|
Post by malcolmffc on Jan 23, 2012 6:51:13 GMT
What's the reason for the seemingly endless series of weekend closures on the Met line? Presumably it's not for S Stock works as they now run in passenger service no the entire line?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2012 8:19:45 GMT
Track replacement I think, saw a tonne of battery locos and Schomas at Neasden station on saturday
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 24, 2012 10:16:59 GMT
Frustrating as it can sometimes be, recently I wouldn't term it as "endless."
The 2 weekends prior to Christmas, and the first 2 of this year both saw full services operate on the Met. 28th & 29th January, 4th & 5th, 25th & 26th February, 10th & 11th, 24th & 25th March all see full services operating. For a couple of the other weekends, the closures are limited to the city area.
Whilst the S-stock may be running in service, the track on which it runs is in need of replacement, and much of the closures for the first half of this year will concentrate on track and drainage replacement.
|
|
kabsonline
Best SSL Train: S Stock Best Tube Train: 92 Stock
Posts: 686
|
Post by kabsonline on Jan 24, 2012 13:41:18 GMT
Actually the Met closures seem a lot less recently, especially up the north end. It has been quite good
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 18:52:57 GMT
Met Control or anyone else, where can you find information about the development work at Neasdon Depot?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 19:09:55 GMT
Met Control or anyone else, where can you find information about the development work at Neasdon Depot? The Senior Project manager for Neasden Depot tells us what is happening
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 19:15:37 GMT
I am afraid to say that it most certainly is endless. I have been using the Met regularly for 15 years and throughout that time it has always been a lottery to travel at weekends without checking first. Perhaps old track needs more maintenance than new. The ride quality isn't improving either, not even with the new trains, and, even sadder, they haven't even started on the signaling yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 19:55:29 GMT
Very interesting, thanks Juliang. Also there's lots of Aldgate-Baker Street Closures due to upgrading work at Farringdon although most of the work is done for the moment
|
|
kabsonline
Best SSL Train: S Stock Best Tube Train: 92 Stock
Posts: 686
|
Post by kabsonline on Jan 24, 2012 20:00:45 GMT
Does this mean the S Stocks are still not being cleaned on the outside as he says they are building facillities to do this at the moment?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 20:30:28 GMT
Last weekends (21st/22nd Jan) was for track replacement on the n/b Jubilee through the platform at Wembley Park and towards the fly under from what I saw.
Maybe we should have a dedicated thread on here of more detailed information of what is going on during possessions? The public information available is usually scant.
Even better, if TfL were to provide links to a fuller technical description of each weekends work, I think the Metronet website had some stuff about track replacement around Amersham. Might help the more technical commuters have more understanding (and sympathy) of what is happening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 21:23:17 GMT
I thought Neasden Depot held Jubilee stock and C stock in addition to Met stock? If so, how are they making all the stocks compatible?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 24, 2012 21:58:02 GMT
Neasden used to house C stock years ago but you only see the odd one now for wheel turning. In days gone by Neasden used to house a variety of stocks. Up to the early 70s Neasden even stabled CO/CP stock for the Circle Line that would operate early morning trains to Rayners Lane and/or call at the Bakerloo (now Jubilee) Stations.
The aim is to stable some S7s at Neasden I understand.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 24, 2012 22:20:45 GMT
I am afraid to say that it most certainly is endless. I have been using the Met regularly for 15 years and throughout that time it has always been a lottery to travel at weekends without checking first. Perhaps old track needs more maintenance than new. The ride quality isn't improving either, not even with the new trains, and, even sadder, they haven't even started on the signaling yet. The ride quality on S stock is far better than on the old trains, so I don't know what you're referring to there.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 24, 2012 22:22:39 GMT
Agreed. The ride on the S stock is better, but I feel it is not good enough - is that what you are hinting at?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 24, 2012 22:25:40 GMT
It will get even better when the track is renewed, but on the current (dodgy) track, the S stock has a considerably better ride.
