|
Post by philthetube on Sept 27, 2018 15:37:21 GMT
Its hardly a secret that the TOCS would love to ditch 'privs' if they could - its only the fact the fact that the privatisation legislation makes their provision a requirement for 'safeguarded' ex BR employees which means they still run the scheme.
If they are so keen to scrap the scheme, why did the extend it a few years ago to allow the discount on off-peak tickets as well as anytime tickets? There might be support for scrapping right at the top but many of the people needed to do the work for scrapping would be doing themselves out of cheap travel.
|
|
|
Post by trt on Sept 28, 2018 9:33:25 GMT
And from what I read in the paper, a lot of the people right at the top enjoy the privilege of reduced travel costs in First Class!
|
|
|
Post by phil on Sept 28, 2018 21:54:20 GMT
If they are so keen to scrap the scheme, why did the extend it a few years ago to allow the discount on off-peak tickets as well as anytime tickets? There might be support for scrapping right at the top but many of the people needed to do the work for scrapping would be doing themselves out of cheap travel.
How many people exactly?
Please remember that unless you happened to have the good fortune to either have been employed by British Rail on a specific date in March 1996 or were in receipt of a British Rail pension at the time then you don't get it full stop!
That means anyone post 1996 workers who are employed by Network Rail, any of the freight operators, train maintainers (where it has been outsourced to the likes of Hitachi etc), those working for the big track renewal contractors, etc all lose out.
That move has already saved ATOC (or whoever they are these days) an awful lot of money over the years and is why they don't want to reopen the 'priv' system to the aforementioned workers (and charge large fees to the likes of NR who are duty bound to 'buy' it in for their ex BR employees).
ATOC keep it in place for passenger TOCs because it suits them to do so - and because nobody wants to be the first to break ranks over it.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Sept 28, 2018 22:00:18 GMT
And from what I read in the paper, a lot of the people right at the top enjoy the privilege of reduced travel costs in First Class! Do not confuse 'priv' tickets (which are supposed to only be used for leisure / personal journeys and not business related trips) with internal 'company perks (i.e. discounted travel on all franchises held by one particular company)' or 'mutual recognition' type schemes amongst TOCs
For example that Southern guy who kicked up a media storm a month or so ago was using his internal company travel pass - not a 'priv'
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Sept 30, 2018 21:09:21 GMT
And from what I read in the paper, a lot of the people right at the top enjoy the privilege of reduced travel costs in First Class! Quite, and account for a substantial proportion of first class usage. When Mr Corbyn nationalises the railways will first class be for the chop? I ask because when I was a boy my dad usually made a beeline for the declassified firsts in the Quint-arts (declassified 1941 but still comfortable in the 5os!)
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 1, 2018 3:47:55 GMT
They're not waiting for Corbyn or nationalisation. Last year Grayling said first class should be abolished on commuter trains and its possible that it will be removed from Southeastern when the next franchise is awarded in 2019. Great Western reduced the number of first class seats on their High Speeds by half in 2011 and Chiltern abolished first class in 2002 but reintroduced "Business Class" in 2011.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 1, 2018 9:08:39 GMT
They're not waiting for Corbyn or nationalisation. Last year Grayling said first class should be abolished on commuter trains and its possible that it will be removed from Southeastern when the next franchise is awarded in 2019. Great Western reduced the number of first class seats on their High Speeds by half in 2011 and Chiltern abolished first class in 2002 but reintroduced "Business Class" in 2011. Don't kid yourself - Chiltern's 'Business class' is simply 'first class' by another name (and the MD has admitted as much in the past).
They may well have ditched 'first class' back in 2003 while basically an outer suburban style outfit but it was made very clear to the board by various wealthy inhabitants of Warwickshire that if Chiltern wanted to provide areal alternative to luxury cars (via the M40+A40 corridor into the heart of London) or Virgin on the WCML who did offer first class accommodation), then having some form of 'enhanced' travelling accommodation on Chiltern services was a must. Hence Chiltern introduced their 'business class' on their new loco + refurnished Mk3s between London and Birmingham and the returns from doing so have been very satisfactory.
Granted, South Eastern is a bit different as it has never been seen as a potential 'InterCity' type operation (unlike London - Birmingham) and their services on HS1 are of a single class - although you could argue that the premium fares charged for the bits of the journey that use HS1 infrastructure are a sort of substitute for first class in the sense that you are paying extra for something a bit better (in this case better = faster).
