Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2008 12:35:41 GMT
I noticed that the 'Smile' panelling is being removed from this passage as part of the Northern Ticket Hall works. Between the Victoria and Picc lines, at least some of the tunnel segments are date-stamped 1968 or 1966.
The passage wasn't built until 1980/1 - I remember the bridges over the Victoria line going in. These segments and tunnel section are therefore not part of the original construction of the Vic, but why were they hanging around for 10 or more years before being used - is/was there a EEC Segment Mountain somewhere?!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2008 6:18:00 GMT
Perhaps some of the tunnel was built as an access or ventilation shaft when the Vic was built?
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Oct 9, 2008 22:54:41 GMT
At a tangent,perhaps,but this reminds me of a "theory" I once heard,that some of the Victoria Line alignment was built using pre-existing tunnels constructed as part of some wartime/cold war government works,which dictated the route during the protracted planning process,and explains the alternating concrete/iron sections along the line. Years ago,I met an LCC civil engineering draughtsman,seconded to LT Victoria Line planning in the '60s,and took the opportunity to ask him about this "theory"......he went quiet and refused to talk about it. Can anyone throw any light n this story,or is it just an urban myth? Slugabed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2008 23:30:17 GMT
At a tangent,perhaps,but this reminds me of a "theory" I once heard,that some of the Victoria Line alignment was built using pre-existing tunnels constructed as part of some wartime/cold war government works,which dictated the route during the protracted planning process,and explains the alternating concrete/iron sections along the line. Years ago,I met an LCC civil engineering draughtsman,seconded to LT Victoria Line planning in the '60s,and took the opportunity to ask him about this "theory"......he went quiet and refused to talk about it. Can anyone throw any light n this story,or is it just an urban myth? Slugabed In some 50 years of reading about LT, I have never seen this mentioned. Of course, to a committed conspiracy theorist, the lack of evidence merely proves the conspiracy.... The official story is that LT wanted to test different methods of building tube tunnels. In 1959, the Government approved construction of one mile of twin tube tunnel between Finsbury Park and S Tottenham, on the alignment approved by Parliament in 1955. The section from Manor House to Tottenham was lined with cast iron, but using a new method of construction. From Manor House to Finsbury Park pre-cast concrete was used for lining, in various thicknesses.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 9, 2008 23:54:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JR 15secs on Oct 10, 2008 12:47:39 GMT
At a tangent,perhaps,but this reminds me of a "theory" I once heard,that some of the Victoria Line alignment was built using pre-existing tunnels constructed as part of some wartime/cold war government works,which dictated the route during the protracted planning process,and explains the alternating concrete/iron sections along the line. Years ago,I met an LCC civil engineering draughtsman,seconded to LT Victoria Line planning in the '60s,and took the opportunity to ask him about this "theory"......he went quiet and refused to talk about it. Can anyone throw any light n this story,or is it just an urban myth? Slugabed If you believe all the rumours the Vic line has a non public station for HM perhaps thats why it don't go too near the palace. There are however tunnel segments on the Central line with GPO on them, also you have to remember that when any tunnelling is done it normally goes quite close to sensitive locations and that can mean anything.
|
|
|
Post by cetacean on Oct 10, 2008 17:19:15 GMT
Perhaps some of the tunnel was built as an access or ventilation shaft when the Vic was built? That's a very plausible theory - There's a giant ventilation duct that runs above and parallel to the southbound platform.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Oct 10, 2008 21:44:33 GMT
Speaking of hidden tunnels... I've always wondered what that lit up section to the left as you depart Oxford Circus southbound on the Victoria line, probably a storage facility...
