class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Aug 22, 2018 8:08:45 GMT
I caught a District Line train from Hammersmith to Victoria (destination Upminster). It made its way very slowly to Earl's Court, stopping frequently (with 'We are being held at a red signal' announcements each time). Once at Earl's Court, it was on the outside track, and two trains, both for Upminster arrived and departed whilst we waited. During this time there were no announcements by the driver.
As the second of these trains was leaving its platform, we started and crawled out of the station - at much less than walking pace. After a minute or so we speeded up to a very slow pace and made our way to Gloucester Road. After that we proceeded at a normal pace.
Whilst writing this it occurred to me that perhaps there was a signal failure on our platform, but it really was a very odd experience.
And why do LU insist that drivers make entirely superfluous announcements about red signals whenever the train stops at one (what do they think passengers think when a train stops other than at a platform - that's it's stopped to have a natter with its mate on the adjacent line?), and yet go completely silent when there is a significant delay?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 9:27:03 GMT
There was no signal failure at Earls Court or around the surrounding area this morning.
This does happen quite frequently and happens when the trains are either out of turn or arrive late at Earl’s Court and the signaller puts them back in turn to arrive at Barking and Upminster in the right order as this can cause issues when trains arrive one after the other going into sidings / Depot.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Aug 22, 2018 9:29:16 GMT
Possibly a faulty train, the line controller put it into the platform 1 and ran trains around it through platform 2 while the driver was trying to deal with the fault. If its a choice between dealing with a fault to get the train moving again and making PAs guess which one we're going to choose?
Although the driver should have made a PA when the train got to Earl's Court informing the punters that there would be a delay while they dealt with the fault, etc. From empirical observations drivers on the Sub-Surface Lines seem a lot less chatty that those on the deep level.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
Member is Online
|
Post by rincew1nd on Aug 22, 2018 11:51:18 GMT
From empirical observations drivers on the Sub-Surface Lines seem a lot less chatty that those on the deep level. Perhaps because those on the SSR are more used to seeing other people/the sky than those on the tube lines?
|
|
|
Post by trt on Aug 22, 2018 11:51:24 GMT
Christmas already! (See thread title - No L).
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Aug 22, 2018 12:01:13 GMT
There was no signal failure at Earls Court or around the surrounding area this morning. This does happen quite frequently and happens when the trains are either out of turn or arrive late at Earl’s Court and the signaller puts them back in turn to arrive at Barking and Upminster in the right order as this can cause issues when trains arrive one after the other going into sidings / Depot. Sorry, I meant to say that it was yesterday (Tuesday 21st) morning. What was odd about the two later trains going first was that all three involved were going to Upminster. Otherwise I'd just have assumed it was re-ordering. The snail's pace departure from the platform, when there was another train also going, in the first instance, to Gloucester Road, departing the adjacent platform at exactly the same time was weird.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 22, 2018 16:55:21 GMT
There were no reported failures at Earl's Court yesterday morning.
Almost certainly this was down to the Service Operator at Earl's Court putting trains back in turn. As already mentioned, it is important for trains to arrive in turn at Upminster as it greatly assists the Service Operator there when numerous trains are being put away at the end of the morning peak.
I think I have identified the services involved although am not certain as you didn't give a timeframe. Due to the morning failure at Hammersmith there was a long queue of trains waiting to get through Earl's Court on the east, and both platforms were in use. The signalling allows simultaneous departures, with your train being cleared up to EC7 as another train was cleared past EC13. Once that train had cleared the section, you got the right hand route to Gloucester Road, but the slow speed running was due to following this service and, later, waiting for a Circle line train to pass in front at Gloucester Road.
All entirely normal.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Aug 22, 2018 17:51:26 GMT
There were no reported failures at Earl's Court yesterday morning. However there was a late finish to engineering work at West Kensington which prevented trains from moving through the area and from departing Lillie Bridge sidings before 06.20. Even when things started running trains from Lillie Bridge could only depart towards Olympia.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Aug 22, 2018 18:20:57 GMT
This happened at around 10:10am.
