rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Dec 19, 2017 12:56:03 GMT
The new Railway has made it onto the map:
Without wishing to reopen the whole CrossRail/Elizabeth Line debate, I find it interesting that on the map key LUL lines are listed as just their name "Northern" "Circle" whereas the CrossRail line keeps the word 'line': "Elizabeth Line".
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Dec 19, 2017 13:49:40 GMT
I suppose there wasn't enough space for "the Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith Line"... On a more serious note, doesn't the cable car keep "line" in it's title? And the DLR keeps "Railway"
|
|
|
Post by AndrewPSSP on Dec 19, 2017 14:11:20 GMT
The cable car does keep line in its title. And with the DLR, it's a acronym so I assume that's the reason why it has (technically) managed to keep the word "railway". I think LT did a good move on the Tube Map when they showed the DLR with two lines while keeping the other LU lines as a solid colour. TfL were good to keep that IMO as it allowed them to add the other services onto the map. Although it's gotten a bit confusing, especially around Highbury where there are multiple LO meeting.
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Dec 19, 2017 16:57:25 GMT
From first glance, the Central line has got quite the swan neck in the City, the City Branch of the Northern line is more obtuse, the Mill Hill East branch is curving away more abruptly, the Highbury end of the Victoria line has got a weight on it, the Hammersmith end of the H&C is less rectangular in form, the DLR Stratford branch is now having to swerve clear of Crossrail on it's way up to the same location and the NW end of the Metropolitan line looks more elongated North of Rickmansworth and West of Ruislip.
Disclaimer: The above are not criticisms nor an attempt at a complete list of observations just differences I picked out whilst looking at it for the first time, I am simply marvelling at the rapid impulsive distinctions that our brains pick out when something so familiar such as the tube map evolves into what looks from afar to be minor alterations.
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Dec 19, 2017 17:05:50 GMT
one other thought - how are services going to be structured. The map as is seems to imply that the Elizabeth (God bless Her Majesty)[1] Line runs from Heathrow to the two eastern termini only.
How are they going to indicate the fact that unlike (eg the Northern Line), it doesn't stop at the end stations marked. With LO stuff, they avoid the issue with trains out of Euston by having LO as a separate branded service, so you can't accidentally catch an LO train to Glasgow (yet...). Will there be bemused oystercarders washing up in Reading?
[1] I am of course standing to attention when I type this bit, and humming the national anthem...[2] [2], I am of course being silly, but naming it after a serving monarch does raise some interesting questions about proper title and style. Will other trains be obliged to stand up when it comes in. And you mustn't turn your back on the monarch either...
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Dec 19, 2017 17:14:39 GMT
one other thought - how are services going to be structured. The map as is seems to imply that the Elizabeth (God bless Her Majesty)[1] Line runs from Heathrow to the two eastern termini only. How are they going to indicate the fact that unlike (eg the Northern Line), it doesn't stop at the end stations marked. With LO stuff, they avoid the issue with trains out of Euston by having LO as a separate branded service, so you can't accidentally catch an LO train to Glasgow (yet...). Will there be bemused oystercarders washing up in Reading? [1] I am of course standing to attention when I type this bit, and humming the national anthem...[2] [2], I am of course being silly, but naming it after a serving monarch does raise some interesting questions about proper title and style. Will other trains be obliged to stand up when it comes in. And you mustn't turn your back on the monarch either... As far as I'm aware, the map is correct. When it makes its debut next year the trains will only run from Heathrow to Paddington (Main Line), Abbey Wood to Paddington (Underground) and Shenfield to Liverpool Street (Main Line). 2019 will see the connection of all possible permutations.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Dec 19, 2017 17:25:32 GMT
one other thought - how are services going to be structured. The map as is seems to imply that the Elizabeth (God bless Her Majesty)[1] Line runs from Heathrow to the two eastern termini only. How are they going to indicate the fact that unlike (eg the Northern Line), it doesn't stop at the end stations marked. With LO stuff, they avoid the issue with trains out of Euston by having LO as a separate branded service, so you can't accidentally catch an LO train to Glasgow (yet...). Will there be bemused oystercarders washing up in Reading? [1] I am of course standing to attention when I type this bit, and humming the national anthem...[2] [2], I am of course being silly, but naming it after a serving monarch does raise some interesting questions about proper title and style. Will other trains be obliged to stand up when it comes in. And you mustn't turn your back on the monarch either... In December 2018, it will only be running between Heathrow and Paddington (starting may 18), Paddington and Abbey wood, & Liverpool Street and Shenfield. May 2019 is when the Shenfield services start going through the core, and then finally in December 2019, the western services will start running to/from reading and into the core. Once fully launched, the anticipated map will look something like this. Bemused oystercarders washing up in reading needn't worry as there should be oyster card reader in place by the time services start operating.
