|
Post by uzairjubilee on Jan 4, 2009 16:50:19 GMT
I agree with you adw. Why does every train 'have' to be going to Wimbledon just because it is on the Wimbledon branch. My dad wont change his mind if he is disappointed by something
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Jan 4, 2009 17:03:13 GMT
I'm sure that would have meant a new underground link to connect with the "main" Piccadilly west of Earls Court. Also, would a District Uxbridge branch have continued on to Upminster? In such a scenario, I feel that the Richmond branch would be in the best position to provide service along the western half of the Circle to Edgware Rd. Yes that would have required a branch at Earls Ct to link Fulham Broadway etc onto the Piccadilly. The District might have run Uxbridge-Tower and Richmond-Upminster & Ealing - Upminster (giving Turnham Green moaners residents an extra 6tph). Casualties: slower journeys for Uxbridge folk and no Wimblewares
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2009 17:54:43 GMT
The Uxbridge lot would have used (and do) the faster Met service.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 4, 2009 20:09:07 GMT
Other places that spring to mind where it is a possibility are Leytonstone w/b, Wembley Park s/b. Harrow on the Hill ? Did you mean Wembley Park N/B? If two southbound trains were to leave simultaneously towards the same destination, there would be a bit of a crunching sound of two A-stocks becoming one ;D I can agree with aspect about the HOTH service. A southbound fast and slow will arrive in the platform at the same time. The slow wil usually set off first, to be overtaken at Northwick Park by the fast. Regrettably because of signalling the fast will be held outside Wembley Park to let the same slow in first! If the fast is either due through Wembley first in the timetable or is some way ahead of a late-running local, then it will be signalled through Wembley Park. There are a surprising number of southbound fast trains in the current timetable, which are given additional running time from Harrow to Wembley and this can quite often mean a fast arrives at the home signals some 3 minutes early. The signalling does restrict fast trains being brought into Wembley if a train on platform 5 already has the starter cleared.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2009 20:14:42 GMT
I don't know any locations with the same set up as Earls Court. Most stations that have multiple platforms have the tracks converge straight out of the platform, so one is held in the platform. To wimbledon, both trains can leave the platforms only for one to be held shortly afterwards!
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jan 4, 2009 20:59:12 GMT
I don't know if this is a stupid suggestion or not, but at Acton Town you could (and as has happened in the past in my experience) have two Heathrow branch trains leaving from the local and fast WB platforms, and I suppose you could have an ex-Rayners and ex-Heathrow in the EB which would mean one left before the other.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 4, 2009 21:36:17 GMT
I don't know if this is a stupid suggestion or not, but at Acton Town you could (and as has happened in the past in my experience) have two Heathrow branch trains leaving from the local and fast WB platforms, and I suppose you could have an ex-Rayners and ex-Heathrow in the EB which would mean one left before the other. But there are two WB tracks on the Heathrow branch as far as Northfields, and all EB Piccadilly trains normally use the fast platform at Acton Town.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2009 22:20:53 GMT
EB Piccadilly trains normally use the fast platform at Acton Town. If only! They are often to be found sitting in the E/B local platform holding up the District!
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 4, 2009 23:01:48 GMT
If only! They are often to be found sitting in the E/B local platform holding up the District! I've never seen a Piccadilly in the EB local, I thought they only delayed District trains when going WB.
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Jan 4, 2009 23:22:44 GMT
If only! They are often to be found sitting in the E/B local platform holding up the District! I've never seen a Piccadilly in the EB local, I thought they only delayed District trains when going WB. If only!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 4, 2009 23:34:14 GMT
Funny you should mention that. Was at Acton not too long back when two piccs were terminating, one in each eastbound.
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Jan 5, 2009 1:18:28 GMT
EB Piccadilly trains normally use the fast platform at Acton Town. If only! They are often to be found sitting in the E/B local platform holding up the District! Trains are routed in the best interests of the overall service by the Service Operator, even if the timetable is different. If one then sits down in the platform, saying owing to a crew relief problem, then this is an issue for the Duty Manager (Trains). The easiest way round it is to "stock and crew" reform the train, so that the one without a Train Operator is now in the Fast platform. It is quite common to send Heathrow trains via the Local lines, both timetabled and ad-hoc.. It is also possible for a train to leave the westbound platform(s) first, then be held at the Advance Starter for the other to pass, if headed to Ealing Common.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 5, 2009 2:20:22 GMT
I don't know any locations with the same set up as Earls Court. Most stations that have multiple platforms have the tracks converge straight out of the platform, so one is held in the platform. To wimbledon, both trains can leave the platforms only for one to be held shortly afterwards! As Aspect posted earlier: Other places that spring to mind where it is a possibility are Leytonstone w/b, Wembley Park s/b. Harrow on the Hill ? Ignoring things like two Piccadilly line trains one on the fast and one on the local at various locations ! I don't know about the track layout at Wembley and Harrow, but at Leystone it is perfectly possible for a westbound from platform 1 to leave before one from platform 2 (or vice versa) only to be held at the signal protecting the convergence while the one that departed second overtakes it.
