|
Post by ruislip on Feb 27, 2008 3:47:57 GMT
One DVD I saw for sale at Transport Diversions' site featured somthing about A62 stock on this branch. How would they have gotten as far as Epping, given that they would not have been able to use the tunnels through Central London
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Feb 27, 2008 7:58:30 GMT
Was this when the track was still connected at Newbury Park (from Ilford I think it was), or Leytonstone (from Temple Mills Yard)? That would of course have required possibly diesel or even battery loco haulage from Ruislip say though there was at one stage a connection between the Central at Ealing Broadway and the Up GWR Slow. I remember it well as a long siding which came off the Central before it curved round to the left, and was visible from EB trains on Hangar Lane bridge.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2008 8:03:09 GMT
When the EOR took over they had to lower the track at the M11 bridge to allow mainline DMUs to run, so I can't see how A stock would fit. Unless it was before the M11 was built in the 1970s.
ruislip, are you sure the DVD wasn't referring to 1962 tube stock rather than A62?
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Feb 27, 2008 22:34:13 GMT
They did get onto the Central Line at the other end of course, Ruislip Depot to Acton Works via Ealing Broadway.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Feb 27, 2008 23:56:06 GMT
The Newbury Park-Ilford branch was closed in 1956, so of course the A stock couldn't have gone by that route. Staff DMUs used to run to Epping from the Leyton connection until the early 80s, so how would A stocks made it to there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2008 0:20:09 GMT
www.bandrvideos.co.uk/ Volume 130: London Transport Archive Using all archive film taken over many years up to 1980, this film covers the operations on the LONDON TRANSPORT network on rail and road. Metropolitan Railways are seen with steam at Rickmansworth in 1961 taking over from electric locos. Lots of coverage of the LT pannier tanks at NEASDEN, CROXLEY, WATFORD, FARRINGDON and LILLIE BRIDGE. The Metropolitan electric locomotive tours of 1972. Tube trains of 'Q' stock, '38' stock on the Northern Line and A62 stock on the Epping to Ongar line and others. Road transport covers trams, trolleybuses in EDMONTON and some ex LT vehicles in Spain. Horse buses back on the London streets in 1979 with their history mixing with a few preserved examples of early motor buses. The RT buses in central London up to the last on Route 62 at BARKING. RLH types in East London and Routemasters including FRM1 at POTTERS BAR. Witness a visit to ALDENHAM WORKS and the skid pan at CHISWICK with an RT. LONDON COUNTRY routes with green RT, RML, RMC and RF. GREEN LINE with RM's and RP's around HARLOW. There are all-over advert liveried Routemasters, Silver Jubilee and Shoplinkers examples. RTW's at NIAGARA FALLS, WR, A very nostalgic period remembered of LONDON TRANSPORT's history. Filmed virtually all in excellent colour, with a sound track and informative commentary
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Feb 28, 2008 0:39:39 GMT
So it does-but is it a mistake? Anyone fancy splashing out for it?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Feb 28, 2008 0:47:20 GMT
I've got a copy - it is actually '62 stock on the Epping - Ongar. 'A' stock was tested on the Central Line but at the other end. I know I contributed to a recent thread about this, but can't for the life of me find it. The WTT [1] that mentions the testing of the 'A' stock on the Central that I have has currently been borrowed by my General Manager, so I can't give you a date. COLIN [1] Working Timetable
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Feb 28, 2008 7:33:51 GMT
How recent is recent? - your last 300 posts go back to around October.............I couldn't find anything relevant in them
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Feb 28, 2008 20:41:45 GMT
Sounds like a good idea for the heritage route - A60/62 stock. =D
They are really set for getting steam soon, but Im not so sure this could take place, what with expense both to run it and for the environment. A stock will be perfect (if able of course)
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Feb 28, 2008 20:47:19 GMT
Sounds like a good idea for the heritage route - A60/62 stock. =D They are really set for getting steam soon, but Im not so sure this could take place, what with expense both to run it and for the environment. A stock will be perfect (if able of course) PLUS all the extra paperwork now needed to run any train!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2008 21:02:04 GMT
I am just dreaming here but if they had a varitey of old tube stock running on there and they could have one each day of the week
I am not trying to critisize the EOR at all but they didn't really preserve much of LUL's heratige of running the line.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Feb 28, 2008 21:12:34 GMT
The nightmare they would have to go through running electric services and being staffed by volunteers would never have got off the ground, the health and safety people wouldnt have it.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Feb 28, 2008 21:14:13 GMT
