|
Post by stapler on Dec 1, 2015 11:19:33 GMT
Posters on the current thread The Boy Who Turned Yellow, 1972 have mostly used the word "Motorman" to describe the driver. I know the Moorgate accident inspector did a few years later. Undoubtedly driver and later T/op later superseded it; being a tedious old buffer myself, I tend still to use it. When did it pass out of current usage?
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Dec 1, 2015 12:14:55 GMT
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,745
|
Post by class411 on Dec 1, 2015 13:50:52 GMT
It must have been circa 1978 when Hannah Dadds became the first woman train driver. I remember the day after her first, when it was reported that 'a few' passengers (dinosaurs?) had waited for the next train when they saw a female driver. I'm not sure how true that was because not that many people peer into the cab of an approaching train. I know when I tried to spot a friend of mine who was a central line driver it was nigh on impossible to identify the driver (despite the clue of his extremely long hair) without gawking like an idiot. I suppose it's easier in overground sections.
|
|
|
Post by rheostar on Dec 1, 2015 15:17:00 GMT
Back in the day, I used to have MM01 on my payslip.
From memory, the term Motorman ended when OPO came in during the mid 1980s. I think LU were looking for a term that fitted all staff at the front of a train so Train Operator came into use.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Dec 1, 2015 19:26:50 GMT
Train operators came into being with the opening of the Victoria line in 1968.
This was a big promotion at the time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2015 21:16:07 GMT
The change came in March 1982 in Traffic Circular 12/82 - The term “motorman” changed to “Train Driver” (in accordance with PT&R Arrangements of 09.03.81). The term “Automatic Train Operator” remains.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Dec 1, 2015 21:59:47 GMT
Talking of Hannah Dadds, a couple of years before that there was a severe shortage of guards on the Chingford line. When asked why guards' jobs were not open to women, a senior ER manager replied that they were, but no woman could pass the test of lifting a three-link coupling at the end of a four-foot pole. I always thought the 305s had automatic couplers, but perhaps the men in suits didn't know that....
|
|
|
Post by johnb2 on Dec 1, 2015 22:59:14 GMT
Talking of Hannah Dadds, a couple of years before that there was a severe shortage of guards on the Chingford line. When asked why guards' jobs were not open to women, a senior ER manager replied that they were, but no woman could pass the test of lifting a three-link coupling at the end of a four-foot pole. I always thought the 305s had automatic couplers, but perhaps the men in suits didn't know that.... I believe that if the auto couplers (buckeyes?) failed/parted, they had to be dropped and the emergency coupler was a three link or screw coupling painted red that was carried in the guards compartment They are weighty pieces of steel and take some heaving about. If they had to be used it was the guards duty to do the work. It certainly was the case for the 310s with which I regularly used and that was the reply when I asked why the big red coupling hanging on the bulkhead. So proving the handing that would be an essential test back then. Similarly if a loco had to be used to haul a failed train the loco coupling had to be used, again it being the guard of the failed train who had to do the coupling up. Very few locos except on SR had buckeyes then
|
|
hobbayne
RIP John Lennon and George Harrison
Posts: 516
|
Post by hobbayne on Dec 1, 2015 23:11:07 GMT
The term Guard/Motorman was still in use in the late 80,s early 90,s. I was one on the Central Line in 1990.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 2, 2015 20:40:39 GMT
The term Guard/Motorman was still in use in the late 80,s early 90,s. I was one on the Central Line in 1990. Maybe it was still used unofficially at that time, especially by the older crews.
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Dec 2, 2015 22:29:37 GMT
Surely Guard/Motorman was retained until a line went driver only when guards were no longer required.
When I was a depot clerk the senior yardmaster would allocate driving duties to of course rostered spare drivers first, then to Guard/Rated Motorman who were Guard/Motormen who had done enough driving duties in a year to paid as a motorman whether working as a driver or guard. Then to Guard/Motormen who were fully qualified as drivers and always looking for driving duties to get rated.
