towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 9, 2009 20:21:48 GMT
004-003 now signed off and in service.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jan 10, 2009 13:03:27 GMT
I think care would be needed if this rule were changed - it may be ok to just do a PA and go off to the sidings if a driver is changing ends, but if the train is being stabled it really ought to be checked first! How would a change in the ruling stand versus carrying passengers over shunt only moves (ie, the points don't require the same legalities of locking as Green signal moves)? How did the land lie before the current tip out ruling came into effect? The rule hasn't actually changed. We were always supposed to check as passengers were not allowed over shunt signalled moves. It's just the rule is now strictly enforced whereas before, if a punter got taken for a ride you just told 'em to wait till you got back into the station. If we took someone into the depot, we walked them out. I once gave a nice young lady a lift home.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jan 10, 2009 13:48:18 GMT
I think care would be needed if this rule were changed - it may be ok to just do a PA and go off to the sidings if a driver is changing ends, but if the train is being stabled it really ought to be checked first! How would a change in the ruling stand versus carrying passengers over shunt only moves (ie, the points don't require the same legalities of locking as Green signal moves)? How did the land lie before the current tip out ruling came into effect? The rule hasn't actually changed. We were always supposed to check as passengers were not allowed over shunt signalled moves. It's just the rule is now strictly enforced whereas before, if a punter got taken for a ride you just told 'em to wait till you got back into the station. If we took someone into the depot, we walked them out. I once gave a nice young lady a lift home. The interesting question is where Kennington fits into this. Northern Line trains are not required to be detrained at Kennington s/b CX if they are destined to reverse via the loop. However any train reversing via the sidings IS required to detrain. The rule has been relaxed because of the time taken to detrain every southbound train in the platform, and also because lack of staff at Kennington means detaining would frequently have to be carried out by the Train Operator, exacerbating the delay. Whenever I've asked for the reason for this ruling, I've been told "it's a green signal move, not a shunt signal, so passengers can be carried". Have LU forgotten why the detrainment rule was first introduced? I guess things will be okay unless there's some kind of incident involving a loop train, then a lot of trouble could break loose.
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Jan 10, 2009 14:52:10 GMT
What actually is the technical difference between a green signal move and a shunt move, other than the fact that shunts can't be done in passenger service?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jan 10, 2009 15:26:48 GMT
This has been posted many times previously - I suggest you use the search function.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 10, 2009 16:09:47 GMT
From memory, a shunt move requires a lower standard of proof that the route is secure than a passenger move does. After spending about 20 minutes trying to find a more comprehensive answer using the search, all I can find is this from Colin We also cannot carry passengers past shunt signals as the points are not locked in position in the same way as those where colour light signals fitted. and from Mandgc ( click to see post): Neither of these posts are a full explanation of the sort that I know I received after I made the enquiry a couple of years back.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2009 18:05:12 GMT
As a non-expert, I would suggest that the key point is probably in Tubeprune's #8 post here (before that of mandgc) i.e. it authorises a running movement over a running line, which may be, and on the Underground normally is, authorised for passenger (carrying) trains (an LU case where I would expect this not to be the case is Seven Sisters to Northumberland Park). Presumably the loop at Kennington is an authorised passenger running line, back to the other side of Kennington, but in principle not really any different to that on to Stockwell.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 15, 2009 19:00:50 GMT
006-005 now signed off and in service,046-045 now stopped for retro fitting.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 16, 2009 6:42:45 GMT
062-061 now out of TFOS,signed off and in service,042-039 now stopped for retro fitting.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Jan 26, 2009 21:41:18 GMT
Was looking at the depth of the queues for the Jub atCanary Wharf home time the other day thinking that ATO really can't come soon enough. Such build-up of passenger volume would just be impossible to cope with at other hot points like Bank or Victoria. Considering what towerman has told us I was wondering whether the businesses are aware of the delays to the upgrade and whether any opinions have been expressed?
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 30, 2009 19:56:12 GMT
117 has come back from Highgate,106-105 has gone to Highgate.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 30, 2009 22:56:28 GMT
Do you mean that 117 and another unit has come back from Highgate, as 106 and 105 have gone there, otherwise there would be an odd number of units there?
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 31, 2009 0:00:16 GMT
118 should've come back this week but the train was cancelled so Highgate has 3 units of 96TS at the moment,no doubt it will be back at SMD in the next week or two.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 31, 2009 20:28:02 GMT
All retro fitting now finished,a couple of staff will stay on for "snagging" work,the rest will move to Edgware in February to start on 95TS.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 31, 2009 21:28:38 GMT
118 should've come back this week but the train was cancelled so Highgate has 3 units of 96TS at the moment,no doubt it will be back at SMD in the next week or two. So how are 96TS units moved to/from Highgate then?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 31, 2009 21:37:54 GMT
via the Kings Cross/Euston Loop to the Picc, round to Rayners, onto the Met then on the Jubilee at Neasdon I guess
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 31, 2009 21:43:45 GMT
I meant how do you transfer a single unit of 96TS, as they are single ended.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2009 21:54:46 GMT
Using a battery loco.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jan 31, 2009 22:00:12 GMT
Between 2 battery locos with Schoma locos used as barrier vehicles.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 31, 2009 22:15:16 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2009 9:52:35 GMT
The upgrade plans only envisage 30tph between North Greenwich & Willesden Green. Interesting after a bit of reading I've found out that the original JLE expectation of 36tph was just the ultimate design capacity (with just 5secs operating margin at full speed run ins). The original plan was for 27tph upon opening, and 30tph in 2005.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Feb 10, 2009 0:26:51 GMT
118 unit is returning from Highgate tonight.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Feb 19, 2009 20:02:28 GMT
Jubilee will be shut all over Easter for TBTC works,the only exception will be Stratford-Waterloo Easter Saturday from 15:00.BTW,there will be trial ops between Green Pk & Stratford on 16th April.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Feb 23, 2009 0:52:41 GMT
Having read 'Tube Trains Under London', by J Graem Bruce, it states that plans "have been made for this [the introduction of rolling stock fitted with ATO and the resignalling of Baker Street - Stanmore with ATO] to be reached in 1982". So would 30 years late be a respectible estimate for the delivery of the project?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Feb 23, 2009 2:08:41 GMT
Sounds about right ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Feb 23, 2009 19:34:30 GMT
ATO and the resignalling of Baker Street - Stanmore with ATO] to be reached in 1982". Not sure but I think I have seen a specfication document on that subject in the LU Library. -- Nick
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2009 22:48:58 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2009 16:45:15 GMT
I really dread to think how long it will take to relay new stuff again, will we be able to ever use the full jubilee at weekends again anytime soon?
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Feb 27, 2009 16:47:52 GMT
I really dread to think how long it will take to relay new stuff again, will we be able to ever use the full jubilee at weekends again anytime soon? I was told that on a recent 'PEDs' course too.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Feb 27, 2009 18:07:11 GMT
How will they spin that one when the clousures come round again?
|
|