The nightmare they would have to go through running electric services and being staffed by volunteers would never have got off the ground, the health and safety people wouldnt have it. It could be like in Alderney and have them towed round by a diesel loco They have altered the way that the doors operate too, as there are no compressors, but can't remember how!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,766
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 28, 2008 21:14:40 GMT
There's at least one line that runs mainline AC locos by towing a generator/battery behind the loco. Presumably the EOR could do something similar.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Feb 28, 2008 21:23:22 GMT
There's at least one line that runs mainline AC locos by towing a generator/battery behind the loco. Presumably the EOR could do something similar. I believe that one forum member is involved at said railway.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Feb 29, 2008 2:32:32 GMT
How recent is recent? - your last 300 posts go back to around October.............I couldn't find anything relevant in them It was in some thread that mentioned Northolt (I think) or possibly Greenford - and this was the bit of line used for testing the A stock 'at the discretion of the Engineer and all parties concerned'; though I may well be confusing myself in the process. I am right in thinking that the A stock was/could be tested on the western end of the Central, aren't I? EDIT: I can remember keying in something like 'Aha, that explains the timetable note' I think it was in an ostensibly completely unrelated board but (as the lovely Angel Islington will testify) I am a past master at thread drift .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 17:49:57 GMT
Interesting thread.
I can not recall 'A' stock ever being considered for this line simply because of the logistical effort in getting them there, in saying that, the original group who wanted to take over the line (not ORPS) when an early attempt closure was announced, are pictured examining possibly 'R' stock for operation on the line, nothing came of this as the line was reprieved.
Electric Preservation! and why not? Just because the line was electrified doesn't mean HMRI or whoever would get there knickers in a twist, why should they and to say otherwise is shortsighted indeed, if you don't ask you'd never know.
To put the record straight, I met HMRI before the line closed and posed the question 'would there be a problem with operating preserved LU stock on the line' 'none at all, as long as the safety case was in place and everything conformed to appropriate standards and regulations'.
The chances of electric LU stock operating on the line is zilch, mainly due to the lack of juice rails and the prohibitive cost of replacing them, plus you'd need a sub-station or supply from the Grid.........expensive.
As we all know, the Central operates ATO, codes in the track and no train stops. Getting a train from the branch in to Epping is quite simple really, it's not rocket science and conventional signals with train stops and coded working can work together in harmony, it just needs a little bit of thought, if you know anything about signaling then you will know it can be done.
When I still worked at the Wood Lane, I was approached by a Senior Manager who was seeking to get the line back and to operate it as a LU Heritage Railway funded by TfL, he wanted to know if I, and more importantly CHTL, would be interested in the project. What the current situation is I don't know but LU operating the line in a Heritage capacity would be a darn sight more interesting than what goes on now.
Fortunately we saved the Cravens 60TS from Booths and preserved Epping Cabin, I bowed out in Nov 2006.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 18:47:24 GMT
BTW if we can do steam on the met and 38 stock tours why can't we have 4th rail operation between epping and ongar
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Mar 3, 2008 18:50:08 GMT
why can't we have 4th rail operation between epping and ongar No current rails.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 18:52:14 GMT
BTW if we can do steam on the met and 38 stock tours why can't we have 4th rail operation between epping and ongar The difference is that the 1938 tours run on track that makes money at all the other times trains run! Epping to Ongar would not be economical and was closed for a reason!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 3, 2008 19:01:25 GMT
I would like to see more preserved trains. In the next 10 years there will be a mass slaughter of rolling stock and if one working example of each (A, C, D, 67/72 73) couldn't be saved it would be criminal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 19:56:36 GMT
The Epping - Ongar railway was recently sold.
It was purchased by the former owner of Blue Triangle Bus Company, which it's self was recently sold to Go-ahead group.
He owns the London Bus Company which has a large fleet of Routemasters and RT's (formerly Blue Triangle's herritage fleet) and numerous examples of most other London Transport type buses (and some Titans and Metrobuses for sale I believe).
