|
Post by stapler on Aug 8, 2019 20:49:43 GMT
Why is an offpeak z5/z2 fare Buckhurst Hill- Hackney Central £1.50 on LU (tapping pink reader at Stratford) whereas z5/z2 Chingford-Hackney Downs on LO £2.40?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 8, 2019 21:33:30 GMT
Short answer: Politics. Slightly longer answer: TfL don't fully control the fares on National Rail routes and on routes with parallel NR services they are set in combination with the relevant other operator(s) and the DfT. They are also not allowed to allow cliff-edge fare differences at the Greater London zonal boundary. Like anything to do with rail fares in the UK though it's all very complicated.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Aug 8, 2019 21:44:12 GMT
Short answer: Politics. Slightly longer answer: TfL don't fully control the fares on National Rail routes Also why fares are higher and Over-60 passes are not accepted before 0930 on most TOC-operated routes.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Aug 9, 2019 12:32:40 GMT
Short answer: Politics. Slightly longer answer: TfL don't fully control the fares on National Rail routes and on routes with parallel NR services they are set in combination with the relevant other operator(s) and the DfT. They are also not allowed to allow cliff-edge fare differences at the Greater London zonal boundary. Like anything to do with rail fares in the UK though it's all very complicated. I can see that, but there are no other routes paralleling the Chingford line. So it must just be the DFT (there is an A missing from that, surely?)
|
|
futurix
Formerly Alex F
The cows are not what they seem.
Posts: 75
|
Post by futurix on Aug 9, 2019 14:12:43 GMT
Considering that Chingford line is Overground, which is for ticketing purposes is fully a National Rail concern - there's no need for a parallel NR services.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Aug 9, 2019 16:59:58 GMT
There is a parallel NR service over part of the route, between Liverpool Street and Hackney Downs
|
|
|
Post by phil on Aug 9, 2019 17:39:26 GMT
Short answer: Politics. Slightly longer answer: TfL don't fully control the fares on National Rail routes and on routes with parallel NR services they are set in combination with the relevant other operator(s) and the DfT. They are also not allowed to allow cliff-edge fare differences at the Greater London zonal boundary. Like anything to do with rail fares in the UK though it's all very complicated. I can see that, but there are no other routes paralleling the Chingford line. So it must just be the DFT (there is an A missing from that, surely?) It’s a point lots of people (including quite a few on this fourm) fail to appreciate - that despite all the ‘Overground’ branding (and TfLs attempts to act as though the national rail network doesn’t exist publicity wise), the transfer of said ‘Overground’ services to TfL from the DfT is contingent on certain things being done (and continuing to be done) as the DfT dictate. It is a legal requirement (of the deal between the DfT and TfL) that ‘Overground’ fares must broadly in line with national fares policy (e.g. year on year increases, no ‘cliff edges’ at / close to the TfL boundary, no reduction in the revues accruing to other TOCs as part of the Travelcard scheme, etc. Yes TfL have some wiggle room - but due to differing fares polices between the DfT and TfL that room is reducing year on year. Incidentally it’s being part of the national rail setup that has saved quite a few ticket offices as under the 1994 privatisation legislation there are a lot more legally mandated hoops that must be jumped through compared to ‘pure’ TfL operations like the Tube. Were TfL to try and do there own thing then powers exist for the DfT to take back control of the Overground concession - though obviously relations would have to have completely broken down for this event to take place. As such Mayor Khan’s ‘fare freeze’ is impossible to implement on the Overground - if he kept fares low on the Chingford branch say then you would get a ‘cliff edge’ situation emerging between Walthamstow and Hackney Downs (the later being shared with the DfT run Grater Anglia franchise who are expected to increase fares up to 1% above inflation every year by said DfT).
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Aug 9, 2019 19:37:04 GMT
Thanks for all those explanations. Since there is a 60% difference,I shall stick to LU and the "safe" LO services like the North London in future! Epping to West Croydon via Whitechapel for £1.50 is quite good value.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 9, 2019 19:45:39 GMT
I do wish they'd abolish the fare zones on maps. Whatever use they might supposedly have as a general guide is negated by the fact that NR services run on a very different scale. In fact, you could probably just as well guess from looking at how long a journey is on the map that longer=more expensive in general. And if that's all people get from the zonal markings...
|
|
londoner
thinking on '73 stock
Posts: 480
|
Post by londoner on Aug 9, 2019 20:57:21 GMT
If the same journies mentioned by the OP were made, would these "fare disparities" exist if an oyster travelcard was used, or a contactless card with weekly capping?
