mar 13, 2007 9:49:02 GMT
What we should do is collect them all up [the abandoned ones] and simply hand them all back to a vendor! Surely 'vendor' is the wrong word if they're giving the da*n things away. I'm trying to think of a better word....ideas??
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Mar 13, 2007 10:09:02 GMT
Surely 'vendor' is the wrong word if they're giving the da*n things away. I'm trying to think of a better word....ideas?? There are many words that could be used to describe them. I think that they need a proper job title. How about Refuse Distribution Operative (RDO)?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Mar 13, 2007 10:10:34 GMT
Distributor is what comes to mind, although that implies the bulk movement of newspapers from the printers to the 'sale' point.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2007 22:19:21 GMT
I'm not sure exactly what the issue is here.
Yes papers are left on trains for others to read (and us drivers are most grateful!). The cleaners then come along and put the rubbish in their rubbish bag and the papers in their papers bag. The papers are then put in the big, blue paper recycling bins. So what's wrong with that?
|
|
|
Post by johnb on Mar 14, 2007 11:33:29 GMT
I'm not sure exactly what the issue is here. Yes papers are left on trains for others to read (and us drivers are most grateful!). The cleaners then come along and put the rubbish in their rubbish bag and the papers in their papers bag. The papers are then put in the big, blue paper recycling bins. So what's wrong with that? Nothing - but it's fun to moan about things anyway
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Mar 14, 2007 22:17:00 GMT
Its a bloody disgrace, it makes the tube look like a tip, and its also a fire hazard.
|
|
jimini
Posts: 387
Member is Online
|
Post by jimini on Mar 15, 2007 0:05:27 GMT
I'll reply to this thread as someone who works in this neck of the woods, and therefore has a selection of facts to hand. First off, I work for a national daily paper, not a freesheet. So my opinion is unbiased. Albeit suitably annoyed at the situation - as are a lot of fellow commuters - here are the raw figures: For the ABC period February 2007, the daily average circulation figures for these freesheets (available at www.abc.org.uk/) are as follows: London Lite: 400,977 thelondonpaper: 436,945 Rupert Murdoch's offering (tlp) is winning currently, mostly down to the fact that they've won the contract to distribute on the NR network. It's all about advertorial revenues. Both companies are required by ABC rules (upon which they directly sell their ad space) to collect and record any undistributed copies on a daily basis. At the end of each month, these figures are audited. Hence the fact that you find large piles of said freesheets on buses: a copy dealt is a copy "sold" in ABC terms. All they see is the supervisor for any given area recording how many copies those damn vendors dare not to give out. And therefore recorded for ABC purposes. I’ve seen many vendors hopping on and off the D3 / D8 bus routes in the Wharf ditching 20 or so copies at a time. They all count as “sales” by audit standards. But with no cover price, advertorial is the way forward for these freesheets. It’s a profit making industry. It works for both News International and Associated Newspapers. So don’t expect it so stop anytime soon! As a disclaimer to the above, I don’t work in advertorial / editorial, I’m from somewhere else random within the tower. With a vested interest in the whole situation nonetheless. And still my usual curious self with regards to the intricacies of LU. Toodle pip!
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Mar 15, 2007 11:01:36 GMT
Dumping /only/ 20? I've seen piles of 50 or so being dumped on buses, well done to those drivers who then get the distributor to pick half of them back up.
|
|
|
Post by rayb on Mar 15, 2007 14:07:54 GMT
I've been on a few buses lately where the driver has either flashed his lights/sounded his horn at the person giving these papers out and gestured for them to place more on the bus! The latest incident was on Monday night. There was already a stack of one of the freesheets, to which this individual added his (rival) offering.
If the figures quoted by Jimbo are right, that's 438,000 papers a day extra that have to be disposed of - be it by recycling or land fill or incineration - is this really the responsible way to behave?
RayB
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on Mar 15, 2007 14:48:31 GMT
The thing is, people aren't complaining enough about the issue.
Some of us might be guilty of picking up one of the papers to read now and again, but whether the majority of us are kicking up a stink about it officially is another matter. If the whole of London got together and complained, not to the papers themselves, but to those who have control over regulating the papers, like the local councils, transport officials, etc., then we'd probably be more likely to get a result.
It is indeed disgusting that these evening freebies should even be allowed to waste raw resources like this, but whether they've got anything on their conscience is another thing. The best we can do is hope most - if not all of the waste is being recycled.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2007 17:44:04 GMT
Well, I do pick thelondonpaper from time to time which I make sure it ends up in the recycling bin outside my halls of residence at the end.
However, there is indeed the wider issue of recycling since tube carriages just after the morning peak is simply trashed with newspapers, and ditto for the evening.
I don't really find much wrong with what the cleaners do - except its the commuters who should be shoving them into the recycling bins themselves. As for fire hazard, yes it probably does create a bigger risk, only compounded by chavs which have resulted in the withdrawal (I'm assuming here) of fire extinguishers in tube carriages.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2007 19:18:33 GMT
Its a bloody disgrace, it makes the tube look like a tip, and its also a fire hazard. Indeed TB, all it takes is a few idiots with some matches and the consequences would be very grave indeed
|
|
|
Post by edb on Mar 15, 2007 19:48:50 GMT
As V3.1 said, it'll be either people complaining or some kind of tragic accident that will cause any changes.
However this is true of everything. If we all didn't got to work for a day due to the £4 single then i'm sure someone would listen. But the problem i have found (especially at uni) is that people are too acceptant of getting a rubbish deal or being pestered. (Why else are labour still in power) I was gutted at uni when i found out that no one cared anymore, and that is the problem.
Most people don't care.
|
|