DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Apr 2, 2006 21:01:54 GMT
Elephant & Castle
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 21:55:13 GMT
Well you say there isn't a hint of NR at this station, so it can't be:
Balham Elephant and Castle? London Bridge Moorgate Old Street Kings Cross Waterloo Charing Cross Euston Kentish Town
The Elephant and Castle has a question mark as there is an NR station there, but on the tube map it is described as being nearby. Clapham North and Embankment also have this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 21:56:00 GMT
Another try I suppose.....Borough?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 22:08:31 GMT
It's definitely a UERL Northern Line station, though. South Wimbledon? Are you sure TOK? I'm sure that it's a UERL Northern Line station, i.e. one of the ones built in the 1920s when the C&SLR was extended to Morden. I only guessed South Wimbledon because of the colour scheme. Having examined it again, I believe it is... BOROUGH!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 22:17:08 GMT
I only guessed South Wimbledon because of the colour scheme. All those stations (Clapham South - South Wimbledon inclusive) have a lot more green in their tiling. IMHO these 1926 extension stations are the best designed on the whole network.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 22:30:53 GMT
I'm gonna say Stockwell before it got turned into the bombsight it is right now, lol.
Dunno why...
But that sign bugs me, Northern Line, Platform One Southbound... **Mumbles and studies LU Map Closer**
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 3:04:28 GMT
Hooray!!!
AlexH and TOK have the right answer. AlexH got in first by a few minutes.
The picture is of the passageway from the Northbound platform to the lower lift landing and Southbound platform.
Before CSLR comes in to give an explanation of why this passageway is unusual, does anyone else have an idea?
I will post the full pic tonight (I'm writing this before going to work).
Thanks for entering!
David
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 18:46:42 GMT
As promised, here is the full picture of the cross-passage at Borough. Can anyone explain why the passage is so large?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 18:54:28 GMT
Hmm! Come in Mr CSLR.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 19:13:25 GMT
Is this one where they ran out of small tunnel lining sections and had to use running tunnel sections?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 20:38:10 GMT
Borough was where an original C&SLR running tunnel collapsed during live expansion for through services to and from the CCE&HR. I would not be surprised if the tunnel shown above was originally a running tunnel that was changed into a station tunnel (like London Bridge) because of the collapse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 21:07:27 GMT
I think, without realising it, this quiz and survey section has provided the best history lesson on aspects of the underground ever seen! I've certainly learnt a few things from it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 22:51:00 GMT
I think, without realising it, this quiz and survey section has provided the best history lesson on aspects of the underground ever seen! I've certainly learnt a few things from it. Yep, well put Alex, and well done David.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Apr 4, 2006 2:14:17 GMT
David commented that there are some unusual features about this passage – there are. It breaks all the rules of the C&SLR and has a link to what is happening right now on the Waterloo & City. When the line was first planned it was proposed to be cable operated. Because the carriages would never have gone to the surface, there was no need for a depot. The engineer of the railway, James Henry Greathead, was therefore faced with the same problem as the Waterloo & City; how to get heavy equipment and rolling stock into the underground tunnels. Although there were six stations by the time the line opened, the original plan was for only three. Of these, King William Street was inside an existing building and had restricted access, while Elephant & Castle was situated at one of south London’s busiest road junctions. The Borough was therefore chosen and designed as the access point to the railway. The passage from the northbound platform to the lifts is huge, straight and level. The bottom entrance to the lift-shaft opens directly into this passage and unusually is the same height and width as the passage. Until the new lifts were installed the ‘wall’ at the bottom of the lift-shaft (the newly tiled area at the very back of David’s picture) was made of steel plates that were bolted together and could be removed to provide access to this passage. What you see in the picture is the very point where, in 1889, the first C&SLR locomotive and experimental carriages arrived underground and were dragged towards the camera position and then on into the northbound station tunnel. They were then placed on the rails to form a train for experimental running.