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Aug 10, 2019 7:04:26 GMT
Someone with a better grasp of all this will know forsure, but presumably that is all accounted for when the spoils of the pot for travelcard/weekely capped use are divided up between the operators?
|
|
|
Post by phil on Aug 10, 2019 9:10:11 GMT
If the same journies mentioned by the OP were made, would these "fare disparities" exist if an oyster travelcard was used, or a contactless card with weekly capping?
Yes! The DfT requirements as regards Overground fare policy must be maintained whatever the payment method (cash, Oyster, Contactless or Travelcard) used. As I said earlier even though TfL like to pretend they are in total control of Overground services, the reality is somewhat different.
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Aug 10, 2019 10:42:02 GMT
I do wish they'd abolish the fare zones on maps. Whatever use they might supposedly have as a general guide is negated by the fact that NR services run on a very different scale. In fact, you could probably just as well guess from looking at how long a journey is on the map that longer=more expensive in general. And if that's all people get from the zonal markings... The value of showing the zones is in knowing where a travelcard will be valid.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Aug 10, 2019 14:57:24 GMT
I too appreciate seeing zones on maps.
As for fares, it seems that west London TfL services are cheaper than east London. I've gone from Gants Hill to West Drayton and only been charged £1.50 I am also charged £1.50 to West Croydon and Clapham Junction but if I return home via Ilford (instead of Gants Hill, both are in zone 4) then my fare is £1.90.
Last week I was in south-west London, and my fare to Putney from Gants Hill (via Clapham Junction and a pink Oytser reader at Canada water) was £2.50 - £1 extra for travelling a couple of stations!!
It gets worse ... a local journey Putney - Barnes cost £2.10! I walked back to Putney - I could have caught a bus and paid a cheaper fare but I had a lot of time on my hands so decided to walk.
I have found a way however to make individual fares 'less important' - or even irrelevant. This is to spend enough on travel fares to reach the fares cap. In this respect the higher mainline TOC fares make life easier!!
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Aug 10, 2019 15:17:35 GMT
There are other threads to discuss the inclusion of zones on maps. Back on topic please.
|
|
|
Post by commuter on Sept 3, 2019 7:47:42 GMT
All single journeys on the TFL services into Liverpool St {this includes the TFLRail/Crossrail line from Shenfield as well as the ex West Anglia routes of Greater Anglia that are now run by Overground} are higher than the equivalent zones on the TFL farescale.
This has been since the services were launched. I believe the concern was something to do with revenue loss from longer distance NR routes, and was mandated by the DFT.
Mr Khan’s fare freeze {that doesn’t benefit many people as most Londoners haven’t had a fare freeze} also doesn’t apply for trips on these routes and these have increased the last 2 years.
|
|
|
Post by dagdave on Sept 3, 2019 7:57:05 GMT
All single journeys on the TFL services into Liverpool St {this includes the TFLRail/Crossrail line from Shenfield as well as the ex West Anglia routes of Greater Anglia that are now run by Overground} are higher than the equivalent zones on the TFL farescale. This has been since the services were launched. I believe the concern was something to do with revenue loss from longer distance NR routes, and was mandated by the DFT. Mr Khan’s fare freeze {that doesn’t benefit many people as most Londoners haven’t had a fare freeze} also doesn’t apply for trips on these routes and these have increased the last 2 years. Once the Elizabeth line opens fully, is the fare structure going to change to the LU model? By naming the line like a London Underground line it's bound to cause confusion if it is not.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Sept 3, 2019 18:03:04 GMT
By naming the line like a London Underground line it's bound to cause confusion if it is not. Except it's not named like an underground line. The Victoria Line is simply "Victoria", however Crossrail is to be the "Elizabeth Line". Thus Crossrail should actually be the "'Elizabeth Line' Line".
