|
Post by wimblephil on Jan 29, 2015 5:59:35 GMT
Will be interesting to hear the reason why! Does this mean the initial ones that have been S-Stock e.g. 63 & 125 will revert back to D, or will they continue to run as S?
|
|
|
Post by malcolmffc on Jan 29, 2015 7:19:29 GMT
The 4th & 5th D stock to S stock conversions (set numbers 62 & 64) shown previously will not now take place next week as intended. I'm not fully aware of the reasons why, but issues have come to a head and the powers that be have decided it would be best to postpone the conversion programme until such time as they're happy to proceed. That being said, there are two morning/evening H&C stock moves in passenger service to and from Upminster that are planned to start running 7 days a week from next week; those will still go ahead. I have seen a plan that shows the conversions up to the 46th S stock - covering the new timetable from May 2015 - but of course this may well be revised as a result now.... Hope they get it sorted out soon.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,746
|
Post by class411 on Jan 29, 2015 8:39:46 GMT
The 4th & 5th D stock to S stock conversions (set numbers 62 & 64) shown previously will not now take place next week as intended. I'm not fully aware of the reasons why, but issues have come to a head and the powers that be have decided it would be best to postpone the conversion programme until such time as they're happy to proceed. That being said, there are two morning/evening H&C stock moves in passenger service to and from Upminster that are planned to start running 7 days a week from next week; those will still go ahead. I have seen a plan that shows the conversions up to the 46th S stock - covering the new timetable from May 2015 - but of course this may well be revised as a result now.... Whilst I'm sure there are good reasons for this, I have to say that the entire S-Stock conversion has, from a customer POV, been an utter farce. This is almost certainly more down to an overenthusiastic publicity department than any technical incompetence (I'm sure we'd all rather have the new stock safe and working than delivered to any particular schedule.) Fortunately, most passengers don't care that much one way or the other and the D stock are still doing the job pretty well - and I'm missing the C Stock already.
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Jan 29, 2015 9:40:26 GMT
The 4th & 5th D stock to S stock conversions (set numbers 62 & 64) shown previously will not now take place next week as intended. I'm not fully aware of the reasons why, but issues have come to a head and the powers that be have decided it would be best to postpone the conversion programme until such time as they're happy to proceed. That being said, there are two morning/evening H&C stock moves in passenger service to and from Upminster that are planned to start running 7 days a week from next week; those will still go ahead. I have seen a plan that shows the conversions up to the 46th S stock - covering the new timetable from May 2015 - but of course this may well be revised as a result now.... Whilst I'm sure there are good reasons for this, I have to say that the entire S-Stock conversion has, from a customer POV, been an utter farce. This is almost certainly more down to an overenthusiastic publicity department than any technical incompetence (I'm sure we'd all rather have the new stock safe and working than delivered to any particular schedule.) Fortunately, most passengers don't care that much one way or the other and the D stock are still doing the job pretty well - and I'm missing the C Stock already. I think you're absolutely right. Most passengers don't care that much one way or the other provided their train turns up when it's supposed to. If the delays in introduction of S Stock had caused gaps in the service or closures of sections of the railway that would indeed be a farce. As it is I agree entirely with the overenthusiastic publicity department theory. Provided the old trains aren't incapable of service and the new trains work as and when they start running is all passengers really need to be made aware of.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 20:23:39 GMT
Whilst I'm sure there are good reasons for this, I have to say that the entire S-Stock conversion has, from a customer POV, been an utter farce. This is almost certainly more down to an overenthusiastic publicity department than any technical incompetence (I'm sure we'd all rather have the new stock safe and working than delivered to any particular schedule.) Fortunately, most passengers don't care that much one way or the other and the D stock are still doing the job pretty well - and I'm missing the C Stock already. Absolutely nothing to do with any publicity department - the press and communications team do what the project and management team ask them to do, not the other way round. It is just a brief pause in the rollout to ensure that the fleet of D and S we have got are performing well. Too many delays last week on the District. My understanding is that the two C&H trains that are due to start from Upminster will start as planned on Monday and so a couple of District paths that are due to have an S stock may not.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,746
|
Post by class411 on Jan 30, 2015 9:01:52 GMT
[]Absolutely nothing to do with any publicity department - the press and communications team do what the project and management team ask them to do, not the other way round. Quite honestly I find that a little hard to believe. The earliest date I have seen for introduction on the Hammersmith and City & C lines and the District line was 2009! The date kept being put back and back and back. It would be rather worrying if the whole project management had that little clue about how long things would take. The post from Colin, above, gave the impression that it's a little more than that. (I say 'impression', advisedly as the post isn't that specific).