* In the 1920s, this passage was used as a means of removing spoil during the reconstruction – the station being closed at that time and converted into a working site. As a matter of interest, access to the southbound platform has always been by an insignificant opening in the side of this passage and down the only flights of stairs to lead to an original C&SLR platform. The entrance to these stairs can be seen in David’s photograph to the right of the enamelled route map. At the other five stations it was possible to enter the stations, and descend to the platforms without going up or down a single step. This is because at stations where the depth of the twin tube tunnels was staggered, the bottom lift landing came in at a depth between the platform levels. Passage between the lifts and platforms was provided by a subway that sloped gently up or down, depending which platform passengers were going to. At the termini, the lift went right down to the level of the island platforms. There is one rather interesting thought regarding this type of layout. Because Greathead had a thing about stairs, he almost succeeded in the late 1800s in doing what TfL are now struggling with. Without realising it he effectively designed and built a tube railway for disabled passengers! It was only the technical constraint of providing access for equipment that forced him to put in a staircase to one of the Borough platforms. Had he known at the time that he would be building a depot at Stockwell, this layout at the Borough would have been unnecessary. This passage also has one other design feature. It was the first subway on a tube railway system that cut through the roof of a station tunnel with a passenger bridge (the bridge over the southbound tunnel is in the foreground of David’s photograph at the point where there is a central handrail and flagstones) – this type of bridge subsequently became a feature of the Yerkes lines. Speculation: Bearing in mind that the passage was used for getting heavy equipment onto the railway, I often wonder what weight limit Greathead placed on the bridge that crossed the southbound line? I also wonder why he did not do things the other way round. If he had taken the lower lift landing to a slightly deeper level, he would have been able to go directly into the southbound tunnel using a shorter passage and without the need for such a substantial bridge. And, because the northbound tunnel is the farther of the two from the lifts, he would just have had enough space to build an inclined passenger subway without any need for the stairs that he desperately tried to avoid.* For further details of experimental train operation from the Borough, see this earlier post districtdave.proboards39.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=History&thread=1142008420
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Apr 4, 2006 5:47:19 GMT
Thanks for that CSLR... think it might be interesting to pay the station a visit at some point!
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Apr 4, 2006 10:34:15 GMT
Thanks for that CSLR... think it might be interesting to pay the station a visit at some point! If you do go there Tom, it might be worth looking at the passenger bridge. I cannot remember if this is the original Greathead one or if it was replaced during the reconstruction. Also note the station tunnels. As you enter the platforms, you are still walking into the original brick-built tunnels that were designed to accommodate a locomotive and three carriages. As you pass along the platforms you can clearly see the different shape and size of the cast-iron lined extensions that were added in the 1920s to allow the running of longer trains. You might also like to take a peek at the very bottom of the emergency stairs. There should be some original C&SLR tiling there, unless it has been covered up. If it has, try the Oval. That emergency staircase is less used and there is a greater likelihood that the tiling is still intact Note: David has asked if anyone would get some up-to-date pictures of the location. See his request at districtdave.proboards39.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=northern&thread=1144143414
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2006 12:05:52 GMT
Fascinating stuff, CSLR - thanks.
Such a shame that the other tube railways of the time didn't share the CSLR's aversion to stairs!
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Apr 4, 2006 15:22:11 GMT
Sorry for the quality of this image, but I thought you might like to see a shot of the subway during the 1920s reconstruction. Most of the northbound platform had been removed and a siding was put in alongside the running line, partly obscured from passenger view by a screen. Spoil going out, and building supplies coming in, were transferred between the muck wagons and the surface by these hand-operated trucks. The passenger bridge over the southbound line is clearly visible in the foreground of the passage flanked by handrails. I am afraid that I cannot oblige with a photo of a locomotive being pushed along this tunnel 33 years earlier.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2006 18:35:20 GMT
Wow - thanks for taking the trouble to post that information and picture, CSLR.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 4, 2006 20:14:05 GMT
If you're planning to visit Borough (damn, I would have got it right had I been online as I used to work there!) or any of the original 1890 C&SLR platforms, have a look at the form of the station tunnels. Most tube profiles are round, but these on the C&SLR had a flattened base profile as they were built in brick. This method of construction was changed when the line was extended and cast iron segments were used instead. This was because the ground above the 1890 stations subsided due to their brick construction causing too much damage to dwellings and roadways above. Cast iron rings were found to be much better in this respect which will give a round profile.
