Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2013 20:52:12 GMT
The truth is many Supervisors view enthusaists with fairness using common sense... others object, refusing access - although this might be due to congestion or other problems that the enthusiast might not be aware of. IMO regularly stated reasons of security and/or safety are, for the most part, meaningless bland excuses used to get rid of the enthusiast at all costs. Creating a map of stations where enthusiasts have problems capturing images, will in time become less and less useful as I bet every station will have a Supervisor who will give permission and another who will refuse. Stepping back for a moment, the impression I get is that LU/TfL are concerned with their image and don't want others to establish an income selling on photos taken on its land. Realistically is TfL prepared to tangle itself in knots trying to identify all the images captured of trains/platforms/people taken on its stations that have been uploaded to te internet and take legal action against every single photographer... IMO probbaly not, however if it did so I suspect there would be an outcry, similar to that that occurred a couple of years ago when a total ban was proposed by the Glasgow Metro - including a £1000 fine - of photography. This only resulted in a climb down by SPT. IMO TfL would have been apallingly advised if it decided to go in the samne direction. As enthusaists we could choose the rock the boat and force TfLs hand... or just go with the flow... using common sense and approaching Supervisors first for permission. In my experience they're not all dragons and quite a few are very friendly and are accepting towards enthusiasts. I quite agree, Chris. I took photos on the SPT Subway during the ban, and no-one bothered me at all (this was October 2010). Despite all of the above, I would happily fork out £20-30 quid a year for some kind of photographic permit, if that meant that I didn't get grief from staff. Unless you are a photographer, you cannot appreciate how frustrating/ embarrassing it is to be hauled over the coals in front of the passengers waiting on the platform, just for wanting to take photographs.
|
|
|
Post by rsdworker on Oct 5, 2013 22:45:06 GMT
i think TFL needs revise the plans to update the rules bringing up to 21 century where mobiles and smartphones have photos so i believe if person who wants photo (flash) then he should get permit from TFL office but for non flash - the photographers should be allowed without permit if they have no flash camera or mobile or smartphone which is should accepted (other transit systems already allow it)
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Oct 6, 2013 6:37:59 GMT
Despite all of the above, I would happily fork out £20-30 quid a year for some kind of photographic permit, if that meant that I didn't get grief from staff. Unless you are a photographer, you cannot appreciate how frustrating/ embarrassing it is to be hauled over the coals in front of the passengers waiting on the platform, just for wanting to take photographs. I used to agree that a small charge for an annual permit might be one concept that would work... however my concern is that a small charge of £20-30 per annum now would become £40-50 next year and in 5 years or so it would be used as a cash cow costing £200-250. How many enthusiasts would be able to afford that??!!! As I posted in my first contribution to this thread, IMO TfL and LU should view enthusiasts as being an additional pair of eyes and ears... goodness knows how many times I've flagged something with station staff when I've noticed something wrong. Choosing not to engage the enthusiast community appropriately/fairly could well repel the goodwill shown by enthusiasts towards the Underground.... and I really don't want to see that happen because then everyone loses out!!!
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Oct 6, 2013 7:37:15 GMT
It would also set a dangerous precedent for every Tom Dick and Harry to start charging for photography on their premises - together with the resultant arguments about whether someone taking a camera into a location could be charged even if the claimed they weren't going to use it.
And, as I said earlier, it's all pretty moot now because there is no way that anyone can tell whether someone using a mobile phone with a camera is taking a photograph or receiving/making a video call.
It's just a pity that people who want to take decent photographs may be prevented from doing so whereas people snapping on a mobile will carry on regardless. (Although you can get some pretty good shots on mobiles, now.)
