Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 9:05:18 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 9:05:18 GMT
Is being done up at Neasden, ready for life over at the depot museum. Static car for display only .
|
|
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 11:51:52 GMT
Post by graeme186 on Oct 4, 2012 11:51:52 GMT
Is being done up at Neasden, ready for life over at the depot museum. Static car for display only . Thank you for the info Underground Driver. Presumably it will still make the trip to Northwood on Monday and be transported direct from there to the LTM at Acton? What are peoples views as to whether it should be re-numbered back to its original number?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 13:19:34 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 13:19:34 GMT
Then whats the unit preserved?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 13:35:20 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 13:35:20 GMT
Then whats the unit preserved? Both 5234/5110 are to be kept running to passenger standards. However its up to the LTM to pick one unit after the RAT work ends.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 18:38:50 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 18:38:50 GMT
Then whats the unit preserved? Both 5234/5110 are to be kept running to passenger standards. However its up to the LTM to pick one unit after the RAT work ends. Do you mean after this years leaf fall season or later?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 20:01:14 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 20:01:14 GMT
Both 5234/5110 are to be kept running to passenger standards. However its up to the LTM to pick one unit after the RAT work ends. Do you mean after this years leaf fall season or later? With the LTM who knows...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 20:22:39 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2012 20:22:39 GMT
Do you mean after this years leaf fall season or later? With the LTM who knows... Understood!
|
|
|
5034
Oct 4, 2012 21:37:15 GMT
Post by motorman on Oct 4, 2012 21:37:15 GMT
So to clarify it ultimately looks that in addition to 5034 an operational preserved unit will also survive when replaced on RAT dutues presumable by D Stock
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 5, 2012 14:28:45 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2012 14:28:45 GMT
As long is one is preserved and does a few charter trains, I'm happy. If not, fair enough
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
5034
Oct 5, 2012 16:55:51 GMT
Post by metman on Oct 5, 2012 16:55:51 GMT
If not - I shall be deeply unhappy!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 5, 2012 18:02:31 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2012 18:02:31 GMT
Nothing's confirmed for the long term regarding RAT units 5110/5234. While they're needed for RAT duties they'll be maintained, and as mentioned further up the thread that includes being capable of occasional passenger use. But when the requirement for A-stock RATs ends an alternative proposal will be needed if either of the two units are to be kept operational.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 13:55:55 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2012 13:55:55 GMT
Any news or picutres of 5034 in its new home? From another thread we know it has arrived safely. I hope it was uncoupled and not gas-axed from the set.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 14:26:37 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2012 14:26:37 GMT
Any news or picutres of 5034 in its new home? From another thread we know it has arrived safely. I hope it was uncoupled and not gas-axed from the set. I found this on Twitter of 5034 arriving into Acton /photo/1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 14:34:00 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2012 14:34:00 GMT
|
|
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 14:51:46 GMT
Post by Dstock7080 on Oct 11, 2012 14:51:46 GMT
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 15:45:46 GMT
Post by cso on Oct 11, 2012 15:45:46 GMT
Why would 5034 reach Acton by road, rather than by rail? I was under the impression that A-Stock would have been able to run there outside of traffic hours...
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 16:06:32 GMT
Post by DWS on Oct 11, 2012 16:06:32 GMT
Why would 5034 reach Acton by road, rather than by rail? I was under the impression that A-Stock would have been able to run there outside of traffic hours... Because one car can not be moved on its own, the car has no compresser, only one cab
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
5034
Oct 11, 2012 19:16:00 GMT
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 11, 2012 19:16:00 GMT
Shoreditch, love it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 16:49:13 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2012 16:49:13 GMT
Why would 5034 reach Acton by road, rather than by rail? I was under the impression that A-Stock would have been able to run there outside of traffic hours... Because one car can not be moved on its own, the car has no compresser, only one cab Why not tow it?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 17:02:28 GMT
Post by metman on Oct 12, 2012 17:02:28 GMT
On a lorry! It's easier to take it by road. Considering the rest are going by road one more didn't hurt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 18:10:10 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2012 18:10:10 GMT
On a lorry! It's easier to take it by road. Considering the rest are going by road one more didn't hurt. Hang on, there's something wrong here. It's sitting on LU track which connects directly to Acton, you have LU engines (battery locos etc), LU infrastructure run by LU staff. In other words you use your own assets. Yet you choose to use outsiders to put it on an external heavy duty lorry, drive around London at high emission charge rates, block up the roads, then place it back on LU track and write out a very large cheque in the process?? What am I missing? It just seems such a waste of money.
