Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 3:44:49 GMT
Ditch road tax and add the cost onto fuel duty, include automatic 3rd party insurance cover into the equation and Robert's your dads brother..
Pay as you go pricing without spending billions on a pointless system.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Feb 22, 2007 8:41:35 GMT
The road pricing scheme isn't just meant to get people onto public transport, it's to discourage people from driving more than they need to. Would it encourage you to move nearer Taunton and only use the car to access rural areas? If there is little or no public transport in isolated rural areas and people are encouraged to move closer to towns, that will only hasten the depopulation of the countryside. With fewer residents, this lestens the demand for public transport, which is then reduced thus forcing the remaining residents into cars. Moving people towards towns then results in houses being turned into rural holiday homes to which people will travel in their cars - cars that they will also use for transport while they are on vacation in the newly created holiday homes. Touche!
|
|
|
Post by agoodcuppa on Feb 22, 2007 9:25:10 GMT
Pay as you go pricing without spending billions on a pointless system. Are you serious? ?? Do you realise just how many bureaucrats and other petty officials you're denying job opportunities to??? ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Feb 22, 2007 11:55:05 GMT
Do you realise just how many bureaucrats and other petty officials you're denying job opportunities to??? Country needs more janitors .
|
|
|
Post by johnb on Feb 22, 2007 14:29:53 GMT
Fuel tax is a solution to a different problem, though.
A road pricing scheme would charge people heavily for driving in London at 9AM, but would charge them little or nothing for driving from (e.g.) their village to the nearest station.
Higher fuel tax would not distinguish between the two journeys, and so would punish people who have no alternative.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 15:15:48 GMT
But still, at the moment the PM has said he wants the road pricing in but has said nothing about removing road tax or dropping fuel tax.
If you can get where you want by train or bus or by walking great. But the bootle of drink and sandwich you buy on the way will have doubled once the new road pricing is in.
Theres alot of things people can't do without cars. I should know we had to stop running ours about two years ago.
Shopping. Now it's cheaper to go buy a good amount of food at a big supermarket and trust me lugging it on the bus is an awful experience i can assure you.
Then you end up getting bits from your local shop which is a heck of alot more expensive. Which will rise under the road pricing or they will go bust!
Need to get somewhere in the dead of night. Err wheres the bus or train??? Or should i walk and have the chance of being mugged or rundown?
Need to get somewhere that no bus runs too. I can think of aload of places round here! Going to the beach, need to lug alot of your gear around e.t.c Or if you live in the countryside. I use to live in a village outside of London. About 5 miles from Upminster.
Now they had 2 trains an hour and a bus service that had no buses. So if i didn't have a car out there what do i do??
Walk down one of the most dangerous road outside of London a.k.a St marys lane???
All of this is personal car use.
But imagine when all these supermarket lorries call out centres and other things that need to be delivered. Well toilet roll £1. Could rise to £1.50. But imagine about these stores in london. Do you think they would ever get a delivery?
Also we will be spyed on where we go!
All i can say is Road pricing should be thrown out now. We don't want it so there! But the PM doesn't think of this neither do any MP's mainly because they get all their travel paid for them!!
Say no thats all i can say. Or think about voting NO to Labour at the next election!!
James
To sum up.
Road pricing is invasion of privacy. Road pricing will put up prices everywhere. Road pricing cannot be a form of getting people off the road. Road pricing is a win win situation for the goverment. Road pricing will put up the cost of motoring.
So wheres the money going. Hmm well alot of our fuel and road tax goes to the EU. Well i would vote YES to getting out of the EU.
EU = Stupid laws, millions going down the drain and nothing else. Oh sorry a tonne of immagrants some dangerous coming into the country!
So theres nothing great about road pricing is just another form of tax but a huge one at that.
If you think for one second that you would be fine to be tracked where you drive and have to drive and paying a huge amount in doing so. Then i say you are an idiot!
Also i bet alot of people who think it's a good idea but have cars now. Boy are you going to be kicking yourself when your at a bus stop waiting to get on a crammed bus with loads of shopping, or anything of a big size.
But wait::
So the goverment is going to spend millions on another form of taxing when the money could go to the now Sh**e NHS due to Labour, education if you have children or Policing.
Nope tax all the way:
New Labour should be called Labour.
Not a labour of Love but a labour of hate!
Edit: Thought i would correct a few things and add a few points.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Feb 22, 2007 15:18:15 GMT
But it's been pointed out everywhere that it will be scalable. i.e. in the village in the middle of nowhere, it'll be very low priced. In London, it'll be highly priced as there's public transport there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 15:32:56 GMT
But still why would anyone want to be charged more?
