|
Post by retep on Apr 30, 2011 18:27:23 GMT
I'm sure they have probably improved the door safety on 73ts Infact i'm not sure if it was mainly the 1973 tube stock which had incidences described below but it seems like it because of the stations these incidences happened at. The incidences: 1993 at Hounslow East. Elderly woman killed as she was dragged by the departing train with her coat caught in the doors. 1994 at Ealing Common. 73 year old man dragged along the platform as the train departed with his walking stick caught in the doors. 1997 at Holborn. 11 year old boy killed as he was dragged along the platform and into the tunnel with the toggle of his anorak trapped in the doors. A more disappointing fact is that a similar incident happened with a 95ts, i thought when those trains were made they had technology to stop this from happening. www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23753425-terrified-commuter-dragged-along-platform.do
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2011 20:14:00 GMT
A more disappointing fact is that a similar incident happened with a 95ts, i thought when those trains were made they had technology to stop this from happening. www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23753425-terrified-commuter-dragged-along-platform.do Well there is not really any technology involved in this case because its on a 95 stock, dosent have any of that gear. Since the strap of the bag is very soft, of course the interlock is not going to feel anything is there, that is virtually impossible. On the new 2009 stock there is "sensitive edge" that senses if there is any tiny obstruction between the doors.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2011 21:18:06 GMT
Retep, (without trying to sound like a backseat moderator) I really don't think your post should have been made.
I doubt there's anybody that actively participates and/or reads this site that doesn't know that the pilot light door proving has it's limitations.
All you're doing is giving the Evening Substandard petrol to pour on a magnesium fire... they will do anything to sensationalise things, just like the recent Jubilee Line broken shoebeam story. Which in itself is really a non-story. The media do read these forums..
There is a warning on the doors. "Obstructing the doors may be dangerous" - and it's quite obvious that getting something trapped in the doors may well be too, especially on platform side.
Unfortunately the limitations of the screen size and video quality make it impossible to check for this, especially in the peaks, where people will be right up to near the edges of the platform anyway. That's where sensitive edges come in on 09s and AIUI the S stock as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2011 22:21:25 GMT
I agree with Charlie here
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Apr 30, 2011 22:28:33 GMT
Retep, (without trying to sound like a backseat moderator) I really don't think your post should have been made. I doubt there's anybody that actively participates and/or reads this site that doesn't know that the pilot light door proving has it's limitations. All you're doing is giving the Evening Substandard petrol to pour on a magnesium fire... they will do anything to sensationalise things, just like the recent Jubilee Line broken shoebeam story. Which in itself is really a non-story. The media do read these forums.. There is a warning on the doors. "Obstructing the doors may be dangerous" - and it's quite obvious that getting something trapped in the doors may well be too, especially on platform side. Unfortunately the limitations of the screen size and video quality make it impossible to check for this, especially in the peaks, where people will be right up to near the edges of the platform anyway. That's where sensitive edges come in on 09s and AIUI the S stock as well. I take a different view, there is nothing wrong with Retep's posting which highlights unfortunate incidents except that his emphasis is wrong. It is impossible to protect people from their own actions all the time. It is a sad fact that people expect to be looked after even when they fail to use common sense and come to grief as a result. LUL has bent over backwards in so many ways to obviate needless accidents but passengers wilfully force themselves into potentially unsafe positions in the peaks and must be held responsible for their own actions. There is no need whatsoever for trains to be overcrowded or for platforms to be overcrowded, they become so because passengers in general are thoughtless individuals rushing hither and thither instead of planning their journeys with waiting time to allow for the congestion that inevitably occurs when thousands of passengers all decide to arrive at a station at the same time. I cannot understand how anyone can get caught in train doors on the outside of a train unless they were trying to force themselves into a packed one as the doors were closing. Common sense and patience are prerequisites for the commuter, lack of either is not the fault of LUL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2011 22:33:37 GMT
The people who get in the way of closing doors to let the world and his wife onboard are the ones causing the delays therefore creating overcrowding!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2011 19:43:46 GMT
The people who get in the way of closing doors to let the world and his wife onboard are the ones causing the delays therefore creating overcrowding! Yeah they'll soon begin squeaking when they get caught and go for a quick ride along the platform!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,429
|
Post by Chris M on May 1, 2011 19:56:43 GMT
The people who get in the way of closing doors to let the world and his wife onboard are the ones causing the delays therefore creating overcrowding! There are bright yellow notices now on the 09 stock doors that obstructing the doors causes delays so please keep belongings and clothing clear.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2011 20:00:56 GMT
Yet they still dont listen
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 1, 2011 20:41:12 GMT
Remember London gets a lot of tourists, not all of them speak english. Hell not even some holders of british passports speak english. If you don't know where you are and someone else is leading you, you'd try your hardest to stay with them, even if that meant chancing closing doors. Two incidences mentioned by retep in the original post are old people, add the one at Eastcote in the 90s. I'd suggest that these people possibly weren't taking undue risks, and that its possible they just took longer to get on the train then they thought they would. You'd hope an 11 year old boy would have been a bit more spritely, but panic can be the deciding factor.
