|
Post by 21146 on Oct 22, 2008 11:41:59 GMT
I doubt WHU have the money to pay for any rebuild of Upton Park station at this moment and in any case rumours still persist that they will move to a new ground in the future when finances improve. If not they should pay for event-day main line plaforms to allow c2c trains to make tidal-flow stops (as Newham Council have suggested). Even in my days of driving on the DR back in 80s/90s the vast majority of homebound fans seemed to transfer to the LTS at Barking rather than stay on the 'all stations' EB DR.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Oct 22, 2008 11:46:45 GMT
How about being up front and say now that the disruption will continue until March at least (TFL) ? So, public don't bother planning anything until then that needs the use of your annual ticket at weekends. So much disruption, so little benefit. No doubt this time next year, the signalling will need replacing. Another negative is the affect this work has on the parts of the District Line which is still running. On various occasions recently I've encountered unexplained gaps of up to 15 minutes before a train finally arrives and invariably crush-loaded worse than in the MF peak. It doesn't help that so many District Line stations don't have modern DMIs so one can't even make an informed decision to use another route/mode.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Oct 22, 2008 14:32:57 GMT
WHU should do the decent thing and pay for direct replacement buses and a wholsesale redevelopment of Upton Park station !! I doubt WHU have the money to pay for any rebuild of Upton Park station at this moment and in any case rumours still persist that they will move to a new ground in the future when finances improve. If not they should pay for event-day main line plaforms to allow c2c trains to make tidal-flow stops (as Newham Council have suggested). Even in my days of driving on the DR back in 80s/90s the vast majority of homebound fans seemed to transfer to the LTS at Barking rather than stay on the 'all stations' EB DR. As you say 21146, the long term plan is for West Ham United to move to a location much closer to West Ham station - so any talk of 're-building' Upton Park station is a non starter. As it happens, Upton Park has been discussed before - mind the dust - in this old thread.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Oct 23, 2008 20:06:07 GMT
Was last weekend's planned engineering work at the east end of the DR the first time the GBRf/Metronet class 66's have worked via the Barking connection onto LU metals?
|
|
solidbond
Staff Emeritus
'Give me 118 reasons for an Audible Warning on a C Stock'
Posts: 1,215
|
Post by solidbond on Oct 23, 2008 20:15:00 GMT
I know they were there the previous weekend, ie Sunday 12th October, as I went past them on the C2C. Not sure if that was the first time they'd been used, but it possibly was.
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Oct 23, 2008 20:35:09 GMT
They were up there for the weekend 4th/5th too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2008 21:02:55 GMT
They were up there for the weekend 4th/5th too. and 20th / 21st September. I noted one in the e/b at Hornchurch, the week after the link had been completed.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Oct 23, 2008 22:53:36 GMT
OK - Brian Hardy was asking about this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2008 13:37:28 GMT
I note that the eastern end is closed for many weekends until May. How much longer after that ? It's even closed on the day of the London Marathon - well planned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2008 15:11:33 GMT
the whole BTR possessions were booked for a total of 52 weekends dont know which ones we are on now though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2008 19:16:23 GMT
I note that the eastern end is closed for many weekends until May. Weekend closures in the central London part of the line have started happening again, too. I suspect patience is wearing thin for continual shutdowns with no end in sight and no obvious benefit to show for them.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 2, 2008 4:33:22 GMT
Weekend closures in the central London part of the line have started happening again, too. I suspect patience is wearing thin for continual shutdowns with no end in sight and no obvious benefit to show for them. Whilst I do understand the frustration - indeed like all of my colleagues, we have to deal with members of the public that end up with no train service - to say there is no obvious benefit is rather wide of the mark.... Maintenance & renewal has to be carried out; perhaps you'd prefer to see a return to the 80's & 90's where only the absolute bare minimum was done? Customers today are demanding more relaibility (and why shouldn't they?), but if we (LU) are going to offer better reliability, there has to be some pain at some point. The