Guards would obviously do guard duties, but at Upminster you had four guard/shunters who worked around the clock in the control tower. there were other guards who could step up to do their duties for sickness and holiday cover. Finally there were Station/Guards who when not required as a guard worked at a station as a railman.
The system generally worked quite well as the yardmaster knew who he could rely on.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Dec 3, 2015 0:56:53 GMT
The term Guard/Motorman was still in use in the late 80,s early 90,s. I was one on the Central Line in 1990. Maybe it was still used unofficially at that time, especially by the older crews. There is still a sign in the north shed at Queen's Park which reads along the lines of "Motormen must draw right up to signal". To this day a small handful of drivers still put it before their name when writing memos.
|
|
|
Post by glen on Dec 5, 2015 14:51:46 GMT
I always preferred Motorman to Train Driver or Train operator, though I thought my payslip always had MM02, don't know what the difference was between that and MM01 unless MM01 was a trainer.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Dec 5, 2015 15:17:31 GMT
See The Boy Who Turned Yellow thread for whether LT recruited female guards in 1972!
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Dec 5, 2015 15:33:22 GMT
I always preferred Motorman to Train Driver or Train operator, though I thought my payslip always had MM02, don't know what the difference was between that and MM01 unless MM01 was a trainer. I've always like the term Motorman. "Driver" to me implies the use of a steering wheel (it just does) and "Operator" sound too clinical. My old mate Pete was a road sweeper in LB Redbridge in the early eighties although his official title was "Street Orderly". He hated the term and couldn't understand what was wrong with road sweeper!
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Dec 5, 2015 16:23:48 GMT
I always preferred Motorman to Train Driver or Train operator, though I thought my payslip always had MM02, don't know what the difference was between that and MM01 unless MM01 was a trainer. I've always like the term Motorman. "Driver" to me implies the use of a steering wheel (it just does) and "Operator" sound too clinical. My old mate Pete was a road sweeper in LB Redbridge in the early eighties although his official title was "Street Orderly". He hated the term and couldn't understand what was wrong with road sweeper! I agree. There's nothing demeaning about road sweeper or being one, as most people understand. No reason why Motorwoman couldn't have been added to Motorman, just as Chairwoman could've joined Chairman, instead of Chairperson or the truly idiotic Chair. I got in serious strife in work referring to people as Chairman or Chairwoman once or twice but stuck to my guns. Going back on subject, Motorman itself had a certain cachet about it, which is precisely what the job merits.
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Dec 5, 2015 17:44:22 GMT
I've always like the term Motorman. "Driver" to me implies the use of a steering wheel (it just does) and "Operator" sound too clinical. My old mate Pete was a road sweeper in LB Redbridge in the early eighties although his official title was "Street Orderly". He hated the term and couldn't understand what was wrong with road sweeper! I agree. There's nothing demeaning about road sweeper or being one, as most people understand. No reason why Motorwoman couldn't have been added to Motorman, just as Chairwoman could've joined Chairman, instead of Chairperson or the truly idiotic Chair. I got in serious strife in work referring to people as Chairman or Chairwoman once or twice but stuck to my guns. Going back on subject, Motorman itself had a certain cachet about it, which is precisely what the job merits. Ah cross purposes here BF, he didn't regard the initial nomenclature as demeaning at all. He just thought it was pointless creating a description for "someone who sweeps roads that doesn't mention sweeping roads".