|
|
|
Post by greggygreggygreg on Sept 3, 2019 18:04:55 GMT
All single journeys on the TFL services into Liverpool St {this includes the TFLRail/Crossrail line from Shenfield as well as the ex West Anglia routes of Greater Anglia that are now run by Overground} are higher than the equivalent zones on the TFL farescale. This has been since the services were launched. I believe the concern was something to do with revenue loss from longer distance NR routes, and was mandated by the DFT. Mr Khan’s fare freeze {that doesn’t benefit many people as most Londoners haven’t had a fare freeze} also doesn’t apply for trips on these routes and these have increased the last 2 years. Once the Elizabeth line opens fully, is the fare structure going to change to the LU model? By naming the line like a London Underground line it's bound to cause confusion if it is not. It'll have to in Central London, surely, as it'll be impossible to tell whether someone has travelled on the Elizabeth Line or LU services until someone has travelled east of Stratford / west of Ealing unless separate gatelines are to be installed? How is Thameslink fares structured within the core? Do I recall LU fares applied to that when it opened within the central area?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 3, 2019 19:10:03 GMT
The single fare finder shows identical fares for all combinations of West Hampstead, Farringdon, London Bridge and Elephant and Castle stations that I tried.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Sept 3, 2019 19:16:05 GMT
Once the Elizabeth line opens fully, is the fare structure going to change to the LU model? By naming the line like a London Underground line it's bound to cause confusion if it is not. It'll have to in Central London, surely, as it'll be impossible to tell whether someone has travelled on the Elizabeth Line or LU services until someone has travelled east of Stratford / west of Ealing unless separate gatelines are to be installed? How is Thameslink fares structured within the core? Do I recall LU fares applied to that when it opened within the central area?
West of Paddington and East of Liverpool Street fares on the Elizabeth line will HAVE to mirror those currently in place on the national rail network.
Ealing Broadway will still be served by GWR and Stratford will continue to be served by GA. Any departure by TfL from National rail fares will cause differences to emerge leading to the cliff edge situation the DfT has specifically forbidden.
Yes between Paddington and Abbey Wood its TfLs railway so they can do what they want - but by virtue of operations west of Paddington and east from Liverpool St to Shenfield being takeovers of current national rail services operating on national rail infrastructure then the DfT rules as regards fares MUST stay.
Thameslink fares through the core are determined by the DfT rules - and many are still based on the premise that national rail services from the north 'terminate at Faringdon (was Moorgate) and those from the south 'terminate at City Thameslink (was Holborn Viaduct). They fit within the zonal structure because the DfT has input (via franchised operators) into the Travelcard scheme meaning TfL cannot arbiterally 'freeze fares'
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 3, 2019 19:40:28 GMT
I seem to recall reading that TfL rates (rather than the higher TOC rates) are already charged between Abbey Wood and Farringdon although at present the only direct trains run via Maze Hill
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 3, 2019 19:54:17 GMT
Current Oyster/contactless fares: Farringdon → Abbey Wood £3.90 peak / £2.80 off peak (route unspecified) Farringdon → Abbey Wood £5.90 peak / £4.60 off peak (changing at: "Blackfriars, Cannon Street, Charing Cross, London Bridge or Waterloo East (or Victoria or Waterloo)")
Farringdon → Plumstead £4.20 peak / £3.10 off peak (route unspecified) Farringdon → Plumstead £5.90 peak / £4.60 off peak (changing at: "Blackfriars, Cannon Street or London Bridge (or Charing Cross, Victoria, Waterloo or Waterloo East)")
So TfL rates are being charged, but they're lower than the TOC rates.
The unspecified route fares are presumable available by changing outside Zone 1 (i.e. Greenwich, Lewisham, Woolwich Arsenal or New Cross).
