Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2009 14:50:06 GMT
Now please forgive me if i am wrong here, but I was under the impression there were no district lines running east of Embankment this weekend.
However, last night at around 6.45pm I witnessed a District Line pulling into the bay platform at Barking. Now Where had this train come from, if the line was shut between Embankment and Upminster and where was it returning too?
It definitely had passengers on it so i am left somewhat confused!
Can anyone shed any light on this?
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Apr 5, 2009 15:46:06 GMT
Only the Hammersmith & City Line was running to Barking this weekend.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2009 16:01:36 GMT
Now that is what I thought, which is why i had to look twice.
It was def a D Stock pulling into the bay platform at Barking at around 6.45 last night.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Apr 5, 2009 18:31:23 GMT
I know it is not unknown to run Upminster - Whitechapel shorties in this sort of service - I know I've got a District TTN for trackwork at Cannon Street earlier this year with this working and there are not Whitechapel - Barking quickies. However, this possiblity is ruled out by there being trackwork at Upminster also this weekend.
Curious!
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Apr 5, 2009 19:24:41 GMT
Pure guess, but as West Ham were at home perhaps it was a football train?
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Apr 5, 2009 19:40:17 GMT
Pure guess, but as West Ham were at home perhaps it was a football train? That's exactly what it was; there were two, 501 & 502 operating between Barking and Whitechapel until 21:00.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2009 19:43:56 GMT
There was indeed one D stock running Whitechapel - Barking short trips. I don't have a timetable, so I don't know if this was an ad-hoc extra or scheduled.
I saw this train several times yesterday, both afternoon and well into the evening.
There was a second D stock I noted with a driver in the cab in Barking Sidings and this was suitably timed for the football, so I assume that one was indeed a football extra.
Both trains seem to be sourced from Barking sidings (one train usually overnights there and one road is usualy spare which probably took a curtailed (Timetable variation) Upminster train on the Fri night.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2009 20:16:45 GMT
I got one on the d stock train yesterday at barking when the football crowded got and at upton park and there was d stock train going back to barking at the station as well.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Apr 5, 2009 21:24:19 GMT
I experienced a similar thing a few months' ago during one of these never-ending District Line shutdowns. The last EB from Aldgate East (off the WB) was formed by a D Stock even though the DR was officially suspended west of Whitechapel (again...).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2009 21:39:13 GMT
Now thats explains it thanks for your answers.
Sadly was I was on a rather crammed C2C tran, when I saw it so i couldn't see properly. Now I only wish C2C could follow the same example rather than running stupidly busy 4 coach only trains when these works are taking place and on top of that when there is football on!
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Apr 5, 2009 22:07:47 GMT
The service pattern seemed to be different from previous weekends. As well as Richmond - Embankment, Wimbledon Park - High St, Ealing - High St, there were also Olympia - Embankments.
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Apr 5, 2009 22:09:51 GMT
The service pattern seemed to be different from previous weekends. As well as Richmond - Embankment, Wimbledon Park - High St, Ealing - High St, there were also Olympia - Embankments. Four of them (the two normal Olympias plus two extra), also helped to relieve congestion at High Street Kensington, though can a PITA signalling wise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2009 9:31:39 GMT
Now thats explains it thanks for your answers. Sadly was I was on a rather crammed C2C tran, when I saw it so i couldn't see properly. Now I only wish C2C could follow the same example rather than running stupidly busy 4 coach only trains when these works are taking place and on top of that when there is football on! My thoughts exactly, what the hell C2C were playing at I have no idea, I couldn't even get on the first one to arrive at Upminster, it was totally rammed. Surely not rocket science, that carrying all those extras you need to put 8 car sets out !!! The service pattern seemed to be different from previous weekends. As well as Richmond - Embankment, Wimbledon Park - High St, Ealing - High St, there were also Olympia - Embankments. Ooo, thats unusual ! We do like unusual patterns like that. Glad it was keeping Upfast and co on their toes ;D ;D
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Apr 6, 2009 19:27:54 GMT
The service pattern seemed to be different from previous weekends. As well as Richmond - Embankment, Wimbledon Park - High St, Ealing - High St, there were also Olympia - Embankments. As well as Edgware Road to Putney Bridge.
|
|
|
Post by ajamieson on Apr 8, 2009 13:11:06 GMT
It wasn't just C2C who dropped the ball over the weekend, it would appear.
