|
Post by xplaistow on Jan 14, 2020 14:41:36 GMT
Another small nitpick:
AB-DB-BD-BA X AB-DB-DB-BA X AB-DB-BD-BA X
AB-DB-BD-BA is repeated. One of them should be AB-BD-DB-BA.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Jan 15, 2020 0:02:36 GMT
In which case, surely having the shuttles is pointless and you may as well keep projecting what trains were being projected from Woodford via Hainault to Central London previously through to Central London? I thought the idea of having a 4 car unit was that it would release another 4 car unit for mods, which will obviously not be possible if you then have to stick with an 8 car? I've yet to see how a shuttle service saves anything.Two trains to provide 3tph service including reversing times is very inefficiently. It requires two drivers and four operative cabs. The current through trains avoid reversing time at Hainault platform, and instead take it at Woodford siding. By running through they have 20 minutes extra run time, which can be covered by one 8-car train, one driver and two operative cabs.
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Jan 15, 2020 13:56:56 GMT
In which case, surely having the shuttles is pointless and you may as well keep projecting what trains were being projected from Woodford via Hainault to Central London previously through to Central London? I thought the idea of having a 4 car unit was that it would release another 4 car unit for mods, which will obviously not be possible if you then have to stick with an 8 car? That would require a new timetable and duty rosters which would mean carrying on with WTT69 for several months while further delaying the heavy overhaul (should have been completed by August 2017). indeed, defeats the objective somewhat, no reduction, no point changing WTT69
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jan 15, 2020 21:29:45 GMT
I have read this with incredulity ... utterly astonished that the shuttle will be run - even though the trains will be no shorter.
There is a practical reason why a few months delay will significantly benefit the travelling public.
This is because it is the winter and passengers will be happier not having to alight at open air stations in the colder weather. At present they do not need to do this - passengers on trains which terminate at Hainault or Newbury park tend to alight at Gants Hill and wait for a Woodford via Hainalt there.
Admittedly its not yet been icy cold, but I still see people doing this.
By way of contrast, in the summer its much more pleasant to change trains at an outdoor station.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jan 16, 2020 8:27:11 GMT
So does this mean: 1 - that the loop will have 8 car trains Nov-Mar, and 4s Apr-Oct 2 - That the upgrade will last not 3 years, as was being told by "Tube Managers" (!) at affected stations recently, but 3yrs 9 months? 3 - or that the gapping problem is such that it'll last 6 years?
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Jan 16, 2020 11:32:19 GMT
1) if WTT70 is introduced on 26 January the loop will have 8-car shuttles until they can find a way to stop 4-car shuttles getting "gapped". Once they sort that out it will be 4-car shuttles until they introduce WTT71 or whenever they reintroduce the Woodford via Hainault service.
2) don't know.
3) ditto.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jan 16, 2020 12:04:22 GMT
WTT70 seems a bit of a dog's breakfast what with gapping and no de-icing. Isn't one (or 100) of TfL's "strategic managers" paid to obviate this sort of thing? Especially as if the upgrade programme isn't finished till 2026, by which time the trains will have only 6-7 years of life left? Or is the NTFL introduction on the Central itself delayed??
BTW, how do the 92TS get to the Acton facility, which "Tube managers" were saying had been specially built, and where is it in realation to the rest of the works? Is there a timetable slot for the transfers? Also BTW, what happened about the rear cab closedown buttons referred to earlier in this thread, for stepping back at Loughton?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 16, 2020 12:35:58 GMT
This all sounds like a shambles!
Does either 1962 RAT (Rail adhesion train) have a de-icer car? If so would it be possible to run that (not in passenger service) in between the shuttle paths?
Not sure how to sort out the gapping issue. Perhaps short trip a couple of Hainault trains every so often to Newbury Park and a couple of Epping trains at Loughton/Woodford to release a train?
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Jan 16, 2020 13:52:57 GMT
Not sure how to sort out the gapping issue. Perhaps short trip a couple of Hainault trains every so often to Newbury Park and a couple of Epping trains at Loughton/Woodford to release a train? Once again if you are going to "short trip" trains on a regular basis that would require a revised timetable and changes to the duty roster. There were complaints when it was announced that we'd be reducing the number of Epping trains during the morning and evening peaks so I suspect if we were to have even more Loughton reversers it would not be popular.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Jan 16, 2020 15:14:23 GMT
Message from the ASLEF rep, they've met with management and WTT70 will go ahead as planned, starting Sunday 26 January
Let the fun and games commence!
