Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2016 18:24:05 GMT
I will be releasing some Tube-based fiction soon, in the form of a short story published as an eBook on Amazon (with a novel to follow). I am looking for a suitable image for its cover.
Does anyone have an image of a Tube train actually inside a tunnel, ideally from a front-on perspective?
The train in the story is on the Piccadilly Line, so it would be perfect if the image was of 1973 rolling stock. However I realise that may be asking too much!
I will be happy to credit the copyright owner for the image and include a link to any website, if anyone is kind enough to allow permission for it to be used as a cover.
Many thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Post by phoenixcronin on Jul 20, 2016 19:48:20 GMT
I went through my phone now and came across this from 2014. Its a 1973 Stock in Wood Green Siding. However, it is NOT mine, and unfortunately I have no idea where I originally found it, as I just saved it in my phone around two years ago. Perhaps someone will recognise it and find the original source.
|
|
|
Post by will on Jul 20, 2016 20:42:06 GMT
Go on google images and click on the little camera in the search bar and you can actually upload the picture and it will find the source 😃
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jul 20, 2016 20:48:04 GMT
I'm guessing you're wanting something similar to that used in the film Creep:
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jul 20, 2016 22:03:00 GMT
I can supply an image similar to this but further inside the tunnel. The image I have in mind is not online, so I can't show it at the present moment. The location is just to the north of Hendon Central station, which is on the Northern Line. Simon
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Jul 20, 2016 22:34:14 GMT
You could always use a photo of the 1972 stock on the Aldwych branch and then doctor it slightly to look more 73TS. I remember Chris W had it as his avatar a while ago.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Jul 21, 2016 7:17:54 GMT
You could always use a photo of the 1972 stock on the Aldwych branch and then doctor it slightly to look more 73TS. I remember Chris W had it as his avatar a while ago.
If you're talking about this image: IMG_4008 by Chris Westcott, on Flickr
.... this photo is of a model that was on display at the York NRM that I captured back in June 2012 at the Railfest event
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2016 9:55:37 GMT
I went through my phone now and came across this from 2014. Its a 1973 Stock in Wood Green Siding. However, it is NOT mine, and unfortunately I have no idea where I originally found it, as I just saved it in my phone around two years ago. Perhaps someone will recognise it and find the original source.
Go on google images and click on the little camera in the search bar and you can actually upload the picture and it will find the source 😃 Thank you very much phoenix, this is exactly the sort of image I had in mind! Would you mind if sending that my way? I'm assuming this is the same resolution as on your camera, and there isn't a higher-res version? I've also tried to find the owner via Google Images but with no luck. If anyone on this forum knows who originally took this, please get in touch. I'm guessing you're wanting something similar to that used in the film Creep: Argh, yes that's very similar to what I'm looking for, albeit without the bloody hand! I deliberately haven't watched Creep and have avoided it for fear of being influenced. But I am going for something along those lines. I can supply an image similar to this but further inside the tunnel. The image I have in mind is not online, so I can't show it at the present moment. The location is just to the north of Hendon Central station, which is on the Northern Line. Simon Simon, thank you, I would love to see the image please. Drop me a line and I will send you my email address. You could always use a photo of the 1972 stock on the Aldwych branch and then doctor it slightly to look more 73TS. I remember Chris W had it as his avatar a while ago.
If you're talking about this image: .... this photo is of a model that was on display at the York NRM that I captured back in June 2012 at the Railfest event
Thanks both, that is a terrific image considering it's a model. But I think I will need am image of a full-size train.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 21, 2016 17:55:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jul 21, 2016 19:56:00 GMT
David, I've now placed versions online for you (all everyone else) to see. These are small images - the full size versions are much larger. Simon
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2016 23:06:07 GMT
David, I've now placed versions online for you (all everyone else) to see. These are small images - the full size versions are much larger. Simon Thanks Simon, those are both really nice images. For my purposes I need the train to be actually inside the tunnel, rather than looking at it from the outside, so sadly these aren't quite for me. But I do appreciate your help so thanks again.
