|
Post by deadmans on Nov 6, 2010 18:35:45 GMT
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Nov 8, 2010 8:26:03 GMT
Just for info, all threads are now locked after 6 months of non-use after a rash of incidents where new members would add bits to every old thread they could find, creating great confusion (and yes, we did announce it at the time we introduced it.... ) *The info in your OP is somewhat inert in terms of new info but we hope that you will be able to provide lots of times and numbers as the process progresses. OTOH, if nothing happens for 6 months..... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D. *We also said that all you have to do to reopen a thread is to ask a mod - it's done immediately without discussion so you could have had the old one back if you wanted it
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 12, 2010 23:50:43 GMT
So due to various delays in getting the first six S stock into PROPER SERVICE ( not gimmick shuttle trains), these dates have been pushed way back. However look for some movement in the EARLY part of next year. I can say no one. A little bit of knowledge... There have been no delays and the project is moving towards a full timetabled service on programme. As for the scrapping dates, these haven't been pushed back either and, following the recent trial scrap, next year was always the plan for commencing the main fleet disposal. You are not very well informed for someone who attempts to post information. (Gimmick - a trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2010 14:56:01 GMT
So due to various delays in getting the first six S stock into PROPER SERVICE ( not gimmick shuttle trains), these dates have been pushed way back. However look for some movement in the EARLY part of next year. I can say no one. A little bit of knowledge... There have been no delays and the project is moving towards a full timetabled service on programme. As for the scrapping dates, these haven't been pushed back either and, following the recent trial scrap, next year was always the plan for commencing the main fleet disposal. You are not very well informed for someone who attempts to post information. (Gimmick - a trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business). on the subject of 'Delays' and I quote you; 'there have been no delays' I'm still under the impression that 'S' stock still can't run into Ricky North Sidings, which should have been commissioned some time ago, along with various other locations/sections When you refer to delays do you mean purely on the physical delivery of 'S' stock, as surely this sits hand in hand with making the infrastructure ready, which clearly has witnessed some delays?
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 13, 2010 20:38:45 GMT
By 'no delays' I mean no delays to the overall programme. We are meeting our targets and are currently on schedule to make our next milestone. Rickmansworth sidings has had a number of issues and should have been commissioned some time ago but this has not (as yet) affected our programme. Uxbridge sidings is also suffering from similar issues but is being progressed and, again, is not currently affecting our overall programme.
In terms of train delivery, since you mention it, we have slowed that deliberately as the next one down is doing type testing at Old Dalby for deicing equipment and we want that completed before it is delivered. We are also hanging on to the pre-series train for a bit longer than we originally anticipated as this makes our life easier for testing, in particular OPO testing.
Hope this clarifies.
|
|
|
Post by deadmans on Nov 21, 2010 19:16:02 GMT
Another know all reply from the leader of the s stock clique, except he does not know all, and gets upset when other users post CORRECT information he has no access too. The first set of scrapping dates started were : 5132. 16.08.2010 5179. 16.08.2010 5142. 24.08.2010 5207. 24.08.2010 5048. 01.09.2010. These were DATED IF the s stock went into proper service. ( not mickey mouse shuttle trains) But due TO DELAYS just look now... 5132 13.01.2011 5179 13.01.2011 5142 21.01.2011 5207 21.01.2011 5048 29.01.2011. THE LAST UNIT IS NOW 5062. 12.09.2012,, BUT LOOK AT THE FIRST SET OF DATES... The last five to leave service should be. 5106. 16.01.2012 5118. 16.01.2012 5234. 16.01.2012 5136. 16.01.2012 5062. 16.01.2012 But all course there are no delays to the project these dates have been moved back for fun. Once again if users require a date for a favorite unit, they can PM me.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Nov 21, 2010 19:47:18 GMT
Moderator Comment.
