|
Post by jimmysbow on Aug 6, 2008 16:21:18 GMT
Hello to all group members I am currently building a model of a rake of Q stock in 4mm. Can you help me out with the following please?: I have read that towards the end of their careers some Q23 Motor cars were converted to trailer cars to replace Q38 cars that had been taken away for conversion to R Stock.Does anyone know what modification works were carried out to these cars,were the driving end windows blanked off?. Are there any photos of these modified cars in service ? What were the running numbers of the converted cars? Thanks in advance John
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Aug 7, 2008 15:08:36 GMT
The driving windows were not covered - not even the drivers' doors converted, just locked out and seats put in the space. J door was removed. Motors were removed but how much else below the solebar was changed would need a greater expert than I. There are VIDEOs of them in service - particularly "Q stock remembered". They come up regularly on ebay at reasonable prices (usually). For converted running numbers you'll need a VERY patient member to list them- or get hold of one of the usual reference books like an old Ian Allen 'ABC of London railways', again from ebay. jsp3970 had a website (geocities) with all you needed on it: www.geocities.com/jsp3970/LUindex but I've just tried it and it's dead, whether temporary or permanent I know not.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Aug 7, 2008 15:30:24 GMT
To get you going, I've scanned a page which might help. Find it : HERE(If you click on the pic to enlarge it, it becomes quite legible)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2008 19:52:31 GMT
The 14 converted Q23 motors to trailers were numbered 08835-08848. They were done at Acton 1958-60.
Previous numbers respectively 4140, 4142, 4151, 4153, 4154, 4155, 4156, 4157, 4159, 4163, 4165, 4169, 4171 and 4183.
They were among the first Q Stock to be scrapped (apart from the WW2 damaged ones and the two South Acton cars) in 1964-66.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2008 4:16:48 GMT
jsp3970 had a website (geocities) with all you needed on it: www.geocities.com/jsp3970/LUindex but I've just tried it and it's dead, whether temporary or permanent I know not. Huh! Strange it is dead! I don't know why! I will try to fix it EDIT: Ok fixed it, its working now. I caused the error when I moved a file, didn't know I had done it. Sorry for that.
|
|
|
Post by jimmysbow on Aug 8, 2008 15:32:38 GMT
Hello Phil,Reg and JSP Many thanks for taking the time to help me out. That is just the info i was after Cheers John
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 9, 2008 0:09:05 GMT
I would also like to add the the Q23 trailers probably had the leading A2 motor bogie replaced by a K2 trailing bogie.
What models are you using jimmysbow?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Aug 9, 2008 7:39:47 GMT
I would also like to add the the Q23 trailers probably had the leading A2 motor bogie replaced by a K2 trailing bogie. You would have to get a photo of individual cars to confirm this as most ex-motor car trailers kept their motor bogies (minus equipment).
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 9, 2008 10:28:24 GMT
Did they?! There would have been quite a lot of K2 bogies left over from the Circle stock (unless they were used on the remaining Dreadnoughts and T stock trailers)?
Not being alive at the time I would go with Tubeprune (as always!).
|
|
|
Post by jimmysbow on Aug 11, 2008 17:23:50 GMT
I would also like to add the the Q23 trailers probably had the leading A2 motor bogie replaced by a K2 trailing bogie. What models are you using jimmysbow? Hi Metman I am having a crack at scratchbuilding a Q35 trailer at present (will post some photos when i have something reasonable to show)and have plans to build a couple of Q23 cars after that.I also have enough unbuilt kits to keep me going for the next decade at least.I particually like the old harrow whitemetal kits and have a 5 car rake of F stock to build and a 4 car rake of Q38 stock(which may yet emerge from the works as R stock).Have returned to modelling after about a decade away (work and life got in the way!) and have managed to liberate a 15' X 12' attic to build a layout in although it needs some work to make it habitable first. I got interested in LT railways when in the early 1990's i was a member of the Weston Railway modellers and we exibited an em guage BR/LT layout called Grove Park.It had a 4 car rake of Harrow F stock running on it and it didn't only look right but it thundered into the station and it sounded right! The next thing i am thinking about is a prototype to model for the attic layout i also have a couple of 501's in the to-do box so somewhere where the North London line and LT meet perhaps,Gunnersby looks quite interesting. I like the look of your Harrow project do you have anymore photos?How do you find the Radley models resin cast models to build compared to the older whitemetal kits Cheers John
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 11, 2008 18:22:09 GMT
Hi John, glad you like the stuff, you should see the stuff I'm working on at the moment! The Radley Models kits are great! The Resin stuff is so much easier than the metal kits. Firstly they are lighter, so your train doesn't strain. Secondly, it goes together better and can be cut and converted easier!
As far as Q stock goes: Radley and the Little Bus Company make Q23, Q27 and Q31/35 stock! They are cheap too! I was thinking of producing a Q35 DM as a one off limited ed!
As far as R stock is concerned-there is now a model of an R stock trailer, which those who know their stuff should really be an NDM. I'll try and get that changed. You can use two of the Q38 motors as R38 and use the rest as either O/P or Q38 stock.
Gunnersbury would be a great layout! All the District stock is available including A, B, C, D, E, F ,G(Q23), K(Q27), L/M/N (Q31-35) trailers, O, P, Q38, R38/47, C69. DC kits do a 501 and No Nonsense Kits make class 507 and 508s!