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on Jul 26, 2016 16:09:18 GMT
Sadly not. All the time I was in and out of Wood Green Sidings, I could't be bothered to get out and photograph it because I didn't bring a clothes peg for my nose... A colleague has a photo of a 73 taken in Down Street, though it's a phone picture and they're unlikely to say yes to commercial use: www.flickr.com/photos/tubesnaps/25915918095/If I had the time, I'd go down and get a photograph for you, but the nature of the shot means you're still probably going to have to ask TfL to use it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 17:23:09 GMT
Sadly not. All the time I was in and out of Wood Green Sidings, I could't be bothered to get out and photograph it because I didn't bring a clothes peg for my nose... A colleague has a photo of a 73 taken in Down Street, though it's a phone picture and they're unlikely to say yes to commercial use: www.flickr.com/photos/tubesnaps/25915918095/If I had the time, I'd go down and get a photograph for you, but the nature of the shot means you're still probably going to have to ask TfL to use it. Thanks for your reply - I take it Wood Green Sidings isn't the most fragrant of places?! Your colleague's picture is fantastic, but you've raised an issue I'd like to ask about. If I include a Tube train on the story cover, do I need to ask TfL for permission, even if the actual photo is not one of theirs? Or does this only apply if it's for commercial use? I have produced a provisional cover based on the image phoenixcronin provided, but now I'm concerned that it TfL might ask for it to be taken down once it is published on Amazon.
|
|
|
Post by phoenixcronin on Jul 26, 2016 17:43:29 GMT
Thanks for your reply - I take it Wood Green Sidings isn't the most fragrant of places?! Your colleague's picture is fantastic, but you've raised an issue I'd like to ask about. If I include a Tube train on the story cover, do I need to ask TfL for permission, even if the actual photo is not one of theirs? Or does this only apply if it's for commercial use? I have produced a provisional cover based on the image phoenixcronin provided, but now I'm concerned that it TfL might ask for it to be taken down once it is published on Amazon. Hi David, sorry for being a total knob and not replying but I haven't been on in the last few days. Unfortunately the Wood Green picture I uploaded is the same quality as on my phone, and I don't have a better one available. If you want to use it just right click and save it, however I still have no idea on the source, so obviously I can't give or not give permission etc
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jul 26, 2016 17:56:22 GMT
A colleague has a photo of a 73 taken in Down Street, though it's a phone picture and they're unlikely to say yes to commercial use: If I include a Tube train on the story cover, do I need to ask TfL for permission, even if the actual photo is not one of theirs? Or does this only apply if it's for commercial use? I think the problem would be where the photograph was taken from, rather than what it's subject is. In general, there is no restriction on photography taken from a location to which you have a right of access, e.g a public highway, or your own house. The photographer owns the copyright and can use the photo in any way he wishes. If someone leaves a tube train, sculpture, or indeed their own face, lying around in view of the public, that's their lookout if a someone takes its picture, be they paparazzi, CCTV, or Google Street view. Bit that picture was taken on private property, to which the public do not normally have access. The landowner can impose any restrictions he likes. He may ban photography altogether, or only allow it for non-commercial purposes, or not for publication. Of course, you lose nothing by asking (as long as you were allowed to take the picture at all)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 17:57:28 GMT
Hi David, sorry for being a total knob and not replying but I haven't been on in the last few days. Unfortunately the Wood Green picture I uploaded is the same quality as on my phone, and I don't have a better one available. If you want to use it just right click and save it, however I still have no idea on the source, so obviously I can't give or not give permission etc No problem! Thank you again, I have saved it from your post and based a cover around it. I'm going to add something to the acknowledgements asking that the original owner gets in touch so I can request permission. But now I am worried that any Tube train on a cover might be a copyright problem?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 19:03:01 GMT
Hi David, sorry for being a total knob and not replying but I haven't been on in the last few days. Unfortunately the Wood Green picture I uploaded is the same quality as on my phone, and I don't have a better one available. If you want to use it just right click and save it, however I still have no idea on the source, so obviously I can't give or not give permission etc No problem! Thank you again, I have saved it from your post and based a cover around it. I'm going to add something to the acknowledgements asking that the original owner gets in touch so I can request permission. But now I am worried that any Tube train on a cover might be a copyright problem? I'm not a lawyer. Not a copyright problem if you own it, or you have permission to use the image. (Things may get more flavoursome if it's a photograph of a piece of work that is itself subject to copyright, that might be different, but you can take photographs of tube trains without copyright being an issue as far as I know. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't conceive of a way in which this could not be true.) However, as norbitonflyer explains, the issues come if the photograph was taken from a place to which the public normally do not have access. I can't see a way for there to be a problem if the image is taken from, say, a platform, a bridge, another train, or anything like that. But somewhere like a siding, or the running tunnels might be more interesting. Did I mention I'm not a lawyer?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 19:55:56 GMT