It may be normal, but in 60 years of using the Underground I've never known a train move so slowly for so long.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 22, 2018 19:10:25 GMT
This happened at around 10:10am. It may be normal, but in 60 years of using the Underground I've never known a train move so slowly for so long. The alternative is to move quickly to the next signal and then sit at a stand for longer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 19:20:59 GMT
There were no reported failures at Earl's Court yesterday morning. However there was a late finish to engineering work at West Kensington which prevented trains from moving through the area and from departing Lillie Bridge sidings before 06.20. Even when things started running trains from Lillie Bridge could only depart towards Olympia. Cable fault on 24a points
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 20:20:41 GMT
Possibly a faulty train, the line controller put it into the platform 1 and ran trains around it through platform 2 while the driver was trying to deal with the fault. If its a choice between dealing with a fault to get the train moving again and making PAs guess which one we're going to choose? Although the driver should have made a PA when the train got to Earl's Court informing the punters that there would be a delay while they dealt with the fault, etc. From empirical observations drivers on the Sub-Surface Lines seem a lot less chatty that those on the deep level. This actually happened to me on Tuesday on the way home (going towards london on the met) Train was stopped for a while, and then the driver came on apologising stating he was getting instruction on how to deal with a fault.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Aug 22, 2018 20:35:25 GMT
This happened at around 10:10am. It may be normal, but in 60 years of using the Underground I've never known a train move so slowly for so long. The alternative is to move quickly to the next signal and then sit at a stand for longer. Indeed. And drivers seem to use a mixture of techniques. I've often known drivers reduce to a sub walking speed crawl (mainly coasting) when approaching a red signal, but I don't ever remember it happening when departing from a station. Presumably, knowing a train was departing from the adjacent platform, the driver used his knowledge of the track and signal spacing to work out a suitable speed which, in this instance, was extremely slow.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Aug 22, 2018 21:09:48 GMT
Presumably, knowing a train was departing from the adjacent platform, the driver used his knowledge of the track and signal spacing to work out a suitable speed which, in this instance, was extremely slow Leaving Earl’s Court eastbound the next signals EC7 EC13 are clearly visible to both drivers of departing trains.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 22, 2018 21:09:49 GMT
The alternative is to move quickly to the next signal and then sit at a stand for longer. Indeed. And drivers seem to use a mixture of techniques. I've often known drivers reduce to a sub walking speed crawl (mainly coasting) when approaching a red signal, but I don't ever remember it happening when departing from a station. Presumably, knowing a train was departing from the adjacent platform, the driver used his knowledge of the track and signal spacing to work out a suitable speed which, in this instance, was extremely slow. I don't have diagrams of Earl's Court to hand ( tut?), but departure from Earl's Court is very much approaching a red signal - the next signal is little more than a train's length outside the platform.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 21:26:26 GMT
Indeed. And drivers seem to use a mixture of techniques. I've often known drivers reduce to a sub walking speed crawl (mainly coasting) when approaching a red signal, but I don't ever remember it happening when departing from a station. Presumably, knowing a train was departing from the adjacent platform, the driver used his knowledge of the track and signal spacing to work out a suitable speed which, in this instance, was extremely slow. I don't have diagrams of Earl's Court to hand ( tut ?), but departure from Earl's Court is very much approaching a red signal - the next signal is little more than a train's length outside the platform.
Um, nothing showing distances or anything really, but the main site does have an older signalling diagram for Earl's Court
And Triangle Sidings
Both out of date, but I don't think the relevant signals have been moved?
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Aug 22, 2018 23:23:33 GMT
The alternative is to move quickly to the next signal and then sit at a stand for longer. Indeed. And drivers seem to use a mixture of techniques. I've often known drivers reduce to a sub walking speed crawl (mainly coasting) when approaching a red signal, but I don't ever remember it happening when departing from a station. Presumably, knowing a train was departing from the adjacent platform, the driver used his knowledge of the track and signal spacing to work out a suitable speed which, in this instance, was extremely slow. *If* that was what was going on then it’s poor driving - as it would have blocked the platform for any train behind. It even used to be clearly stated in the rule book that motormen should depart as quickly as possible to ensure rapid clearing of home signals.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Aug 23, 2018 2:58:44 GMT
Both out of date, but I don't think the relevant signals have been moved? EC13 REC13 EC18 are now on the other side of appropriate track.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2018 11:12:51 GMT
There’s no REC13 it’s FREC13
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Aug 23, 2018 17:59:26 GMT
I've watched Trackernet replayer from 09:50 until 10:30, during that time there weren't any Upminster trains on Plat 1 held while two Upminster trains left from Plat 2.