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Feb 22, 2007 15:38:34 GMT
Nobody *wants* to be charged more.
However if it were instead of some other tax, which IIRC has been mooted, it should be lower where you genuinely need private cars and higher where you don't.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Feb 22, 2007 16:30:28 GMT
Sooner or later the whole country is going to get hold of something being hidden very well by ' interested parties': in inner cities the amount of toxic fumes being breathed in near vehicles (especially stationary ones in a jam) by kids (who are nearer the ground) are so high that if it were a factory it would be closed down by H&S. There is now a PROVED link in terms of mental development, lung disease, asthma, stunted growth and a whole lot more for those who live or go to school on or near busy roads. BBC made a big fuss of it one lunchtime a couple of months ago, but it was gone by the SixOClock News........ For that reason alone traffic has to be reduced for the sake of the kids - and if folks will not leave cars at home just because they are asked nicely, what IS a government to do to reduce the problem? If road pricing is not the answer, WHAT IS??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 16:40:26 GMT
Oh it does Phil. We need to cut motoring but not get rid of it!
London is a stupid place to drive but hey people need to drive there at somepoint. But wait theres a congestion charge??? But LOL at the fact congestion has gone up sine it was put in.
People have the right to own a car and use it. But putting money into more buses and trains in some areas and at a low cost to to consumer will ineffect give another option to people.
Bus services where i live are ok. But we have to pay our rates to allow that route to come through here.
More money on public transport so theres another option for people. Say you want to get somewhere for a meeting got plenty of time go by bus or train. But if you need the car for stuff e.t.c then take your car.
But yes congestion in London is ridiculous. How about a new permit system for the most congested areas in London and other cities. Say 10am to 3pm with people not with a permit not allowed in the area for that period of time. If you need to get there within this time apply for a permit and with ground why you need to.
james
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 16:45:20 GMT
One more thing to add. Road price in the city if they wish where it needs it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 16:52:32 GMT
road pricing money should not be solely into public transport but also cleaner fuels.
if the traffic is bad, which it is, some will be priced off the roads and onto public transport.
some people, notably school run children with mum taking them to school (which I was), will take the car whatever happens because they have enough disposable income to spend.
Think back to 1956 when they were developing the Routemaster. They had to make a bus that was just as quick and as comfortable as a car. And look what they came up with, a very comfortable bus that people could read the paper on and smoke. It was described by its creators as an antiquated design with the conductor as it wasn't maximising productivity, but it had to rival cars for speed, so that was what was designed. They also had bus lanes and other bus priority measures to make it more attractive to the car.... and it succeded. Bus numbers grew with it but fell away afterwards as private cars became more popular and standards on the buses fell with OPO and unreliability of the bus network.
Fast forward to the 80s. The tube was in a dire state because of the GLC and the political method of running the tube. Numbers fell hugely to levels not seen since 1943 because the tube was not an attractive proposition. The numbers were very low and professionalism within the company wasn't high and the passengers weren't given a reliable service or a comfortable one. What people want from transport is to get somewhere as quickly as possible and in comfort. It has to be as comfortable as a car or quicker, both being ultimately preferable!
Look now at the tube, they invested £900m in the central line and scrubbed up other lines. Got new rolling stock for the northern and Jubilee and tried as hard as possible to deliver a world class service.
Passenger levels are very high but people are still complaining; things like new stock and new signalling that is being delivered will mean that more people will be dragged onto public transport.
what should the objective be for public transport? be as quick as the car and be as comfortable. If the Metropolitan line customers had to stand for their journey they would go back to the car. If there are daily signal failures and they are never certain of journey times they will go back to the car.
Make public transport competitive with the car is the answer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 16:56:39 GMT
Very good point Rob, but still a new tax is not the answer! Peoples view at the moment is: Why should i pay and not have anything in return??
But Yes we do need an alternative but the car must stay!
People will upgrade their cars one day. So why doesn't the goverment invest also in cleaner engines for cars??
Road pricing is not an option. Public transport for cities yes. No go areas for cars in london will surely allow more people to be brought on to the Tube.
But to be charged to go down a quiet country lane???
The goverment should be looking at what cause the congestion in areas and work out ways to stop it.
Stopping cars but not lorries for deliveries into certain areas is an option.