No problem! Thank you again, I have saved it from your post and based a cover around it. I'm going to add something to the acknowledgements asking that the original owner gets in touch so I can request permission. But now I am worried that any Tube train on a cover might be a copyright problem? I'm not a lawyer. Not a copyright problem if you own it, or you have permission to use the image. (Things may get more flavoursome if it's a photograph of a piece of work that is itself subject to copyright, that might be different, but you can take photographs of tube trains without copyright being an issue as far as I know. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't conceive of a way in which this could not be true.) However, as norbitonflyer explains, the issues come if the photograph was taken from a place to which the public normally do not have access. I can't see a way for there to be a problem if the image is taken from, say, a platform, a bridge, another train, or anything like that. But somewhere like a siding, or the running tunnels might be more interesting. Did I mention I'm not a lawyer? You're not a lawyer or anything, are you?! Thank you, this is helpful, if only to know that ordinary photos of Tube trains are not a problem. I worry that this might be, since it's clearly taken by someone standing in the siding. I'm not sure if TfL would be too concerned about a story self-published on Amazon using such an image. But on the other hand, I'd rather play by the rules.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Jul 26, 2016 20:14:06 GMT
Short version: if you take a photo on TfL property and use it commercially you *must* have written permission from TfL first. Sometimes a fee will be involved, sometimes it won't be; it ultimately depends on the use and what TfL determine to be "fee-worthy". If the photo is of an underground train but was not taken on TfL property (I.e. from outside any railway boundary) there are no issues with commercial use, although I would expect TfL to be in touch if it tarnishes their identity in anyway (all trademarks, such as the roundel, are defended quite heavily against unauthorised use, although I have never heard of there being issues with photography). The longer version was buried within the LUL bye-laws and on the TfL website, but it appears that the areas specifically related to photography (as far as I can see from a cursory glance) were removed in the latest update. Certain parts of the filming & photography guidelines are still relevant, though. Edit: An additional thought, considering the nature of the image that you're looking for - be cautious if you use anything that's *actually inside a tunnel*, such as that linked by version3point1 , unless you have explicit written permission from TfL. These images may not necessarily have been taken by an authorised person (though in this case they have), and could land both yourself and the photographer (and anyone else involved) in hot water. More generally, the same goes for anything taken in or from non-public areas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 20:25:02 GMT
Short version: if you take a photo on TfL property and use it commercially you *must* have written permission from TfL first. Sometimes a fee will be involved, sometimes it won't be; it ultimately depends on the use and what TfL determine to be "fee-worthy". If the photo is of an underground train but was not taken on TfL property (I.e. from outside any railway boundary) there are no issues with commercial use, although I would expect TfL to be in touch if it tarnishes their identity in anyway (all trademarks, such as the roundel, are defended quite heavily against unauthorised use, although I have never heard of there being issues with photography). The longer version was buried within the LUL bye-laws and on the TfL website, but it appears that the areas specifically related to photography (as far as I can see from a cursory glance) were removed in the latest update. Certain parts of the filming & photography guidelines are still relevant, though. Edit: An additional thought, considering the nature of the image that you're looking for - be cautious if you use anything that's *actually inside a tunnel*, such as that linked by version3point1 , unless you have explicit written permission from TfL. These images may not necessarily have been taken by an authorised person (though in this case they have), and could land both yourself and the photographer (and anyone else involved) in hot water. More generally, the same goes for anything taken in or from non-public areas. Thanks again for such detailed advice. It looks like the nature of the image I need might actually preclude its use. Presumably, if such an image was used non-commercially, there would not be any problems? For example, if the story itself was free to download?