The station staff at Mile End claimed there had been no attempt to increase the frequency of the H&C service despite there being no other way of getting from Mile End, Whitechapel or Aldgate East to the west end of London. Whether this was true or not I don't know but certainly there were absolutely colossal gaps in the H&C service (16 minutes westbound, 11 minutes eastbound when I was at Mile End on Saturday 2.30pm) and a platform absolutely rammed with people.
There was also no mention of the knock-on effects on other lines. The District was described as providing a "good service" west of Embankment when it was clearly providing nothing of the sort. Huge service gaps and an advertised 6-10 minute interval is not a normal service.
I don't mind the engineering work but the absurd fingers-in-ears pretence by TfL that there is no disruption beyond what is suspended or closed is becoming a bore.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Apr 8, 2009 13:55:31 GMT
To be fair, the H&C service *is* supposed to be augmented on these occasions, but is still totally inadequate for the number of people travelling. There only needs to be the odd hic-cup and intervals of 15+ minutes are common. It is high time TFL stopped advising people to use alternative lines because, in the central area at least, these just don't have the capacity to take additional passengers in these circumstances. Indeed, there have been several times of late when the Piccadilly Line wanted to go "minor delays due to Jubilee Line engineering work" and it was only "internal politics" which prevented this from going out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2009 21:46:12 GMT
The station staff at Mile End claimed there had been no attempt to increase the frequency of the H&C service despite there being no other way of getting from Mile End, Whitechapel or Aldgate East to the west end of London. Whether this was true or not I don't know but certainly there were absolutely colossal gaps in the H&C service (16 minutes westbound, 11 minutes eastbound when I was at Mile End on Saturday 2.30pm) and a platform absolutely rammed with people. There was also no mention of the knock-on effects on other lines. The District was described as providing a "good service" west of Embankment when it was clearly providing nothing of the sort. Huge service gaps and an advertised 6-10 minute interval is not a normal service. The H&C was timetabled to provide a substantially increased service to Barking; sat every 8 mins in place of every 16. Sunday every 8 mins in place of no trains at all ! (Plus can now confirm two extra untimetabled District trains ran all day Whitechapel - Barking and two more Embankment - Olympia) There may well have been blips in the service of course, not remotely helped by the FA continuing to schedule West Ham home games after they have been notified of shutdowns before setting fixtures. Be it adequate or not if the timetabled service is operating, then that is a "good service" and MORE than the timetabled service was operating ! The matter of overspill to other lines has been substantailly enhanced given that rail replacement buses are not provided for zone 1 or where other suitable routes are deemed to be readily available.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Apr 8, 2009 23:13:26 GMT
I don't believe that an 8 min service without a Central or District alternative is acceptable. Until the late-1990s there would be a rail replacement bus service in addition in all areas, not just Zone 3. As said, the alternative rail routes cannot cope with this - and still no extra lines, crossovers, line capacity etc from the so-called "TFL Investment Programme"!
|
|
|
Post by ajamieson on Apr 9, 2009 8:24:36 GMT
The H&C was timetabled to provide a substantially increased service to Barking; sat every 8 mins in place of every 16. Sunday every 8 mins in place of no trains at all ! (Plus can now confirm two extra untimetabled District trains ran all day Whitechapel - Barking and two more Embankment - Olympia) There may well have been blips in the service of course, not remotely helped by the FA continuing to schedule West Ham home games after they have been notified of shutdowns before setting fixtures. Be it adequate or not if the timetabled service is operating, then that is a "good service" and MORE than the timetabled service was operating ! The matter of overspill to other lines has been substantailly enhanced given that rail replacement buses are not provided for zone 1 or where other suitable routes are deemed to be readily available. Thank you for the explanation but you have laid bare the sort of Alice-in-Wonderland approach that leaves customers (and staff) frustrated. The timetable did not work as described, for whatever reason, leaving staff at the affected stations exasperated. I do not know which is more extraordinary: the notion that a service can be 'good' regardless or whether it is adequate or the idea that big events should be scheduled around the needs of public transport planners whose job is to provide access to these events in the first place. Will we be able to reschedule the Olympics?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2009 9:27:28 GMT
Indeed, I can only agree.
Again the District is shut down this weekend (and infact all over Easter), couple that with the Jubilee Line being closed for most of the holiday, travel from the East will again be near on impossible.