It could have been T 107, left Hammersmith 9:59 (1 minute late), arrived Plat 1 10:12 (8 minutes late as a result of a lot of congestion at Earl's Court)
Train 070 (Edgware Road) was on Plat 2 when T 107 arrived, left at 10:13 (6 minutes late).
Train 015 (Upminster) arrived on Plat 2 from the Wimbledon branch 10:14 (14 minutes late),
At 10:15 both signals on Plat 1 and 2 cleared but obviously the signal protecting the points where the two lines merge cleared to allow T 015 to go ahead of T 107.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
Member is Online
|
Post by Colin on Aug 23, 2018 20:59:08 GMT
I too checked out Trackernet and found the same - so either the O/P’s perception of events is incorrect or Trackernet is fibbing.....
In anycase my first thought regarding a long delay and no announcement would be a driver changeover (don’t forget Earls Court is a crew relief location). It is the responsibility of the driver getting off to make a PA but this often dosen’t happen as we’re supposed to do it after the DVA has finished and normally the driver getting off is long gone by then. There’s no requirement for the relieving driver to make a PA therefore it gets missed.
All that being said though, there is no scheduled relief on train 107 at that time of day.
As for the train’s speed departing platform 1, firstly the permanent speed limit there is 20mph. The station starter at platform 1 also carries the repeater for the next signal - logic would suggest that if a train in platform 2 is also going towards Gloucester Road and has a green starter, one should stay put in platform 1 as all you’re going to achieve is getting stopped between stations at the next signal which you already know is at danger.
However.....
Departures are monitored at Earls Court eastbound - if the signal is green and it’s the correct time to depart, the train must move within 30 seconds or we have to explain the delay.
So we must depart but know the next signal is red.
I haven’t got time to go and quote who said it, but to suggest we ought to race out of a platform with a red signal ahead, just over a train length away.......sorry pal but you are just plain wrong.
Did someone say poor driving? Bet you’re on an ATO line!
We train to drive defensively on manually driven lines - any other way is asking for a SPAD!!
Anyway, as has already been said; crawling out of Earls Court platform 1 is totally normal.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Aug 23, 2018 23:58:51 GMT
I too checked out Trackernet and found the same - so either the O/P’s perception of events is incorrect or Trackernet is fibbing..... In anycase my first thought regarding a long delay and no announcement would be a driver changeover (don’t forget Earls Court is a crew relief location). It is the responsibility of the driver getting off to make a PA but this often dosen’t happen as we’re supposed to do it after the DVA has finished and normally the driver getting off is long gone by then. There’s no requirement for the relieving driver to make a PA therefore it gets missed. All that being said though, there is no scheduled relief on train 107 at that time of day. As for the train’s speed departing platform 1, firstly the permanent speed limit there is 20mph. The station starter at platform 1 also carries the repeater for the next signal - logic would suggest that if a train in platform 2 is also going towards Gloucester Road and has a green starter, one should stay put in platform 1 as all you’re going to achieve is getting stopped between stations at the next signal which you already know is at danger. However..... Departures are monitored at Earls Court eastbound - if the signal is green and it’s the correct time to depart, the train must move within 30 seconds or we have to explain the delay. So we must depart but know the next signal is red. I haven’t got time to go and quote who said it, but to suggest we ought to race out of a platform with a red signal ahead, just over a train length away.......sorry pal but you are just plain wrong. Did someone say poor driving? Bet you’re on an ATO line! We train to drive defensively on manually driven lines - any other way is asking for a SPAD!! I find it pretty incredible that the implication seems to be the only reason to depart on a green over yellow seems to be worrying about having to explain why there was a delay. There’s a clue in there somewhere. That signal has been provided to maintain the headway, it isn’t there just because someone thought it would be good to have a signal there, or perhaps to catch out SPAD-prone drivers. Remaining in the platform will simply mean the following train will now be being held, so simply transferring the issue to someone else’s train, meanwhile the signalman will be looking at the diagram wondering what is going on. If he wanted a train to remain in a platform then wouldn’t he be holding the starting signal at danger? (Or should that be outlawed on the basis someone might hit that?). Furthermore at certain places where there are points close in advance of a signal - and EC.7 is one such location - the points will be locked until the train is proved to have come to a stand at the signal. So if a driver going towards Gloucester Road decides to wait on a green over yellow at EC.6 with 8 points normal he would be waiting all day for green over green! Or, in reality, until the signaller calls