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Jul 26, 2016 20:33:26 GMT
For non-commercial use I doubt there will be an issue, as long as it was taken by someone with authorisation to be there. Naturally this isn't official TfL advice, but I do have several friends who have had no issues in publishing photos taken from restricted areas where they have been used non-commercially (such as their own websites).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 20:47:27 GMT
Short version: if you take a photo on TfL property and use it commercially you *must* have written permission from TfL first. Sometimes a fee will be involved, sometimes it won't be; it ultimately depends on the use and what TfL determine to be "fee-worthy". If the photo is of an underground train but was not taken on TfL property (I.e. from outside any railway boundary) there are no issues with commercial use, although I would expect TfL to be in touch if it tarnishes their identity in anyway (all trademarks, such as the roundel, are defended quite heavily against unauthorised use, although I have never heard of there being issues with photography). The longer version was buried within the LUL bye-laws and on the TfL website, but it appears that the areas specifically related to photography (as far as I can see from a cursory glance) were removed in the latest update. Certain parts of the filming & photography guidelines are still relevant, though. Edit: An additional thought, considering the nature of the image that you're looking for - be cautious if you use anything that's *actually inside a tunnel*, such as that linked by version3point1 , unless you have explicit written permission from TfL. These images may not necessarily have been taken by an authorised person (though in this case they have), and could land both yourself and the photographer (and anyone else involved) in hot water. More generally, the same goes for anything taken in or from non-public areas. Thanks again for such detailed advice. It looks like the nature of the image I need might actually preclude its use. Presumably, if such an image was used non-commercially, there would not be any problems? For example, if the story itself was free to download? From reading everything that Jack has said, I really wouldn't say it would preclude its use, at least in the general case. You'd just have to go about it in the right way and through the official channels. This may require going through more hoops and the payment of more monies than it would be worth for you, but I'm sure you could definitely do it. Of course, permission can be denied at various points in the process, but let's face it, there are a lot of books about the Underground out there, with plenty of behind-the-scenes and otherwise visually interesting pictures illustrating them. It might be more trouble than it's worth for a self-published short taster story, it might not, and I have no experience working with the TfL press office, but why don't you just ask? It's possible that you might be able to get ahold of someone at TfL who would be happy to provide you with images. It's possible that you will not be getting these images for nothing, but you can enquire about what it might be possible to arrange.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 21:10:14 GMT
From reading everything that Jack has said, I really wouldn't say it would preclude its use, at least in the general case. You'd just have to go about it in the right way and through the official channels. This may require going through more hoops and the payment of more monies than it would be worth for you, but I'm sure you could definitely do it. Of course, permission can be denied at various points in the process, but let's face it, there are a lot of books about the Underground out there, with plenty of behind-the-scenes and otherwise visually interesting pictures illustrating them. It might be more trouble than it's worth for a self-published short taster story, it might not, and I have no experience working with the TfL press office, but why don't you just ask? It's possible that you might be able to get ahold of someone at TfL who would be happy to provide you with images. It's possible that you will not be getting these images for nothing, but you can enquire about what it might be possible to arrange. Thanks tut, you may be right that it's worth asking the press office. You've echoed my fears that it would indeed involve more hoops and money than is worth it, and it may just be easier to make the story free from the start. But maybe it's worth a shot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 21:20:15 GMT
From reading everything that Jack has said, I really wouldn't say it would preclude its use, at least in the general case. You'd just have to go about it in the right way and through the official channels. This may require going through more hoops and the payment of more monies than it would be worth for you, but I'm sure you could definitely do it. Of course, permission can be denied at various points in the process, but let's face it, there are a lot of books about the Underground out there, with plenty of behind-the-scenes and otherwise visually interesting pictures illustrating them. It might be more trouble than it's worth for a self-published short taster story, it might not, and I have no experience working with the TfL press office, but why don't you just ask? It's possible that you might be able to get ahold of someone at TfL who would be happy to provide you with images. It's possible that you will not be getting these images for nothing, but you can enquire about what it might be possible to arrange. Thanks tut, you may be right that it's worth asking the press office. You've echoed my fears that it would indeed involve more hoops and money than is worth it, and it may just be easier to make the story free from the start. But maybe it's worth a shot. Well it's your story, but I'm surprised you find the cover image a game changer on this matter. You could go for something else. A stylised, minimalist line drawing, perhaps. An illustration of tunnel with a pair of headlights in the distance. A drawing of a red signal. I mean you could knock these up yourself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2016 21:24:47 GMT
Thanks tut, you may be right that it's worth asking the press office. You've echoed my fears that it would indeed involve more hoops and money than is worth it, and it may just be easier to make the story free from the start. But maybe it's worth a shot. Well it's your story, but I'm surprised you find the cover image a game changer on this matter. You could go for something else. A stylised, minimalist line drawing, perhaps. An illustration of tunnel with a pair of headlights in the distance. A drawing of a red signal. I mean you could knock these up yourself. That's true, and I have considered such options. But I think the image of a Tube train is a powerful one for many people, and would be really effective. Plus it directly reflects the basic idea of the story itself, which is to be stuck on a train in the tunnel between stations. Depending on how things go though, I haven't discarded those other options!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,781