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Jan 16, 2020 16:26:50 GMT
With some additional earlies for us, not that that matters to you 😉
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Jan 16, 2020 23:29:50 GMT
WTT70 seems a bit of a dog's breakfast what with gapping and no de-icing. Isn't one (or 100) of TfL's "strategic managers" paid to obviate this sort of thing? Especially as if the upgrade programme isn't finished till 2026, by which time the trains will have only 6-7 years of life left? Or is the NTFL introduction on the Central itself delayed?? ….. Latest fleet summary has CLIP 2020/23, and Siemens deliveries 2030/36, with a programmed lift 2027/29, but no funding available at present. So current trains will have 10-16 years to run at least.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 17, 2020 23:55:51 GMT
WTT70 seems a bit of a dog's breakfast what with gapping and no de-icing. Isn't one (or 100) of TfL's "strategic managers" paid to obviate this sort of thing? Especially as if the upgrade programme isn't finished till 2026, by which time the trains will have only 6-7 years of life left? Or is the NTFL introduction on the Central itself delayed?? ….. Latest fleet summary has CLIP 2020/23, and Siemens deliveries 2030/36, with a programmed lift 2027/29, but no funding available at present. So current trains will have 10-16 years to run at least. 2030-2036 seems a long time to deliver a fleet of trains to one line.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Jan 18, 2020 0:27:30 GMT
Latest fleet summary has CLIP 2020/23, and Siemens deliveries 2030/36, with a programmed lift 2027/29, but no funding available at present. So current trains will have 10-16 years to run at least. 2030-2036 seems a long time to deliver a fleet of trains to one line. I've a feeling the contract with Siemens was modified before signing to have only one production line instead of two, but with possibility of further discussions to speed deliveries.
|
|
|
Post by underover on Jan 18, 2020 22:24:25 GMT
Does either 1962 RAT (Rail adhesion train) have a de-icer car? If so would it be possible to run that (not in passenger service) in between the shuttle paths? It is fitted with deicer (Sandite cars always are to improve their usefulness). When it would run however is another question. The 5 car is off for works to be done, the 8 car is currently not able to go via rail/tunnel. The train does not live at Hainault (only during sandite season).
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 19, 2020 14:58:05 GMT
If there is an urgent need for deicing perhaps the 8 car RAT can be taken by road to Hainault although that concept is absurd!
If the shuttle runs every 20 mins there should be available paths on the Chigwell section. I don’t know what difficulties there would be at Woodford and Hainault though. Perhaps a reverse off the platform at Woodford and the use of a spare platform (if there is one?) at Hainault?
|
|
|
Post by littlejohn on Jan 19, 2020 16:13:13 GMT
2030-2036 seems a long time to deliver a fleet of trains to one line. I've a feeling the contract with Siemens was modified before signing to have only one production line instead of two, but with possibility of further discussions to speed deliveries. I suppose that by spreading the delivery over a number of years, TfL don't have to find the money all at once but can similarly spread the cost.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 19, 2020 16:40:26 GMT
I've a feeling the contract with Siemens was modified before signing to have only one production line instead of two, but with possibility of further discussions to speed deliveries. I suppose that by spreading the delivery over a number of years, TfL don't have to find the money all at once but can similarly spread the cost. Or alternatively. allow for slippage.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jan 20, 2020 8:27:21 GMT
If there is an urgent need for deicing perhaps the 8 car RAT can be taken by road to Hainault although that concept is absurd! If the shuttle runs every 20 mins there should be available paths on the Chigwell section. I don’t know what difficulties there would be at Woodford and Hainault though. Perhaps a reverse off the platform at Woodford and the use of a spare platform (if there is one?) at Hainault? I wouldn't have thought there was much capacity, if any for this, especially at Woodford, where any little delay affects the "main line" disproportionately. I'm afraid I plead ignorance: what happens on a frosty morning if de-icing fluid has not been applied? Severe arcing, I assume, but enough to stop the service? Don't the 92s also have sleet brooms as well?