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Oct 6, 2013 7:52:20 GMT
class411 - it has already happened, alas - I forget which cathedral now charges to for permission to take pictures with a camera, but it does - presumably also charges the moneychangers a good floor space rental, too... Once everyone is wearing Google Glass, the arguments may get even sillier?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2013 8:20:36 GMT
You could argue that Enthusiasts are helping to create a photographic record of LULs evolving history. To my knowledge TfL/LUL hardly take any official photographs these days. Unlike the 60s, & 70’s when LT took great care to photograph the many aspects of its operations. The database of which is available on line through the LTM. However the archive seems to fizzle out in the mid 80’s. Which perhaps ties in with the various measures taken in that era to reduce costs.
So without people volunteering their time and trouble to photograph events, such as the arrival of the first S stock train, the loss of various stocks etc, these momentous events would be lost forever.
I suspect that many of the books on sale in the LTM have photos obtained by enthusiasts in much the same way. I wonder if they all obtained a permit!
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Oct 6, 2013 10:00:21 GMT
You could argue that Enthusiasts are helping to create a photographic record of LULs evolving history. To my knowledge TfL/LUL hardly take any official photographs these days. Unlike the 60s, & 70’s when LT took great care to photograph the many aspects of its operations. The database of which is available on line through the LTM. However the archive seems to fizzle out in the mid 80’s. Which perhaps ties in with the various measures taken in that era to reduce costs. So without people volunteering their time and trouble to photograph events, such as the arrival of the first S stock train, the loss of various stocks etc, these momentous events would be lost forever. I suspect that many of the books on sale in the LTM have photos obtained by enthusiasts in much the same way. I wonder if they all obtained a permit! In which case I would encourage all enthusiasts to get some photos up on Flickr and share them with the LT Museum account: www.flickr.com/groups/ltmuseum_vehicles-on-the-move/By adding your photo to this group, you are giving London Transport Museum permission to display your photo on www.ltmuseum.co.uk or on the Museum's Flickr wall in the gallery. More info can be found on their RULES page. ... we are therefore all recording the history of the Underground for future generations. EDIT - I just want to flag that this group is for LT Museum events and not for day-to-day LU operations
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Oct 6, 2013 10:36:09 GMT
You could argue that Enthusiasts are helping to create a photographic record of LULs evolving history. To my knowledge TfL/LUL hardly take any official photographs these days. Unlike the 60s, & 70’s when LT took great care to photograph the many aspects of its operations. The database of which is available on line through the LTM. However the archive seems to fizzle out in the mid 80’s. Which perhaps ties in with the various measures taken in that era to reduce costs. So without people volunteering their time and trouble to photograph events, such as the arrival of the first S stock train, the loss of various stocks etc, these momentous events would be lost forever. I suspect that many of the books on sale in the LTM have photos obtained by enthusiasts in much the same way. I wonder if they all obtained a permit! In which case I would encourage all enthusiasts to get some photos up on Flickr and share them with the LT Museum account: www.flickr.com/groups/ltmuseum_vehicles-on-the-move/By adding your photo to this group, you are giving London Transport Museum permission to display your photo on www.ltmuseum.co.uk or on the Museum's Flickr wall in the gallery. More info can be found on their RULES page. ... we are therefore all recording the history of the Underground for future generations. The closest to an official photographer is on Flikr - bowroaduk
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2013 13:39:27 GMT
The closest to an official photographer is on Flikr - bowroaduk Also, Version 3.1 does bits and pieces for the staff magazine 'On the move'.
|
|
|
Post by londonboi1985 on Oct 7, 2013 14:29:29 GMT
i think the best thing to do in any situation now would be to just have a nice quiet chat with the supervisor and just let them know your intention would be to be there for say 5/10 minutes to take a few pictures do they mind.
if they say yes thank them for there time and try else where at the end of the day the supervisor is in charge of the station during there shift so staff and customers must abide by there rules
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Oct 7, 2013 14:45:18 GMT
I replied to the first email with this attachment.. Second reply from TfL: Date: 07.10.2013 Dear Mr Siddiqi, Thank you for replying to me on 4 October regarding photography at Underground stations. I do empathise with your position as highlighted in the document you attached. I do continue to recommend that you notify the station supervisor as a matter of courtesy but there is no obligation on your part to do so. I do believe it might help avoid a repeat of the situation you faced at Parsons Green in future. Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact us. Please contact me again if you need any further assistance, or if you would prefer to talk to us about this matter, please call us on 0343 222 1234. They are employed by TFL therefore they must follow the rules giving to them and they must ensure the safety and security of the station they manage. LUL or TfL..?