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Oct 10, 2008 22:40:30 GMT
At a tangent,perhaps,but this reminds me of a "theory" I once heard,that some of the Victoria Line alignment was built using pre-existing tunnels constructed as part of some wartime/cold war government works,which dictated the route during the protracted planning process,and explains the alternating concrete/iron sections along the line. Years ago,I met an LCC civil engineering draughtsman,seconded to LT Victoria Line planning in the '60s,and took the opportunity to ask him about this "theory"......he went quiet and refused to talk about it. Can anyone throw any light n this story,or is it just an urban myth? Slugabed In some 50 years of reading about LT, I have never seen this mentioned. Of course, to a committed conspiracy theorist, the lack of evidence merely proves the conspiracy.... The official story is that LT wanted to test different methods of building tube tunnels. In 1959, the Government approved construction of one mile of twin tube tunnel between Finsbury Park and S Tottenham, on the alignment approved by Parliament in 1955. The section from Manor House to Tottenham was lined with cast iron, but using a new method of construction. From Manor House to Finsbury Park pre-cast concrete was used for lining, in various thicknesses. I've tracked down where I found the story originally.....It's in a slim book called "Tunnels under London" by Nigel Pennick published by Electric Traction in 1981. The book covers a lot of topics,rather unevenly,including the development of the Tube network,GPO tunnels,abortive schemes,the Deep Level Shelters etc. etc. The paragraphs headed "Tubes fit for heroes" and "The Victoria and Jubilee Lines" are devoted to the theory that the 1946 Inglis Report Route B was at least partially dug before the report was published,using concrete tunnel segments. When the Victoria and Jubilee (Fleet) lines came to be built,Pennick argues that the Victoria Line South of Victoria and North of Warren Street as far as Kings X,and the Jubilee Line between Bond Street and Green Park were already built using this wartime concrete technique,and were spliced into the new lines using Cast-iron tunnel lining. He mentions the experimental section North from Finsbury Park GN&C,pointing out the similarity of the Ventilation shafts at Seven Sisters' Road and Blackhorse Road,to the one at St.Martin's le Grand. He states that the press at the time (1961) considered concrete linings a novelty,thugh he maintains it was used extensively during wartime construction. I tell HIS story without claiming that ANY of it is true.It has always intrigued me,I have never heard anyone else mention this theory,and wonder how much of it,if any at all,has any basis in fact. This blog is as good a place as any to root the facts out,as it seems to have contributions from historians and staff alike;each can bring a different perspective to the history of the Underground. Slugabed
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 11, 2008 0:09:40 GMT
<finds stapled copy of book> Best to remember, that Nigel P wrote his book without the benefit of what we know now. AFAICR the Inglis report is available as a FoI request. At a guess, tunnel segments with 'GPO' on them are spares/cast at the same time as Guardian, Anchor and Kingsway. Perhaps a topic that merits further research, not forgetting the railway under Mount Pleasant.
An interesting and neglected avenue of tunnel construction, I feel. Pre- NATM and with more intruige!
|
|
|
Post by JR 15secs on Oct 11, 2008 11:51:23 GMT
< At a guess, tunnel segments with 'GPO' on them are spares/cast at the same time as Guardian, Anchor and Kingsway. An interesting and neglected avenue of tunnel construction, I feel. Pre- NATM and with more intruige! I did not think any of the Central was constructed around the time those exchanges were constructed 1950's?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 11, 2008 12:17:12 GMT
< At a guess, tunnel segments with 'GPO' on them are spares/cast at the same time as Guardian, Anchor and Kingsway. An interesting and neglected avenue of tunnel construction, I feel. Pre- NATM and with more intruige! I did not think any of the Central was constructed around the time those exchanges were constructed 1950's? Indeed - are there tunnel segments on the Central with 'GPO' in them? Certainly would be interesting if there were - perhaps the tunnel equivalent of 'spot resleepering'. Where? Liverpool Street or between Chancery Lane and St. Pauls. Kingsway is underneath Chancery Lane, so if any tunnel segments shifted during the construction of the Kingsway extension in 1949 - 51 it would make sense to use the ready supply of segments on hand. Click here and go to the second picture down - the Main Distribution Frame for Kingsway exchange - I think the tunnel segments there look dashed familiar to LT eyes.
|
|
|
Post by JR 15secs on Oct 11, 2008 13:45:42 GMT
The company that made all the segments Stanton & Staveley, yes the pic of Kingsway does look like LT ones. The segments I saw on the Central were not in running tunnels.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Oct 11, 2008 13:57:06 GMT
Interesting, very interesting! In my many years at LU I heard many stories about all sorts of tunnels and facilities connected to the Underground network.
I have always had an open mind on the subject but over the years as I walked most of the Underground network I think many have turned out to be more myth than substance. I knew about Holborn/Museum tandem at Kingsway because I was a telephone engineer before I joined LT and worked alongside staff who had been on secondment at Kingsway and other such locations. At one time there was direct access to Kingsway from Chancery Lane station just as at one time there was direct access to the Houses of Parliament from Westminster.