|
|
|
Post by underover on Jan 20, 2020 13:28:30 GMT
If there is an urgent need for deicing perhaps the 8 car RAT can be taken by road to Hainault although that concept is absurd! If the shuttle runs every 20 mins there should be available paths on the Chigwell section. I don’t know what difficulties there would be at Woodford and Hainault though. Perhaps a reverse off the platform at Woodford and the use of a spare platform (if there is one?) at Hainault? Wheels on the RAT train generally get turned on the lathe after every season. Its normally done at Northfields, so you have to wait your turn to use the lathe. Service trains take priority. You then have the team who looks after the RAT, they don't just get packed away until next sandite season, so exams need to booked and the team made aware so they can plan. Any issues the train may have, the team needs to be available to carry out repair, especially if the train is providing a required service, in which case repairs need to be done as quick as possible and I believe the team is based at Acton. But never say never, regardless how absurd an idea is.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jan 21, 2020 0:05:22 GMT
If there is an urgent need for deicing perhaps the 8 car RAT can be taken by road to Hainault although that concept is absurd! If the shuttle runs every 20 mins there should be available paths on the Chigwell section. I don’t know what difficulties there would be at Woodford and Hainault though. Perhaps a reverse off the platform at Woodford and the use of a spare platform (if there is one?) at Hainault? I wouldn't have thought there was much capacity, if any for this, especially at Woodford, where any little delay affects the "main line" disproportionately. I'm afraid I plead ignorance: what happens on a frosty morning if de-icing fluid has not been applied? Severe arcing, I assume, but enough to stop the service? Don't the 92s also have sleet brooms as well? Here is a good story about an icy day on the red line: www.districtdave.co.uk/html/ice_tale.html
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jan 21, 2020 0:34:40 GMT
If there is an urgent need for deicing perhaps the 8 car RAT can be taken by road to Hainault although that concept is absurd! If the shuttle runs every 20 mins there should be available paths on the Chigwell section. I don’t know what difficulties there would be at Woodford and Hainault though. Perhaps a reverse off the platform at Woodford and the use of a spare platform (if there is one?) at Hainault? I wouldn't have thought there was much capacity, if any for this, especially at Woodford, where any little delay affects the "main line" disproportionately. I'm afraid I plead ignorance: what happens on a frosty morning if de-icing fluid has not been applied? Severe arcing, I assume, but enough to stop the service? Don't the 92s also have sleet brooms as well? It can be enough to stop the service, as it builds up an insulating layer on the conductor rails which can prevent trains picking up current. This is especially risky if the train is climbing a gradient, going over points or a short train - in other words places where continuity of power is more essential. When it snows this is the main reason for trains getting stuck, there would be no chance at all of running without de-icing. Having said all this, I don’t think this is necessarily a show-stopper for the shuttle plans. They could just have the odd Epping train diverted on a random basis, or a train terminating at Hainault via Newbury Park could be diverted via Woodford instead as the running times more-or-less match up. Naturally wait for the day when someone forgets and watch out for an inquest into why!
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jan 21, 2020 8:32:36 GMT
Thanks for replies.I don't even remember severe weather in 2004. North Ends's last para probably hits the button!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jan 23, 2020 11:28:36 GMT
On the topic of snow, power rails and the Central line this still image from video may be of interest (filmed from footbridge over the line near Sainsbury's Newbury Park) As for the changes to the Hainault - Woodford service, this line guide extract (seen at Bank station) might be old, but its becoming relevant again.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jan 23, 2020 12:00:37 GMT
Public leaflet on the proposed changes:
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Jan 23, 2020 12:18:37 GMT
On the topic of snow, power rails and the Central line this still image from video may be of interest (filmed from footbridge over the line near Sainsbury's Newbury Park) As for the changes to the Hainault - Woodford service, this line guide extract (seen at Bank station) might be old, but its becoming relevant again. Wonder why the line map is shown inverted?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jan 23, 2020 12:34:15 GMT
Wonder why the line map is shown inverted? Probably for reading down from station of origin, then loop would be on correct right side ?
|
|
|
Post by ijmad on Jan 23, 2020 13:23:32 GMT
The most disappointing part of that (otherwise great) story was them not getting to couple and drive a 24 car train!
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jan 24, 2020 0:32:14 GMT
Public leaflet on the proposed changes: Makes me smile how it’s spun as an enhancement programme. It would have been a little more honest to tell it as it is - along the lines of that these trains are royally knackered and urgently need a package of remedial works to allow them to continue to operate reliably or perhaps even at all. Honesty is the best way to get people on side, especially if you’re subjecting them to what at times will no doubt be quite an inconvenience.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jan 24, 2020 8:26:26 GMT
Since when have we had honesty without spin from TfL?
|
|