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 30, 2015 10:30:46 GMT
The earliest date I have seen for introduction on the Hammersmith and City & C lines and the District line was 2009! The date kept being put back and back and back. It would be rather worrying if the whole project management had that little clue about how long things would take. Where did you see that 2009 date? Dates can slip for all sorts of reasons: often political: see the Croxley link, or Thameslink 2000-and-counting. The first S stock in public servce was in July 2010. The first H&C service was in 2012. The trilemma of engineering - "on time, on budget, on spec - choose two!". As time was not of the essence here, (the ACD stocks were not actually falling to bits), they decided to get the other two right.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,746
|
Post by class411 on Jan 30, 2015 11:33:59 GMT
The earliest date I have seen for introduction on the Hammersmith and City & C lines and the District line was 2009! The date kept being put back and back and back. It would be rather worrying if the whole project management had that little clue about how long things would take. Dates can slip for all sorts of reasons: often political: see the Croxley link, or Thameslink 2000-and-counting. I know. That's why I was very careful to say: 'From a passenger POV'. As mere passengers, all we saw was an announcement of fancy new stock, with a date that kept slipping, usually a year to 18 months at a time. Again from a purely passenger POV, what counts is when you start regularly using the new stock, not when you occasionally see an example over the course of some months.Or it's working on some other line. For the H&C, the perceived time when S-Stock became 'the' stock for the line was well into 2014. And, as I said in my original post in this sub-thread, that was exactly the correct decision. What I question is the wisdom of making promises when there is no way of knowing they can be kept.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Jan 30, 2015 12:36:47 GMT
The post from Colin, above, gave the impression that it's a little more than that. (I say 'impression', advisedly as the post isn't that specific). I was deliberately vague as the information I got was itself vague! All I can add is that the pause is to allow certain interested parties and stakeholders time to ensure they have the mechanism's in place to assist the S stock introduction. If were to add my thoughts on what that means, well I suspect its a combination of driver training, depot works and train maintainers all not being at the right point. In terms of driver training, the actual training courses at the east end of the line are running bang on schedule. However, drivers have an option to sign them themselves off as happy and competent to drive an S stock on their own after their "qualification trip" at the end of their course. The qualification trip (one Barking/Olympia rounder) is the one and only time they get their hands on a real train - all of the training is done on a non moving simulator. Of course many drivers are not signing themselves off that after just the one round trip between barking and Olympia and so although the number of drivers trained is high, the number actually able or willing to drive an S stock alone is extremely low. The depots at Ealing Common and Upminster have required extensive works in order to accommodate S stock. In particular all of the stabling markers and walkboards have needed to be altered. Whilst Upminster is well advanced and is currently able to accept something like 36 S stocks, Ealing Common can only handle about 10. Then there's the train maintainers. I don't know how their training has gone, etc, but there have been one or two teething problems at Upminster with train preps not being able to take place due to non qualified staff. I stress that what I have posted is my own guesswork and is not the formal position of anyone. All I have seen are words to the effect of "the pause is to allow certain interested parties and stakeholders time to ensure they have the mechanism's in place to assist the S stock introduction".
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jan 31, 2015 4:07:00 GMT
the sheds at Ealing Common were not only extended they were completely gutted. Everything has been replaced.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jan 31, 2015 9:22:43 GMT
the sheds at Ealing Common were not only extended they were completely gutted. Everything has been replaced. The 'Acton end' half yes, the 'Ealing end' has yet to be touched.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 3, 2015 18:12:58 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2015 20:00:47 GMT
Excuse my ignorance... is the Chiltern Line the only possible route for delivering S stock?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 3, 2015 21:06:57 GMT
Unless there are loading gauge constraints it could be routed down the Midland Main Line and the Dudding Hill route and then either with a reversal onto the Chiltern at Neasden, or round to Acton Wells and the new North Line and up to Aylesbury.
A pity the Croxley Link isn't there to allow access to the Met from the WCML!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2015 21:44:20 GMT
There is a link from the District to the Goblin line at Barking. I thought it was put in for moments such as these.
John
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 3, 2015 21:57:35 GMT
There is a link from the District to the Goblin line at Barking. I thought it was put in for moments such as these. John Indeed - if they are being delivered to Upminster or Barking that would be an option. There are links at Wimbledon and Richmond as well, but they are hardly convenient for a delivery from Derby. Where are the S7s for the District being commissioned?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2015 6:38:38 GMT
I believe at the depot they will be based from so either EC or UP
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 4, 2015 8:24:12 GMT
Currently all are delivered to Ruislip then moved across to Neasden.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 4, 2015 10:27:50 GMT
So Midland Main Line, Dudding Hill, Acton Wells, Castle Bar line to New North Line would seem to be the easiest way to Ruislip if the line is blocked north of Banbury. If you don't want them to end up back to front they could be reversed off the Dudding Hill line at Neasden onto the Chiltern route via Wembley Stadium.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Feb 4, 2015 16:41:07 GMT
@ norbiton flyer
Yes, "If you don't want them to end up back to front.........."