track has to be renewed at some point in time - it doesn't last forever and cannot possibly be replaced in the 4 hour window available at night. In fact now that we can handle the larger Network Rail engineering trains at the east end of the District line, the amount of track being replaced in one weekend is quite something. The new flat bottom rail coupled with concrete sleepers is giving a major step forward in quality of ride and as such I'm extremely confident that our passengers at the east of the District will almost certainly be able to spot where the new track has gone down just by riding over it. Finally, to put things in context if I may........yes the east end of the District is suffering at weekends for a while, but that track is gonna be there for something like 25-30 years - isn't it a small price to pay now for such a large return?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2008 10:26:29 GMT
Whilst I do understand the frustration - indeed like all of my colleagues, we have to deal with members of the public that end up with no train service - to say there is no obvious benefit is rather wide of the mark.... Maintenance & renewal has to be carried out; perhaps you'd prefer to see a return to the 80's & 90's where only the absolute bare minimum was done? Customers today are demanding more relaibility (and why shouldn't they?), but if we (LU) are going to offer better reliability, there has to be some pain at some point. The track has to be renewed at some point in time - it doesn't last forever and cannot possibly be replaced in the 4 hour window available at night. In fact now that we can handle the larger Network Rail engineering trains at the east end of the District line, the amount of track being replaced in one weekend is quite something. The new flat bottom rail coupled with concrete sleepers is giving a major step forward in quality of ride and as such I'm extremely confident that our passengers at the east of the District will almost certainly be able to spot where the new track has gone down just by riding over it. Finally, to put things in context if I may........yes the east end of the District is suffering at weekends for a while, but that track is gonna be there for something like 25-30 years - isn't it a small price to pay now for such a large return? Sorry for the late reply. I'm starting to wonder if this would be better in the "rant" forum ( ), but here's my thoughts ... I do see what you're saying about all this, but the populace is growing very cynical about the merits of "pain today" for endless promises of "jam tomorrow" when that tomorrow never seems to arrive. Take your final comment about the track being there for 25 - 30 years once the work's finished. Fair enough, but I fear the traveling public will never experience the benefits gained from this, as I suspect that - no sooner is the track work completed - and another long-term project will be announced which will also take in excess of 10 years. And when that's all done, it'll be something else. And then after that, it'll be time to do the track all over again. And this is the bottom line - it's all starting to look very "forth bridge". We never actualy get to feel the benefit of these works - instead we continue to fork out rail-level fares to travel on buses stuck in endless traffic jams thanks to constant roadworks and showcase extravangazas/parties held in central London (hopefully less of those showcases now that Ken's been given the boot). Travelling in London at weekends has now become almost impossible. There's now so much disruption to the transport system (both road and rail) that it might as well not be there and I'm seriously begining to wonder if it'll ever be any different again - with memoreis of times when the transport service ran normally at weekends being just a dim and distant legend told to children by old folks. Still, the contractor companies must be making a nice sum.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 9, 2008 10:55:43 GMT
Yes, public transport always used to run at weekends without hindrance, but how much maintenance or renewal was being done?
That's the whole point. Nothing was done for years, so now lost time is being made up by getting more done now - I accept that customers are currently entering the 'Forth bridge syndrome' and that perhaps it is a bit of a cheek to charge rail fares for bus journeys.....all I can do is assure you that the current level of activity on LU won't last forever and that in the long term, it'll all be worth it.
Here's another angle though - when the scale of work required was realised (and this work has to done; it's not being done for the sake of it), two main options were considered across the whole of LU:
1 - Close whole sections of line or whole lines for six months 2 - Close sections of line at weekends
Obviously option 2 is better as it affects far less customers. Or can you come up with another way?