I don't disagree with RT that the majority of people are just thoughtless, clearly they are; but overcrowding is caused first and foremost by underprovision and underfunding of transport facilities. Though delays of even a few seconds can exacerbate the problem. Put another way, if demand was half that which is experienced, held doors wouldn't necessarily have such an impact on timing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2011 20:49:51 GMT
No no, but if all trains ran on time I doubt we'd have as much crowding etc
|
|
|
Post by redsetter on May 1, 2011 21:04:23 GMT
it must have been a very traumatic experience for this poor man,many carry a rucksack and dont expect to have this happen.if he had been dragged along this would have been a lot more serious he could have been killed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2011 21:47:07 GMT
Remember London gets a lot of tourists, not all of them speak english. Hell not even some holders of british passports speak english. If you don't know where you are and someone else is leading you, you'd try your hardest to stay with them, even if that meant chancing closing doors. Two incidences mentioned by retep in the original post are old people, add the one at Eastcote in the 90s. I'd suggest that these people possibly weren't taking undue risks, and that its possible they just took longer to get on the train then they thought they would. You'd hope an 11 year old boy would have been a bit more spritely, but panic can be the deciding factor. Ah, I wondered what that sign at Eastcote was for, asking drivers to take care to let elderly people alight/board...
|
|
|
Post by edwin on May 2, 2011 1:46:55 GMT
It must be pretty difficult to get your clothes stuck in the door on the platform side... When the doors are closing it's people rushing to get ON, not off. Unless I suppose you realise you may miss you stop, but even then theres a very small window for the doors to slam shut and for you to get out but your clothes to be stuck in the doors. Sorry for being ghoulish, but can anyone else shed light on how these people ended up being dragged?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2011 6:00:40 GMT
it must have been a very traumatic experience for this poor man,many carry a rucksack and dont expect to have this happen.if he had been dragged along this would have been a lot more serious he could have been killed. Simple answer, carry the rucksack in your hand, don't stick over your shoulder. You’re going to work not attempting the difficult north face of the Eiger. People wearing rucksacks on their backs on public transport take up twice as much room as normal and are always obstructing doors because people forget they are that much bigger with them on. I agree with Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz; “Death’s too good for them”.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2011 6:36:41 GMT
Ok being serious I remember being told about the Holborn incident and the blame was put down to the 73s operating with platform monitors rather than in-cab CCTV. The TOp closed up, he got the “pilot”, as far as he could tell the kid was clear of the doors and once he was past the headwall he had no idea what was happening behind him.
I’ve not heard about the other incidents but when I tried Google all I could find was a comment left on the thisislondon.com page inked in the original post. Does anyone have any information that these happened or are we just going on the word of Douglas of Gerrards Cross?