|
|
|
Post by tecchy on Jan 24, 2012 22:41:02 GMT
Does this mean the S Stocks are still not being cleaned on the outside as he says they are building facillities to do this at the moment? S Stocks cannot use the carriage wash as the profile of the train is different from the A Stocks. But at the moment S Stocks are washed manually.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 22:43:48 GMT
Even better, if TfL were to provide links to a fuller technical description of each weekends work, I think the Metronet website had some stuff about track replacement around Amersham. Might help the more technical commuters have more understanding (and sympathy) of what is happening. Although inspired by a different industry, there is an interesting suggestion here on how public perception might be improved when things aren't going well (however or whyever that might be).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2012 23:06:08 GMT
Agreed. The ride on the S stock is better, but I feel it is not good enough - is that what you are hinting at? Sorry guys, I don't agree. If you disregard the clunking from the A Stock bogies, and the bounce from their seats, I find the ride quality to be very much on a par. For a design 50 years younger, the S Stock should be infinitely smoother, just try the new Heathrow Connect trains.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 24, 2012 23:22:06 GMT
Agreed. The ride on the S stock is better, but I feel it is not good enough - is that what you are hinting at? Sorry guys, I don't agree. If you disregard the clunking from the A Stock bogies, and the bounce from their seats, I find the ride quality to be very much on a par. For a design 50 years younger, the S Stock should be infinitely smoother, just try the new Heathrow Connect trains. Well Metman is one of our most loyal A stock supporters, so for him to say anything positive about the S stock, there must be some truth! I remember a conversation between some people on an S stock, who commented that these trains are smooth, not like the "shake, rattle and roll" of the old trains. Presumably you have been on both stocks to make the comparison? I agree that the S stocks should be smoother, but as has been pointed out, much of this is related to the poor track oondition.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 25, 2012 8:07:33 GMT
and their tiny wheels...... ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 25, 2012 22:58:24 GMT
Track replacement is not quite halfway through on the Met, but it will be forging ahead over the coming months when time permits (there's some sports event happening mid-year which is really getting in the way of things - not least messing up the tv schedules for weeks on end).
You have to keep in mind that track replacement over, say, 5 years ago, is not what it is now.
Years ago we replaced track on an "it's desperate" basis, and did it on the cheap. The old stuff was ripped out, a small section replaced during a weekend closure, and often the work over-ran into Monday morning.
Now we replace larger sections, with better quality work that doesn't (usually) affect Monday. But it is going to take time to replace everything (including the botched-up stuff that you've already suffered for.)
The re-signalling won't always mean hefty closures.
Farringdon and/or Liverpool Street closures are in relation to the Crossrail project.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2012 22:12:13 GMT
The re-signalling won't always mean hefty closures. . Wow, MC, this is a brave statement; perhaps the inclusion of the word "always" will be your get out of jail card, particularly with the need to close the Finchley Road tunnel
|
|
|
Post by orienteer on Jan 27, 2012 16:52:54 GMT
I also think the S stock does not ride as well as the A stock, once you factor out the latter's bouncy seats. In my view this is due to the smaller wheels.
Hopefully, when the track has been fully renewed, it won't be so noticeable. We shan't have the A stock to compare it with by then anyway!
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 27, 2012 21:11:16 GMT
The re-signalling won't always mean hefty closures. . Wow, MC, this is a brave statement; perhaps the inclusion of the word "always" will be your get out of jail card, particularly with the need to close the Finchley Road tunnel I say again, "The re-signalling won't always mean hefty closures." Now, does he who questions whether I am in a position to make such "bold" statements also want to put his money where his mouth is. Just read my statement carefully, then decide whether you wish to challenge me. There will be weekend closures, but it will not be week after week of shutdowns in the way track replacement and the Jubilee Line project thwarted us. Shall we re-visit this thread in, say, a few years. (I'll add it to my ever growing list). Set your alarm...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2012 1:16:31 GMT
If only the matter were in your hands, MC, I would indeed have total confidence. But then you would not have made the decision to delay the new signalling which has now become the achilles heel of the Met and is undermining all the potential benefits of the new trains. Despite regular weekend closures for 15 years or more (in my mind already pretty hefty) the signal failures are still getting worse. In an earlier thread on this forum it was openly stated that the signal cabling in the Finchley Road tunnel is so bad that it can only be fixed via a complete replacement involving an extended closure; this, with the Olympics coming, should have been done last summer. I believe the LU management, having buried their heads in the sand for so long, are now realising there is a risk of a catastrophic failure this summer when the eyes of the world are on us, and they are starting to embark on panic measures. The new timetable ignores the interests of their long term customers and is designed purely to reduced the line traffic and at the same time enhance recovery capability, while the new trains will cram more people in, regardless of comfort or distance. And you can rest assured that, during the Olympics period, there will be a contingency plan to combine services with Chiltern in an emergency. But, if the signalling deteriorates much further don’t rule out a crash programme of closures in the next few months to patch up the weakest parts of the system.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 28, 2012 22:16:39 GMT
