|
Post by redsetter on Jun 12, 2011 13:01:52 GMT
does anyone know the future of the chesham shuttle bay now that its disused at little chalfont?.i was wondering if the track was proposed to be lifted as was the line at chesham that is now a planting bed as tends to happen with abandoned track presumably for safety upkeep.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 14:32:39 GMT
Little Chalfont? Don't you mean Chalfont & Latimer?
And there is no bay platform, just one Chesham/Amersham/Aylesbury bound platform and one Baker Street/Marylebone.
So nothing will happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 14:42:41 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 15:32:13 GMT
Oh right, I didn't realise. Serves me right for trusting wikipedia! In which case I presume it will just be left, rather than TfL paying for the demolition of it.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jun 12, 2011 16:24:46 GMT
Oh right, I didn't realise. Serves me right for trusting wikipedia! . Strange - the current Wikipedia entry for C&L doesn't seem to have been updated since the end of the shuttle, as ity mentions both that and the Bay in the present tense. They can't demolish the bay platform itself, as the opposite face is the main southbound platform, but no doubt at some stage the track will be lifted and the points plain-lined: although presumably some form of trap point must remain to protect the main line from a runaway on the branch?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 17:26:20 GMT
It could be turned into a siding for engs trains?
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 12, 2011 17:27:45 GMT
Very recently (last week or so) the track fuses have been removed and the bay taken fully out of use. It now cannot be used except in the most extreme emergency. Basically, if such an event arose it is to be treated as if it is an un-connected / un-electrified piece of track.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 19:27:59 GMT
Ahh but would the juice still flow, even if its treated as no juice?
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Jun 12, 2011 20:48:37 GMT
Little Chalfont? Don't you mean Chalfont & Latimer? Although it's called Chalfont and Latimer, I thought the station was actually in Little Chalfont...
|
|
vato
Zone 6D - Special Fares Apply
Posts: 131
|
Post by vato on Jun 12, 2011 22:50:11 GMT
That is correct. Latimer is a "fair step" to the east, and the valley there is beautiful, in part because there isn't much there...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 22:55:27 GMT
It ws mighty damp today though!
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Jun 15, 2011 19:18:23 GMT
I still think a platform extension would have been a better option than the through service, and on that basis, moving the points west and extending the platforms should be left as a future option during the next resignalling, i.e. TPTB should leave the bay in situ, or at worse, trackless.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2011 21:30:00 GMT
I still think a platform extension would have been a better option than the through service... Alternatively new short trains could have been used, either a special S4 train or an Underground version of the 378s used on the Overground.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2011 21:36:02 GMT
How prone is C&L to vandalism? Could you hold a preserved A stock in there, and let it run up and down the Chesham branch at weekends?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2011 21:53:37 GMT
From what I've read, the use of heritage trains on the system is difficult to organize anyway, let alone having one running on a permanent basis. I'm not an expert by any stretch of the imagination but the costs of maintaining spares and (what would inevitably be) exponential engineering time just to keep a single item like that running even on a weekly basis would be unjustifiable on a revenue earning railway.
As much as I would love to see a 4-car A stock plying its trade here I think we have to take a step back. As enthusiasts our judgement is massively and sometimes irrationally skued. The average travelling public really couldn't give a damn about the age or shape of what gets them where they want to go as long as it's economical and punctual. LUL spend a great deal of time trying to ensure this happens. As the greater travelling public are the ones paying the bills we have to concede to the majority.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2011 22:05:25 GMT
@little red train: That was apparently one of the proposed ideas when the A stock replacement was being planned but I guess you cant anymore.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Jun 15, 2011 22:48:45 GMT
From what I've read, the use of heritage trains on the system is difficult to organize anyway, let alone having one running on a permanent basis. I'm not an expert by any stretch of the imagination but the costs of maintaining spares and (what would inevitably be) exponential engineering time just to keep a single item like that running even on a weekly basis would be unjustifiable on a revenue earning railway. As much as I would love to see a 4-car A stock plying its trade here I think we have to take a step back. As enthusiasts our judgement is massively and sometimes irrationally skued. The average travelling public really couldn't give a damn about the age or shape of what gets them where they want to go as long as it's economical and punctual. LUL spend a great deal of time trying to ensure this happens. As the greater travelling public are the ones paying the bills we have to concede to the majority. To counter this, there are several class 121 DMUs (from the early 1960s) still in use on limited services (2 units with Chiltern used on the Princes Risborough - Aylesbury off-peak service and 1 unit with Arriva Trains Wales on the Queen Street - Cardiff Bay). Of course, once the A-stock has gone, a couple of double ended D-stock units may be more suited for any hypothetical Chesham shuttle.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Jun 16, 2011 0:39:04 GMT
even a train of tube stock?