Much of the GPO telephone network in London runs in the long defunct tunnels of the Atmospheric Traction Company (Gas and Electricity distribution also uses some of this former lift company's tunnels). These old tunnels were added to before WW2, during WW2 and afterwards, the LU network was used to connect parts of of the GPO network to other wartime facilities via Trafalgar Square and the Bakerloo line to South London. Remember that Churchill and the Railway Executive were at Down st, Anti Aircraft Control at Brompton Road, CEGB at St.Pauls etc. The BBC had cables running on the Central line from Wood Lane and Dollis Hill was an important GPO research facility on war work, also the munitions and aircraft parts factory in the new Central line eastern extension tunnels etc. many facilities were all interlinked throughout London using the largest conduit in London.
I was told that Down Street was quite a place but in the 10 years that I worked there it was quite obvious that it was never any bigger than the originally built station cleverly divided to make the most of the space. The Aldwych branch second tunnel was similarly used divided into offices and dormitories on two levels just like the government tunnels built as civilian shelters and connected to the Northern line in North, South and Central London.
There are massive spaces underground which are part of the LU network, many of which I had the opportunity to explore over the years such as Baker Street, Bond Street, Oxford Circus, Leicester Square, Waterloo, London Bridge, Green Park, Euston etc. Many of these spaces were once lift shafts or station passageways and platforms. These days Oxford Circus uses one of its disused shafts as an underground substation but there are several others, two of which are either side of Argyll Street and of course there was once an underground substation at Embankment which is perhaps one of the largest derelict caverns on the system although it is used to link the Northern, Bakerloo and District lines via other disused passageways and shafts for cabling purposes.
I expect I would be lost at King's Cross now following all the recent works but there was plenty of non-public area there in bygone years, indeed much of the old ticket hall was still extant off the bull ring still decorated in its original green tiling, the area having become ISTR a pump room. Certainly part of the Thameslink subway was in existence long before it was built, I can recall that it ran from the Northern to the Piccadilly concourse and was privileged to be shown it by the station supervisor in the late 1970s. I believe it may have been the original entrance/exit from the platforms to the old lifts though I don't know. In those days I was not as interested in checking the dates on segments as I later became when I explored places such as Moorgate and Stockwell.
No-one has so far mentioned the stainless steel segments to be found on the Victoria line. In the standard Victoria line running tunnels there are steel and concrete segments but some of the steel segments are of a different pattern being flat rather than chunky and wider than the normal CI rings. In crossover and station tunnels and escalator shafts and passageways normal CI rings in various sizes are used to allow for the various circumference requirements.
Seven Sisters was my 'home' station when I lived in London so I spent a lot of time travelling the Victoria line. It was not until I had to survey it from Walthamstow to Euston that I noticed the different segments although I had always been aware of both concrete and steel segments being used. The careful shaping of the tunnel into cone shapes to improve forced air ventilation was something I had not seen before and the access shafts to the substations seemed much larger than on older lines. I also had the chance to use and explore the emergency detrainment point between Seven sisters and Manor House and have always suspected that this was perhaps where the original Victoria Line tunnel was built from/to Manor House. Of course Manor House is itself an interesting site as it encompasses not only the station but also the substation around the corner which houses the LT Manor House telephone exchange and ventilation shaft and lies directly behind the old bus offices which apparently sit above what was once a single deck tram depot. I went to the offices for my initial recruitment test and eye test way back in 1976 and over the years explored all the other areas except the area beneath the bus offices!
As for an EEC segment mountain I don't know nowadays but back in the 1970s/80s there was certainly one in a compound alongside the Central line at Snaresbrook IIRC and after Walthamstow bus garage closed I believe that segments were also stored there as well.