The Standard is inaccurate at the best of times, the people who write to the Standard doubly so.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2011 8:12:27 GMT
Accidents happen, it's unfortunate but true. The same thing happens with buses and National Rail trains. Sometimes people die as a result of an unfortunate set of circumstances, mostly they are the authors of their own misfortune.
There are sections of the media that actively try to shock the public about all forms of life from "Bacon causes cancer" to "Paper. Are your children safe?" They carry adverts for ambulance chasing legal firms but are first to highlight when over-cautious authorities and public service companies bring in rules to minimise the threat of legal action. "Health and Safety gone mad".
We are talking about an industry that has very flimsy moral code (phone hacking, chasing famous people to their death, entrapment) and will happily sensationalize anything to sell copy. I really don't think we should be throwing scraps on their table.
|
|
|
Post by singaporesam on May 2, 2011 12:02:59 GMT
LUL already has some of the most sensitive doors in metros around the world. so a solution to stop incidents is rather difficult to find. Its not cost, its just nearly impossible to do. Door dragging incidents are probably the single largest cause of fatalities on trains worldwide, such an incident is the only blemish on the Shinkansen's otherwise impeccable record search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20010308a4.html. Even retrofitting PEDs is not necessarilly a solution as the July 2007 Shanghai incident showed. The system on the 09 TS might slow down the rate compared to the rest of LUL a bit, but my experience of sensitive edges is that they can't be too sensitive so its only a matter of time before one happens on those too, you can't stop this type of incident, only improve the occurrence rate, there will always be some.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2011 15:28:45 GMT
Putting passenger useable Emergency Stop Buttons on the platforms will be a good idea to help - They were tried with great success on the Victoria Line, and subsequently introduced onto the Central Line in around 1992. Even the Hong Kong Metro has them these days - maybe it's a good idea to fit them to the Jubilee line, now that has ATO on it....
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on May 2, 2011 15:47:13 GMT
Putting passenger useable Emergency Stop Buttons on the platforms will be a good idea to help - They were tried with great success on the Victoria Line, and subsequently introduced onto the Central Line in around 1992. Even the Hong Kong Metro has them these days - maybe it's a good idea to fit them to the Jubilee line, now that has ATO on it.... All these buttons do is ring a bell! Originally on the Vic they stopped the train from moving or brought it to a halt if moving but that was altered years ago as a result of 'abuse'! Thus nowadays pushing such a button relies upon someone else noting the alarm and acting upon it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2011 21:43:59 GMT
Really? I thought that the button would bring the train to hault as they are only on the ATO lines just incase the driver isnt paying as much attention to whats ahead than on a manual line.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,101
|
Post by Tom on May 3, 2011 0:06:55 GMT
Putting passenger useable Emergency Stop Buttons on the platforms will be a good idea to help - They were tried with great success on the Victoria Line, and subsequently introduced onto the Central Line in around 1992. Even the Hong Kong Metro has them these days - maybe it's a good idea to fit them to the Jubilee line, now that has ATO on it.... All these buttons do is ring a bell! Originally on the Vic they stopped the train from moving or brought it to a halt if moving but that was altered years ago as a result of 'abuse'! No it wasn't - they still take the code off the platform track circuits and those on the approach and departure side! A lot of the bells however were subject to 'abuse' by staff, either disappearing or being relocated without anyone being told. The one at the top of the Escalators at King's Cross was one in mind, nobody heard it ring for years until after the ops room moved from there to outside the gateline! LUL already has some of the most sensitive doors in metros around the world. so a solution to stop incidents is rather difficult to find. Its not cost, its just nearly impossible to do. As singaporesam points out, it's nearly impossible. This is a good example of the ALARP principle in action. Sensitive edges and the like lower the risk (in terms of frequency) of a dragging incident. It doesn't completely remove the chance, but to do more to further reduce the risk is prohibitively expensive compared to the benefits doing the work would bring. Hence the risk is considered to be reduced to a level As Low As Reasonably Practicable.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on May 3, 2011 1:15:09 GMT
