metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Apr 20, 2011 16:34:48 GMT
I think you're right. A60s did go directly to Derby, if you count reversing at Aylesbury and P'Risboro' as direct ;D
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on Apr 20, 2011 17:00:28 GMT
Just out of interest what time of the day do the Northwood removals tend to happen? I've seen the vids up on YouTube with the tractor shunting the cars within the siding and would like to try and get up there myself and have a look if any more moves are taking place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2011 17:01:30 GMT
Well, just keep an eye on this thread or the Met line board as news of another A stock going for scrap will spread very fast!
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on May 3, 2011 8:59:08 GMT
Well, just keep an eye on this thread or the Met line board as news of another A stock going for scrap will spread very fast! 8 cars of A stock may leave Neasden Depot next Monday for the scrap yard.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 3, 2011 9:00:49 GMT
Really, any idea which ones? 5066+5???
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 3, 2011 15:54:40 GMT
Ask yourself, are there any ones that are still grubby? We know that 5066/7 is doomed, as for the others, its a case of waiting.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 3, 2011 21:03:33 GMT
There are a few about still grubby but that numbers 10 units at least.
I must say the trains look so much better clean, they look nearly new where the paint is in good condition still!
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 4, 2011 19:25:24 GMT
There are a few about still grubby but that numbers 10 units at least. I must say the trains look so much better clean, they look nearly new where the paint is in good condition still! 5022 and 5167 are rather dirty, GREAT NEWS, favourite unit 5130 even has the red end of it Rayners Lane
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on May 6, 2011 13:17:46 GMT
Since we're nearing the end of the 'working week', I thought I would ask whether anybody is able to kindly confirm whether there will definitely be a movement of 8-cars of 'A' Stock from Neasden Depot to Northwood for scrap on Monday 09/05? If so, are the timings as per the January move? Thank you in anticipation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2011 13:36:13 GMT
If so, are the timings as per the January move? Thank you in anticipation. Probably
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on May 6, 2011 15:23:03 GMT
I hope it isn't 5066, was expecting a hat-trick out of it ;D 5066 did the last public Shoreditch and also the last public ELL service (also taking in the Surrey Quays crossover) and I was on both of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2011 21:52:11 GMT
I plan to check out Northwood on Monday.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 6, 2011 23:48:53 GMT
Nothing has been confirmed at all. Last I heard was that all stock was being taken from Neasden now...
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 6, 2011 23:59:05 GMT
I hope it isn't 5066, was expecting a hat-trick out of it ;D 5066 did the last public Shoreditch and also the last public ELL service (also taking in the Surrey Quays crossover) and I was on both of them. 5066 has apparently been stripped out, and more to the point, hasn't been sighted since the end of RAT trains in December....
|
|
|
Post by citysig on May 7, 2011 10:09:41 GMT
Since we're nearing the end of the 'working week', I thought I would ask whether anybody is able to kindly confirm whether there will definitely be a movement of 8-cars of 'A' Stock from Neasden Depot to Northwood for scrap on Monday 09/05? If so, are the timings as per the January move? Thank you in anticipation. Unless any unforeseen circumstances occur, 8 cars of A-stock running as Train 771, will depart Neasden depot at 1143 Monday morning, 9th May, and will travel on its final journey to Northwood. I haven't been made aware of the units concerned, though maybe the predictions so far made could be spot on. We haven't had any serious problems with the stock for the past few weeks, so it's not as if any unit has "leap-frogged" the plan like last time.
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 7, 2011 13:00:52 GMT
With the exception on 5066/7, are there any units that haven't been seen for while.
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on May 7, 2011 22:23:28 GMT
Thank you very much MetControl for the advice concerning the running of T771 on Monday.
Assuming one of the units is 5066, based on observations this week, there are five units I've not seen this week. Two of those five units were formed up together the week before and I expect I just didn't see that train this week because I've made fewer trips to London. The remaining three units are 5130, 5167 and 5175. I doubt whether it is 5175 as that had an external clean a fortnight ago. Re the other two, both were in service last week and were uncoupled over the holiday weekend. I'm wondering whether like 5006, one of them developed a defect that was deemed not economical to repair. We'll see on Monday.
Re the external clean programme, approx 30 units have been done to date.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on May 7, 2011 23:24:25 GMT
this is bad news,fifty years of stirling service and replaced with what looks like a near derelict room design with questions' still remaining.the lessons' of its not broke don't fix it have been totally discarded with modernist tones,something that looks satisfactory on a cad screen to someone and only themselves seen amersham on an underground map. rather then the proven layout that has withstood the test of many decades without complaint.
