Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2010 15:29:05 GMT
Whilst I can't see forcing people to pay for zone 1 when they don't want it as remotely justifiable, is there really a huge revenue loss from people exiting the UndergrounD in zone 2 and continuing to zone 1 by bus (buses in zone 1 are covered by any travelcard.) Presumably the effect will mean more passengers will remain on the UndergrounD into the busier central area, where TfL would rather they were on a bus! However I have to feel the residents North of Moor Park should focus their attentions upon their local authority councils and whether they should be providing a subsidy to the operation of the Met Line services, which I rather doubt are commercially viable upon fare revenue alone without the present TfL subsidy levy collected from the residents of councils of the London Boroughs.
|
|
|
Post by thc on Dec 29, 2010 16:22:16 GMT
However I have to feel the residents North of Moor Park should focus their attentions upon their local authority councils and whether they should be providing a subsidy to the operation of the Met Line services, which I rather doubt are commercially viable upon fare revenue alone without the present TfL subsidy levy collected from the residents of councils of the London Boroughs. Absolutely no chance. Given that the largest cuts to local authority funding in a generation are about to take place in England over the next four years, anyone seeking extra subsidy for rail services outside London or the PTE areas will be disappointed. THC
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 29, 2010 17:02:04 GMT
Remember this? and what has boris johnson done about these fare rises',we have just found out. zones 2-9 hit me as i then used the bus to golders green,this is totally outrageous fair rises.also why are trains heading to upminster for maintenance?. the met lines outlay does give an indication of its past. homepage.ntlworld.com/clivebillson/tube/1960.htmlpreviously to these rises it was more viable to abandon chiltern at amersham and use a then oyster card,this advantage has been lost,however i have not seen the latest chiltern fares but it now looks if someone traveling by met from amersham or chiltern from aylesbury to harrow will now pay the same,again leaving the difference south of harrow,this then leaves the bus option open also from that point.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 29, 2010 17:14:48 GMT
And all announced during the holiday period when the Evening Standard doesn't publish and the TV local news programmes are truncated or cancelled. "A good time to bury bad news." All well and good, but the new fares were originally announced in October and were covered in the press at the time. So no there has been no burying of bad news. I don't know why it was originally chosen to be done on this timescale (or who did the choosing), but I believe that at least since the advent of the position of Maylor of London the fare rises have been announced in the autumn and have come into effect on the first working day of the new year. Remember that 2nd January was the start of PAYG acceptance on National Rail. While I have very little positive to say about Boris Johnson, the timing of the fare increases is not something that can be attributed to him.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 29, 2010 17:23:21 GMT
i dont know how long these new fares have been on the tfl website,the increases appear to be announced in october but little outside publicity was generated.its without doubt that they will only come to prominence for most people now.
also separate anyone paying the £2 a day zone 1 increase over five week days will end up paying £40 a month more,that soon starts adding up,there may well be more surprises for other users elsewhere on the system also.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2010 17:31:59 GMT
Absolutely no chance. Given that the largest cuts to local authority funding in a generation are about to take place in England over the next four years, anyone seeking extra subsidy for rail services outside London or the PTE areas will be disappointed. Essex seem fine with it though so why not Hertfordshire or Buckinghamshire?
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 29, 2010 17:34:35 GMT
upminster is still within greater london.not sure about the epping fares though as this relates to the metroplitan section.
good spot small increase from epping.
peak/off peak cap 2010.
£14.80 £7.50
2011
£15.00 £8.00
there is some explaining to do and tfl are not doing it.
|
|
|
Post by thc on Dec 29, 2010 18:08:59 GMT
Absolutely no chance. Given that the largest cuts to local authority funding in a generation are about to take place in England over the next four years, anyone seeking extra subsidy for rail services outside London or the PTE areas will be disappointed. Essex seem fine with it though so why not Hertfordshire or Buckinghamshire? Essex County Council has a history of providing discretionary subsidy for LT/TfL rail services that Hertfordshire CC and Buckinghamshire CC do not and it is this discretion to do so that answers your question. In the current financial climate, local authorities will scale back discretionary services and funding to concentrate on statutory duties. The scale of the funding cuts to local authorities is unprecedented - an average of 27% over four years - and so it is wishful thinking to imagine that either HCC or BCC will choose to spend any spare funds subsidising fares or enhancing marginal services on an already well-used and well-served transport corridor. THC
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2010 18:26:33 GMT
Could Essex decide to withdraw funding then and force the Central line stations outside of Zone 6?