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Dec 19, 2017 17:37:36 GMT
I'm looking forward to seeing that 2019-edition on the fare zones version... It clearly *works* in that it doesn't offend any of the tube map rules, but it is bending the geographical bending even further than it has ever done before (38 miles London to Reading v 24 to Amersham according to a quick google).
Not sure what else you can do, but still...
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 19, 2017 17:56:07 GMT
I remember when the Central line was completely horizontal all the way from Ealing Broadway to Mile End.
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Dec 19, 2017 18:13:02 GMT
I remember when the Central line was completely horizontal all the way from Ealing Broadway to Mile End. I've been completely horizontal on the Central Line from Ealing Broadway to Mile End on several occasions in my youth.
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Dec 19, 2017 18:13:23 GMT
The new Railway has made it onto the map: Without wishing to reopen the whole CrossRail/Elizabeth Line debate, I find it interesting that on the map key LUL lines are listed as just their name "Northern" "Circle" whereas the CrossRail line keeps the word 'line': "Elizabeth Line". As a newcomer, Crossrail still didn't get line with it, because every one knew what it was. I suppose 'The Elizabeth' or 'Elizabeth' could refer to anything, even if anyone with an atom of sense would know if it's on a flaming Tube map, it still refers to a line, and not a chain of tofu snack bars. Possibly. I suppose we should give great thanks to A) Kaiser Wilhelm II for WWI & making the Sax-Coburg-Gotha family change to Windsor, rather than at Windsor. B) Various members of the renamed family for devaluing the monarchical coin sufficiently for the brown-nosers to stop at 'The Elizabeth Line' without adding imperials, HRH's etc.
|
|
|
Post by jukes on Dec 19, 2017 18:39:56 GMT
TfL are still working on the zoning issue to Reading. Remember that DfT REQUIRE them not to undercut the TOC (GWR) fares. My guess is that TfL will create two new 'ghost' zones 15 and 16. Gatwick for example is in 'ghost zone' 14. Zones above 9 are used in the TfL system for calculating caps amongst other things but are not shown on public maps. The Mayor also hasn't yet made a formal decision on Freedom Passes but I hope the same rule will apply as for Shenfield and Watford Junction that is you can use it so long as you travel only on a EL train but there could be problems with the gates at Reading for example which are operated and coded by GWR.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 19, 2017 19:13:04 GMT
I remember when the Central line was completely horizontal all the way from Ealing Broadway to Mile End. I've been completely horizontal on the Central Line from Ealing Broadway to Mile End on several occasions in my youth. I would ask if this was face down or up, but I fear it goes beyond the scope of this thread . . .
|
|
|
Post by arun on Dec 19, 2017 19:28:52 GMT
Domh245 commented on Oystercard holders washing up in Reading. Given that the Elizabeth line trains are supposed to stop at all the intermediate stations out of PAD at least as far as Maidenhead [as I understand it] why would anyone in their right mind get on a cl.345 when they could get on a non-stop 800/802/HST from PAD to RDG?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 19, 2017 19:40:06 GMT
Domh245 commented on Oystercard holders washing up in Reading. Given that the Elizabeth line trains are supposed to stop at all the intermediate stations out of PAD at least as far as Maidenhead [as I understand it] why would anyone in their right mind get on a cl.345 when they could get on a non-stop 800/802/HST from PAD to RDG? You could have the same argument for Shenfield when there are fast Greater Anglia services. Remember that some passengers want to travel to the intermediate stations though.