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Oct 7, 2013 14:50:27 GMT
i think the best thing to do in any situation now would be to just have a nice quiet chat with the supervisor and just let them know your intention would be to be there for say 5/10 minutes to take a few pictures do they mind. if they say yes thank them for there time and try else where at the end of the day the supervisor is in charge of the station during there shift so staff and customers must abide by there rules So TfL say one thing, LUL says another, and the Station Supervisor say something else?
|
|
|
Post by southfieldschris on Oct 7, 2013 15:48:28 GMT
i think the best thing to do in any situation now would be to just have a nice quiet chat with the supervisor and just let them know your intention would be to be there for say 5/10 minutes to take a few pictures do they mind. if they say yes thank them for there time and try else where at the end of the day the supervisor is in charge of the station during there shift so staff and customers must abide by there rules So TfL say one thing, LUL says another, and the Station Supervisor say something else? Yes of course. I don't see any reason why a Station Supervisor shouldn't exercise discretion over something like that even if the Rule Book sets it out in absolute terms.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 7, 2013 17:18:51 GMT
There may be temporary issues with (parts) of a station that an enthusiast might not be aware of that would give a good reason why photography wasn't permitted at the time you were there, and station supervisors need to be able to enforce that. Where possible though they should advise you that these reasons exist and what they are, and definitely shouldn't make up reasons where none exist.
The only things that come immediately to mind would be maintenance work that reduced the space available on a platform to a level that was safe for passenger loadings but anyone hanging around would get in the way; or if there had been an incident on the station that was being investigated.
|
|
|
Post by rsdworker on Oct 7, 2013 18:18:27 GMT
yes normally the staff should been told at platform or a No photography sign on mobile sign would be helped - a enforcing the rules
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 7, 2013 19:03:12 GMT
I replied to the first email with this attachment.. Second reply from TfL: Date: 07.10.2013 Dear Mr Siddiqi, Thank you for replying to me on 4 October regarding photography at Underground stations. I do empathise with your position as highlighted in the document you attached. I do continue to recommend that you notify the station supervisor as a matter of courtesy but there is no obligation on your part to do so. I do believe it might help avoid a repeat of the situation you faced at Parsons Green in future. Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact us. Please contact me again if you need any further assistance, or if you would prefer to talk to us about this matter, please call us on 0343 222 1234. I think the key is in the wording that you have highlighted: "you shouldn't have a problem". That's not to say you won't, but on more occassions than not it will be fine. I think that the latest response you have received is probably the best you can hope for, they are not saying the SS was wrong (and are thus supporting their staff in their decisions made) but at the same point they accept that you have not broken any "rules". Depending on how militant you're feeling you could keep a print-out in your camera bag. Or maybe you could try this approach that I have seen advocated: Official: You're not allowed to take photos here. Photographer: I'm sorry, I thought I was. Why am I not allowed? Official: It's in the rules. Photographer: Oh, I'm sorry, I thought I was allowed to. Official: No, it's not allowed. Photographer: I'm so sorry, I really didn't know. Thank you for telling me, I hope I've not caused any trouble. Could I take your name so that I can write in and tell them what a good job you're doing? Official: My name is on my badge, it's Fred. Photographer: Ok Fred, that's great thanks. You wouldn't have a pen and paper so I can write that down, I wouldn't want anyone else getting the credit. No. Oh, perhaps I could just take a picture of your badge then? [/tongue in cheek]
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Oct 7, 2013 19:33:14 GMT
Ladies & Gents IMO its really really simple... ask the Station Supervisor first... if they say yes you'll be signed in and are free to take photos as long as you use some common sense and don't then reveal a tripod, start to use flash or trespass... If the Supervisor says no... then move on as its seriously not worth: - the hassle
- your time
- rocking the boat
Otherwise there's the risk of misunderstanding... antagonism... and reinforcing the (unfair) reputation of some LU staff that all enthusiasts are a PITA !!! As a advertising meerkat says... SIMPULZ !!!