All these buttons do is ring a bell! Originally on the Vic they stopped the train from moving or brought it to a halt if moving but that was altered years ago as a result of 'abuse'! No it wasn't - they still take the code off the platform track circuits and those on the approach and departure side! A lot of the bells however were subject to 'abuse' by staff, either disappearing or being relocated without anyone being told. The one at the top of the Escalators at King's Cross was one in mind, nobody heard it ring for years until after the ops room moved from there to outside the gateline! This is interesting, I was told years ago that the platform code destroyer yellow buttons function had been altered such that they did not remove the code and simply rung a bell. In fact I'm sure I recall that at some sites the platform buttons were actually blanked with aluminium plates to prevent them being pressed too although I might simply be thinking of the OMO kit on sub surface platforms. King's Cross is a site that I recall as I installed most of the ops room kit following the fire. I recall the Westinghouse case in the UMC that contained a battery charger as the PSU, original Vic line kit for the code destroyers I believe. AFAIK the bell was never relocated and was outside the ops room high on the wall above ops room door and false ceiling although I might be thinking of another bell. Lots of original Vic line kit disappeared or was abused over the years. I recovered all the platform PIPs, original PA systems control relays and 8 track cartridge players except where it was near impossible to do so due to the ridiculously cluttered cupboard CERS. AFAIR some of the PA kit is still extant boxed into the platform facings with subsequent station refurbishment. Station staff were very fond of silencing bells with home made 'wedges' of rolled up traffic circular, newspaper or similar material and silencing BBMS loudspeakers with cash bags and rubber bands! Some may recall the original OMO kit that was extant on the Met and District platforms that gradually disappeared over the years, the yellow buttons on the platforms which were all plated over before I began my LT career and the yellow signal heads with diamond backboards covered with sacking. AFAIR these signal heads would alert drivers that someone had pressed a panic button and a bell would ring on the platform too but they were never used because the unions weren't having OMO!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2011 3:23:37 GMT
I can only speak for the Central but the “code busters” still work. If CCTV fails and we need station staff to monitor the departing train they use them to stop us if there’s a problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2011 9:52:27 GMT
I seem to remember a while ago someone being caught in the doors of a 95 at Euston. The driver got really annoyed and cut out the csde mcb. He then drove a short distance down the platform, stopped opened the door again and then carried on as normal.. I bet she never did that again!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2011 19:29:27 GMT
In Victoria Line Stations, you'll often see Emergency Stop Buttons provided for Staff Use, in the control room or ticket hall, they are often mounted on a 45degree angled box on the control desk etc, with one button for each platform face.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on May 3, 2011 22:54:14 GMT
In Victoria Line Stations, you'll often see Emergency Stop Buttons provided for Staff Use, in the control room or ticket hall, they are often mounted on a 45degree angled box on the control desk etc, with one button for each platform face. Yes the ops room has Code Destroyer Plungers but it also has Tunnel Telephone Plungers which usually look no different, both being Craig & Derricot plungers. However, other lines also have emergency T/T plungers in the ops rooms, for instance there are/were eight at Leicester Square.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2011 5:27:02 GMT
I seem to remember a while ago someone being caught in the doors of a 95 at Euston. The driver got really annoyed and cut out the csde mcb. He then drove a short distance down the platform, stopped opened the door again and then carried on as normal.. I bet she never did that again! Bet the TOp never did that again either, that's a dead cert for a P45 if it was reported.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2011 1:26:10 GMT
There is no need whatsoever for trains to be overcrowded or for platforms to be overcrowded, they become so because passengers in general are thoughtless individuals rushing hither and thither instead of planning their journeys with waiting time to allow for the congestion that inevitably occurs when thousands of passengers all decide to arrive at a station at the same time. I cannot understand how anyone can get caught in train doors on the outside of a train unless they were trying to force themselves into a packed one as the doors were closing. Common sense and patience are prerequisites for the commuter, lack of either is not the fault of LUL. This was quite a jaw-dropping pair of paragraphs! Describing passengers in general as "thoughtless individuals" just because we need to (and indeed pay to) use public transport at peak times? That seems to suggest the vast majority of people who start their daily work schedule at around the