Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 14:57:56 GMT
Considering that Crossrail is pretty much a new National Rail project, will it be featured on the tube maps?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 16:08:14 GMT
I think it will be since it will be TfL run, although to be honest, I think TfL really needs to step back and consider the remit of the Tube map because it is experiencing a huge amount of feature creep these days. It's not a Tube map anymore. It's a TfL services map. And that's fine, but we could really use an actual Tube map without the clutter of the DLR and LO. It's not too bad at the moment, but once you add upteen more DLR extensions, including some more into Central London, more routes on LO, Crossrail, Chelney, it's just going to be a mess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 16:16:39 GMT
I agree. I mean they are discussing extending the Dlr from Bank to Euston and Victoria. The Euston / King's Cross area of the map is already near impossible to navigate so you're right, we don't need anything else.
I think they should make two maps. One which is just the lines and one that includes Crossrail, Chelney, possibly Thameslink, Tramlink, DLR and London Overground
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 16:17:49 GMT
I'm surprised Tramlink isn't on the tube map.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 17:38:32 GMT
I think it will be since it will be TfL run I'm not so sure about that. A Crossrail franchise is going to be let and that would suggest to be that it's more likely to be a dft rail franchise rather than run by tfl.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 17:40:58 GMT
Is it worth doing one featuring the original tube lines and then all the subsequent LO and DLR etc. stuff on a transparent overlay?That way it'll stop everybody moaning and, then all the ugly step free access signs can be on a third overlay that can be removed completely by those who don't require to know about them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 18:15:06 GMT
Is it worth doing one featuring the original tube lines and then all the subsequent LO and DLR etc. stuff on a transparent overlay?That way it'll stop everybody moaning and, then all the ugly step free access signs can be on a third overlay that can be removed completely by those who don't require to know about them. Good idea. I mean let's face it, it won't be too long until all stations have disabled access so the symbols won't be necessary then. By the way, does anyone know if Crossrail will be on the announcements at stations? For example when a DLR service pulls into Stratford will the announcement say 'This is Stratford, change for the Central and Jubilee Lines, London Overground, National Rail and Crossrail?
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on May 23, 2011 19:52:23 GMT
That's how the announcements probably will be I'm thinking - Crossrail will be a big part of London so I guess it will be announced separately.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 21:20:24 GMT
Now if only they did the same for Thameslink... ;D
|
|
|
Post by 1018509 on May 23, 2011 21:31:02 GMT
I'm surprised Tramlink isn't on the tube map. I'm prepared to be shot down over this but I could swear that I have seen a platform tube map with Tramlink on it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 21:44:44 GMT
I'm surprised Tramlink isn't on the tube map. I'm prepared to be shot down over this but I could swear that I have seen a platform tube map with Tramlink on it. That'd be the London Connections map with all the NR services in the area too, including HEx and HS1. www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/oyster-rail-services-map.pdfThere it's the "Oyster rail services in London" map but in NR stations it's called London Connections
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2011 21:45:23 GMT
I mean let's face it, it won't be too long until all stations have disabled access so the symbols won't be necessary then. "Won't be too long?" I wouldn't expect it in my lifetime... Currently only 11 out of 100 tube stations in zone 1 have complete disabled access - and with Crossrail and all other reasonably real projects up to 2025 it will be only 27 out of 100.
|
|
|
Post by rapidtransitman on May 24, 2011 2:13:21 GMT
@ It's a TfL services map. And that's fine, but we could really use an actual Tube map without the clutter of the DLR and LO.
People use the tube map to get around, not as a design object. DLR, LO, Thamelink, & Crossrail are all key parts of TfL services of getting around the city, and all need to be shown.
Furthermore, I get somewhat upset that people want to get rid of the wheelchair symbols on the tube map. With an aging population, and millions of tourists (& luggage), these wheelchair symbols are essential. I don't find this feature creep. This is essential information.
There are other options than reducing information on tube maps, such as expanding the size of the printed Tube map, showing just inner zones for more clarity.
But system & network complexity is here to stay. How can we best relay this information so that the user has all the info they need to plan their journey?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on May 24, 2011 2:45:05 GMT
I agree that DLR and LO should be on the map - they're just as important to people travelling as the tube is.
I don't agree about the wheelchair symbols though as they're too blunt an instrument, as they only show step free access from all platforms to the street and real life is more complicated than that. For example going from Waterloo to Kings Cross looks like an easy journey via London Bridge for a disabled passenger, unfortunately there is no step free interchange at London Bridge - you have to exit from the station via one entrance and walk about 400 metres on the surface and re-enter at a different entrance to get to the Jubilee Line. This isn't well signposted. There are other stations where one can interchange but not exit, and these are not shown - for example a step free journey from London Bridge to Brixton can be made, using the cross-platform interchange at Stockwell, but tube map does not show this.
There is a separate map showing the access in detail, including where you can and can't interchange, and what the horziontal and vertical distance between the train and platform is. This gives information that is actually useful and should be more available. At the very least, the large blue blobs should be replaced by a wheelchair symbol adjacent to the name (exactly like the NR, river service, tram, airport and dagger symbols are. This could be colour coded, so say blue for full access, red for partial - see details.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 24, 2011 5:21:38 GMT
This highlights another problem; the wheelchair blobs introduction has given people the false illusion of information, and as such people wrongly consider them to be a) useful, b) essential and c) indespensible.