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 29, 2010 19:43:23 GMT
there has been problems funding projects in the outer met before and placed the chesham branch under threat,again its a false hope expecting passengers to fund any gap and tfl's failings.
the met now appears to be on a fare scale comparable to national rail inc chiltern railways per distance,people will just cut back on social travel,use other means.
best option with tfl's take it or leave it attitude is just walk away if you can.they are the ones that ultimately lose.and tfl can take a hike instead not the passenger.
|
|
|
Post by thc on Dec 29, 2010 19:48:46 GMT
Could Essex decide to withdraw funding then and force the Central line stations outside of Zone 6? In theory, yes, but without seeing the agreement with TfL or the subsidy profile it is not possible to say on what terms any changes could be made. There is nothing on Essex CC's website nor on TfL's regarding subsidy for the Central line but if you were to make an enquiry under the Freedom of Information Act to Essex (as the procuring authority) to obtain further details, they may release a copy of the agreement or, more likely, a summary to you. THC
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Dec 29, 2010 20:22:09 GMT
there has been problems funding projects in the outer met before and placed the chesham branch under threat,again its a false hope expecting passengers to fund any gap and tfl's failings. the met now appears to be on a fare scale comparable to national rail inc chiltern railways per distance,people will just cut back on social travel,use other means. I think you'll find that the Met line station fares are still considerably cheaper than equivalent fares from National Rail stations at similar distances. You can see this in the TfL fares where fares from Watford Junction are higher than any of the zone 9 stations. Comparison with the Chiltern stations between Amersham and Aylesbury is complicated as the route south of Amersham is shared with the Met and this affects the fares. If you look at High Wycombe or Beaconsfield instead (a similar distance from London), you can see that fares are much higher than Amersham/Chesham.
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Dec 29, 2010 22:14:15 GMT
The headline 9 to 1 single fares are very reasonable in my view, in fact I think the off-peak PAYG single is underpriced if anything. Clearly there theoretical increase on the cap for a 9 - 2 journey is quite outlandish but, apart from the occasional transport enthusiast, I seriously doubt that most people who formerly hit the old cap will now hit the new one.
|
|
|
Post by edwardfox on Dec 29, 2010 22:20:13 GMT
My only problem with the fare revision is the withdrawal of the Z2-6 and Z2-9 One Day Travelcards. Many people genuinely don't need Zone 1, but I guess it finally occurred to someone on high that there is no way to detect illegal travel through Zone 1 with a Zone 2-6 Travelcard. I know a couple of people who have done this and seemed proud of their "accomplishment".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2010 3:11:14 GMT
My only problem with the fare revision is the withdrawal of the Z2-6 and Z2-9 One Day Travelcards. Many people genuinely don't need Zone 1, but I guess it finally occurred to someone on high that there is no way to detect illegal travel through Zone 1 with a Zone 2-6 Travelcard. I know a couple of people who have done this and seemed proud of their "accomplishment". Surely you detect someone crossing Z1 on a 2-6 Travelcard the same way you'd detect anyone crossing with a dodgy ticket - with ticket inspectors! Although that would mean TfL hiring some people, so I guess thats out the window.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 30, 2010 10:50:10 GMT
I certain circumstances you can also detect it with the routing used and timings.
For example Whitechapel to Royal Oak. If you haven't been through the barriers at Hammersmith, Shepherd's Bush or Wood Lane you've been through zone 1. Similarly St John's Wood to Bermondsey. A direct journey would take about 20 minutes, a route avoiding zone 1 would take about an hour most likely. So if you've arrived in 25 minutes you must have gone through zone 1.
This isn't always possible though, e.g. Richmond-Stratford.
|
|
|
Post by messiah on Dec 30, 2010 11:39:56 GMT
in response to a couple of comments made in this thread:
Yes people do travel through zone 1 without a zone 1 valid card (or having touched in at the appropriate point) e.g. Using a 2-6 travelcard traveling West across zone 1 from Canary Wharf on the DLR and tube (that's why they often check tickets between Shadwell and Bank even though passengers will need to touch out from whichever tube station they get off at). If the DLR inspectors checked the ticket at any other point on that DLR journey then the travelcard would be valid even though it had not been touched in.
A flat fare for the tubes is seen as being unfair and unworkable - however it is worth bearing in mind that this is the exact situation that applies on London buses - going 2-3 stops to the local shops costs the same as a cross London journey through zone 1 - making long journeys seem very cheap while the short ones seem very expensive.
|
|
|
Post by edwardfox on Dec 30, 2010 12:10:11 GMT
My "travel through Zone 1 on a Z2-6 TravelCard" referred to a paper One Day TravelCard. Never been ticket checked on a London Underground service.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 30, 2010 17:26:35 GMT
nothing can disguise this rise,there has been various ideas put for reasoning,the line is subsidised in the fact chiltern pay to use it.
it remains that the mayor and tfl have kept very silent and havent issued any statement that could remotely justify any of this,the fact remains during a recession companies take customers for granted and hike prices massively.just walk away is the best advice.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Dec 30, 2010 18:34:08 GMT
I can appreciate all the outcry regarding increases, but seriously, as value for money goes, anywhere served by the tube system is on an absolute bargain. You try getting those sort of distances around this area for the snip you are paying.
A flat rate bus fare in London will get you miles further that the nearly £4 I'd be paying to get from the lower City to the upper, barely 3 miles, and I've got a good ten minute walk to the nearest bus stop.