|
|
|
Post by JR 15secs on Oct 11, 2008 14:47:09 GMT
Interesting, very interesting! In my many years at LU I heard many stories about all sorts of tunnels and facilities connected to the Underground network. I have always had an open mind on the subject but over the years as I walked most of the Underground network I think many have turned out to be more myth than substance. I knew about Holborn/Museum tandem at Kingsway because I was a telephone engineer before I joined LT and worked alongside staff who had been on secondment at Kingsway and other such locations. At one time there was direct access to Kingsway from Chancery Lane station just as at one time there was direct access to the Houses of Parliament from Westminster. Much of the GPO telephone network in London runs in the long defunct tunnels of the Atmospheric Traction Company (Gas and Electricity distribution also uses some of this former lift company's tunnels). These old tunnels were added to before WW2, during WW2 and afterwards, the LU network was used to connect parts of of the GPO network to other wartime facilities via Trafalgar Square and the Bakerloo line to South London. Remember that Churchill and the Railway Executive were at Down st, Anti Aircraft Control at Brompton Road, CEGB at St.Pauls etc. The BBC had cables running on the Central line from Wood Lane and Dollis Hill was an important GPO research facility on war work, also the munitions and aircraft parts factory in the new Central line eastern extension tunnels etc. many facilities were all interlinked throughout London using the largest conduit in London. I was told that Down Street was quite a place but in the 10 years that I worked there it was quite obvious that it was never any bigger than the originally built station cleverly divided to make the most of the space. The Aldwych branch second tunnel was similarly used divided into offices and dormitories on two levels just like the government tunnels built as civilian shelters and connected to the Northern line in North, South and Central London. There are massive spaces underground which are part of the LU network, many of which I had the opportunity to explore over the years such as Baker Street, Bond Street, Oxford Circus, Leicester Square, Waterloo, London Bridge, Green Park, Euston etc. Many of these spaces were once lift shafts or station passageways and platforms. These days Oxford Circus uses one of its disused shafts as an underground substation but there are several others, two of which are either side of Argyll Street and of course there was once an underground substation at Embankment which is perhaps one of the largest derelict caverns on the system although it is used to link the Northern, Bakerloo and District lines via other disused passageways and shafts for cabling purposes. I expect I would be lost at King's Cross now following all the recent works but there was plenty of non-public area there in bygone years, indeed much of the old ticket hall was still extant off the bull ring still decorated in its original green tiling, the area having become ISTR a pump room. Certainly part of the Thameslink subway was in existence long before it was built, I can recall that it ran from the Northern to the Piccadilly concourse and was privileged to be shown it by the station supervisor in the late 1970s. I believe it may have been the original entrance/exit from the platforms to the old lifts though I don't know. In those days I was not as interested in checking the dates on segments as I later became when I explored places such as Moorgate and Stockwell. No-one has so far mentioned the stainless steel segments to be found on the Victoria line. In the standard Victoria line running tunnels there are steel and concrete segments but some of the steel segments are of a different pattern being flat rather than chunky and wider than the normal CI rings. In crossover and station tunnels and escalator shafts and passageways normal CI rings in various sizes are used to allow for the various circumference requirements. Seven Sisters was my 'home' station when I lived in London so I spent a lot of time travelling the Victoria line. It was not until I had to survey it from Walthamstow to Euston that I noticed the different segments although I had always been aware of both concrete and steel segments being used. The careful shaping of the tunnel into cone shapes to improve forced air ventilation was something I had not seen before and the access shafts to the substations seemed much larger than on older lines. I also had the chance to use and explore the emergency detrainment point between Seven sisters and Manor House and have always suspected that this was perhaps where the original Victoria Line tunnel was built from/to Manor House. Of course Manor House is itself an interesting site as it encompasses not only the station but also the substation around the corner which houses the LT Manor House telephone exchange and ventilation shaft and lies directly behind the old bus offices which apparently sit above what was once a single deck tram depot. I went to the offices for my initial recruitment test and eye test way back in 1976 and over the years explored all the other areas except the area beneath the bus offices! As for an EEC segment mountain I don't know nowadays but back in the 1970s/80s there was certainly one in a compound alongside the Central line at Snaresbrook IIRC and after Walthamstow bus garage closed I believe that segments were also stored there as well. There are a number of connections between LT & what was the GPO cable tunnels some are in the public and a few are not, whenever there are works going on at stations if the segments are revealed they usually have some markings being what year or who they belong to. I remember the segments alongside the Central, re the telephone exchange at Manor House was this the bus one, I seem to remember that the railway one was at Finsbury Park.