asking what is going on - and subsequently the driver will be having a non-voluntary little chat with a manager who will be putting the delay down firmly as a driver error! Running up slowly to the signal in this case is simply further delaying the signal clearing, making the train late, and needlessly blocking the railway. And just to correct something else, looking at the scale plans, it's actually approximately 265 metres from Earl's Court platform 1 to EC.7. This is rather more than a train's length - it's actually going on to two and a half train lengths. Given that it's typically possible to pull up a loaded train on full service braking from 35 mph in approximately 100-110 metres, there should be no issue at all in pulling up from 20 mph in substantially less than 265 metres, in a location which is dead level. If we're really saying that drivers need to be extra defensive to avoid driving straight into a red signal with supplementary co-acting signal, approached on the level and straight, with an additional repeater in the form of a fog repeater, at 20 mph, then something is seriously wrong. The scale plans also show something else interesting - namely that the officially calculated sighting point for EC.7 isn't until some way after passing the fog repeater. This suggests the repeater REC.7 beneath EC.6 is actually superfluous from a driving point of view, which does raise the question of why it's there. Perhaps just to repeat the junction indication on EC.7 to give earlier opportunity to report a wrong-route? Either way, the signal designers appear to be assuming drivers should drive out of Earl's Court platform 1 without any immediate preconception of what aspect EC.7 may be showing, which given the 265m distance and 20 PSR seems entirely correct to me. We used to have exactly the same at Camden with people failing to move right up to a particular signal, blocking up the whole junction in the process. It caused such an issue one day when the job was up the wall that assessments were targeted to run through this section for a while as a means of checking drivers were driving correctly. There’s nothing wrong with defensive driving, within reason, however the point I was making was that people shouldn’t be choosing their speed based on avoiding coming to a stand, which was what the original poster suggested may have been going on. As explained above, as well as being a pain in the backside for the railway, there are places where it causes bigger problems. As for ATO, there are plenty of drivers who manage to drive in a way which doesn’t crucify line capacity *and* not have SPADs. If everyone was up to the same standard then possibly we wouldn’t need ATO... The idea that driving around at line speed is inviting a SPAD is wide of the mark - in any case virtually all SPADs are down to other factors - distractions, fatigue, loss of concentration, lulled into a false sense of security, misunderstanding how a particular signal works, nonsense trained by certain I/Os (eg Y signal always clears if you do X mph), poorly sited signal, etc. One final point - yes, you're right, I'm now on an ATO line - or more accurately my line is now ATO. One rare benefit of being on such a line is not having to get involved with mess-ups where people have tried to infer things from signalling layouts without actually being aware of the underlying design which has gone into it. Without knowing how an individual signal works it really is best simply to work on the basis of green means go and red means stop, as demonstrated above very clearly at Earl's Court remaining in platform 1 would be a classic case of tripping one's self up due to an incorrect understanding of the signalling, messing up the service in the process. Sadly this sort of thing is one reason much of the legacy signalling struggles to achieve its design potential - lack of understanding leading people to use it in ways that work against it for completely spurious reasons. Sadly this is the very reason the company is heavily in favour of ATO, is trying everything possible to discourage manual driving, and seemingly has a policy of telling drivers as little about the new systems as possible! For something like TBTC the trains course really only covers the very basics, in sharp contrast to the signallers course which is a cool seven weeks...
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Aug 24, 2018 9:51:35 GMT
I too checked out Trackernet and found the same - so either the O/P’s perception of events is incorrect or Trackernet is fibbing..... Almost certainly my perception. As I had plenty of time I really wasn't paying that much attention until the second train left, and we started inching from the platform. Most likely I was mistaken about the first departing train being an Upminster one. It was the two trains that were clearly both going to use the same piece of track very soon, departing at the same time, and the ultra slow speed that were most puzzling. I think I have a clear picture of what happened, now.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Aug 24, 2018 15:51:18 GMT
There’s no REC13 it’s FREC13 something doesn't seem right therefore:
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Aug 24, 2018 15:55:11 GMT
There’s no REC13 it’s FREC13 something doesn't seem right therefore: Fog repeater converted to a standard repeater as part of the recent changes?