|
|
pitdiver
No longer gainfully employed
Posts: 439
|
Post by pitdiver on Oct 7, 2013 20:32:22 GMT
As an ex meber of LUL/TfL staff and there fore a TfL pensioner I receive evey year a calendar. On looking at this calendar it can be seen TfL still have photographs taken of cuerrent subjects. These are in fact available by contacting Tfl's visual image service which I believe can be reached via 55 Broadway or Widsor House.
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Oct 7, 2013 20:48:46 GMT
Cool. I'll ask from now on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2014 21:23:10 GMT
I`ve just read this thread with interest and would ask what are the rules referred too here and are they valid in English law, are they part of the Conditions of Carriage or bylaws, or simply an advisory/guidance?
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Feb 9, 2014 2:15:53 GMT
I`ve just read this thread with interest and would ask what are the rules referred too here and are they valid in English law, are they part of the Conditions of Carriage or bylaws, or simply an advisory/guidance? Have a read of this section of this page on the forum: www.districtdavesforum.co.uk/thread/6610/photography-on-underground-rules-adviceAlso on the District Dave main site that accompanies the forum: www.districtdave.co.uk/html/photography.htmlI've tried to cover LU, mainline and photography in public places as accurately as I can. Section 4.5 of the conditions of carriage states what behaviour is banned and photography itself definitely isn't, only that flash/camera support equipment should not be used... photography isn't even mentioned in the bylaws as far as I'm aware ! The bottom line is that it's always best to employ common sense by asking first... it's only polite and after all how can staff on duty tell between a responsibly enthusiast who'll refrain from using flash/tripod and a complete and utter wally brain who takes the approach that rules only ever apply to others. Some might (wrongly/foolishly) take a jobsworth approach, perhaps because they've had experiences with the wally brain fraternity. In my experience the vast majority of LU employees are open minded and decent enough to trust those that ask first... and as I've already posted earlier, if the answer is NO, just move on The Conditions of Carriage is a legal document, in that it states the conditions that members of the public must follow in order to have access to the land or use the transport system. If someone became a repetitive hazard, a court order might be obtained banning them from LU for a period of time... that's how I understand it anyway. In extreme cases (e.g. Vandalism) any breach of a court order can result in a fine or even a prison sentence...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2014 2:36:49 GMT
Only read the first part of the thread, someone had already answered
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2014 10:12:30 GMT
I`ve just read this thread with interest and would ask what are the rules referred too here and are they valid in English law, are they part of the Conditions of Carriage or bylaws, or simply an advisory/guidance? Have a read of this section of this page on the forum: www.districtdavesforum.co.uk/thread/6610/photography-on-underground-rules-adviceAlso on the District Dave main site that accompanies the forum: www.districtdave.co.uk/html/photography.htmlI've tried to cover LU, mainline and photography in public places as accurately as I can. Section 4.5 of the conditions of carriage states what behaviour is banned and photography itself definitely isn't, only that flash/camera support equipment should not be used... photography isn't even mentioned in the bylaws as far as I'm aware ! The bottom line is that it's always best to employ common sense by asking first... it's only polite and after all how can staff on duty tell between a responsibly enthusiast who'll refrain from using flash/tripod and a complete and utter wally brain who takes the approach that rules only ever apply to others. Some might (wrongly/foolishly) take a jobsworth approach, perhaps because they've had experiences with the wally brain fraternity. In my experience the vast majority of LU employees are open minded and decent enough to trust those that ask first... and as I've already posted earlier, if the answer is NO, just move on The Conditions of Carriage is a legal document, in that it states the conditions that members of the public must follow in order to have access to the land or use the transport system. If someone became a repetitive hazard, a court order might be obtained banning them from LU for a period of time... that's how I understand it anyway. In extreme cases (e.g. Vandalism) any breach of a court order can result in a fine or even a prison sentence... Good post, that sounds reasonable enough, enthusiasts do of course act as extra eyes and ears in issues of security and the enthusiast market does make a significant financial contribution of course towards financing the railways.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2014 8:21:35 GMT
Should have just ignored the PA to be honest, similar thing happened to me and a mate at Brixton whilst waiting around for 67ts in their final months. PA came over 'Can the customers on the end of the platform stop taking flash photographs' we didn't even have our cameras out let alone taking flash photos! We ignored it and stayed put, a few minutes later the Station Supervisor and one of his SA's came walking down the platform. The Station Supervisor gave us aload of rubbish about tresspass and fare evasion, we stood our ground throughout and then he got his SA to contact the control room to phone the BTP. They walked off without saying anything and we didn't see any BTP at all! Ah well, turned out there were no 67ts out that day anyway! Fare evasion? What nonsense - I assume you all had valid tickets!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2014 9:26:08 GMT
Using flash photography on the Underground is just plain stupid and potentially dangerous; take a photo without flash and edit it at home. As for asking permission of the Station Supervisor, will this apply to all the 1000's of tourist with camera phones, common sense needs to prevail?
XF
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2014 23:26:15 GMT
Should have just ignored the PA to be honest, similar thing happened to me and a mate at Brixton whilst waiting around for 67ts in their final months. PA came over 'Can the customers on the end of the platform stop taking flash photographs' we didn't even have our cameras out let alone taking flash photos! We ignored it and stayed put, a few minutes later the Station Supervisor and one of his SA's came walking down the platform. The Station Supervisor gave us aload of rubbish about tresspass and fare evasion, we stood our ground throughout and then he got his SA to contact the control room to phone the BTP. They walked off without saying anything and we didn't see any BTP at all! Ah well, turned out there were no 67ts out that day anyway! Fare evasion? What nonsense - I assume you all had valid tickets! Yep! Must have been having a slow day or something!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2014 7:24:17 GMT
As has been stated in an answer at the beginning of the thread you can take photo's as long as you don't use flash or a tripod. This of course is for "personal use" only. If your a business or wish to use LU property for films or photo's contact the TFL photo/film unit. They can issue you with a permit which costs £50. If your passing through no one is going to stop you and if your a spotter and spend 30 mins on the platform, they may ask who you are and what you are doing but should not chase you out of the station.A good idea if you plan to spend more than 10 mins on a platform is to ask to speak to the supervisor and inform him/her that you will be spending so much time on platform so and so. Some might ask to sign in,others will say no problem and thanks for telling me. As has been stated before train spotters can be a useful extra set of eyes.