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Jan 5, 2009 15:10:52 GMT
I don't know about the track layout at Wembley and Harrow, but at Leystone it is perfectly possible for a westbound from platform 1 to leave before one from platform 2 (or vice versa) only to be held at the signal protecting the convergence while the one that departed second overtakes it. And I've seen it happen...
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 5, 2009 19:16:41 GMT
It is quite common to send Heathrow trains via the Local lines, both timetabled and ad-hoc. But doesn't that only happen WB, as the EB local beteen Northfields and Acton Town is used as a test track?
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Jan 5, 2009 19:34:32 GMT
It is quite common to send Heathrow trains via the Local lines, both timetabled and ad-hoc. But doesn't that only happen WB, as the EB local beteen Northfields and Acton Town is used as a test track? Very rarely used as a test track. There are a few timetabled trains though each day to run via the EBLL. Its mainly used when trains come back from Heathrow in the wrong order. It's not as common as on the westbound, as it has to be done in Push Button mode, at Northfields and Acton Town.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2009 22:30:34 GMT
Trains are routed in the best interests of the overall service by the Service Operator, even if the timetable is different. Trains are routed in the best interests of the Piccadilly Line overall service by the Service Operator, even if the timetable is different If one then sits down in the platform, saying owing to a crew relief problem, then this is an issue for the Duty Manager (Trains). The easiest way round it is to "stock and crew" reform the train, so that the one without a Train Operator is now in the Fast platform. The Piccadilly Line DMT is not remotely concerned if one of his trains is sitting down in the local and only delaying District Line trains. With the note that I truely hate to quibble with your emminent self Upfast. It is extreemly difficult to justify to our passengers why, the Piccadilly Line train we have been running next to is put in the local when the fast is empty, only for another to go past into the fast and sometimes yet another comes by into the local .... and then sits down !!! The District Controllers are often pulling their hair out at the "antics" at Acton Town !! Plus i notice Acton Town tip out's (e/b) invariably get dumped in the local, blocking the District .. coincidence ... i doubt it ! However I would conceed my personal experiences have been better in the last month or two, thankfully I mostly do Richmond and Wimbledon runs !!
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Jan 6, 2009 5:35:00 GMT
Trains are routed in the best interests of the overall service by the Service Operator, even if the timetable is different. Trains are routed in the best interests of the Piccadilly Line overall service by the Service Operator, even if the timetable is different Aspect that is not quite right. Both lines ask for priority over the other. Many people take no notice and carry on doing the best for all the passengers. What you may well experience is that trains on the WBFL have their route called before those on the Local when the Programme Machine is in First Come First Served (90% of the time). This is simply as trains top at Chiswick Park on the Local, but not the Fast! If one then sits down in the platform, saying owing to a crew relief problem, then this is an issue for the Duty Manager (Trains). The easiest way round it is to "stock and crew" reform the train, so that the one without a Train Operator is now in the Fast platform. The Piccadilly Line DMT is not remotely concerned if one of his trains is sitting down in the local and only delaying District Line trains. With the note that I truely hate to quibble with your emminent self Upfast. It is extreemly difficult to justify to our passengers why, the Piccadilly Line train we have been running next to is put in the local when the fast is empty, only for another to go past into the fast and sometimes yet another comes by into the local .... and then sits down !!! The District Controllers are often pulling their hair out at the "antics" at Acton Town !! Plus i notice Acton Town tip out's (e/b) invariably get dumped in the local, blocking the District .. coincidence ... i doubt it ! However I would conceed my personal experiences have been better in the last month or two, thankfully I mostly do Richmond and Wimbledon runs !![/quote] Well. Regarding the westbound, there are many more Piccadilly line trains than District. If there is blocking back, then the Local will be used. Regarding the eastbound, the Local platform is used when you can't get the Picc into the fast due to a train sitting down there. Either way the District will be stuck, be it at Ealing Common or behind. Sometimes, when there are sit downs, or you know that the Picc train that could be put into the Local will not move due to say, no crew relief, the District controller "will moan". So either way, you can't win! As to the District Controllers pulling their hair out. They might look at getting their own house in order first! Anyway, Aspect. I still don't think I have seen you come up and visit to see and understand how the equipment works. Maybe this could help with an explanation to the passengers. Happy Bunny of this parish has been up to have a look! Also, just to add that diverting a train isn't quite as quick or simple as pressing one button. Programme Machines need to be put into Push Button mode, numbers have to be cancelled off and extra trained. So it's not done just willy nilly!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2009 13:35:00 GMT
The same could be said of the Circle and Northern Lines, but spliting them removes flexibility. I am against a split in the Northern Line. Isn't the Wimbleware service shown separately on the LU map including at Earls Court? It doesn't remove flexibility as long as staff are kept trained for both lines. If the Northern Line was split you could still keep the same trains, same staff, and even 'unsplit' it in case of problems. Just like the Piccadilly can use the Jubilee and the Piccadilly can use the District line tracks if needed. In the end line names are just brands to make things clearer to the public that don't necessarily lead to big changes internally.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 6, 2009 17:10:37 GMT
...as long as the staff are trained on both lines, they keep the trains etc! Why not leave it as it is! I think the Northern line works well, with ATO it will hopefully run more frequently. The line is split off peak and is re combined in the peak.