Happy hunting
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2006 20:33:22 GMT
I would have loved to be able to travel on one of those early trains from King William Street. It must have been an amazing experience!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2006 20:38:59 GMT
Yeah, the carriages scraped against the tunnel wall when negotiating the 'Arthur Street Curve' [was just out from KWS]
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Apr 4, 2006 21:03:28 GMT
I would have loved to be able to travel on one of those early trains from King William Street. It must have been an amazing experience! Although we will never be able to enjoy that, maybe someone will build us a BVE one day.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 5, 2006 8:48:57 GMT
Must have been scarey to drive too. The drivers had to sometimes back up and try again to get it up the hill if they didnt go fast enough, but if they did go fast enough they hit the sides.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Apr 6, 2006 13:17:48 GMT
Must have been scarey to drive too. The drivers had to sometimes back up and try again to get it up the hill if they didnt go fast enough, but if they did go fast enough they hit the sides. I posted a picture in a previous thread that partly illustrated the problem of restricted clearance. districtdave.proboards39.com/index.cgi?board=northern&action=display&thread=1137476541&page=1#1141817507What seems to have happened is that, with the bogies of the carriages in their original position, the centre of the carriage sometimes hit the inner edge of the 1.51 chain curve just outside King William Street station and the entrance to the crossover at Stockwell. To overcome this, the company attacked the tunnel wall at Stockwell and removed a layer of brickwork to improve the clearance, but they could not do that to the cast-iron lining at Arthur Street curve. The solution was therefore to move the bogies slightly closer together to change the way that the carriages turned (the carriage in the museum appears to have been altered in this way). Several years later, this caused a problem when King William Street station was converted to an island platform as the ends of the carriages hit the station wall when moving between the crossover and the platform. The company then repeated what it had done at Stockwell and hacked a layer of brick out of the wall at King William Street.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2006 18:00:10 GMT
HMRI would have a fit!
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Apr 6, 2006 18:57:48 GMT
I agree, but it was the Board of Trade (BOT) railway department in those days. They carried out inspections of all railways, approved methods of operation, ensured that regulations were being followed and investigated accidents. But they had never come across anything quite like the C&SLR, and there were times when they just seemed to give up. When the line was first inspected, the BOT discovered that there were several curves that were sharper than those authorised. The company made the feeblest of excuses during the inspection and the BOT just accepted it. The same applied in other areas. In less than four years the C&SLR broke the signalling regulations by using a dubious device to automatically accept trains between stations on what was supposed to be an absolute block system. They then went on to build and introduce a motorised wooden carriage in contravention of the electrical safety regulations that had been imposed on them. The attitude of the company seemed to be that if they thought that the BOT would not approve it they would do it anyway and then, when it was working, they would write and confess what they had done. Rather strangely, the response of the BOT was one of virtual disinterest, although on each occasion that it happened, they agreed to send an official to have a look at it at a future date - they never rushed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2006 19:36:31 GMT
Could it be that the BOT were being 'leant on' by HMG to allow the CSLR to develop themselves 'free from hinderence'? The history of the CSLR is so fascinating, like the plot of a good novel! Keep it coming CSLR
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2006 19:42:32 GMT
And while going up the steep climb into King William Street, the lights in the cars reportedly faded to a dull red. I wonder what state KWS is in now? I did hear that entrance to the station tunnel is still possible, but is sealed because of bad air and about 3 feet of water!
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Apr 6, 2006 19:57:32 GMT
And while going up the steep climb into King William Street, the lights in the cars reportedly faded to a dull red. I wonder what state KWS is in now? I did hear that entrance to the station tunnel is still possible, but is sealed because of bad air and about 3 feet of water! It was converted in WWII to a shelter, the top station is now an office block (obviously there will have been access from there at that time but I don't know whether it remains - several books contain pieces about the station).
|
|