|
Post by rob66 on Jul 5, 2007 10:04:57 GMT
I wonder what caused the Derailment at Mile End today? Todays news stated that six cars were derailed.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jul 5, 2007 10:11:03 GMT
Just speculating here: A dodgy bit of track causing the train to bounce off, or a broken rail. A bit of equipment being stored in the tunnel by a contractor or LUL "falling" onto the track (it happened on the Northern a few weeks back).
At least no-one is seriously injured, just late for work.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 5, 2007 10:12:39 GMT
Reputedly (according to BBC Radio Solent) someone had a slight foot injury and that's all but "hundreds" of passengers had to be evcuated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 10:15:35 GMT
Well , aslogn as no one was badly hurt. Reminds me of the time i was in the train behind the Chancery Lane accident. At least it wasn't that bad...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 10:20:49 GMT
I don't want to compete of course, but I was on the train behind Moorgate - no further comment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 10:41:02 GMT
What are the chances it turns out to be another traction motor deciding to part company with the rest of the train?
Just had a very slow journey W Acton - Holborn, it seems due to problems with trains reversing at Liverpool St. As there's two siding there (I think) surely it should be possible to reverse almost the whole normal service there? Don't think there could have been many trains between White City and Liverpool St as I waited 15 plus minutes at N Acton and when I got off at Holborn the next train was shown as 14 minutes away.
|
|
|
Post by edb on Jul 5, 2007 10:43:30 GMT
I got off and walked from Bond street to Holborn. Wasn't worth the wait and the fighting my way through the crowded carriage at Holborn.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Jul 5, 2007 10:46:30 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 11:32:49 GMT
Would be great to know the cause soon but the track is just terrible in that section, although the EB is worse than WB where the train derailed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 11:53:03 GMT
As there's two siding there (I think) surely it should be possible to reverse almost the whole normal service there? Its OK when they use the sidings adjacent to the WB road as the train can exit without any conflict, however when it comes to getting a train out of the siddings next to the EB road you have to make sure it does not conflict with the move into the other sidings, which takes a bit of doing. Couple of with the amount of trains that the central line has in the peak, it would be night impossible to reverse the whole service there at that time of the day and keep up the same service that would normally be on offer. EDIT: There also was a siding occupied with an engineers train. I *suspect* this is probably a track related defect, as if something had fallen off a train, the central line would probably have no service at all, similar to what happened after the incident at Chancery Lane.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Jul 5, 2007 12:05:19 GMT
I wonder what caused the Derailment at Mile End today? Todays news stated that six cars were derailed. Isn't there a set of cross-over points between Mile End and Bethnal Green?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 12:06:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jul 5, 2007 12:09:48 GMT
Just to make it easier for our journalist friends! Howard Collins, deputy chief operating officer for London Underground, said something resembling "sheeting" had obstructed the track. "Initial reports from the driver are he saw something white flapping in the tunnel, before he hit it. There was a loud noise and then he hit the brakes," he said. --- What with all the contractors and subbies that work on the tube (Metronet, Connect etc etc), who is to blame, did it get in somehow via a shaft, did it have a storage licence...?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 12:47:19 GMT
Today's Central line incident London, 5 July 2007 - A Metronet spokesperson said: "Shortly after 9am this morning, the three leading bogies of a Central Line train came off the rails in a tunnel on the west-bound track between Mile End and Bethnal Green. “Whilst it is important not to pre-judge the outcome of the investigation, our initial reports suggest that a bale of material became dislodged from its licensed storage position in a tunnel cross-passage. “As a precaution, Metronet has ordered an immediate audit of all similar storage sites used by its staff and contractors – and this will be completed before the start of service tomorrow morning. To enable this work to proceed, Metronet has additionally ordered that all works be suspended tonight, with the exception of essential maintenance. We apologise to passengers for the distress that this morning's incident has caused – and for the inconvenience to the many people that use the Central line daily. “Working closely with London Underground, Metronet already has teams on site to start the work of restoring this section of the line to service as quickly as possible.“ ENDS Metronet
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 5, 2007 14:00:20 GMT
!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 14:06:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by rookie on Jul 5, 2007 14:47:17 GMT
Any news on the T/Op???
|
|
|
Post by signalfailure on Jul 5, 2007 14:47:35 GMT
wow makes me think it must have been pretty heavy duty stuff to derail a 100tonne train, A friend of mine who works for the met has just told me its thoughts of vandalism!!
One question, what is Bale Material?
I use a Baler at work, you put recyclables in it and a ram pushes down with an exerted force of 20 tonnes, does it have anything to do with this?