Chatting to him the other day, I gather that the line is presently closed again, with substantial effort being put into doing work on the permenent way. This is all volunteer work.
In terms of it's future, I think the view is that it needs to run some form of steam operation primarilly to generate some revenue to try to make at least an effort to be self supporting. If that generated enough revenue to support other types of operation then so much the better.
Chatting to his chief engineer a few weeks back, he is especially keen to aquire an A60 set when they are withdrawn and to convert it to some for of diesel generator operation as per the Alderney train. Whether they can pull all of this off we shall have to wait and see .... but it does leave it as a possibility for the future !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 21:57:43 GMT
Although I'm not involved any longer with the presrvation scene in the UK, I do still follow events of the line and of course Cravens Heritage Trains.
The PWay on the line was in a sorry state when the line closed in 94. with ballast 3 feet deep in places, made up because the embankments are primarily ash and prone to sinking/slippage. Maintenance in the last 10 years of the line (LU) was 'makedo' to say the least, scouring of the bridge abutments at Cripsey Brook was also identified as a future problem.
Operating and maintaing a Steam/Diesel or any other fleet will be extremely hampard by the building of houses on Ongar Goods Yard, there aren't (if any) other suitable places on the line for a depot of sorts.
It does seem strange that the 'Chief Engineer' wants an A60, they couldn't look after the two 4 car 62TS they had, personally, I think he's in cloud cuckoo land.
It would be interesting to know just how much of there membership base is made up of experienced railwayman with the knowledge to restore the line and potential rolling stock, I'm not taking anything away from the enthusiasts, they are the valuable men and women who make these things work.
Membership of ORPS has remained around the 250-300 mark, any idea what the EOR's is?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Mar 3, 2008 22:14:41 GMT
As we all know, the Central operates ATO, codes in the track and no train stops. Getting a train from the branch in to Epping is quite simple really, it's not rocket science and conventional signals with train stops and coded working can work together in harmony, it just needs a little bit of thought, if you know anything about signaling then you will know it can be done. Quite. Somehow I don't think I'll be getting the red pen out to do the work any time soon though...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 22:20:44 GMT
Probably not Tom but there is a Cabin at Epping that requires the Frame to be installed, kick some butt for me!
|
|
|
Post by techoffretired on Mar 3, 2008 22:45:16 GMT
Probably same route as the old diesel staff trains. Via Stratford Temple Mills to Leyton via crossover onto our line.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2008 23:17:06 GMT
It does seem strange that the 'Chief Engineer' wants an A60, they couldn't look after the two 4 car 62TS they had, personally, I think he's in cloud cuckoo land. I meant the bus company chief engineer, and like I said the railway changed ownership only a few months ago, so not the same team who allowed, i believe, two 1962 stock sets to be wrecked !
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Mar 3, 2008 23:27:43 GMT
BTW if we can do steam on the met and 38 stock tours why can't we have 4th rail operation between epping and ongar The difference is that the 1938 tours run on track that makes money at all the other times trains run! Epping to Ongar would not be economical and was closed for a reason! Correct, it wasn't economical, but then again it was made to seem even more uneconomical by LT / LUL running it down over the years, to the point where the service was so inadequate, nobody wanted to use it. This may be an outdated view, but railways aren't meant to make big profits! It is a shame that LUL didn't care for it a bit more, becuase there has been a lot of development at Ongar since closure.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,766
|
Post by Chris M on Mar 3, 2008 23:43:02 GMT
What would probably make it economical would be to extend the line from Ongar to somewhere like Chelsmford, share tracks with LU between Epping and south of Loughton and then branch off to meet the Chingford line (I've not looked at the terrain, but it is quite hilly around Loughton so this might be expensive). This service would give an alternative way into London from Chingford, Epping and Loughton and of course give Ongar a rail service again. It would also relieve some of the pressure on the Central Line, number 20 bus and, possibly, the Victoria Line.
It would work best as a mainline rather than a tube service - is Chelmsford too far out for London Overground? If so then, assuming the track capacity exists, then perhaps express service operated by Nat Express and Local services as far as Ongar by LU.
|
|