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Aug 24, 2018 20:39:29 GMT
I suppose that once the system has been automated the train would be rushed to the stopping locating which acts as an equivalent of a red signal and then wait until the line is clear.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2018 21:55:34 GMT
something doesn't seem right therefore: Fog repeater converted to a standard repeater as part of the recent changes? The FR was in the tunnel not been that side of Earls Court since xmas. They should of just put it on the same post as the starter EC11, the signal head is there its only blanked off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2018 22:02:46 GMT
I suppose that once the system has been automated the train would be rushed to the stopping locating which acts as an equivalent of a red signal and then wait until the line is clear. When a train sits at EC7 (junction signal) there is a 4 1/2 sec time delay before the points (8’s) are thrown. To stop the time delay EC7rt2 has to be cleared before EC6. When you see EC6 has a green and REC7 is yellow but no train in area the signallar has pushed them out of sequence. The train will pull upto EC7 wait the 4 1/2secs then signal will clear towards Gloucester Road. This is all in the non safety side of the signalling.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Aug 24, 2018 23:32:17 GMT
I suppose that once the system has been automated the train would be rushed to the stopping locating which acts as an equivalent of a red signal and then wait until the line is clear. When a train sits at EC7 (junction signal) there is a 4 1/2 sec time delay before the points (8’s) are thrown. To stop the time delay EC7rt2 has to be cleared before EC6. When you see EC6 has a green and REC7 is yellow but no train in area the signallar has pushed them out of sequence. The train will pull upto EC7 wait the 4 1/2secs then signal will clear towards Gloucester Road. This is all in the non safety side of the signalling. I dread to think how Seltrac will handle this particular site...
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
Member is Online
|
Post by Colin on Aug 25, 2018 13:13:01 GMT
I find it pretty incredible that the implication seems to be the only reason to depart on a green over yellow seems to be worrying about having to explain why there was a delay. There’s a clue in there somewhere. By using the words "the imlication seems to be".......you're clearly making an assumption about what I've said. So to clear things up, here's a more detailed explanation..... Firstly I did not state that its a hard & fast rule to always remain in a platform when looking at a green starter with a yellow repeater. I said logic would suggest that if a train in platform 2 is also going towards Gloucester Road and has a green starter, one should stay put in platform 1 as all you’re going to achieve is getting stopped between stations at the next signal which you already know is at danger. That statement is very specific to the Earls Court area, though should have clarified that one shouldn't stay in the hope of seeing double green as that isn't true; I should have added "for a little while" to the end. At the likes of Mansion House or Cannon Street on the eastbound where we have a similar set up of Green starter & yelllow repeater, we stay put - particularly Mansion House as the rear car is still in the platform if stopped at the next signal. Conversly though, we always depart at the likes of Barons Court both directions with a green starter and Yellow repeater as the relevent next red signal will only clear once its approached. You can't compare different locations or rely solely on printed diagrams as each area works in different ways. Local line knowledge is key and its not a case of one way fits all areas. To further illustrate my point, you made comparisons to Camden but I fail to see the relevance as all trains go in the same direction. At Earls Court, looking beyond towards Gloucester Road, we have the Circle line crossing our tracks on their way to High Street Kensington. This can add a delay to a train departing Earls Court platform 2 which in turn then delays a train departing platform 1 for even longer at EC7........further more, there's a draw up signal on the way to Gloucester Road from Earls Court and if the aforementioned Circle line gets in the way thus causing that draw up signal to come into play, the said draw up signal only clears once the District train has stopped at it. Paper diagrams are all well & good if things work how they're shown! Reality is sometimes different. My basic original point was if you know how an area works, you can perhaps apply a little common sense and not deliberately delay passengers between stations for longer than neccessary. Surely its always far more desirable to hold in a platform that between stations? That abillity to use common sense has been taken away by a policy of carry on regardless. That's all I was saying. Remaining in the platform will simply mean the following train will now be being held, so simply transferring the issue to someone else’s train, meanwhile the signalman will be looking at the diagram wondering what is going on. If he wanted a train to remain in a platform then wouldn’t he be holding the starting signal at danger? Earls Court is a crew relief point and many trains have booked stand time there of two or three minutes. Its not at all unusal for trains to remain in the platforms for extended dwell times and to see reds on the approach to the the station. And if I