same time are somehow supposed to find a magic moment when things aren't incredibly busy in the rush hour. Unless those thousands of passengers are to be issued with some WTT to help spread themselves out across a time period I'm not at all following how we are supposed to plan as you suggest! If it is true that there is "no need whatsoever" for platforms to be overcrowded then it's probably worth a reminder that passengers often can't tell the situation until getting to the bottom of the escalator or stairs. In some stations there is, at that point, little or no way to go back upstairs again without first entering the platform and so there would be no way to avoid adding to the crowd. Controlling flow of passengers at ticket hall level is surely the only practical way and that is something *only* the staff can do. Now to address the second paragraph - as I was boarding a train a couple of weeks ago a number of people entered the carriage ahead of me. There was clearly still space inside, but just after I had entered I was pushed backwards by several tourists trying to get out (I won't blame them for this - they were clearly unfamiliar with the system). I found myself in the situation of stepping back through the doors just as the warning beeps started and I was then faced with a very fast choice to make of getting out or trying to stay on. The doors closed quickly with me mostly outside and - mercifully - opened again. Of course then the tourists still wanted to get out so I just stepped back and, giving myself time to recover from the sudden and scary moment, let them through and watched the train go without me. I shudder to think that it might be considered ok to "drive on a bit", or for anyone to punish or blame me in some way for reacting to a situation like that - and on behalf of the many who will have been in such a position but not have read your post here's something that I thought would be considered "common sense": the person stuck in the doors isn't always being an idiot!
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on May 6, 2011 3:11:33 GMT
There is no need whatsoever for trains to be overcrowded or for platforms to be overcrowded, they become so because passengers in general are thoughtless individuals rushing hither and thither instead of planning their journeys with waiting time to allow for the congestion that inevitably occurs when thousands of passengers all decide to arrive at a station at the same time. I cannot understand how anyone can get caught in train doors on the outside of a train unless they were trying to force themselves into a packed one as the doors were closing. Common sense and patience are prerequisites for the commuter, lack of either is not the fault of LUL. This was quite a jaw-dropping pair of paragraphs! Describing passengers in general as "thoughtless individuals" just because we need to (and indeed pay to) use public transport at peak times? That seems to suggest the vast majority of people who start their daily work schedule at around the same time are somehow supposed to find a magic moment when things aren't incredibly busy in the rush hour. Unless those thousands of passengers are to be issued with some WTT to help spread themselves out across a time period I'm not at all following how we are supposed to plan as you suggest! If it is true that there is "no need whatsoever" for platforms to be overcrowded then it's probably worth a reminder that passengers often can't tell the situation until getting to the bottom of the escalator or stairs. In some stations there is, at that point, little or no way to go back upstairs again without first entering the platform and so there would be no way to avoid adding to the crowd. Controlling flow of passengers at ticket hall level is surely the only practical way and that is something *only* the staff can do. Now to address the second paragraph - as I was boarding a train a couple of weeks ago a number of people entered the carriage ahead of me. There was clearly still space inside, but just after I had entered I was pushed backwards by several tourists trying to get out (I won't blame them for this - they were clearly unfamiliar with the system). I found myself in the situation of stepping back through the doors just as the warning beeps started and I was then faced with a very fast choice to make of getting out or trying to stay on. The doors closed quickly with me mostly outside and - mercifully - opened again. Of course then the tourists still wanted to get out so I just stepped back and, giving myself time to recover from the sudden and scary moment, let them through and watched the train go without me. I shudder to think that it might be considered ok to "drive on a bit", or for anyone to punish or blame me in some way for reacting to a situation like that - and on behalf of the many who will have been in such a position but not have read your post here's something that I thought would be considered "common sense": the person stuck in the doors isn't always being an idiot! There is so much I might say here, however, let the passengers off first should ring a bell. Instead of rushing about like headless chickens passengers should leave plenty of time for their journeys!
|
|