the A stock stands out amongst all in having that distinction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2011 23:59:32 GMT
Youve got the right idea redsetter
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 8, 2011 0:16:16 GMT
It is a shame more cars are leaving us. I would like to know which additional unit is going
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on May 8, 2011 0:28:29 GMT
I believe 5130 & 5175 were formed up until 29th April, 5130 has also been cleaned recently. 5167 is rather dirty though.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on May 8, 2011 8:20:41 GMT
It is a shame more cars are leaving us. I would like to know which additional unit is going Get your self set up on the Northbound platform at Northwood on Monday and you will find out the units going to scrap yard
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on May 8, 2011 16:31:56 GMT
These are the timings I've been given for the move, should be running as train 771. Location | Arrive | Depart | Platform/Path | Neasden Depot | | 11:43 | | Wembley Park | | 11/52 | 1 to FL | Harrow on the Hill | | 11/58½ | 3 to SL | Pinner | | 12/04 | 1 | Northwood | 12:08½ | 12:10 | 1 | Northwood Siding | 12:12 | | 22 Siding |
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 8, 2011 17:26:03 GMT
I think we will loose 5066+5132 or 5207.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on May 8, 2011 19:18:00 GMT
this is bad news,fifty years of stirling service and replaced with what looks like a near derelict room design with questions' still remaining.the lessons' of its not broke don't fix it have been totally discarded with modernist tones,something that looks satisfactory on a cad screen to someone and only themselves seen amersham on an underground map. rather then the proven layout that has withstood the test of many decades without complaint. the A stock stands out amongst all in having that distinction. To put the other point of view. The internal design of the A-stock is broken. The seats have never had the necessary support, sagging in the middle and the bigger seats are not wide enough for three people, so much space gets wasted. The internal layout of the Metropolitan line stock will always be a compromise, between the needs of London commuters, especially the central zones and the needs of the people living outside London. The A stock interior is too heavily biased towards the long distance punters to be a good design for the modern Metropolitan line. Possibly the S stock has gone a bit too far in the other direction, but other than having separate internal designs for the Amersham / Chesham branches and for the Watford / Uxbridge branches, it is a better compromise for these crowded times.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 8, 2011 19:31:25 GMT
Its a shame money was tight when they refurbed them. The plan was to have individual seats of a similar type to current commuter trains. Unit 5132 sported this for a while.
The problem with a generic stock is that the seating layout cannot be increased because there isn't space. Therefore is 2+2 seating is used for the S stock we would only get 16 more seats per train!
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on May 8, 2011 20:28:44 GMT
I think we will loose 5066+5132 or 5207. I don't think you will find it will be 5132 or 5207. The former is formed up with 5211 whilst the latter is formed up with 5102. I think you will find that it will be 5066 and 5167. 5207 is one of the 30 or so units that has had an external clean.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2011 20:32:08 GMT
this is bad news,fifty years of stirling service and replaced with what looks like a near derelict room design with questions' still remaining.the lessons' of its not broke don't fix it have been totally discarded with modernist tones,something that looks satisfactory on a cad screen to someone and only themselves seen amersham on an underground map. rather then the proven layout that has withstood the test of many decades without complaint. the A stock stands out amongst all in having that distinction. To put the other point of view. The internal design of the A-stock is broken. The seats have never had the necessary support, sagging in the middle and the bigger seats are not wide enough for three people, so much space gets wasted. The internal layout of the Metropolitan line stock will always be a compromise, between the needs of London commuters, especially the central zones and the needs of the people living outside London. The A stock interior is too heavily biased towards the long distance punters to be a good design for the modern Metropolitan line. Possibly the S stock has gone a bit too far in the other direction, but other than having separate internal designs for the Amersham / Chesham branches and for the Watford / Uxbridge branches, it is a better compromise for these crowded times. Maybe the A stock's 3 person seats aren't wide enough, but the S Stock doesn't even have 3 person seats so that argument is invalid!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2011 20:42:59 GMT
50 years ago the A stock was considered by some as inferior to the T stock they replaced. In 50 years time when the S stock is replaced by a ? Stock it will most likely enjoy the nostalgia that the A stock is currently revered with.
I will miss these great trains, as I grew up with them and unpainted trains in the 1960's were something different and exciting
Xerces Fobe
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on May 8, 2011 20:45:07 GMT
To put the other point of view. The internal design of the A-stock is broken. The seats have never had the necessary support, sagging in the middle and the bigger seats are not wide enough for three people, so much space gets wasted. The internal layout of the Metropolitan line stock will always be a compromise, between the needs of London commuters, especially the central zones and the needs of the people living outside London. The A stock interior is too heavily biased towards the long distance punters to be a good design for the modern Metropolitan line. Possibly the S stock has gone a bit too far in the other direction, but other than having separate internal designs for the Amersham / Chesham branches and for the Watford / Uxbridge branches, it is a better compromise for these crowded times. Maybe the A stock's 3 person seats aren't wide enough, but the S Stock doesn't even have 3 person seats so that argument is invalid! No it isn't, as 3 person seats for not really suitable for any LU stock, the third 'seat' just takes up valuable standing room for the busy parts of the line and isn't necessary for the extremities of the route. (This might be different if the trains were wider). An extra point is that the 2 person seats are also too narrow on the A-stock and the standing space in the aisle between the seats is limited, so the doorways get crowded very quickly. Also, as mentioned by Metman you wouldn't get many more seats with a 2+2 layout on the S-stock, but you would lose standing room.
|
|