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Sept 3, 2019 20:42:04 GMT
Current Oyster/contactless fares: Farringdon → Abbey Wood £3.90 peak / £2.80 off peak (route unspecified) Farringdon → Abbey Wood £5.90 peak / £4.60 off peak (changing at: "Blackfriars, Cannon Street, Charing Cross, London Bridge or Waterloo East (or Victoria or Waterloo)") Farringdon → Plumstead £4.20 peak / £3.10 off peak (route unspecified) Farringdon → Plumstead £5.90 peak / £4.60 off peak (changing at: "Blackfriars, Cannon Street or London Bridge (or Charing Cross, Victoria, Waterloo or Waterloo East)") So TfL rates are being charged, but they're lower than the TOC rates. The unspecified route fares are presumable available by changing outside Zone 1 (i.e. Greenwich, Lewisham, Woolwich Arsenal or New Cross). There is a direct half hourly Thameslink service between Abbey Wood and Farringdon so you don't need to change. You can also sit in the first class as there are no first fares available for the journey.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 3, 2019 21:00:16 GMT
There is a direct half hourly Thameslink service between Abbey Wood and Farringdon so you don't need to change. You can also sit in the first class as there are no first fares available for the journey. It's not the direct service which causes the lower fare though. It's because the fares were set before it was realised that Crossrail wasn't going to happen, and when it does, there will be a common barrier line at both Abbey Wood and Farringdon so it will be impossible to identify which route has been taken, so the lower TfL fare will have to be charged unless you do an OSI en route (e.g at Cannon Street).
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 3, 2019 21:22:55 GMT
There is a direct half hourly Thameslink service between Abbey Wood and Farringdon so you don't need to change. You can also sit in the first class as there are no first fares available for the journey. It's not the direct service which causes the lower fare though. It's because the fares were set before it was realised that Crossrail wasn't going to happen, and when it does, there will be a common barrier line at both Abbey Wood and Farringdon so it will be impossible to identify which route has been taken, so the lower TfL fare will have to be charged unless you do an OSI en route (e.g at Cannon Street). Indeed, and this is exactly why Bond Street to Abbey Wood is cheaper than Bond Street to Plumstead, despite there being no direct route.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Sept 3, 2019 21:29:57 GMT
Of course,some fares were always the same,and tickets interavailable; eg Stratford-LV via Central Line or main line. So eg,Loughton to Oxford Circus has always been the same whether or not you go through the barrier at LV,and presumably that wil lbe the same after Crossrail. Doubtless all these anomalies will one day be sorted out,with fares set at the highest common denominator!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 3, 2019 22:47:05 GMT
Whether it's the highest, lowest or somewhere in between will I suspect depend, in part, on the political hue of the Mayor of London, Chancellor of the Exchequer and Secretary of State for Transport of and when it happens. As politics is even less predictable than usual at the moment, speculating on what combination would lead to what is not what I'd suggest as a good use of time.
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Sept 6, 2019 10:35:25 GMT
Current Oyster/contactless fares: Farringdon → Abbey Wood £3.90 peak / £2.80 off peak (route unspecified) Farringdon → Abbey Wood £5.90 peak / £4.60 off peak (changing at: "Blackfriars, Cannon Street, Charing Cross, London Bridge or Waterloo East (or Victoria or Waterloo)") Farringdon → Plumstead £4.20 peak / £3.10 off peak (route unspecified) Farringdon → Plumstead £5.90 peak / £4.60 off peak (changing at: "Blackfriars, Cannon Street or London Bridge (or Charing Cross, Victoria, Waterloo or Waterloo East)") So TfL rates are being charged, but they're lower than the TOC rates. The unspecified route fares are presumable available by changing outside Zone 1 (i.e. Greenwich, Lewisham, Woolwich Arsenal or New Cross). There is a direct half hourly Thameslink service between Abbey Wood and Farringdon so you don't need to change. You can also sit in the first class as there are no first fares available for the journey. Surely, unless explicitly declassified, you can only sit in first class if the train is advertised as standard class only rather than simply not having a fare between a specific station pair.
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Sept 6, 2019 10:47:53 GMT
There is a direct half hourly Thameslink service between Abbey Wood and Farringdon so you don't need to change. You can also sit in the first class as there are no first fares available for the journey. Surely, unless explicitly declassified, you can only sit in first class if the train is advertised as standard class only rather than simply not having a fare between a specific station pair. It amounts to the same thing. It applies all the way to Rainham (Kent) The screens on the platform at Farringdon say first class is not available. Also the screens in first class area of the trains confirm this. It is the same for Southeastern trains when they put out long distance units on Metro services.
|
|