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jul 5, 2007 14:58:56 GMT
Nope my my is on incorrectly stored materials! Putting things just clear of the track to avoid a late surrender protection (aka late finish of engineering work) and the subsequent money and PR costs. As I said a similar thing happened on the Northern a month or so ago.
It will be interesting to see if the materials were being stored as per licence, and whose material it is.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 15:05:58 GMT
One of the things that worries me, is the fact it takes 2 hours to evacutae the trains. Imagine if this would've happened in middle of summer!
Proves perhaps we need the station staff, and the closures of the ticket office and nearly 300 jobs being lost means these events may take longer to remedy.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jul 5, 2007 15:10:03 GMT
How many staff would be needed Simon to safely and quickly evacuate say just that one train with circa 600 customers on?
2 at the train, 2 at the platform edge/ramp and how many along the track....
|
|
|
Post by signalfailure on Jul 5, 2007 15:25:15 GMT
I found this on the Rail Accident Investigation Branch website.
Investigation into a derailment at Mile End on 5 July 2007 The RAIB is carrying out an investigation into a derailment at Mile End on the Central Line of London Underground on 5 July 2007.
Six axles of a westbound Central Line train derailed shortly after 09:00 hrs on the morning of 5 July 2007. The derailment took place in a tunnel between Mile End and Bethnal Green. RAIB Inspectors have attended the site and are investigating the reasons for the derailment.
Approximately 550 passengers have been evacuated from the train. The RAIB understands that a small number of minor injuries and one more serious injury have occurred.
The RAIB's investigation into the derailment is proceeding independently of any parallel investigations by the British Transport Police and the safety authority, but the RAIB will share technical evidence as appropriate, subject to legal exclusions such as the identity and statements of witnesses.
The RAIB will publish a report, including any recommendations to improve safety, at the conclusion of its investigation. This report will be available on the RAIB website.
You can subscribe to automated emails notifying you when the RAIB publishes its reports. Click to subscribe.
The report should be out in a couple of weeks/months.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 15:55:08 GMT
How many staff would be needed Simon to safely and quickly evacuate say just that one train with circa 600 customers on? 2 at the train, 2 at the platform edge/ramp and how many along the track.... Very few stations would have enough staff to handle this procedure properly - although we're trained for it - you must wait for assistance either from an other station or the BTP, which takes time (hence the two hour delay no doubt) In reality you wouldn't need a huge number of staff, 5 perhaps, depending on how far you need to walk them. The question being, how many stations will be on the legal minimum of just 2 from next year
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Jul 5, 2007 17:10:37 GMT
As a general point, I think this highlights the huge responsibility a train operator has, and why they should be paid well.
To suddenly be responsible for 600 odd people in the moments after an incident like this must be very stressful to say the least -thankfully it is a very rare event.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 17:30:26 GMT
As a general point, I think this highlights the huge responsibility a train operator has, and why they should be paid well. To suddenly be responsible for 600 odd people in the moments after an incident like this must be very stressful to say the least -thankfully it is a very rare event. And just to expand also explains the responsibilities (& pay) of station staff and in fact all operational LU staff.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Jul 5, 2007 17:39:49 GMT
There does seem to have been quite a delay between the incident, and actual detrainment here. Obviously living here, we only get half a story, but it sounded like there was up to two hours before people were allowed off the trains. My take, is that the current has to be left on to reverse/move trains to stations to detrain, then current switch off to allow passengers to be lead up the tracks to the nearest station. Pleasing to know that although there were injuries, none were serious. Hats off to all those who ensured the safety of up to 600 people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 17:40:32 GMT
And just to expand also explains the responsibilities (& pay) of station staff and in fact all operational LU staff. Which goes back to the thread elsewhere on the forum that talks about why train ops are well paid in comparison to other jobs. Simply the responsibilty level is different.
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Jul 5, 2007 17:57:08 GMT
wow makes me think it must have been pretty heavy duty stuff to derail a 100tonne train Not necessary - Moscow morons threw an iron grating on the track once, and the leading bogie of the next train derailed (fortunately for everyone, on a very low speed).
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,766
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 5, 2007 18:14:13 GMT
I read this morning on the RAIB site the report into the derailment of a tram on the Seaton Tramway in Devon. That was caused (probably) by "persons unknown" putting small stone(s) between the switch and stock rails such that the leading bogie split the points.
It doesn't take much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2007 18:36:13 GMT
I read this morning on the RAIB site the report into the derailment of a tram on the Seaton Tramway in Devon. That was caused (probably) by "persons unknown" putting small stone(s) between the switch and stock rails such that the leading bogie split the points. It doesn't take much. Trams do derail easier than a train it has to be said.
|
|