Please keep it civil; there is no need for rudeness here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2010 18:18:48 GMT
PRJB is our prime source of 09TS and S' project data; I choose to play nice so as not to offend a gold mine... ;D [offtopic] Why does the Mod Comment title always vary? Blue, red, bold, what next? ;D ;D [/offtopic]
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Nov 22, 2010 18:23:56 GMT
5134+5157 heading into Acton Works today- reason unknown.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Nov 22, 2010 18:24:31 GMT
PRJB is our prime source of 09TS and S' project data; I choose to play nice so as not to offend a gold mine... ;D [offtopic] Why does the Mod Comment title always vary? Blue, red, bold, what next? ;D ;D [/offtopic] Does it really matter? The function is to point out that it is a comment from a mod.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2010 18:27:32 GMT
PRJB is our prime source of 09TS and S' project data; I choose to play nice so as not to offend a gold mine... ;D [offtopic] Why does the Mod Comment title always vary? Blue, red, bold, what next? ;D ;D [/offtopic] Does it really matter? The function is to point out that it is a comment from a mod. No, it doesn't; I was trying to be funny [1], and have failed. [1] Hence the two ;D.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Nov 22, 2010 20:48:47 GMT
5134+5157 heading into Acton Works today- reason unknown. We took it there today for wheel turning. Its got one or two thousand flats ;D
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 22, 2010 20:50:58 GMT
Another know all reply from the leader of the s stock clique, except he does not know all, and gets upset when other users post CORRECT information he has no access too. I think I'm the leader of the 'C' Stock clique actually, but there you go. I'm also happy to have my posts corrected, and do get them corrected frequently. Thats the beauty of this forum, most people are here to share information and learn something from one another and not just post rude or generally negative comments. I sit two desks away from the project manager responsible for 'A' Stock disposal and get my information from source.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 22, 2010 21:12:12 GMT
The first set of scrapping dates started were : 5132. 16.08.2010 5179. 16.08.2010 5142. 24.08.2010 5207. 24.08.2010 5048. 01.09.2010. Wrong! We never planned to start releasing 'A' Stock (with the exception of the trial scrap) until we had a timtable able to accomodate an 'S' Stock service to run. That will not be until the Decemeber timetable change, you know the one that changes every Decemeber? These were DATED IF the s stock went into proper service. ( not mickey mouse shuttle trains) But due TO DELAYS just look now... 5132 13.01.2011 5179 13.01.2011 5142 21.01.2011 5207 21.01.2011 5048 29.01.2011. These look wrong to me too! I will ask the Project Manager tomorrow to confirm. Again, no delays and always planned to introduce 'S' Stock on an operational segment basis. Just as we are doing. THE LAST UNIT IS NOW 5062. 12.09.2012,, BUT LOOK AT THE FIRST SET OF DATES... The last five to leave service should be. 5106. 16.01.2012 5118. 16.01.2012 5234. 16.01.2012 5136. 16.01.2012 5062. 16.01.2012 But all course there are no delays to the project these dates have been moved back for fun. Once again if users require a date for a favorite unit, they can PM me. These also look wrong to me. The problem here is that the line/depot only get to offer the order of scrapping (which unit to go next), based on various factors, but it is the project who dictate when those trains will be taken out. We havent even confirmed the company who will carry out the scrap yet so it would be difficult to confirm the rate at which the trains will be withdrawn. In addition we haven't confirmed the full production build rate for the new stock yet either, so again how could we give firm dates for scrapping when we do not have firm dates for new trains arriving? All the dates we have currently will be shuffled around, which is fine provided we ensure that we meet our milestones, and currently we are achieving our milestones - hence no delay.
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on Nov 22, 2010 21:59:51 GMT
prjb
I wouldn't send them to Eastleigh, they were mangled with a claw, not carefully and sustainably decounstructed as we thought
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2010 22:35:12 GMT
prjb I wouldn't send them to Eastleigh, they were mangled with a claw, not carefully and sustainably decounstructed as we thought I would think prjb saw that absolutely appalling shock image.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2010 23:08:16 GMT
Wrong! We never planned to start releasing 'A' Stock (with the exception of the trial scrap) until we had a timtable able to accomodate an 'S' Stock service to run. That will not be until the Decemeber timetable change, you know the one that changes every Decemeber? These look wrong to me too! I will ask the Project Manager tomorrow to confirm. Again, no delays and always planned to introduce 'S' Stock on an operational segment basis. Just as we are doing.. Am i correct in my assumption that the last segment to go 'live' for 'S' stock will be Baker St - Aldgate? Or will this just drop in place with other segments, ie - Uxbridge branch/Chesham? Without counting trains from a timetable, I imagine the vast majority of daily 'A' stock workings run to Aldgate at some point during the traffic day? Presumably until the 'S' stock get the nod to run to Aldgate, this limits the amount of 'S' stock arriving on the railway somewhat? thanks for the last update prjb - re : milestones etc I sometimes hear whispers about xxx job should have been done by zzz date, but don't actually see the overall project milestones etc that you work towards
|
|
|
Post by deadmans on Nov 23, 2010 6:26:01 GMT
5134+5157 heading into Acton Works today- reason unknown. Oh. It must mean more " minor maintenance" on the damaged wheelsets. The trucks are removed at Acton, sent over to BT Ilford for turning, then put back under at Acton. The depot ( neasden) cannot cope with the current workload.