|
|
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 18:56:32 GMT
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 12, 2012 18:56:32 GMT
Hang on, there's something wrong here. It's sitting on LU track which connects directly to Acton, you have LU engines (battery locos etc), LU infrastructure run by LU staff. In other words you use your own assets. I'm only a layman, but I don't think it's that simple: if it's unbraked (as it would be with no compressor) it would have to be a special move and in particular would have to be topped and tailed by something - and what is there which can couple to the non-driving end of an A stock DM, apart from another A stock car? So you would need the special working to have at least 2 DMs - in which case it would be much easier to send an entire 4-car set - especially as to do anything else would involve much shunting at Northwood. But now you've got three surplus cars ar Acton to take away by road - not impossible - if they can drive one in they can drive three out, and the M4 is just round the corner, but why bother?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 20:44:48 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2012 20:44:48 GMT
Hang on, there's something wrong here. It's sitting on LU track which connects directly to Acton, you have LU engines (battery locos etc), LU infrastructure run by LU staff. In other words you use your own assets. I'm only a layman, but I don't think it's that simple: if it's unbraked (as it would be with no compressor) it would have to be a special move and in particular would have to be topped and tailed by something - and what is there which can couple to the non-driving end of an A stock DM, apart from another A stock car? So you would need the special working to have at least 2 DMs - in which case it would be much easier to send an entire 4-car set - especially as to do anything else would involve much shunting at Northwood. But now you've got three surplus cars ar Acton to take away by road - not impossible - if they can drive one in they can drive three out, and the M4 is just round the corner, but why bother? I appreciate the braking issue, but why the need to top and tail? If eight unbraked S Stock cars can be shifted 200 miles by four braked units surely one car can be controlled over a short distance by one braked loco? Or is it not as simple as that?
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 21:03:04 GMT
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 12, 2012 21:03:04 GMT
I think it's about continuity. The last vehicle needs to have a couple of braked axles, just incase it falls off. Especially as there's no Guard these days to wind the hand-brake on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 21:22:07 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2012 21:22:07 GMT
.... The last vehicle needs to have a couple of brakes axles, just incase it falls off. ... Ah, I didn't think of that. And it makes sense especially after the hoo-ha when that engineering train ran away on the Northern Line a while back. Thanks for the explanation, it's still sad to have to undergo all the expense and palaver of road transport.
|
|
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 21:31:53 GMT
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 12, 2012 21:31:53 GMT
I think it's about continuity. The last vehicle needs to have a couple of braked axles, just in case it falls off. . Exactly so - this is what can happen if there is an unbraked vehicle at the end of the train. Topping and tailing also allows the train to be reversed - necessary on the journey from either Neasden or Northwood to Acton, as ( according to CULG) the only possible route over which A stock is not barred is via Baker Sreet (reverse) and Earls Court "[other than the Richmond and Wimbledon branches] the rest of the District Line is open to all stock except A stock, which may only operate when empty, and only on certain sections: - Upminster to Aldgate East (and thence Liverpool Street) - Mansion House to Embankment (single 4-car units only) - Embankment to Hangar Lane Junction - Gloucester Road to Earl's Court via High Street Kensington (reversing) - High Street Kensington to Edgware Road (single 4-car units only) "
|
|
|
5034
Oct 12, 2012 21:33:38 GMT
Post by motorman on Oct 12, 2012 21:33:38 GMT
Common sense seems to be lacking here! Virtually all A Stock has been despatched through Northwood in what has become a slick operation. To move 5034 to Acton by rail would create a lot of logistical planning and expense. The movement by road was the most cost effective and logical thing to do. Come on get real chaps.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
5034
Oct 13, 2012 9:17:57 GMT
Post by metman on Oct 13, 2012 9:17:57 GMT
The coupling issue is valid to. The 'D' end of the motor car only has a 'cut' bar coupler. Nothing can couple to this at all with out the end being modified.
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
5034
Oct 13, 2012 15:48:15 GMT
Post by cso on Oct 13, 2012 15:48:15 GMT
Common sense seems to be lacking here! I think the 'common sense' option described by ohmslaw was perfectly reasonable, and where my mind had gone: use LU assets to move an LU asset from one LU location to another LU location, verses paying external people to do it. You have to remember that not everyone on this forum has the full knowledge of how and why things are done as they are, and when they find these circumstances, they'll ask
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
5034
Nov 1, 2012 12:27:47 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2012 12:27:47 GMT
|
|