An 8 minute service on the H&C will not cope with this leaving basically the only way into London will be via C2C severely overcrowding these services (as they are bound to be only 4 coaches).
I understand that these works need to be done, however, LU do not make travel any easier. I think passengers are getting sick and tired of tease works, especially when we still have lots of incidents when the District has delays or is suspended because of signal failures etc.
In terms of the FA deciding to play home games after being notified of the works, what are they supposed to do; bring football to s standstill to allow the works to go ahead. I think not!
|
|
|
Post by happybunny on Apr 9, 2009 9:41:17 GMT
In terms of the FA deciding to play home games after being notified of the works, what are they supposed to do; bring football to s standstill to allow the works to go ahead. I think not! Fine by me Many of you will remember recently engineering work between ECT - Embankment and also between HSK and ERD.. still even though Chelsea FC were aware of this they still decided to organise a home game on the Saturday.. the result = chaos !! And everyone makes out its LULs fault for doing the works when football are on, when really Chelsea did the football when the works were on ! (They should have closed Fulham Bdy stn that day)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2009 10:50:03 GMT
Actually, whilst I have some sympathy with the inappropriate non-supply of rail replacement buses over some sections, however ....
I should clarify the H&C service is timetabled for a train every 7 1/2 minutes. There were two additional District Line trains providing a train about every 30 mins.
On a usual Saturday you have one District Line Train every 5 mins and a H & C every 16. Whilst on a Sunday a District every 5 and no H & C.
So 10 trains per hour were provided instead of 15 (sat) or 12(sun). representing an additional waiting time of about 2 - 3 mins, which when looked at from that perspective is not really noticeable on trains that are not routenely crush loaded !
The principle cause (other disruptions aside) of overloading was the inappropriate scheduling of a Football match, which concentrates large numbers of people into a small section of track for about 2 hours. Yes, clearly "match event schedulers" should schedule their events around rail works, why schedule something that your paying customers are going to struggle to get too, there is a supreme arrogance among the FA and some football supporters that everything else should make way for them !! To a lesser extent the insistance of customers in travelling in the cars nearest their exit stairs overloads some cars whilst others are empty.
Finally, do bare in mind, any District contribution is limited to the two trains in Barking sidings, Upminster, Ealing Common and Parsons Green all being isolated. Any additional H&C contribution has to have rolling stock available, paths at other locations (such as Edgware Road and Baker Street) sufficient space for scheduled turnaround time at terminals for the extra trains and sufficient drivers rostered on duty on those days to work the extra trains. Not beyond achieving in the instant case, but tight.(Barking Bay wouldn't cope and reversing via the sidings adds a lot of time and thus trains and crews to the requirement)
|
|
|
Post by ajamieson on Apr 9, 2009 12:00:45 GMT
Yes, clearly match event schedulers should schedule their events around rail works there is a supreme arrogance among the FA and some football supporters that everything else should make way for them Public transport is a public service. It is funded through taxation by individuals and businesses (including football clubs and their supporters) to provide a service were there is demand. The idea that it is entitled to anything, let alone to take precedence over the people that pay for it and use, it is utterly proposterous and arrogant in the extreme. There is a common sense approach where a football club could take into account the needs of a public rail operator, but given that engineering work is shutting the line down on every other weekend I wonder what WHFC is supposed to do? Hold the match at a time when no fans can make it anyway? The information your provide about trains per hour is interesting and very useful (thank you) and I hope it will be used by TfL - in conjunction with the feedback from users like me and from station staff - to improve alternative arrangements in the future.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Apr 9, 2009 21:36:44 GMT
There is a common sense approach where a football club could take into account the needs of a public rail operator, but given that engineering work is shutting the line down on every other weekend I wonder what WHFC is supposed to do? Hold the match at a time when no fans can make it anyway? I'm not a football fan, but I have to side with West Ham on this occasion. If this was the only weekend when the District Line was closed then yes it would be irresponsible for the football to scheduled on a date the line was closed (iff notified sufficiently far in advance). Similarly if WHFC told TfL in September that they had arranged a match on a given weekend in April and TfL arranged a closure for that weekend in January then it would be irresponsible of TfL. Given the sheer number of weekend closures affecting this part of the District Line (not that there isn't good reason for them) it is inevitable that at least some will clash with home football matches at West Ham. Provided that TfL were given adequate notice then the onus is on them to provide adequate alternative arrangements - whatever form they may take.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2009 22:16:36 GMT
Engineering works aside, it's not like Upton Park station was closed, it had a 7 1/2 min H&C instead of a 5 min District, the gaps reffered to by Deals19 suggests there must have been operating problems elsewhere, thats life they happen, may have been TfL's fault may have been customer related, the yobbish element of football create them too !