|
|
|
Post by happybunny on Jan 6, 2009 18:19:48 GMT
Happy Bunny of this parish has been up to have a look! I have I have.... and it was an eye opener... these days when I am held for no (apparent) reason instead of announcing "the signal man is delaying this train" I say "sorry for the delay the District line runs on equipment that is 50years old and the signal cabin at Earls court is understaffed" (because there doing a fiddle ) Seriously now, I know there are many many problems with the program machines and personally if I was in charge of LUL rather than spending millions on painting stations I would have invested in track, and upgrading signalling and associated equipment ! They don't seem to be doing anything about it! Oh and I would build an extra platform juts for Districts at Acton
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2009 18:45:07 GMT
Oh and I would build an extra platform juts for Districts at Acton There is an extra platform just for Districts at Acton - the old South Acton branch platform!
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 6, 2009 20:02:28 GMT
Just like the Piccadilly can use the Jubilee By coming from Uxbridge, then using the Met from Rayners Lane to Wembley Park, and going on to the Jubilee there? The problem with that is there is no connection at Green Park to get back on to the Picc!!! (I know you meant the Met, and also I hope I haven't started a 'connect the Aldwych Branch to Charing Cross Jubilee line platforms' discussion)!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2009 21:28:20 GMT
Oh and I would build an extra platform juts for Districts at Acton There is an extra platform just for Districts at Acton - the old South Acton branch platform! Unfortunatly it's a bit short for a six car D stock train
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 6, 2009 23:35:21 GMT
How easy would it be to extend platform 5? Say for either a 6car D or a 3 car 313?...
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 6, 2009 23:57:42 GMT
How would you get the 313/378 there?
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 7, 2009 0:04:16 GMT
Rebuild the chord over Bollo Lane. I have a cunning plan!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2009 11:42:24 GMT
...as long as the staff are trained on both lines, they keep the trains etc! Why not leave it as it is! I think the Northern line works well, with ATO it will hopefully run more frequently. The line is split off peak and is re combined in the peak. Because it would create more capacity and less delays... And it'x exactly in the peak that the line is most prone to delays. I think those are pretty good reasons to do it. Of course ATO and resignalling can help with this as well, but if problems persist I think splitting would be a good option, or should at least be considered.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jan 7, 2009 15:31:48 GMT
....And splitting the Northern would reduce congestion at Camden Town. If (say) all ex-Barnet trains went via Charing X and ex-Edgware ones via Bank (or vice-versa,it doesn't matter for the purposes of my argument,though it might matter "on the ground") then you wouldn't have people like me hovering in front of the display at the foot of the escalators,waiting to see which S/B platform the next Bank train will arrive at. It always seemed to me to be a design fault at Camden that,when they remodelled it in the '20s,they didn't arrange the tunnels so that one S/B platform took all Bank trains,and the other,all CX trains.Presumably there is a geographical reason why they didn't? Splitting the service would achieve this,for only a moderate loss of journey flexibility.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jan 7, 2009 15:38:08 GMT
Rebuild the chord over Bollo Lane. I have a cunning plan! Pray tell!! Are we talking an "Outer Circle"-type cunning plan,or perhaps a "London Overground to take over the Uxbridge Service"-type cunning plan?? .....Or a plan yet more cunning than these??
|
|