You also need to remember that these days having a first class ticket is less about comfort (take a look inside the 'first class' section of a 700 class unit and note just how little extra you get by way of comfort) and more about guaranteeing a seat!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 1, 2018 12:23:54 GMT
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 1, 2018 12:40:01 GMT
They're not waiting for Corbyn or nationalisation. Last year Grayling said first class should be abolished on commuter trains and its possible that it will be removed from Southeastern when the next franchise is awarded in 2019. Great Western reduced the number of first class seats on their High Speeds by half in 2011 and Chiltern abolished first class in 2002 but reintroduced "Business Class" in 2011. Don't kid yourself - Chiltern's 'Business class' is simply 'first class' by another name (and the MD has admitted as much in the past) The Chiltern "Business Zone" is not first class. Even if you hold a 1st class ticket you have to pay the supplement if you wish to use the facilities.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Oct 1, 2018 12:41:06 GMT
Southeastern has the Javelin service which doesn't have first class.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 1, 2018 19:44:14 GMT
Southeastern has the Javelin service which doesn't have first class.
It might well lack fist class but there is a an additional supplement added to every HS1 ticket. This could be thought of as analogous to first class in some respects because while it may not give enhanced levels of comfort it entitles the user to partake of enhanced speed.
The other things to bear in mind is that the parts of Kent served by Javallin services might not be as affluent as the areas of Warwickshire which Chiltern Railways serve, plus the Javelin operation was largely set up by the DfT (at one stage they were looking at setting it up as a standalone TOC) so the amount of input SE had was reduced accordingly.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 1, 2018 19:49:13 GMT
Don't kid yourself - Chiltern's 'Business class' is simply 'first class' by another name (and the MD has admitted as much in the past) The Chiltern "Business Zone" is not first class. Even if you hold a 1st class ticket you have to pay the supplement if you wish to use the facilities. Thats not the point - what the presence of business class does is take a coach worth of seats away from standard class ticket holders. The fact that it is not marketed as first class / accepts first class tickets* is irrelevant
* Something which benefits the TOC in two ways. Firstly they can charge first class ticket holders so make a bit of extra dosh and secondly it ensures that there is always sufficient 'business class' accommodation available for their own wealthy customers boarding at Chiltern managed stations
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 1, 2018 19:57:41 GMT
InterCity in its latter days required certain minimal levels of comfort including air conditioned coaches. As such the slam door EMUs used in Kent were not up to the job and maps of the 1990s make it clear that BR regarded 'InterCity' services to be those on the WCML, ECML, MML, GWML, GEML (Norwich Only), Gatwick Express and Cross Country.
The Chiltern route at that time was also regarded as an outer suburban service - the potental for it to become a serious compeitor to the WCML was only realised with the introduction of Chiltern's 'Mainline' brand using 'InterCity' standard rolling stock.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 2, 2018 7:09:41 GMT
Kent less affluent than Warwickshire??!!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 2, 2018 9:37:56 GMT
InterCity in its latter days required certain minimal levels of comfort including air conditioned coaches. As such the slam door EMUs used in Kent were not up to the job and maps of the 1990s make it clear that BR regarded 'InterCity' services to be those on the WCML, ECML, MML, GWML, GEML (Norwich Only), Gatwick Express and Cross Country That division was much more to do with "sectorisation", which allocated all services on the former Southern Region to the "Network South East" operating division, (except Gatwick Express and the Cross Country services from the South Coast to Birmingham and beyond, which were deemed "Inter City" - the fomer because it was supposed to be profit-making, and the latter because it didn't fit anywhere else - although in reality it was no more (and no less) of an inter city service than the "Regional" sector's transpennine services). Kent less affluent than Warwickshire??!! Not overall, maybe. But the areas of East Kent served by the Javelins are less well-off than the areas of Warwickshire (Solihull, Warwick) served by Chiltern www.kentlive.news/news/kent-news/21-most-deprived-areas-kent-497851
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Oct 2, 2018 19:06:23 GMT
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Oct 3, 2018 13:54:10 GMT
One of the "reasons" cited is the ability to make staff more visible to "customers", rather than having them hidden away in a ticket office. If you need help with ticketing, or have some complicated problem with trains that you don't know the answer to yourself, is the ability to call staff to the ticketing area available on Overground stations? Is there an intercom button that connects you to their walkietalkie, or alerts them that they are needed in one particular place?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 3, 2018 15:52:48 GMT
I think the idea is that the staff will hover by/in sight of the ticket machines. In my experience of the Underground though this is very hit and miss in practice - usually due to lack of staff.