I was in London for the meet, when the bloke told me it was only £9 for a 1-9 day card I nearly broke his arm off.... I actually double checked the ticket to make sure I hadn't been undercharged. Money well spent IMHO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2010 0:05:03 GMT
I have agree with SE13. From my perspective, working in London all week and back to North Lincolnshire for weekends, the fares on LUL are unbelievably cheap. And then, if you take into account the ratio of fare cost to average London wage (which is considerably higher than most of the rest of the UK - which is why I choose to work there) it makes it even better. Up here, you might get a few sporadic buses every now and again and a one carriage train service that is laughable at best.
Flat fare or PAYG......either way, you'd still really get a good deal in London compared to elsewhere
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Dec 31, 2010 10:38:13 GMT
When I worked on the South Bank about 5 years ago I would arrive at Waterloo on the Bakerloo and leave the station by the Jubilee exit. Ticket checks in the corridor between the two were a regular feature. I can't recall ever being checked on a train in zone 1 though.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 31, 2010 12:26:43 GMT
I can't recall being ticket checked on a train in zone 1, but I have been checked entering zone 1 (DLR) and exiting zone 1 (H&C between Paddington and Royal Oak).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2010 12:45:36 GMT
Good value????Is that a joke? Compared with other European capitals and NYC for instance they are horrendously extortionate.But then we'll get in to the private v public v PPL arguments. Problem is public transport here is seen as a profit making industry rather than a subsidised public service that enhances the social and commercial life of a city
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 31, 2010 15:39:47 GMT
If you consider London fares horrendously extorionate compared to the rest of the world, then just think how bad it is for people in the rest of the UK where London fares are seen as exceedingly good value. And that is not a joke, fares in the rest of the country really are that bad (and service levels are atrocious too). From Cheddar it is possible to commute into central Bristol by car in about 40 minutes door-to-door in the rush hour. By public transport it's a minimum of an hour and a half, including one change, with the peak frequency being once an hour. Public transport is significantly less reliable and very significantly more expensive - and the only effect of the fuel duty rises is to make public transport proportionally MORE expensive as those fares are allowed to rise above the rate of inflation which takes into account the inflationary effect of the fuel price rises. Taunton is about the same distance as Bristol, yet it is not possible to commute there by public transport from here - the first connection doesn't get you in early enough to do a full day's work before you need to leave to get the last connection home. Assuming everything runs to schedule as none of the connections are published ones and so are only maintained by chance.
I'm sorry, but for all London prices are expensive, you pay orders of magnitude less for a service that is orders of magnitude better. I agree with you though that the problem is that public transport is treated as a way to make a profit for someone, rather than to provide a service. Private sector operation of anything only works when there is competition, but with the exception of a handful of point-to-point journeys (over the entire country) there is no competition, and so the non-competitive routes are used to fleece the customers of the money to run the competitive routes. Booking in advance you can get from central Bristol to central London for as little as £2 one way. However, the cheapest I can get to central Bristol from here is about £10 one way.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 31, 2010 17:54:09 GMT
its a scandal that fares can increase 96% overnight without any accountability,it displays utter contempt for the traveling public which the mayor and tfl are to blame.
this is not good value its daylight robbery.
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Dec 31, 2010 19:26:57 GMT
its a scandal that fares can increase 96% overnight without any accountability,it displays utter contempt for the traveling public which the mayor and tfl are to blame. this is not good value its daylight robbery. One thing that does not appear to have been said clearly here is that it's Travel cards and daily caps that have the large variation in percentage increase... With that availability of PAYG, I have to question why we need those kind of tickets at all. Is it not fairer that everyone pays for the journeys that they actually make? However given that Technology has got us that far, I do agree that whilst all you can eat deals still exist, its strange that some combinations are being withdrawn - there can't be a technical requierement.... The headline increase for my PAYG commute would have been 8%, but for the concession that Evening peak travel into Z1 will henceforth be charged off-peak. Living in Z1 and working in Z5 makes me actually slightly better off under the new arrangements.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2010 19:48:01 GMT
When you consider the face costs of actually providing a train, running said train, crewing said train, you'll realise what superb value you are actually getting... Just one T/Op requires over £100 a day, add to that electricity costs and maintenance costs..... I think the tenner or so represents significant value....
I've just read an article on the BBC news about SouthEastern... A season from Canterbury to London now costs £5,192, up from £4,328. If we divide the new fare by how many days in a year, you get roughly £14.22.
Listen, fares are only going to go one way, all the while fare increase % are linked to the Retail Price Index [RPI], Plus the subsidy has to be paid back somehow..... and every year, on NR certainly, TOC's get less... It'll equal out in 5 or so years when we'll start paying for the railways ourselves, with little or no subsidy whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on Dec 31, 2010 21:49:13 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2010 22:03:35 GMT
With that saying that journeys into zone 1 in the evening peak will be charged the off peak fare... I can see that leading to oyster throwing a tizzy over PAYG charging, not to mention confusion among some passengers....
|
|