I have NEVER been able to comprehend LT's/LU's apparent near anal obsession to have 'handed' stock, which is thus inflexible because of it.
I maintain a much better District & "Circle" service could be provided without this nutty, self-imposed restriction
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Feb 4, 2015 17:21:20 GMT
My understanding is that the 'handed' stock mainly came about from the CLR, because of their asymmetrical unit connections. With the advent of the wedgelock automatic coupler, it became less of a problem but having distinct car orientations still occurred (but not with the C stock). With the S7 stock, it seems that the handedness of the stock is more of a token than anything else. Over the past couple of days, I have been in the same car relative to the formation (5th from the back) which have been both odd and even cars over the past week.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 4, 2015 18:38:42 GMT
Handedness matters very little on modern (S, 1995, 1996 stocks) since they are not made up of units that are expected to be separated. In any case S stock can and does get reversed on the Aldgate, Kensington and Watford triangles, and 1995 stock on the Kennington loop. For commissioning purposes Ruislip may need them one way round rather than the other as the two halves of an S7 are not identical (one of them only has three cars....), but it seems unlikely.
As I understand it handedness was simply easier to design in the limited space between cars, avoiding the need to duplicate connections on both sides of the car ends. The GN&CR and C@SLR as first built were very assymetric - the CSLR had an off-centre conductor rail (to avoid fouling the couplings) and the GNCR had a positive rail on one side and a negative on the other. So it was just as well there was no way the trains could be turned round.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 4, 2015 21:33:31 GMT
Handedness matters very little on modern (S, 1995, 1996 stocks) since they are not made up of units that are expected to be separated. In any case S stock can and does get reversed on the Aldgate, Kensington and Watford triangles, and 1995 stock on the Kennington loop. For commissioning purposes Ruislip may need them one way round rather than the other as the two halves of an S7 are not identical (one of them only has three cars....), but it seems unlikely. As I understand it handedness was simply easier to design in the limited space between cars, avoiding the need to duplicate connections on both sides of the car ends. The GN&CR and C@SLR as first built were very assymetric - the CSLR had an off-centre conductor rail (to avoid fouling the couplings) and the GNCR had a positive rail on one side and a negative on the other. So it was just as well there was no way the trains could be turned round. 96 stock does get shunted around on a regular basis - and if I recall correctly the couplers on these are handed. (Can anyone confirm for definite?). The Jubilee has no way of turning the trains however. 95 stock was the first stock where the decision was made to leave the trains in delivered formations as far as possible. Generally this has held true, even on the handful of occasions where trains have swapped about they have eventually been reformed back. I think as I write this all 106 trains are 'correct'. The 09 stock has also avoided reformation, never seen one of them not in delivered formation.
|
|
|
Post by mb2014 on Feb 10, 2015 20:59:00 GMT
51551+51552 and 51567+51711 entered service as such but we now have 51551+51711 plus 51567+51552. As far as I know this is the only permanent reformation
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 16, 2015 9:20:33 GMT
Excuse my ignorance... is the Chiltern Line the only possible route for delivering S stock? The Chiltern line to Princes Risborough, then via Aylesbury to Neasden or direct to West Ruislip are the only routes gauged and authorised for S7 deliveries and S8 workback moves.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Feb 16, 2015 20:42:30 GMT
Is the S stock rollout on the District still on hold?
Only saw three S7 trains on the District main today: 67, 124 and 125.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 17, 2015 7:04:23 GMT
Yes the next stage of introduction is delayed from 2 February. Today 63 67 123 125 are S7.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Feb 17, 2015 13:04:00 GMT
Why are they still putting an S stock on 125?
125 was supposed to be train 6, which is a milestone we haven't reach yet but of course 125 was deleted from the plan [because of the Mansion House reverse move] with 32 inserted in its place.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Feb 17, 2015 14:51:48 GMT
Is 125 an S stock in the morning too, because that's when it does the Mansion House move. I only saw it during the afternoon.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Feb 17, 2015 14:59:42 GMT
Is 125 an S stock in the morning too, because that's when it does the Mansion House move. I only saw it during the afternoon. Given that Dstock posted todays information some 7 hours ago, I thought it obvious that he was referring to the am peak working.
|
|