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 27, 2016 0:33:50 GMT
Not a copyright problem if you own it, or you have permission to use the image. (Things may get more flavoursome if it's a photograph of a piece of work that is itself subject to copyright, that might be different, but you can take photographs of tube trains without copyright being an issue as far as I know. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't conceive of a way in which this could not be true.) The only way I can think of that this could be an issue is with derivative images of copyrighted works. The standard LU livery is almost certainly not copyrightable - it's too simple, however some special liveries almost certainly are copyrightable and therefore copyrighted by default. If the copyrighted artwork is three dimensional and permanently in a public place (e.g. a statue in park) then freedom of panorama applies and you can photograph it without an issue. However if the artwork is only two dimensional, such as a train livery then UK law does not include any freedom of panorama for it and so, unless the use is de minimus* (i.e it's only a small, incidental part of the photograph and not the main subject) your photograph is a derivative work and any use must comply with fair dealing restrictions* (the UK's less generous equivalent of the US' fair use), which are complex and generally do not inlcude making money from the image. The copyright holder can of course waive some or all of their rights and allow you to use such photos with or without the payment of a fee and/or other terms. *There is no single objective definition of what is and is not allowed. This is a very brief summary of my incomplete understanding (IANAL) of what is a very complicated area of law that predates the internet age and is widely regarded as not fit for purpose in the modern world. It will though not be an issue in the case of the OP's desired image. However, as norbitonflyer explains, the issues come if the photograph was taken from a place to which the public normally do not have access. I can't see a way for there to be a problem if the image is taken from, say, a platform, a bridge, another train, or anything like that. But somewhere like a siding, or the running tunnels might be more interesting. If, by chance, you were to be evacuated from a train into the running tunnel, and happened to engineer it so you were last off the train, and happened to have a camera with you, you could probably get the photograph you desire from a place you were authorised to be. The chance of this happening though is extremely small - I'm not aware of an occasion recently where a 1973 stock has had to be evacuated in the manner.
|
|
|
Post by trt on Jul 27, 2016 9:22:55 GMT
Having said all that, Chris, the BBC have on several occasions been approached by the equivalent of TfL over their recreations of tunnels and stations in e.g. Dr Who.
You could always visit the LT Museum and take a picture of the front of their simulator...
|
|
|
Post by trt on Jul 27, 2016 9:58:38 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 9:59:38 GMT
Not a copyright problem if you own it, or you have permission to use the image. (Things may get more flavoursome if it's a photograph of a piece of work that is itself subject to copyright, that might be different, but you can take photographs of tube trains without copyright being an issue as far as I know. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't conceive of a way in which this could not be true.) The only way I can think of that this could be an issue is with derivative images of copyrighted works. The standard LU livery is almost certainly not copyrightable - it's too simple, however some special liveries almost certainly are copyrightable and therefore copyrighted by default. If the copyrighted artwork is three dimensional and permanently in a public place (e.g. a statue in park) then freedom of panorama applies and you can photograph it without an issue. However if the artwork is only two dimensional, such as a train livery then UK law does not include any freedom of panorama for it and so, unless the use is de minimus* (i.e it's only a small, incidental part of the photograph and not the main subject) your photograph is a derivative work and any use must comply with fair dealing restrictions* (the UK's less generous equivalent of the US' fair use), which are complex and generally do not inlcude making money from the image. The copyright holder can of course waive some or all of their rights and allow you to use such photos with or without the payment of a fee and/or other terms. *There is no single objective definition of what is and is not allowed. This is a very brief summary of my incomplete understanding (IANAL) of what is a very complicated area of law that predates the internet age and is widely regarded as not fit for purpose in the modern world. It will though not be an issue in the case of the OP's desired image. However, as norbitonflyer explains, the issues come if the photograph was taken from a place to which the public normally do not have access. I can't see a way for there to be a problem if the image is taken from, say, a platform, a bridge, another train, or anything like that. But somewhere like a siding, or the running tunnels might be more interesting. If, by chance, you were to be evacuated from a train into the running tunnel, and happened to engineer it so you were last off the train, and happened to have a camera with you, you could probably get the photograph you desire from a place you were authorised to be. The chance of this happening though is extremely small - I'm not aware of an occasion recently where a 1973 stock has had to be evacuated in the manner. I'd love to be evacuated into the tunnel, and keep my digital camera on me when I get the Tube just in case - but I agree it's unlikely! Thank you for this detailed info. It does look like I will have to release the story for free to avoid the cover image being seen as derivative or for commercial use. Fortunately that was always an option so it does not hugely change my plans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 10:08:36 GMT
I'd love to be evacuated into the tunnel, and keep my digital camera on me when I get the Tube just in case - but I agree it's unlikely! It's not all fun and games! It's pretty dark down there and the surface you're walking along is very difficult. There are trip hazards and people have been hurt walking along the tunnels in the past. It's also filthy down there, what with the rats and the dust. The risk of leptospirosis, for example, is not to be taken lightly.
|
|