|
|
|
Post by littlebrute on Nov 23, 2010 9:06:12 GMT
Wasn't there a photo a few weeks back of a S stock at Aldgate? So we know testing is happening to the extent where S Stocks are running to Aldgate
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 23, 2010 22:00:17 GMT
Am i correct in my assumption that the last segment to go 'live' for 'S' stock will be Baker St - Aldgate? Or will this just drop in place with other segments, ie - Uxbridge branch/Chesham? Aldgate will be the last S8 segment to go 'live' next year. We are currently working towards all destinations north of Baker Street. Without counting trains from a timetable, I imagine the vast majority of daily 'A' stock workings run to Aldgate at some point during the traffic day? We plan to have three 'S' stock in service and these have specific paths in the new timetable that accomodate this. The paths allow for the trains to run between Baker Street and all northern destinations but could be utilised by 'A' Stock. Similarly, once we can run to Aldgate then we can run them on any path in the new timetable. Presumably until the 'S' stock get the nod to run to Aldgate, this limits the amount of 'S' stock arriving on the railway somewhat? Yes, there are a number of limiting factors. There is a set number that we can take without more stabling being available (Uxbridge etc) and without an increase in power in the depot (which is being worked on). There is also a tipping point where we cannot take anymore without commencing 'A' Stock scrap. We are on track in terms of delivery and in terms of the next milestone, which is why I am stating the program hasn't suffered a delay. Thats not to say that we haven't had a number of set backs along the way though, just none big enough (yet!) to impact on our milestones. thanks for the last update prjb - re : milestones etc I sometimes hear whispers about xxx job should have been done by zzz date, but don't actually see the overall project milestones etc that you work towards No worries!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Nov 24, 2010 13:58:21 GMT
PRJB, do you know roughly how much more power an S8 will draw then an A60, as a proportion or something?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2010 11:22:42 GMT
PRJB, do you know roughly how much more power an S8 will draw then an A60, as a proportion or something? Rail voltage is being upgraded to 750 volts as opposed to 630 volts which the A stock is run on.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 25, 2010 22:24:15 GMT
PRJB, do you know roughly how much more power an S8 will draw then an A60, as a proportion or something? Honest answer Ben - No! I know a man who will know though...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2011 5:47:44 GMT
Another know all reply from the leader of the s stock clique, except he does not know all, and gets upset when other users post CORRECT information he has no access too. The first set of scrapping dates started were : 5132. 16.08.2010 5179. 16.08.2010 5142. 24.08.2010 5207. 24.08.2010 5048. 01.09.2010. These were DATED IF the s stock went into proper service. ( not mickey mouse shuttle trains) But due TO DELAYS just look now... 5132 13.01.2011 5179 13.01.2011 5142 21.01.2011 5207 21.01.2011 5048 29.01.2011. THE LAST UNIT IS NOW 5062. 12.09.2012,, BUT LOOK AT THE FIRST SET OF DATES... The last five to leave service should be. 5106. 16.01.2012 5118. 16.01.2012 5234. 16.01.2012 5136. 16.01.2012 5062. 16.01.2012 But all course there are no delays to the project these dates have been moved back for fun. Once again if users require a date for a favorite unit, they can PM me. Of those listed for January withdrawal this was the state of play on Sunday: 5132 in service (T410) paired with 5065 5179 stabled Wembley Park paired with 5109 5142 Neasden depot, outside adjacent to main running lines and not paired. Gone by early evening. 5048 not seen 5207 in service (T417) paired with 5038 and suffering badly from wheelflats!! Has anyone seen 5142 out and about since?
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Jan 11, 2011 21:45:50 GMT
5142 was in passenger service last week. 5048 was in passenger service today, coupled to 5094.
There are 4 units that I've not seen in passenger service for some 4 to 5 weeks: 5074, 5134, 5138 and 5177. In addition, last autumn's sandite 5066 has not returned to passenger service although that's not unusual just 4 weeks after the end of the season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2011 15:13:26 GMT
5142 was in passenger service last week. 5048 was in passenger service today, coupled to 5094. There are 4 units that I've not seen in passenger service for some 4 to 5 weeks: 5074, 5134, 5138 and 5177. In addition, last autumn's sandite 5066 has not returned to passenger service although that's not unusual just 4 weeks after the end of the season. 5138 was at Upminster Depot for wheel set turning on the lathe last week.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Jan 18, 2011 18:00:51 GMT
It looks like the first servicable (i.e running under its own steam) 8 car is going for scrap on Thursday. I Don't know the unit numbers yet but I'll make a note on Thursday.
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Jan 18, 2011 20:50:06 GMT
For those of you like me who remain very interested to find out which two units will be leaving the Met for scrap in two days time, the two units that were indicated as possibles last week, i.e. 5132 and 5179 were both in service this evening, remaining coupled to the units I mentioned in my posting 4 days ago.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Jan 20, 2011 16:27:35 GMT
The units that went for scrap today were 5006 (s) and as predicted 5179 (N). 5179 was indeed in service yesterday, judging by the amount of yesterdays newspapers etc left in it. A sad day for the underground. There was an S stock nearby too. We wondered if anyone would notice if we took the wrong train. ;D
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 20, 2011 16:30:42 GMT
He he!! I wonder when the next withdrawal is going to be. Hopefully a while form my point of view.
|
|