They are none of the above. They don't actually say how easy it is to board a train; quite a requirement if you wish to travel by one. They imply a totally different function to the one they actually show. As Chris M points out you'd think it'd be possible to interchange inside London Bridge with a wheelchair when you can't. However, at Finchley Road, which doesnt have a blob, interchange between the two lines with a wheelchair is far easier and quicker. Ignoring train-platform issues, which the wheelchair blob does anyway.
As Chris M rightly points out, theres a large-print map with platform issues shown. If someone were to have issues traveling, this is probably the one to use for them. Its existance should be promoted more.
Say I want to do a journey with a broken leg from Ruislip to Morden, how do I do it? The maps impression is very different from how things are in reality.
XR will be run as a tfl franchise, I believe? Makes sense to be on the map; as much reason to be on there as LO and DLR as a franchise. Its only appropriate that as transport gets slowly more and more integrated its promoted as such.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2011 19:34:02 GMT
The argument can be made for an all inclusive map, but then why do we omit the other National Rail franchises? Especially now with full Oysterisation, catching a NR train is just like catching a Tube.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 24, 2011 19:38:42 GMT
Transport has become more integrated in recent years, particularly since Oyster PAYG was extended to National Rail. There is an argument to be had that there is no longer a place for a tube map, and that the only map produced should be one that also contains National Rail.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 24, 2011 19:59:22 GMT
But that isn't quite the case either, as there are still some gaping differences between expectations of NR and TfL.
Perhaps two fully inclusive maps, one with emphasis on NR (XR vs. Thameslink), the other TfL (Central vs. Northern). This exists anyway in both forms. Perhaps both could be tweaked though to share the same style and aesthetic detailing?
|
|
|
Post by 1018509 on May 25, 2011 18:19:56 GMT
I'm prepared to be shot down over this but I could swear that I have seen a platform tube map with Tramlink on it. That'd be the London Connections map with all the NR services in the area too, including HEx and HS1. www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/oyster-rail-services-map.pdfThere it's the "Oyster rail services in London" map but in NR stations it's called London Connections Yep! Now I've seen it mentioned you're right, it was a London Connections map.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2011 20:24:42 GMT
Perhaps both could be tweaked though to share the same style and aesthetic detailing? I think that would be a good idea for the travelling public especially tourists so that they can see the available options on one map. Though clearly, nothing beats local knowledge of the system.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 1, 2011 15:06:45 GMT
I often thought a 'little book of london stations' might be of benefit to many people. Each page would have the layout of the stations drawn with facilities, accessibility, and onward transport connections noted. Something A5 size maybe; the smaller stations would probably only take up half a page, whereas the larger ones would probably take up a double spread. Wouldn't be a technical thing, more orientated towards tourists and regular passengers. Probably be 230ish double sided pages long? With thin enough paper that wouldnt be too impractical.
|
|
|
Post by rapidtransitman on Jun 1, 2011 17:22:12 GMT
ben's 'little book of london stations' Better yet, an iPhone app.
|
|
|
Post by younglulnerd on Jun 4, 2011 10:21:01 GMT
Is it worth doing one featuring the original tube lines and then all the subsequent LO and DLR etc. stuff on a transparent overlay?That way it'll stop everybody moaning and, then all the ugly step free access signs can be on a third overlay that can be removed completely by those who don't require to know about them. Or do a special, Wheelchair access map with the Blue blobs on, all TfL services, then seprate LU,LO and DLR maps, perhaps with a red/orange/teal(?) roundel next to the ame to show it has an interchange with one of the other services, like they do with the NR sign.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2011 12:10:33 GMT
I'm surprised Tramlink isn't on the tube map. I think the fact that it currently only has two interchanges with the lines featured on the tube map (one of which is LO) is probably why it isn't.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2011 13:00:15 GMT
I'm surprised Tramlink isn't on the tube map. I think the fact that it currently only has two interchanges with the lines featured on the tube map (one of which is LO) is probably why it isn't. Possibly. There are also the larger maps that show National Rail, Tramlink etc. on which are visible at most large interchange stations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2011 13:55:03 GMT
I hope not; it takes such a clunky zig-zag route through central london, bypassing key intersections like oxford circus and holborn, that it will only mess it up and make it as confusing as the paris metro map.
Plus there is "liverpool-street", attached to moorgate, which will just crinkle up that end of the tube map [even though its claims to be "liverpool-street" are a bit of a fiction]
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Oct 2, 2011 14:47:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Oct 2, 2011 15:07:05 GMT
Why show something that will happen in at LEAST 7 years?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2011 15:26:10 GMT
So that you know you'll be safe to use it if you break a mirror today.
|
|
|
Post by mikebuzz on Oct 2, 2011 21:43:23 GMT
That's actually not too bad, and if they could tinker with the area around Bank a bit more I'm sure they could have the Central without the kink between Holborn and Liverpool Street and Crossrail just a straight line between TCR and Whitechapel. The section between Whitechapel and custom house is a right mess though! could surely be a lot better (why divert away from Limehouse when in real life the line goes right beside it?).
|
|