|
|
|
Post by nickf on Dec 5, 2015 18:29:55 GMT
I agree. There's nothing demeaning about road sweeper or being one, as most people understand. No reason why Motorwoman couldn't have been added to Motorman, just as Chairwoman could've joined Chairman, instead of Chairperson or the truly idiotic Chair. I got in serious strife in work referring to people as Chairman or Chairwoman once or twice but stuck to my guns. Going back on subject, Motorman itself had a certain cachet about it, which is precisely what the job merits. Ah cross purposes here BF, he didn't regard the initial nomenclature as demeaning at all. He just thought it was pointless creating a description for "someone who sweeps roads that doesn't mention sweeping roads". Just as well such politically correct nomenclature didn't exist back in Ancient Greece, or it would have been called The Colossus of Paved Rights of Way instead on The Colossus of Rhodes
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Dec 6, 2015 11:51:39 GMT
Nickf, and to take up your last point, Rhodesia became Zambia/Zimbabwe...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2015 11:52:33 GMT
Talking of Hannah Dadds, a couple of years before that there was a severe shortage of guards on the Chingford line. When asked why guards' jobs were not open to women, a senior ER manager replied that they were, but no woman could pass the test of lifting a three-link coupling at the end of a four-foot pole. I always thought the 305s had automatic couplers, but perhaps the men in suits didn't know that.... I believe that if the auto couplers (buckeyes?) failed/parted, they had to be dropped and the emergency coupler was a three link or screw coupling painted red that was carried in the guards compartment They are weighty pieces of steel and take some heaving about. If they had to be used it was the guards duty to do the work. It certainly was the case for the 310s with which I regularly used and that was the reply when I asked why the big red coupling hanging on the bulkhead. So proving the handing that would be an essential test back then. Similarly if a loco had to be used to haul a failed train the loco coupling had to be used, again it being the guard of the failed train who had to do the coupling up. Very few locos except on SR had buckeyes then I would've thought raising/lowering the Buckeye auto coupler would be the much bigger challenge then lifting a 3 link coupling on a shunters pole which is very light for something used on the railway! The red emergency screw coupling is quite heavy but not anywhere near as heavy as raising the Buckeye coupler from its lowered position. Looking at photos, the Class 305s do indeed have Buckeye auto couplers.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Dec 6, 2015 12:10:24 GMT
Who now has the job of dealing with buckeyes and emergency screw couplers on DOO trains - and do women drivers have any trouble in this regard? Or have women just got stronger since the 70s?
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Dec 6, 2015 14:01:40 GMT
Who now has the job of dealing with buckeyes and emergency screw couplers on DOO trains - and do women drivers have any trouble in this regard? Or have women just got stronger since the 70s? For the most part, drivers don't have to deal with the physical coupling other than an occasional shift to make sure it is aligned properly. It is worth noting that in this incident, the female driver of one of the trains had difficulties uncoupling 2 units and sustained a hand injury. The RAIB didn't make it clear if this was due to physique, inexperience, or the units not wanting to cooperate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 1:41:09 GMT
Who now has the job of dealing with buckeyes and emergency screw couplers on DOO trains - and do women drivers have any trouble in this regard? Or have women just got stronger since the 70s? The only trains I can think of operated DOO that still have Buckeye couplers that can be lowered/raised are the Class 442 EMUs used currently on Gatwick Express and some Southern services. I'd assume it would be the Driver's responsibility to lower the Buckeye in case of emergency rescue by loco (not fitted with Buckeye) when the screw coupling would have to be used. Since they run normally with the Buckeye in the raised position the Driver would only have to lower it, which is alot easier than raising it and it would most likely be raised again by a Shunter back at the depot after the rescue loco has been uncoupled. The Shunter who comes with the rescue loco may also be the person who would lower the Buckeye coupler if the Driver hasn't done so already in a rescue situation.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Dec 7, 2015 8:25:44 GMT
Thanks. Do we have any female depot shunters yet?