Tax is tax and never stops a problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 17:07:12 GMT
Sorry i had to add this also. Is it me or is this going to effect the poorer people of the nation?? Yes and i thought New Labour was left wing LOLOL
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 17:10:32 GMT
James, at the moment you are being quite speculative. The costs of the charge and where and when it will be enforced and who will be exempt is yet to be decided. It might be restricted to cities and busy motorways in the peak or only valid between certain hours like the congestion charge. We don't know yet
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 17:11:26 GMT
Ah so i am. True say. But still it's going to be a charge whatever it is. Name the last time a charge from Labour turned out well??
It might be but hey i doubt it. Also i am right in thinking that all cars will have the equipment. Whos going to pay for that??
I am not just having ago at the charges i am also thinking about the other costs of a new system!
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Feb 22, 2007 17:49:34 GMT
Sorry i had to add this also. Is it me or is this going to effect the poorer people of the nation?? Yes and i thought New Labour was left wing LOLOL Oh james you poor mis-led fool! New Labour is more RIGHT WING than the current Conservative party, and always has been! That's why a lot of folks are scared of Gordon Brown taking over. He's going ot pull the party back, and there's no General Election for some years now. Lack of Democracy - we get a leader who's not been elected and have to put up with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 17:51:39 GMT
Sorry Phil i miss worded my reply. I know they are Bl**dy right wing!! Don't call me a fool you could of asked why i put that! I mean't it in a very sarcastic way!
I know they are right wing to the extreme but they were mean't to be left wing a.k.a Labour.
Oh yes Gordon Brown should not be in power at all when the time comes! We don't have to put up with it after the next general election Vote no and there you go.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Feb 22, 2007 17:54:09 GMT
How about a new permit system for the most congested areas in London and other cities. Say 10am to 3pm with people not with a permit not allowed in the area for that period of time. If you need to get there within this time apply for a permit and with ground why you need to. james But who decides? That option is open to all sorts of abuse (bribes etc.) and totally unworkable. How many permits? Should ALL residents get them (and if not....heaven help us)? And then ALL those who work in the City? Or just Police....and firemen.....and ambulance drivers......and teachers.....and LU staff.........and bankers..... Where does it stop?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 17:55:54 GMT
Well it was a suggestion. But key workers would be exempt of course.
Well no it would be worked by the police in that case to try and stop bribes e.t.c simular to the congestion charge through cameras onto licence plates e.t.c
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Feb 22, 2007 17:56:32 GMT
Don't call me a fool you could of asked why i put that! Sorry James - important word was misled, not fool!! That's the problem of writing not speaking. If only you could have heard my tone of voice. No offence intended, truly, just a figure of speech.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 17:58:51 GMT
You would have to work out how it would be done.
Say it's an emergency need to get somewhere fast. You would be caught on camera and would have to appeal or face a 200 pound fine for example. But this is in congestion hot spots.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 18:00:12 GMT
Thats ok Phil. Was just annoyed i didn't put my point across correctly. TOny blair should be working for the Tories the way he is!
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Feb 22, 2007 18:01:03 GMT
What does one class as a key worker, though? That's another question.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 18:03:11 GMT
Keyworker in my opinion are: Council workers at work, nurses,doctors,mps it could go on but people who do key jobs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 18:06:20 GMT
But apart from them, and emergency services and buses. No one would be allowed to travel into that area at that given time.
But then you might say where will people go?? Simple they have the choice of going around or taking public transport.
Of course before the area there would be lots of chances to move off onto another route to stop the congestion piling up on to one road. With also improvements to the areas around the zones to ease off any congestion.
So at the end of the day, people would have to choose another route in advance instead of just turn left or right at the area.
Last thing to add. All fine money coming from the area. Would be put back into improving the road system.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Feb 22, 2007 18:12:40 GMT
That's the problem. That is what *you* define as a "key worker". Other people will have different ideas. Result? Squabbles left, right and centre.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 18:14:09 GMT
What the goverment sees fit. It's a system that could be worked out but thats another story to be honest. But still back to the topic which lead to this is that they should looking into ways of stopping the congestion rather than just charging people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2007 18:18:31 GMT
What you need to do, is get Blair out and put him in a job, such as cleaning a hospital, the Minimum Wage Challenge. I'd also like to see him get to work at say a hospice/care home in the middle of the countryside on a pushbike, in the pouring rain. After cycling from the train station THREE hours before his duty commences, because the train services have been sliced due to low usage at that station.
Of course, then man can't get his fingers dirty, nor can he have dry, cracked skin. It would affect his public image when he raises his hands to placate a concerned public!
|
|