|
|
|
Post by arun on Dec 19, 2017 19:51:24 GMT
Sorry Superteacher, I was being unclear. If Oystercard holders want to go to Reading [lets say from Romford for arguments sake], why wouldn't they change to a fast service at PAD?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 19, 2017 20:21:48 GMT
Sorry Superteacher, I was being unclear. If Oystercard holders want to go to Reading [lets say from Romford for arguments sake], why wouldn't they change to a fast service at PAD? Believe it or not, there are those who prefer to take a direct train, even if it does take a fair bit longer. if it was me travelling from Romford to Reading, I would take a GA train to Liverpool Street (stopping only at Stratford), go downstairs to the Elizabeth line, get that to Paddington then get a fast train to Reading, However, sometimes it’s a false time economy waiting for a fast, as it may not be an easy connection with a bit of waiting around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 21:01:42 GMT
Things may change over time but I am sure that when Crossrail was first mooted there was to be a "core" service mostly all-stations from (say) Romford to Slough with fast-ish services going from Reading/Maidenhead to Paddington and from Shenfield to LivSt. if demand (i.e. ticket sales and Oyster stats) was there then a "full-width" service from Reading to Shenfield may be introduced, with limited stops.
As has been pointed out, with a bit of planning, it would probably be quicker to take a fast to Paddington, underground to Liv St ,and fast to Shenfield.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 21:14:09 GMT
According to trainline.com fastest trains Reading-Pad & LivSt-Shen both about 25 mins then 55 mins allowed for Underground transfer, totalling about 1hr45mins.
Variance is about 2-3 mins either way.
How much quicker will Elizabeth Line be over Underground between Pad & LivSt?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 21:26:08 GMT
According to trainline.com fastest trains Reading-Pad & LivSt-Shen both about 25 mins then 55 mins allowed for Underground transfer, totalling about 1hr45mins.
Variance is about 2-3 mins either way.
How much quicker will Elizabeth Line be over Underground between Pad & LivSt?
Currently, the sub-surface lines via KGS take 24 minutes between PAD and LST. I'd expect crossrail to take roughly 15 minutes (including dwell times at stations) but the journey time planner on the crossrail website says it will only take 10. Another thing, do you think dwell times will be longer at stations than the tube? I just have some conception in my head that there will be longer pauses at stations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 21:30:48 GMT
Sorry Superteacher, I was being unclear. If Oystercard holders want to go to Reading [lets say from Romford for arguments sake], why wouldn't they change to a fast service at PAD? Believe it or not, there are those who prefer to take a direct train, even if it does take a fair bit longer. Not with the back-aching metro style seats on the 345's. Seriously, the s stock have such great seats, why did they take a step back? Would it not be faster to change at Stratford even if trains were half as frequent as LST. You would really save time not needing to go down lengthy escalators.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 19, 2017 21:32:15 GMT
According to trainline.com fastest trains Reading-Pad & LivSt-Shen both about 25 mins then 55 mins allowed for Underground transfer, totalling about 1hr45mins.
Variance is about 2-3 mins either way.
How much quicker will Elizabeth Line be over Underground between Pad & LivSt?
Another thing, do you think dwell times will be longer at stations than the tube? I just have some conception in my head that there will be longer pauses at stations. I don’t see why that would be the case,
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 19, 2017 21:36:24 GMT
I don't think that there will be much difference in dwell times between Crossrail and the tube, if anything Crossrail may win in the central section as the trains, stations and the interface between them are all designed from the beginning to allow the easy movement of very large numbers of people as quickly as possible between platform and train and vice versa.
|
|
|
Post by Deep Level on Dec 19, 2017 21:36:44 GMT
I don't understand why they don't just keep both TfL Rail lines under that name and just have the Paddington - Abbey Wood Line named Elizabeth Line and then rename the other two lines as and when they join onto the core route in 2019.
This would surely prevent confusing people.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 19, 2017 21:51:34 GMT
With regard to direct or fast journeys, which I take for any particular journey depends on several factors such as whether I have a deadline, how much luggage I have, how tired I am, what the weather is, what the interchanges are like, how many other interchanges I have to make on my journey (and their nature), and any difference in cost (which partly depends on what other journeys I have/will make that day.
For example, if I was travelling from the east end of the Central line to Heathrow with a tight deadline and hand luggage only then I'd change at Holborn but if I had a lot of both time and luggage then I'd change at Mile End and Barons Court as the cross-platform interchanges are so much better than the crowded stairs, escalators and passages at Holborn.
The other week I was meeting some friends at South Kensington. Travelling from near Mudchute I got the DLR to Heron Quays, walked to Canary Wharf, got the Jubilee to Green Park and then the Picc to South Kensington. Walking quickly at all the interchanges this is the fastest route (or at least it feels like it!). On the way home, I was not pressed for time so I got the District to Monument, then the DLR all the way to Mudchute. It takes longer but the single, simple*, indoor interchange that is rarely crowded at in the evenings won out.