|
|
|
Post by miff on Oct 12, 2008 9:54:08 GMT
As for an EEC segment mountain I don't know nowadays but back in the 1970s/80s there was certainly one in a compound alongside the Central line at Snaresbrook IIRC and after Walthamstow bus garage closed I believe that segments were also stored there as well. I also remember the tunnel segment mountains at (?)Snaresbrook too. I believe they were there for many decades, after originally being ordered for one of the cancelled LU extension projects. They were eventually cleared when a housing development was built. I do not know if they were usable by then or if they just got scrapped but it was certainly a very large quantity.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Oct 12, 2008 21:49:29 GMT
At one time there was direct access to Kingsway from Chancery Lane station just as at one time there was direct access to the Houses of Parliament from Westminster. My friend Mike used to be a GPO Telephone technician and,probably in the '60s,worked at Kingsway.He told me that one night,they opened double doors from the exchange to Chancery Lane Station,and rolled a huge piece of electrical equipment (transformer? power supply?) off a waiting engineering train and into the GPO section. Slugabed In those days I was not as interested in checking the dates on segments as I later became when I explored places such as Moorgate and Stockwell. Perhaps you could tell me why,at the South end of the Northern Line platforms at Moorgate,the station tunnels appear to veer off relative to the running tunnels? Hard to describe,but if yu go there,you'll see what I mean. Also,is it the case that the Northern Line crossover just North of Stockwell,visible from the present station,is built in the old station tunnel from the original island platform?How much of that older station is visible in the current station,and where was the C&SLR depot? So many questions!! Slugabed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2008 0:51:08 GMT
I believe Stockwell depot was on the surface east of the station and line, and accessed by an steeply inclined connection leading from the south running tunnel. From what I remember reading this incline was blocked off by the construction of the southbound Victoria line, although of course the depot had by then long gone.
Just to add to my original post on this, I had a better look at the segments in the KX Thameslink interchange passage yesterday. Those at the top of the stairs from the Victoria line, and for around 10 yards along the passage towards the Piccadilly, are all date stamped 1977. The remaining segments towards the Picc are dated a mixture of 1967 and 1968.
This means that the 1967/8 segments weren't part of the original construction of the Victoria line, but I suspect they may have been some left over from the construction of the Brixton extension and kept at the Snaresbrook store mentioned above.
The 1977 segments are bugging me - I don't think they could have been made for the KXT passage specifically, because that wouldn't have been approved until after then. They also can't relate to the original Jubilee line, because all the tunnel construction work was finished by then and segments would have been made a few years before then. Are they possibly from part of the abortive Fleet/River/Jubilee line proposed extension or the experimental tunnel built around New Cross?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 13, 2008 1:11:40 GMT
I believe Stockwell depot was on the surface east of the station and line, and accessed by an steeply inclined connection leading from the south running tunnel. From what I remember reading this incline was blocked off by the construction of the southbound Victoria line, although of course the depot had by then long gone. From what I recall, your understanding of the depot site is correct: however the incline tunnel is capped at the surface - the construction of the Vic. and the capping may very well have been contemporaneous. AFAIK there are still a few cables debouching onto the surface *up* the depot access. Just to add to my original post on this, I had a better look at the segments in the KX Thameslink interchange passage yesterday. Those at the top of the stairs from the Victoria line, and for around 10 yards along the passage towards the Piccadilly, are all date stamped 1977. The remaining segments towards the Picc are dated a mixture of 1967 and 1968. This means that the 1967/8 segments weren't part of the original construction of the Victoria line, but I suspect they may have been some left over from the construction of the Brixton extension and kept at the Snaresbrook store mentioned above. The 1977 segments are bugging me - I don't think they could have been made for the KXT passage specifically, because that wouldn't have been approved until after then. They also can't relate to the original Jubilee line, because all the tunnel construction work was finished by then and segments would have been made a few years before then. Are they possibly from part of the abortive Fleet/River/Jubilee line proposed extension or the experimental tunnel built around New Cross? Unlikely - pure and unmitigated speculation on my behalf: part of an order for 'Guardian' and 'Anchor' that LT 'piggybacked' onto? New + tunnel was before 1977? Spares from the over-run tunnels at Charing Cross?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2008 1:39:59 GMT
I think those guesses are as good as any of mine! I did notice that all the segments were stamped as LT (1967/8) or LTE (1977), so guess that they must have been specifically for Underground projects.
However, one thing I have found out is that British Rail started work on the Midland City Line electrification in 1976, earlier than I thought (took until 1983 to get services running, due partly to a long industrial dispute), so perhaps the 1977 segments were actually made for the KX tunnel after all, assuming that LT started work at the same time as BR.
I also found this quote from the MP for Bedford which made me chuckle a little: "After the Taj Mahal, the pyramids and the groundnut scheme, Bedford electrification remains a monument to union ineptness and irresponsibility and managerial inability to control events."
|
|