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Dec 7, 2015 13:02:26 GMT
'Motorman' surely came over with Yerkes. In the US, 'driver' was the name for a horse-car 'operator', and the new cable, and then electric cars needed a new term, there being no horse (or mule, in Dixie) to 'drive. 'Gripman' and 'motorman' fitted the bill nicely.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Dec 7, 2015 14:20:18 GMT
I agree. There's nothing demeaning about road sweeper or being one, as most people understand. No reason why Motorwoman couldn't have been added to Motorman, just as Chairwoman could've joined Chairman, instead of Chairperson or the truly idiotic Chair. I got in serious strife in work referring to people as Chairman or Chairwoman once or twice but stuck to my guns. Going back on subject, Motorman itself had a certain cachet about it, which is precisely what the job merits. Ah cross purposes here BF, he didn't regard the initial nomenclature as demeaning at all. He just thought it was pointless creating a description for "someone who sweeps roads that doesn't mention sweeping roads". On my previous address's local council, sanitary inspectors were called "Public health officers"
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Dec 7, 2015 15:34:24 GMT
'Motorman' surely came over with Yerkes. In the US, 'driver' was the name for a horse-car 'operator', and the new cable, and then electric cars needed a new term, there being no horse (or mule, in Dixie) to 'drive. 'Gripman' and 'motorman' fitted the bill nicely. Wiki: A motorman is the title for a person who operates an electrified trolley car, tram, light rail, or rapid transit train.
The term refers to the person who is in charge of the motor (of the electric car) in the same sense as a railroad engineer is in charge of the engine. The term was (and, where still used, is) gender-neutral. Though motormen have historically been male, females in the position (such as in the U.S. during the World Wars) were usually also called motormen as a job title.
The term has been replaced by more neutral ones, as gender-specific job titles have fallen into disuse, and because many systems employ large numbers of women in the position. On the New York City Subway and London Underground, the position is now called train operator (T/Op).
The operator of an electric locomotive or an electric multiple unit train on a commuter or mainline railroad is typically called an engineer or driver.
The term may also refer to a person on a locomotive-hauled train when the train is being propelled by the locomotive. The driver is responsible for applying power in the locomotive, while the motorman (usually in a specially-built or converted vehicle) at the front of the train, is responsible for obeying signals, sounding the horn, and applying the brakes where necessary.
I've definitely read but can't remember where, that Yerkes's takeover brought cars into the UndergrounD nomenclature for carriages, so the evidence points that way vide motorman. I remember GT Moody's Southern Electric used this throughout its' text. Unfortunately, I need to get a new copy of that, without which I can't tell you what the author did for a living, but I think he was in a railway management area, so may be the term was officially adopted before he'd started in such & would again point down the Yerkes route.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Dec 7, 2015 16:17:50 GMT
"Cars" was used by the GER for empty stock, or ECS, before the Thornton era and probably before Yerkes, I think....
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Dec 7, 2015 18:01:51 GMT
in the same sense as a railroad engineer is in charge of the engine. Ugh!!!In most of the civilised (by which in this context I mean non-Anglophone) world, an engineer is a professional practitioner in a specific discipline of engineering (civil, electrical, mechanical, aeronautical etc) - and in many countries the term can only legally be used by a member of the relevant chartered institution, and usually has a degree. Until recently a locomotive engineer would be someone who designed it. In America the engineer was, and is, the person who drove it. But in Britain now it usually means the person who comes to fix it. (What's wrong with "technician" or "fitter"?) 5th July 1938 - Who was the engineer? a Sir Nigel Gresley b Joe Duddington c Tom Bray* d The un-named man who patched up the valve gear at Peterborough after it cracked under the strain, so that Mallard could get to Kings Cross for the press call. In the UK anyone who knows how to wield a screwdriver now calls himself an engineer - and the resulting image problem for the profession has resulted in the IMEE, ICEE, IEEE having a recruitment problem, universities having to close engineering courses for lack of interest, and more and more industrial design, even bespoke work for UK customers, being done abroad. * yes, I have even seen "engineer" used for that role - e.g in Michael Crichton's so-inaccurate-it's-funny early novel "The First Great Train Robbery" (1975)
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Dec 7, 2015 18:33:01 GMT
As a Engineering student (and member of the IMechE) I too am annoyed by the misuse of the title of Engineer! From what I gather though, American engineering students have it slightly worse than those in the UK in terms of misunderstanding what the courses are about! I suppose I'll just have to comfort myself in the knowledge that engineering graduate salaries tend to only come in behind medical professions (Medicine, dentistry, veterinary, etc)
|
|