When it's raining or very cold I will often alight the DLR at Canary Wharf and get the bus home from there as it's a shorter walk from the bus stop than the station.
*If you follow signs to the Northern line from the eastbound SSR platform, rather than signs to the DLR which first takes you to the westbound side of the station.
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Dec 19, 2017 21:59:38 GMT
I don't think that there will be much difference in dwell times between Crossrail and the tube, if anything Crossrail may win in the central section as the trains, stations and the interface between them are all designed from the beginning to allow the easy movement of very large numbers of people as quickly as possible between platform and train and vice versa. You may well be on the money re the Central section, as Crossrail hasn't inherited an imposed Victorian/Edwardian platform structure. The only fly in the ointment I could possibly envisage-if there's longer carriages on Crossrail, will that mean more people being able to cram on to the first train and, because they now won't be waiting for the 2nd or 3rd train to even be able to try & squeeze in, whether that will extend dwell times considerably?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 19, 2017 22:07:27 GMT
Agree with Chris’s post above. It does raise the whole issue of how well you know the system. Like quite a few of us, Chris knows his way around and can make informed choices about his route dependent upon circumstances. Quite a number of people change from the District to the Picc at South Ken complete with luggage, clearly bound for Heathrow. They are obviously unaware of the far simpler cross platform interchange at Barons Court or Hammersmith.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Dec 19, 2017 23:02:29 GMT
Thought the map was good, giving a more graceful bend to the line between Whitechapel and Canary Wharf, until like a previous poster I noticed what had been sacrificed in order to accommodate it.
Given the vast amount of data the tube map now conveys, and the inelegant way it is constantly tinkered with, perhaps the 'clockwork' design has now reached its limit?
|
|
londoner
thinking on '73 stock
Posts: 480
|
Post by londoner on Dec 20, 2017 0:20:32 GMT
Thought the map was good, giving a more graceful bend to the line between Whitechapel and Canary Wharf, until like a previous poster I noticed what had been sacrificed in order to accommodate it. Given the vast amount of data the tube map now conveys, and the inelegant way it is constantly tinkered with, perhaps the 'clockwork' design has now reached its limit? The tube map is ghastly and I think the final nail in the coffin was the expansion of the Overground at Liverpool St and also having a region of zone 2/3 fares. The problem now is that I don't believe TfL are brave enough to improve it.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Dec 20, 2017 0:30:50 GMT
TfL are still working on the zoning issue to Reading. Remember that DfT REQUIRE them not to undercut the TOC (GWR) fares. My guess is that TfL will create two new 'ghost' zones 15 and 16. Gatwick for example is in 'ghost zone' 14. Zones above 9 are used in the TfL system for calculating caps amongst other things but are not shown on public maps. The Mayor also hasn't yet made a formal decision on Freedom Passes but I hope the same rule will apply as for Shenfield and Watford Junction that is you can use it so long as you travel only on a EL train but there could be problems with the gates at Reading for example which are operated and coded by GWR. Surely with the revised methodology for charging on Oyster and use of the "back room system" the existing zonal constraint disappears? This restructuring of the Oyster system should kick in before May next year and thus TfL can provide a far more flexible charging regime without being restricted to pseudo zones. I would not be surprised to see the removal of some of the more bizarre pricing on the "NR extra bits" that were added in phases when there is the May 2018 fares revision. Something has to be done then anyway to accommodate Heathrow Express and TfL Rail running into Paddington. How TfL decide to present all this to the public will be an interesting exercise for all of us I suspect. There was a very interesting tweet from Tom Edwards of the BBC today. During the big media visit to Farringdon today TfL apparently confirmed that *Central London* fares on Crossrail will be the same as the tube. No great shock there but it does rather raise a question or two about charging everywhere else. Clearly the Shenfield line is already on a separate PAYG farescale from the Tube but GWR services are on the TfL scale within the zones. I wonder if a little subtle "adjustment" might arise whereby fares on TfL Rail / Crossrail to the west are migrated to an independent fare scale west of Ealing Broadway. Might help TfL cope with the "no undercutting, no sharp steps in fares across zonal boundaries" rules in the Crossrail agreement.
|
|