If only the matter were in your hands, MC, I would indeed have total confidence. But then you would not have made the decision to delay the new signalling which has now become the achilles heel of the Met and is undermining all the potential benefits of the new trains. Despite regular weekend closures for 15 years or more (in my mind already pretty hefty) the signal failures are still getting worse. In an earlier thread on this forum it was openly stated that the signal cabling in the Finchley Road tunnel is so bad that it can only be fixed via a complete replacement involving an extended closure; this, with the Olympics coming, should have been done last summer. I believe the LU management, having buried their heads in the sand for so long, are now realising there is a risk of a catastrophic failure this summer when the eyes of the world are on us, and they are starting to embark on panic measures. The new timetable ignores the interests of their long term customers and is designed purely to reduced the line traffic and at the same time enhance recovery capability, while the new trains will cram more people in, regardless of comfort or distance. And you can rest assured that, during the Olympics period, there will be a contingency plan to combine services with Chiltern in an emergency. But, if the signalling deteriorates much further don’t rule out a crash programme of closures in the next few months to patch up the weakest parts of the system. The new signalling - for whenever it is planned - will be a bonus to the Met, but until then I would not view our current signalling as our achilles heal. The S-stock, when fully introduced, will allow us to speed up the timetable with the current signalling still in place, before a full "speed up" once the new kit arrives. Weekend closures have been pretty much the norm on my NR line for the last 23 years that I have been trying to get to work on a weekend. However, we have the same old trains, more or less the same old track. But renewals are not always evident, don't always improve reliability, but are essential - and can only be done at certain times. This year (owing to the Olympics) block closures are not so much of an option as they were last year or will be next year... The signal failures are not getting "worse." They still occur, yes I'll agree with you. You do also find there are "spates" of delays - the week before last, every shift I worked tended to have some sort of delay, yet the week prior to that I sat twiddling my thumbs. Finchley Road to Baker Street experiences problems during prolonged wet weather. It is well known where the problems occur, and the track is monitored to prevent delays. It is not always 100% successful, but the work that has been carried out means the reliability is more than it was. The kit needs a "Bayswater Blockade" style shutdown, and it will get it, but as you rightly point out, not this year for obvious reasons. But then, hopefully we are due for a better summer than last year, and it will not rain as much. In any case, prolonged rain of the sort you get in winter is worse than the quick showers you tend to get in summer. Yes, yes, let's beat the Standard to it: "Wrong kind of rain..." Not sitting in the seat I sit in, you will not appreciate the level of planning that is going on behind the scenes to prevent your predicted failure being "catastrophic." I do hope that the planning we're doing now, and the lessons we're learning, continue long after the Olympics. If we have to occasionally rely on Chiltern to move people during disruption - as they rely on us on occasions - then what really is the problem? We don't like making a habit of it, but if it's a question of getting you home then so be it. They haven't commented yet, so why not knock on their door and see if they will be running more than 2-car trains as a contingency for over-crowding... Management can bury their heads as you suggest, but it is down to those on the ground to pull this summer off. So, if all does not go to plan, I sincerely hope you factor our efforts in before you kick us in the teeth. Finally, I am bored of commenting on the new timetable (given it has a multi-page thread here, with plenty of my views). But just to say (again) we have to move forward. The new timetable has the interests of Chesham (through services) and the local line stations between Northwood and North Harrow included. It has fast services in the peaks. It also has - as you rightly say - a built in level of recovery. So are we not to have timetables which can be recovered now? You intend us to run a service that cannot be recovered? Interesting...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2012 13:03:09 GMT
I have actually boycotted the Met Line now. I drive to Hemel and get the train from there. 15 minute drive plus 25 minute train journey equals half an hour less journey time than the Met!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2012 18:31:32 GMT
Bengley have your costs risen a significant amount as a result or are you happy to pay the extra due to the time saved?
I must agree when you look at how much time you would save daily I wouldnt mind paying the extra few quid like yourself.
In regard to the topic title,
I have to say as a met line "leisure" traveller who usually travels at the weekend I think the closures have got a lot better as of late. The problem is people will always complain when a certain section of the line is closed.
In the ideal world the line could be shut for 2 weeks to allow engineers to do everything they need to do and get all those engineering projects done in one go - but as we live in or near to a capital city of millions of people this simply wont happen.
I think people who complain about weekend closures have to remember we have the oldest underground railway system in the world - that means unfortunately for us a very old, creaking railway which needs a LOT of attention. And in this day and age without the funding things can only be done as and when time and more importantly, the budget allows.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 29, 2012 22:11:28 GMT
I have actually boycotted the Met Line now. I drive to Hemel and get the train from there. 15 minute drive plus 25 minute train journey equals half an hour less journey time than the Met! 40 minutes (on a good day) versus 58 minutes Chesham-Euston Square - which in the peak it more or less always has been. Well done, I'm sure your carbon foot-print looks much better. And the cost - petrol, parking, car wear and tear etc. etc.- really does outweigh the journey time on the Met? Excellent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2012 0:46:30 GMT
I have actually boycotted the Met Line now. I drive to Hemel and get the train from there. 15 minute drive plus 25 minute train journey equals half an hour less journey time than the Met! 40 minutes (on a good day) versus 58 minutes Chesham-Euston Square - which in the peak it more or less always has been. Well done, I'm sure your carbon foot-print looks much better. And the cost - petrol, parking, car wear and tear etc. etc.- really does outweigh the journey time on the Met? Excellent. Let me set this straight. I now work for London Midland at Euston Station. I get free parking at Hemel and I get free travel on LM services. I only pay for petrol. I need the car to get there for dead early shifts especially on Sundays. Had the old timetable still been in operation on the Met, I would still happily pay to use it every day as the journey was bearable. I find that the journey is now unacceptably long at off-peak times and stupidly expensive at peak times, so weighing up the pros and cons, I decided that the best thing to do would be to say goodbye to what was once a good line.
|
|