The fact of the matter is, at the best of times, football at West Ham causes massive disruption to all transport in the area, be it Underground, buses or roads. The infrastructure can not cope with the sudden hit of people all arriving and departing simmultaneously. Midweek games often result in trains queuing back to Mile End and delay our "bread and butter" top fare paying peak commuters, not to mention generate disruption which sees many trains turned short at Dagenham East (to the detriment of passenger travelling east there of) and late breaks that feel an effect much later in the day. Weekend games are disruptive though marginally less so, but purely because slightly fewer trains operate.
I'd accept to some extent this is LUL's problem in how it deals with these crowds. However scheduling additional trains to operate for these very small windows is limited by track capacity and is costly, as you can't magic up extra staff and trains at all sorts of odd times. They have to be scheduled every saturday or evening or whatever and then are wasted if they are unusued. Two such trains are scheduled daily (which were the trains used during the shutdown, but uniquely spare staff available enabled their operation all day and evening).
The principle limiting factor however is access to and egress from Upton park platforms, for safety reasons trains are not permitted to depart until platforms are clear, or are held to prevent overcrowding upon the return. Running more trains just exacerbates the problem as more trains are then blocking back.
In the end it will doubtless be seen that the only viable solution will be to close Upton Park station at match times and force the use of Plaistow and East Ham thus reducing the dwell problem by half. This is what happens on the Piccadilly Line for Arsenal games.
Problems will presumably dissipate if West Ham move to the suggested new ground at West Ham as that station design and multiple platforms would handle large crowds much better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2009 21:00:40 GMT
Ten of us are running the London Marathon on 26 April and no District between Upminster and Barking that day. LUL must have known about this event from the day it was planned probably last April. So, we have to fight with replacement buses after running 26 miles on a great day for London. Public service ? Downright incompetence. Perhaps we will have to move the Olympics. What hope is there if the Jubilee is shut all the time when it has just been built in relative terms ? More incompetence. No doubt once the DL has finished its current works, it'll start all over again with relacement signalling. Bah !
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Apr 10, 2009 21:10:31 GMT
The ratio of EB Central Line and Hammersmith & City Line trains at Mile End tonight was 7-to-1, which was really great for those trying to get east of there by the District Line route.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Apr 10, 2009 21:14:39 GMT
Is it not outwith the bounds of possibility that the Timetable Office have considered an alternative route for rail replacement buses on that day. Even though the TTO seem to be against RRBS these days!
After all, nearly every bus route in the area was rescheduled and changed for the '53 Coronation (I've got a huge wodge of TTNs and diagrams for that day) - I can't see why it can't be done also for the Marathon; things are much easier these days with computers. It's not as if things are roneoed [1] off any more.
[1] I could tell you a story about a former (now very sadly deceased) editor of the 'Railway Magazine', a spirit duplicator and a pair of 'y' fronts - but this is a family forum so I'd better sit on that one. ;D
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Apr 10, 2009 21:19:16 GMT
There is a common sense approach where a football club could take into account the needs of a public rail operator, but given that engineering work is shutting the line down on every other weekend I wonder what WHFC is supposed to do? Hold the match at a time when no fans can make it anyway? I'm not a football fan, but I have to side with West Ham on this occasion. If this was the only weekend when the District Line was closed then yes it would be irresponsible for the football to scheduled on a date the line was closed (iff notified sufficiently far in advance). Similarly if WHFC told TfL in September that they had arranged a match on a given weekend in April and TfL arranged a closure for that weekend in January then it would be irresponsible of TfL. Whilst I agree with the sentiments in favour of WHUFC, it's worth bearing in mind the a few points. Firstly, West Ham don't set the dates - the FA does. Secondly, this weekend's shutdown has been planned since Summer 2007 - well before this year's football fixtures have been set. It isn't like TfL have sprung these dates on anyone at the beginning of the football season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2009 21:37:01 GMT
[I wonder what WHFC is supposed to do? Hold the match at a time when no fans can make it anyway? Not apparently a problem if Sky TV request it !!!
|
|