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 16, 2011 8:06:32 GMT
Oh not this old debate again Please remember (again) that we run a service, not a museum. The people of Chesham campaigned for a through service, and coupled to the introduction of new trains, this was granted. However romantic and misty-eyed the shuttle used to be, it's not coming back. Don't get me wrong, it was a virtually trouble-free service, much easier to manage than now. But we have to move with the times. The bay road has been decommissioned as part of the route towards removing it altogether. Keeping preserved trains there, or using them to run a service costs heaps of money in upkeep and maintenance. It's not going to happen. The new rolling stock is S7 or S8. There simply is not the budget to get anything like a S4 if such a thing could exist. And if we did get a non-standard unit, then we would have to splash out on non-standard maintenance facilities for it, or find a way of sending the unit(s) away periodically. There is also no budget for extending the bay platform, and certainly no budget for moving the pointwork. Harrow North Junction is due for renewal and budget setbacks have pushed this major project back. There is no way the layout at Chalfont would come anywhere near being considered for change.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Jun 16, 2011 8:47:36 GMT
So at the moment the intention is to lift the track in the bay completely?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Jun 16, 2011 9:45:19 GMT
It will almost certainly be locked OOU then. Unless it is decided to retain it for engineers use.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Jun 16, 2011 18:10:35 GMT
@little red train: That was apparently one of the proposed ideas when the A stock replacement was being planned but I guess you cant anymore. it could have become a heritage route,someone mentioned that chesham retains many of its steam characteristics,its a nice station to travel from as its quieter then amersham. there looks to be a tree down at sometime on the "branch" too. shown on bowroaduk's stream.there's another picture here also. www.flickr.com/photos/24772733@N05/5752206334/in/photostream/
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 16, 2011 18:40:47 GMT
This happened a few weeks ago - I was the controller on duty and by all accounts the driver had a very lucky escape. This picture does not do justice to the full 90 foot beast of a tree that fell across the track.
EDIT: Sunday 22nd May at around lunchtime ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 16, 2011 18:45:38 GMT
So at the moment the intention is to lift the track in the bay completely? Even getting a team in to lift the track costs money. Far cheaper to simply remove the track fuse so that signals cannot be cleared towards it, and allow nature to take its course. Simply leave it out of use. The track leading from the pointwork forms part of the signalling overlap, and in the event of an over-run, at least the train will remain on rails rather than going off into the dirt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2011 6:53:44 GMT
Don't turn it over to nature too soon - I believe it will be being used on at least three occasions of weekend engineering work between September and October when the line is closed south of Northwood.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2011 7:00:09 GMT
Don't turn it over to nature too soon - I believe it will be being used on at least three occasions of weekend engineering work between September and October when the line is closed south of Northwood. By the sounds of it it's completely out of use now, I can't see that happening.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 17, 2011 14:29:08 GMT
Don't turn it over to nature too soon - I believe it will be being used on at least three occasions of weekend engineering work between September and October when the line is closed south of Northwood. No plans to use it that I'm aware of, and from what I've seen no plans of the line being closed in that area for September or October. The months are filled with a closure south of Harrow, and a handful of city area closures. Other than that, 11th September sees us running a trial of December's new timetable.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2011 16:09:23 GMT
Let's just wait and see - things might change, after all this is lul. But I would keep a close eye on the next bank holiday weekend for starters. If train 407 makes it out for a few trips - just remember where you heard it first!
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 17, 2011 17:16:02 GMT
Nothing between Uxbridge/Northwood and Wembley Park. No mention on my paperwork of the shuttle operating. Should find out the finer details within the next couple of weeks, but if the shuttle did operate, not only would the bay have to be returned to service (after only just being decommissioned following a 6 month wait) but such a service would be a fair step backwards - especially seeing as by that time there will be a fair few S-stocks available.
Can't see it myself, as it would be a huge waste of resources, but as you say, this is LUL and anything is possible from those who don't consult the ones who operate the service - WTT 331 is one such case. We'll revisit this nearer the time...
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jun 17, 2011 18:20:57 GMT
Nothing between Uxbridge/Northwood and Wembley Park. No mention on my paperwork of the shuttle operating. Should find out the finer details within the next couple of weeks, but if the shuttle did operate, not only would the bay have to be returned to service (after only just being decommissioned following a 6 month wait) but such a service would be a fair step backwards - especially seeing as by that time there will be a fair few S-stocks available. Can't see it myself, as it would be a huge waste of resources, but as you say, this is LUL and anything is possible from those who don't consult the ones who operate the service - WTT 331 is one such case. We'll revisit this nearer the time... Presumably there are other options for serving Chesham, not least a Watford to Chesham service as I recall as been operated in the distant past, though not recently as far as I am aware.
|
|