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Dec 9, 2008 11:56:58 GMT
The work doesn't even seem co-ordinated any more with work on the middle/east of the District co-inciding with complete DLR closures and/or shutdowns on the Central or Jubilee Lines in the Statford area. Yes, sometimes this work is associated but more often it isn't. They've even started doing work on the DR during West Ham home games which was a complete no no until recently. The District Line various Earl's Court/Embankment/Whitechapel weekend suspensions have literally being going on for years now yet with no appreciable affect on journey times, ride or frequency of signal failures and still no replacement bus service provided.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 9, 2008 13:31:08 GMT
Indeed there have been a few weekends recently where there has been no Central Line between Liverpool Street and Leytonstone, no Victoria Line service, no Jubilee Line to Stratford, no District Line past Barking and on at least one occasion, there was no/limited service on the NR Chingford Line either. This effectively shuts down access to east and north-east London completely.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2008 19:12:51 GMT
The work doesn't even seem co-ordinated any more with work on the middle/east of the District co-inciding with complete DLR closures and/or shutdowns on the Central or Jubilee Lines in the Statford area. Indeed - hence my comment about it being almost impossible to travel in London at weekends now. And you rasie another interesting point: I can sort of understand the need for major works on ancient parts of the system, but the DLR and JLE are brand new peices of kit - yet they too are subject to increasingly frequent weekend shutdowns. Replacement bus services (throughout the system) often seem to fall apart as a result in getting bogged down in traffic caused London's marvelous on-going streatworks programe to replace: the gas, then the water, then the electric, then the telecoms, then the gas, then the electric, then the water ... ad nauseum, ad infinitum. It's too much, going on for too long, delivering too little apart from nice dosh for the contract companies. The District Line various Earl's Court/Embankment/Whitechapel weekend suspensions have literally being going on for years now yet with no appreciable affect on journey times, ride or frequency of signal failures and still no replacement bus service provided. Yes, sadly, this is my experience too. The posters have also gone up gleefully declaring "further shutdowns will be announced for next year" or words to that effect. Just when will it end? It really isn't an unreasonable thing to ask after umpteen years of these shutdowns. I wouldn't mind if they were doing something to resolve the dreadful mess that is the Earls Court junctions (responsible for an inordinate number of delays on the line). If they could assure me these works meant that one day my Distrcit line journey wouldn't take an age to trundle from West Kensington through to Gloucester Road, I might be in a more forgiving frame of mind. As it stands, I just find myself growing tired of this weekend-closures-without-end stuff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2008 19:13:32 GMT
Indeed there have been a few weekends recently where there has been no Central Line between Liverpool Street and Leytonstone, no Victoria Line service, no Jubilee Line to Stratford, no District Line past Barking and on at least one occasion, there was no/limited service on the NR Chingford Line either. This effectively shuts down access to east and north-east London completely. And, in my view, it's simply not on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2008 19:22:12 GMT
Yes, public transport always used to run at weekends without hindrance, but how much maintenance or renewal was being done? That's the whole point. Nothing was done for years, so now lost time is being made up by getting more done now - I accept that customers are currently entering the 'Forth bridge syndrome' and that perhaps it is a bit of a cheek to charge rail fares for bus journeys.....all I can do is assure you that the current level of activity on LU won't last forever and that in the long term, it'll all be worth it. Here's another angle though - when the scale of work required was realised (and this work has to done; it's not being done for the sake of it), two main options were considered across the whole of LU: 1 - Close whole sections of line or whole lines for six months 2 - Close sections of line at weekends Obviously option 2 is better as it affects far less customers. Or can you come up with another way? I do see your point - but it's clearly gotten completely out of hand. Maybe if LU publically stopped trying to make a virtue out of it (endlessly bigging-up closures up as "improvement works" that nobody seems to see any tangible benefit from just irritates people) and just laid the facts down on the table with a clear explananation along the lines of: 1. What work needs doing - and why. Just "planned improvement works" won't do as an explanation. 2. How long it will take. 3. What the tangible benefits will be when it's finished. 4. An assuarance of uninterrupted service (as far as practical barring emergiencies) for x x x number of years once finished.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 10, 2008 20:11:02 GMT
I'm only a driver, but as such I can obviously see where the new track is going down - and I can only assure you that with regard to the east end of the District, the new track is going in at a very fast rate with the use of the 'mainline' engineering trains. The new track gives a smoother ride, that much is immediately obvious and is a benefit you are getting right now - in fact much of the central area is now done (via the weekend shutdowns over the past two years). Reason for the new track (aside from the fact it's life expired)? S stock demands it - if S stock were run on the old stuff, it would soon be on the deck With the disruption & inconvenience being caused in mind, and the feelings of customers expressed within this thread in mind too, I would say this: The track has got to be replaced. There is no getting away from that fact and it has got to done now. At the moment the best way to do it is via weekend closures which affect the least amount of customers - is there a better way? I don't believe there is but if you feel there is, let's hear it.....
|
|
|
Post by cetacean on Dec 10, 2008 20:57:06 GMT
the DLR and JLE are brand new peices of kit The Jubilee is having a completely new signalling system (admittedly due to failing to be built with one) put in and the DLR is having all of its stations' platforms extended and two major junctions completely rebuilt. So it's upgrades, not maintenance, that the closures are for. If you can think of a better way to do them, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you. Both works should be done by early 2010, mind. The DLR has no major works on the horizon after that except for the Crossrail diversions at Royal Victoria and Pudding Mill Lane, which may or may not be disruptive.
|
|