|
|
|
Post by croxleyn on Oct 3, 2018 17:42:51 GMT
What LR Towers is probably trying to say, in not so many words, is that "We can't guarantee there'll be anyone around, so we won't put them in the most obvious place". Finchley Road & Frognal, on the closure list, has the best possible ticket/control office with wide glass window, easily visible to all passing, so the argument really doesn't stand up. When I've needed to find the Croxley "human", they're invariably in the old ticket office, which can only be seen into by craning across the barrier, then shouting to attract attention... Or the gates are locked open with nobody to be seen.
|
|
londoner
thinking on '73 stock
Posts: 480
|
Post by londoner on Oct 3, 2018 18:50:52 GMT
What LR Towers is probably trying to say, in not so many words, is that "We can't guarantee there'll be anyone around, so we won't put them in the most obvious place". Finchley Road & Frognal, on the closure list, has the best possible ticket/control office with wide glass window, easily visible to all passing, so the argument really doesn't stand up. When I've needed to find the Croxley "human", they're invariably in the old ticket office, which can only be seen into by craning across the barrier, then shouting to attract attention... Or the gates are locked open with nobody to be seen. This is the main issue I have. I don't think its unreasonable to close ticket offices at less busy stations, but the idea that the staff are more visible does not match my experience. If anything, it seems there are fewer station staff and those that remain seem busier and doing tasks behind closed doors. As the other user pointed out, it is indeed hit and miss. I fear that we will end up with staff-less stations in the next 20-30 years.
|
|
|
Post by tjw on Oct 3, 2018 19:37:11 GMT
One of the "reasons" cited is the ability to make staff more visible to "customers", rather than having them hidden away in a ticket office. If you need help with ticketing, or have some complicated problem with trains that you don't know the answer to yourself, is the ability to call staff to the ticketing area available on Overground stations? Is there an intercom button that connects you to their walkietalkie, or alerts them that they are needed in one particular place? By all means evict them from the cosy Booking Office, but will they be on the platform... No, they will gravitate to the equally cosy Porters Room / mess room, with the added bonus of there not being a Station Foreman around to evict them and put them to work.
|
|
|
Post by trt on Oct 4, 2018 12:03:30 GMT
One of the "reasons" cited is the ability to make staff more visible to "customers", rather than having them hidden away in a ticket office. If you need help with ticketing, or have some complicated problem with trains that you don't know the answer to yourself, is the ability to call staff to the ticketing area available on Overground stations? Is there an intercom button that connects you to their walkietalkie, or alerts them that they are needed in one particular place? By all means evict them from the cosy Booking Office, but will they be on the platform... No, they will gravitate to the equally cosy Porters Room / mess room, with the added bonus of there not being a Station Foreman around to evict them and put them to work. Or, indeed, a window.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Oct 4, 2018 13:25:08 GMT
I think the idea is that the staff will hover by/in sight of the ticket machines. In my experience of the Underground though this is very hit and miss in practice - usually due to lack of staff. In my limited experience it is one of two extremes on LU. As per your and others' observations that no one is around or, in Zone 1 locations, there are so many staff that they're having a nice chin wag. I'm not sure either extreme is acceptable - it certainly looks rubbish if you are a customer. I actually used the rebuilt Hackney Wick stn this week. I counted 4 LO staff but I can't be certain they were all on duty or whether a shift change was about to happen as it was mid afternoon. There was certainly one in the ticket office, one "hovering" in the ticket hall and one on the w/b platform. That struck me as a little bit much given the station was not exactly overburdened with passengers. I accept it may be very different in the peaks but isn't that what part time / split shifts are designed to cover? I also don't necessarily "get" this emphasis on visible staff. I'd rather that there was an obvious, well sign posted and consistent location in stations where you know you can find help or assistance if you require it. Quite why that can't be a multi functional space that also happens to sell a ticket I don't know. Having done some station information cover and stood in freezing cold ticket halls for hours on end I can readily sympathise with staff wishing to be in a room rather than standing in an icy blast. There is also, to my mind, another issue at some LO stations. Many are quite small and congested so where on earth will the staff stand without causing congestion at ticket gates or in front of machines or in corridors? Are they going to be forced to stand on platforms where there is often little appreciable cover / weather protection on many LO stations? Given all the money spent on genuine improvements at LO stations I'm not really convinced by a mass closure programme. I also think it may fall foul of Mr Grayling's clear desire not to help out a TfL controlled by a Labour mayor. I wonder how many closure requests may be refused just to heap a bit more financial pressure on TfL? Perverse I know but not the first such decision for this SoS in respect of TfL.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Oct 4, 2018 13:26:33 GMT