had a pound for everytime the signaller has held me past my departure time for no apparent reason..... (Or should that be outlawed on the basis someone might hit that?). No need for that! Furthermore at certain places where there are points close in advance of a signal - and EC.7 is one such location - the points will be locked until the train is proved to have come to a stand at the signal. So if a driver going towards Gloucester Road decides to wait on a green over yellow at EC.6 with 8 points normal he would be waiting all day for green over green! Or, in reality, until the signaller calls asking what is going on - and subsequently the driver will be having a non-voluntary little chat with a manager who will be putting the delay down firmly as a driver error! Running up slowly to the signal in this case is simply further delaying the signal clearing, making the train late, and needlessly blocking the railway. I didn't go so far as to say I'd wait for double green and that's not what I train. Nor does any other driver take that view. All I advocate is what the driver did that started this whole thread off in the first place. Taking a little longer to get to EC7's makes no difference in the grand scheme of things. As has been stated, the points will move 4 and a half seconds after the train is proved stopped at EC7. EC7 can only clear once the train off platform 2 has cleared its overlap which is a darn sight more than 4 and a half seconds! Whole point is, with local knowledge and experience, its pretty easy to judge how long to leave it after the other train departs platform 2 before its worth leaving platform 1 thus ensuring the minimum four and a half second delay at EC7. And just to correct something else, looking at the scale plans, it's actually approximately 265 metres from Earl's Court platform 1 to EC.7. This is rather more than a train's length - it's actually going on to two and a half train lengths. S stock is about 120 metres long so lets meet in the middle and say two train lengths. So two train lengths to EC7 eh? Well I said "just over a train length away" with one and a half train lengths being the figure in my mind. Now if you factor in the double bend departing platform 1, and that EC7 comes into view about 3 cars or so after departing platform 1..... Given that it's typically possible to pull up a loaded train on full service braking from 35 mph in approximately 100-110 metres, there should be no issue at all in pulling up from 20 mph in substantially less than 265 metres, in a location which is dead level. If we're really saying that drivers need to be extra defensive to avoid driving straight into a red signal with supplementary co-acting signal, approached on the level and straight, with an additional repeater in the form of a fog repeater, at 20 mph, then something is seriously wrong. I'll raise one eyebrow at your 35mph/110m ratio........we work on the basis of entering platforms under control, and as a line we say that's 30mph. I feel you're taking what I said (which was "to suggest we ought to race out of a platform with a red signal ahead, just over a train length away") a little to the extreme. All I was getting at, and again its that local line knowledge thing, is that there's no point doing your best to get to EC7 in the minimal amount of time as it ain't gonna clear till the other train has got past its overlap. What you're actually doing is chasing red signals and that's something I wholly discourage as an I/O and that is why I said that we train to drive defensively as any other way is asking for a SPAD. I wasn't saying specifically that anyone is at risk of SPADing EC7 specifically......just that the chasing red signals mentality can lead to that occuring. The scale plans also show something else interesting - namely that the officially calculated sighting point for EC.7 isn't until some way after passing the fog repeater. This suggests the repeater REC.7 beneath EC.6 is actually superfluous from a driving point of view, which does raise the question of why it's there. Perhaps just to repeat the junction indication on EC.7 to give earlier opportunity to report a wrong-route? Well exactly - why put it there if we're to ignore it?! There’s nothing wrong with defensive driving, within reason, however the point I was making was that people shouldn’t be choosing their speed based on avoiding coming to a stand, which was what the original poster suggested may have been going on. With the greatest of respect to the OP, they suggested two Upminster trains departed platform and has since admitted that may be incorrect. I don't think the driver was trying avoid coming to a stand - I suggest they were simply looking to avoid being at a stand for an excessive amount of time. A moving train is better than a stationary one to most passengers. As for ATO, there are plenty of drivers who manage to drive in a way which doesn’t crucify line capacity *and* not have SPADs. If everyone was up to the same standard then possibly we wouldn’t need ATO... The company wants ATO and I can see why. The reason I mentioned the ATO attitude is that with the Northern & Jubilee now using it we're seeing a lot more cross transfers off ATO lines and the difference in attitude to speed is something to behold. We also tend to see these drivers having a lot more issues with platform overruns. The idea that driving around at line speed is inviting a SPAD is wide of the mark. I agree, so not sure where you got that from. As I said above, chasing red signals is bad practice and I hope you agree with that.....
|
|