I'm hoping to put a sneek peek on the site soon......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2008 21:03:30 GMT
Whilst on the subject, in order to backdate the Radley models Acton shuttle car to a DM is all that is required merely filling in the cab windows in one end or am I being completely optimistic?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 25, 2008 21:16:25 GMT
......and removing the single head and tail lights!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2008 21:55:20 GMT
Sounds like my sort of conversion.... Thanks!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2008 22:00:01 GMT
By the way Jimmysbow, I can vouch for the ease at which the Radley models kits can be built. On the two battery locos I have built it took longer to remove the cast resin handrails and replace them with wire than it took to built the rest of the kit in its entireity! Would love to see some pics when you have finished. When I've figured out how I'll post pics of some of my stuff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2008 22:11:40 GMT
Having done what any studious modeller should do and studied the photographs/film available, am I right in thinking that the Acton Shuttle cars had a unique arrangement of marker lights on the supposedly unmodified end? From what I have seen they appear to have a pair of markers each side of the front end as opposed to having all four under the non-driving side as per every picture of a G/Q23 DM I've seen?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2008 22:36:45 GMT
Having looked AGAIN at the pics I have it would appear that some, if not all, G/Q23 DMs have had the lights modified at some point as there appears to be a patch over the area under the Driver's window where the Acton Shuttle had its markers.
Also, is it just me or have the powers that be at Covent Garden made most of the railway exhibits IMPOSSIBLE to photograph?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 8, 2008 22:57:19 GMT
Its weird the arrangment of shutters yes! Maybe tubeprune can explain why some Q23s had lights on the on side and some didn't?
The Acton shuttles will vary of course-4067 was a D end unit so its pipe layout will be different to 4076 which was an A end unit (Simply-4067 will have the pipes at the far ends of the car sides [at the leading end] and 4076 will have them close to the M door!).
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Sept 9, 2008 8:30:38 GMT
Its weird the arrangment of shutters yes! Maybe tubeprune can explain why some Q23s had lights on the on side and some didn't? The marker lights were moved from the driver's side to the other side of "M" door when the cars were fitted with e.p brakes in 1938-9 as part of the Q Stock conversion programme. This was necessary to accommodate the new e.p. brake controller in the cab. There is a patch where the lights were originally located. Some cars didn't have the patch because they were turned from EB to WB motors in 1939 during the Q Stock conversion programme. The S Acton shuttle cars were not converted to e.p. brakes and retained the original arrangement at the original driving end. At the converted trailing end, they had a single headlight and tail light.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2008 21:36:52 GMT
Thanks for the gen metman and tubeprune. I guess I am going to have to be v-e-r-y careful with a scalpel blade in removing them from the moulding under the drivers window in order to re-use them under the non-drivers window! Excellent info re siting of air pipes depending on which way round the car was. The puzzle is why, on the one that I have a picture of the rebuilt end, the pipes were place directly in front of the new head/tail light! No-one to get in the way twixt Acton Town and South Acton then? Fab feedback as always. Thanks again.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 9, 2008 23:17:26 GMT
I believe there actually two versions of the Acton Shuttle available. Might be best to do unit 4067 then.....
Thanks Tubeprune I didn't know why the shutters were moved either!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2008 9:15:13 GMT
Good point but I will be replacing the moulded air pipes anyway. Another question, are LBC kits of surface stock the best kept secret in the London Transport modelling world? It's only since I ordered the Acton shuttle car that I found out that LDC have done kits of all of the 'Q' stock I will ever need including the Q23 DM that I am making out of the Acton Shuttle. The other obvious question is, are they any good? Has anyone made any and do you have pictures perchance?
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 10, 2008 14:49:04 GMT
Ordered one once and the curve in the bodywork would have put a banana to shame.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2008 15:16:41 GMT
Could it be cured with the hot water method?
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 10, 2008 15:27:15 GMT
Don't know, I sent it back and gave up kitbuilding forever. There are too many people out there who build up your hopes, relieve you of a lot of cash, and then send back a box of rubbish in exchange. Things are better now than they used to be, but not better enough to tempt me back.
[Not just my own view, recent editorial in Model Rail magazine pretty much expressed the same sentiment.]
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 11, 2008 7:22:55 GMT
There are some bowed kits around, and the LBC Q stock come with the wrong bogies. All 3 models come with A2 motor bogies when the Q35 trailer should have two K2 trailing bogies and the Q23/27 should have one! I'm working on correcting this oversite!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2008 22:27:57 GMT
By correcting does this mean we'll soon have a new lot of 'Q' stock kits to try and fund the ordering of? Between you and Hornby it seems that I will end up bankrupt, divorced or both! Seriously, thanks for your hard work.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 11, 2008 23:15:59 GMT
Sadly not! Basically, I want to design a new 'proper' trailing bogie for the LBC Q stock that Radley models sell! The Q23 and 27 stock should have one at the trailing end and the Q35 trailer should have two. They will have drop in wheels and hence will not need bearings. Photo of a mock up here: i100.photobucket.com/albums/m6/Adthelad/K2bogiemockup.jpg
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2008 10:41:32 GMT
Looks good. Will it be made available as a 'spare' item or will they just be available for the complete kits?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 12, 2008 16:49:44 GMT
They should be available as a spare item. K2 bogies were very successful in the 50 or so years of use especially as they had double brake blocks. They started on the reconditioned B stock and were provided from new on the G-N stocks. As the B stock was scrapped they were added to the C/D/E stock, and the Mets Dreadnoughts and Circle saloon stock. For my layout, I am actually providing all my dreadnoughts and Circle stock with K2 bogies!
|
|