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Sept 7, 2014 0:01:04 GMT
What happened on Friday (5 September 2014) makes me partially regret that I ever returned to the UK after a successful self-directed study trip to Barcelona. As many may be aware, the D78 Stock is getting withdrawn and I am hoping to get a satisfactory photo of every D78 motor car for historical benefit without absolutely no money involved, much like what the fellow railfan website nycsubway.org tries to do. At West Kensington station, I asked the supervisor in the westbound platform if I could take a few photos of the motor cars and he said as long as there is no flash which was fine. However, less than ten minutes later he told me to get out in a rude manner, claiming that he "received complaints from the line controller", and when I went to complain to the station supervisor at Hammersmith about his behaviour, he threatened to call the police on me. Being a very vulnerable person, I was left being unable to travel home alone because of the intimidation, and I alerted a station supervisor at Victoria. She, and a passing police officer that I summoned, both assured me that they had no power to threaten and chase off me like that just for photographing the motor cars, but the level of intimidation by the two supervisors at West Kensington and Hammersmith left me too scared to travel home alone that my carer had to collect me. The incident has hurt my trust on the District line, considering the fact that I am already racing against time before the first D78 motor car heads for the scrapyard. The behaviour of the two supervisors at West Kensington and Hammersmith has a potential to drive out the network's fanbase. If such behaviour continues in response to my innocent efforts, I show intention in returning to Barcelona forever and become an ex-pat, given the fact that TMB was so positive towards my efforts on Twitter. My mental health is already extremely poor and I was just trying to make most of what little remains of me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2014 0:23:00 GMT
What happened on Friday (5 September 2014) makes me partially regret that I ever returned to the UK after a successful self-directed study trip to Barcelona. As many may be aware, the D78 Stock is getting withdrawn and I am hoping to get a satisfactory photo of every D78 motor car for historical benefit without absolutely no money involved, much like what the fellow railfan website nycsubway.org tries to do. At West Kensington station, I asked the supervisor in the westbound platform if I could take a few photos of the motor cars and he said as long as there is no flash which was fine. However, less than ten minutes later he told me to get out in a rude manner, claiming that he "received complaints from the line controller", and when I went to complain to the station supervisor at Hammersmith about his behaviour, he threatened to call the police on me. Being a very vulnerable person, I was left being unable to travel home alone because of the intimidation, and I alerted a station supervisor at Victoria. She, and a passing police officer that I summoned, both assured me that they had no power to threaten and chase off me like that just for photographing the motor cars, but the level of intimidation by the two supervisors at West Kensington and Hammersmith left me too scared to travel home alone that my carer had to collect me. The incident has hurt my trust on the District line, considering the fact that I am already racing against time before the first D78 motor car heads for the scrapyard. The behaviour of the two supervisors at West Kensington and Hammersmith has a potential to drive out the network's fanbase. If such behaviour continues in response to my innocent efforts, I show intention in returning to Barcelona forever and become an ex-pat, given the fact that TMB was so positive towards my efforts on Twitter. My mental health is already extremely poor and I was just trying to make most of what little remains of me. I'm sorry to hear that. I don't really want to be too judgemental of these individuals and obviously the super has to take seriously requests from the LC, but I really can't see any good reason why the super should treat you in this way - there are ways and means. Ordinarily I'm apt to be very forgiving and supporting of LU staff, but this incident saddens me a lot and I really can't see why LU is so often so ill-disposed towards photography (excluding the issue of flash). There was no reason to threaten to call the police. Maybe he was having a bad day at 'the office', but - if that's so - I'm sorry that it was taken out on you, there was no need for it and it's quite understandably hurt you. I hope you feel ready to return to the District line soon, I'm sure the many District line members of staff we have on here will be glad to have you back on their line. Thank you for sharing your experiences with us.
|
|
|
Post by Indefatigable on Sept 7, 2014 0:31:45 GMT
If you were left feeling unable to get home, one presumes the LU failed their duty of care to a vulnerable person? - more experienced members will no doubt say more.
I was only there the other week when I took a picture at Terminal 5 platforms (hence my avatar) when a member of platform staff (not sure the actual "rank") asked me to put away the camera - stating I needed permission from the people in the picture. I found this somewhat odd as the only person in said picture was, in fact, me... - promptly gave myself permission to take my own picture.
Later on, I had the chance to take a picture of a Picc train outside, in the sunshine and a member of platform staff came to me, asked what I was doing and, upon being told what I was doing stated "No flash" but I was welcome to spend as much time as I wanted there and much the same at Kensington
Maybe the staff, as tut suggests, had a darned bad day and just took it out on you - though that is hardly an excuse of course
|
|