What LR Towers is probably trying to say, in not so many words, is that "We can't guarantee there'll be anyone around, so we won't put them in the most obvious place". Finchley Road & Frognal, on the closure list, has the best possible ticket/control office with wide glass window, easily visible to all passing, so the argument really doesn't stand up. When I've needed to find the Croxley "human", they're invariably in the old ticket office, which can only be seen into by craning across the barrier, then shouting to attract attention... Or the gates are locked open with nobody to be seen. This is exactly it - on both Underground and Overground stations. If you wanted the help of a staff member, you would think that the easiest place to expect one to be would be in the ticket office. What good is someone reading a paper sitting at the far end of a platform in a GLAP to someone who has come in off the street wanting to buy a complex ticket? I remember when the first round of ticket office closures occurred on the tube, some of the local staff were saying how frustrating it was for them, because they were in a position where they would have liked to sell tickets in their spare time to break the monotony and alleviate queues when they formed, but were not allowed to because it was out of hours. Combined with people asking for change, having coppers to pay with, refund forms, oyster problems, I understand they got a lot of stick from passengers during that time for being unable to help. Theres a definite use and benefit to having open and staffed ticket offices beyond that which they have chosen to quantify to justify their pre-decided course of action. As croxleyn intimates, one could easily see this as the thin end of a wedge to prepare people for unstaffed stations, and legitimise this as something unexceptional and to be expected. And, indeed, from both the unions and media, we seem to have unstaffed stations at times already. On a related note, the UTS project put those ubiquitous ticket windows across the tube, which are now being sealed up or replaced with simpler glass panes. In the case of Ickenham, the new office when built had these wide glass windows www.ltmuseum.co.uk/collections/collections-online/photographs/item/1998-83360?&apiurl=aHR0cHM6Ly9hcGkubHRtdXNldW0uY28udWsvcGhvdG9ncmFwaHM/c2hvcnQ9MSZza2lwPTAmbGltaXQ9NDgmcT1pY2tlbmhhbStzdGF0aW9u&searchpage=Y29sbGVjdGlvbnMvY29sbGVjdGlvbnMtb25saW5lL3Bob3RvZ3JhcGhzL3BhZ2UvMT8mcT1pY2tlbmhhbStzdGF0aW9uIt is a shame that, upon removal of the modern type of ticket windows, the former large ones were not put back.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Oct 4, 2018 14:48:38 GMT
I am not sure that is a photo of the UTS standard ticket office at Ickenham. That looks very much pre-UTS to me. There were no wide windows on UTS until the Jubilee Line Extension. I won't bore people with details of the tortured debate that went on about those. The decision to have relatively narrow windows and no big expanses of glass were for security reasons and to ensure the windows and ticket bowls (the bit where you put your money and got your ticket from the clerk) were ballistic attack resistant. That Ickenham window office doesn't look hugely secure to me. Still it's all academic now but a lot of money has been spent on throwing away the past and more will be spent on LO too. Makes me wonder what the evaluation period was for ticket office suites in many station rebuild / refurb / development projects and whether that spend has ended up being wasted. That must certainly be an issue on LO where money has gone into a lot of building work on the former North London Railways stations and then those inherited with West Anglia.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Oct 4, 2018 18:04:19 GMT
I am not sure that is a photo of the UTS standard ticket office at Ickenham. That looks very much pre-UTS to me. Thats my point, that is how it was pre UTS, and it was subsequently altered to the normal small ticket window at some point. However, after ticket sales stopped, the ticket window was replaced with a tiny pane of glass and the wall rebuilt around. Its a shame it couldn't have been restored to what it was pre UTS. I haven't read the full report about ticket office closures on LO, but in the LR article it is noted that the ticket sales for one station were from a period before the ticket office became structurally unsafe. Is this noted in the report? Does the report actually state the observation period for ticket sales, or are we back to measurement tricks like that traffic survey BR arranged to be on the deadest Wednesday of the year in the early 60s?
|
|
|
Post by AndrewPSSP on Oct 5, 2018 12:47:00 GMT
E-mail from TfF:
|
|
|
Post by tom73 on Oct 8, 2018 10:53:05 GMT
Witnessed a female member of staff at a Piccadilly Line station brusque and borderline rude when a partially sighted gentleman politely asked for help with using the ticket machine. I discreetly followed the pair of them over to the machines and heard the staff member interacting with the middle aged gentleman as though he was a child/idiot.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 8, 2018 13:45:17 GMT
You should make a formal complaint to TfL about this if it was how you describe.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 8, 2018 16:42:47 GMT
Anyone know if LO ticket machines will release prebooked NR tickets?
|
|